Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 313211 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

sassyjm

Cresskill, NJ

#314768 Nov 5, 2013
elise in burque wrote:
<quoted text>That guy obviously yearned for a god. He was never an atheist. Some people get confused, thinking that they must be atheists, just because they are spiritually lost. Very simple-minded thinking. Atheists have very defined, solid beliefs. This Gtown character doesn't get it, never got it, never will...because he is incapable of deep thought. He's the perfect little minion to his god.
There are many reasons that people come to the conclusion that there is no God. It's very simple-minded thinking on your part to believe that they weren't spiritually lost. Some are so lost,taught to believe that there was no God,rejected a notion of a God,etc..only because they were victims of circumstances that lead them in that direction. God,through his Holy Spirit will and does lead his creations back to him,in his all his love. That is why he says that NONE will go before him and say that they didn't know him.

It is up to us to accept or respond to his calling. God will not force us to. He wants us to with our free will.
sassyjm

Cresskill, NJ

#314769 Nov 5, 2013
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>Honey, you EAT your loving god. And then you wash his body down with his blood.
My parents created me. I don't snack on them.
Next...
http://www.catholic.com/tracts/christ-in-the-...
Jesus first repeated what he said, then summarized: "‘I am the living bread which came down from heaven; if any one eats of this bread, he will live for ever; and the bread which I shall give for the life of the world is my flesh.’ The Jews then disputed among themselves, saying,‘How can this man give us his flesh to eat?’" (John 6:51–52).

His listeners were stupefied because now they understood Jesus literally—and correctly. He again repeated his words, but with even greater emphasis, and introduced the statement about drinking his blood: "Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink his blood, you have no life in you; he who eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day. For my flesh is food indeed, and my blood is drink indeed. He who eats my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me, and I in him" (John 6:53–56).
feces for jesus

Brooklyn, NY

#314770 Nov 5, 2013
grumpy wrote:
<quoted text>It started with the argument about Noah and the flood. Ink believed the Biblical account which you disputed.
Rather than reading the same old-same old, I tried to put the argument on a scientific level by making the dispute between creation by intelligence (God) or chance (Big Bang).
There is no evidence to support the biblical account of the flood or noahs ark so there is nothing to dispute.

For the Idea that you posed, Isn't it ok to just say I dont know?

Since: Jul 13

Augsburg, Germany

#314771 Nov 5, 2013
feces for jesus

Brooklyn, NY

#314772 Nov 5, 2013
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>Honey, you EAT your loving god. And then you wash his body down with his blood.
My parents created me. I don't snack on them.
Next...
I nomine this for post if the week.
grumpy

Huntington Station, NY

#314773 Nov 5, 2013
feces for jesus wrote:
<quoted text>
There is no evidence to support the biblical account of the flood or noahs ark so there is nothing to dispute.
For the Idea that you posed, Isn't it ok to just say I dont know?
Great! But who here has ever said, "I don't know." about anything. Questions here are either "yes" or "no".

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#314774 Nov 5, 2013
sassyjm wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.catholic.com/tracts/christ-in-the-...
Jesus first repeated what he said, then summarized: "‘I am the living bread which came down from heaven; if any one eats of this bread, he will live for ever; and the bread which I shall give for the life of the world is my flesh.’ The Jews then disputed among themselves, saying,‘How can this man give us his flesh to eat?’" (John 6:51–52).
His listeners were stupefied because now they understood Jesus literally—and correctly. He again repeated his words, but with even greater emphasis, and introduced the statement about drinking his blood: "Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink his blood, you have no life in you; he who eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day. For my flesh is food indeed, and my blood is drink indeed. He who eats my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me, and I in him" (John 6:53–56).
Thanks for making my point.

I don't worship cannibals, and don't intend to be one.
Even symbolically.

You can keep your ravenous bloodthirsty god, with my blessings dear.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#314775 Nov 5, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
True. The contention was that he is only a myth. Most experts say he was a real person.
I imagine that he was a real person that inspired mythical legends surrounding his life. He could also actually be a composite of of more than one person, too, which may be the basis for the Trinity belief. If he did in fact exist, then he made enough of an impression on the times that he became a known historical figure.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#314776 Nov 5, 2013
feces for jesus wrote:
<quoted text>
There is no evidence to support the biblical account of the flood or noahs ark so there is nothing to dispute.
For the Idea that you posed, Isn't it ok to just say I dont know?
This is an excellent point. Nobody seems willing to say that we simply don't know and have no way to get all the facts.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#314777 Nov 5, 2013
sassyjm wrote:
<quoted text> Oh boy!
Listen,I am truly sorry that many women feel used and abused like you describe. But,I gotta say,today,women ADD to this. Let me explain. I hear women(you and some others on here..cough..cough...OCEAN56.. .)degrade the role of homemaker and motherhood as "if" it is a pathetic and unworthy position in life. If we care for others on the outside(jobs where we attend to,care for,nurse,service,etc..)then we are considered "employeed with honor". If we take on the job at our own home,with our own children and families,we are prisoners some how.
Wake up lady. Charity begins at home. Stand proud. Hold you head high. Understand the true value and honor that it is to be a mother and caretaker of our homes and you will THEN lead the mislead pack to a very serene,honorable place.
No job is stress free or without it's tiring moments. Get a grip on reality. Don't take your insecurities out on motherhood/being a wife.
You wanna leave it all behind in such of a "worthy" lot in life(work outside the home),then be prepared to do doubletime work. If you have kids,THEY come first. You want to put them last,then you will have no joy in your life and your priorities will distort who YOU really are and what YOUR place in life is really about. Sorry to be so harsh.
I don't think the point is to degrade wives/mothers/homemakers, but to simply point out that we can do anything we want with our lives and are not just relegated to those roles.

The flip side is people who say ignorant things like how we belong in the kitchen or we should be home taking care of kids. We're people, just like men, and are not just put on this Earth to be breeding stock and glorified maids. I'm NOT saying that is what wives and mothers are, but that is not our sole purpose. Those aren't what we "should" be doing but like anything else is a choice.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#314778 Nov 5, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
They do and it is the source of discussion all the time even among scholars. The thing is they all believe in God and the Christians all believe in Christ as his messenger. It doesn't matter how they get there. What happens on this thread is a discussion between believers and non believers with non believers using the small differences of believers as a reason to throw away the word of God.
DOn't believe that is your choice but don't diminish our beliefs because of small differences.
This is the thing a lot of you don't get...I, and others, are not diminishing your beliefs but are reacting to the Christian contention that you have the truth or know for a fact that an unseen God exists. Believe what you want, but that doesn't mean the bible can't be discussed, debated or dissected.

If you are uncomfortable with people bringing up discrepancies and contradictions in the bible then maybe it's because you know the bible is in fact quite inconsistent and you simply don't wish to acknowledge that to yourself.
feces for jesus

Brooklyn, NY

#314779 Nov 5, 2013
grumpy wrote:
<quoted text>Great! But who here has ever said, "I don't know." about anything. Questions here are either "yes" or "no".
I gladly admit that I dont know how the universe began. If only others would put aside their "beliefs" and personal bias and admit things that they truly dont know.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#314780 Nov 5, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
I would be more than happy for you to tell me how the words of Christ affect you in your life and what messages you are inspired by. Basically your understanding of what he was trying to tell us.
I'm sure you have heard enough of me.
To me Jesus was probably a very charismatic and assertive person who made an impression on a great many people. I think he was probably a pacifist with an idealized vision of how civilized people should interact in a world where we have our humanity in common. Sort of a "we're all in this together so we should all just get along" philosophy. However, if Jesus was walking around telling folks he was the Son of God or the King of Kings then he may have been a touch delusional, too.

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#314781 Nov 5, 2013
sassyjm wrote:
<quoted text>UNICEF collects money for their pro-death organization on Halloween. In fact,UNICEF boxes are distributed to young children in schools to do the work for them. Abortion is taught as an option to an unwanted pregnancy during sex education. Are you really this ignorant or are you pulling my chain?
See,it's clueless posts like these from your side that prove to me how deceptive the pro-abortion movement really is. Thank you!
Lol, yes, because education is sin, in your ridiculous little mind. I'm sorry that you can't send yourself back to the dark-ages, oh pompous one. You would fit right in.
sassyjm

Cresskill, NJ

#314782 Nov 5, 2013
elise in burque wrote:
<quoted text>Lol, yes, because education is sin, in your ridiculous little mind. I'm sorry that you can't send yourself back to the dark-ages, oh pompous one. You would fit right in.
Okay,so you DON'T have a problem with pro-abortion organizations soliciting money for their cause. It's only pamplets that show a human life with a caption that we are not "just" cells,that irks you and leads you to come onto topix to show your true colors.

Interesting.

Since when is abortion "education" btw? Education that belongs in childrens Halloween bags nevertheless.
sassyjm

Cresskill, NJ

#314783 Nov 5, 2013
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't think the point is to degrade wives/mothers/homemakers, but to simply point out that we can do anything we want with our lives and are not just relegated to those roles.
The flip side is people who say ignorant things like how we belong in the kitchen or we should be home taking care of kids. We're people, just like men, and are not just put on this Earth to be breeding stock and glorified maids. I'm NOT saying that is what wives and mothers are, but that is not our sole purpose. Those aren't what we "should" be doing but like anything else is a choice.
Well,you are very much incorrect when you thought that this..so called.."point" was not intended to degrade wives/mothers/homemakers. Ocean clearly called it enslavement and Leonie also put down being a wife and a mother,referring to it as being a slave. I've had many conversations with Ocean about this.

Are you afraid to admit that we *don't* belong in a kitchen? Is being in the kitchen an insult? Not to me it isn't. We all have to eat. Cooking is a necessity and a passion to some. Even an art. Chefs cook for a living,which serves people.

We have children but somehow think that we *shouldn't* be the ones raising them? Is being home with our children an insult? Is it enslavement? are some ABOVE the task?

We call chefs and childcare owners/workers "educated professional" but cooking and taking care of our families with the "mother" title is the bottom of the barrel,slave masters job. LOL WOW!

Question: WHY isn't or shouldn't it be our "SOLE PURPOSE IN LIFE" as how you stated it in such a derogatory fashion?
sassyjm

Cresskill, NJ

#314784 Nov 5, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't recall referring to paul as an atheist.
Since he wasn't.
What he was, was very very religious, and thought he was doing the work of God.
Those men who flew the planes into the buildings, on 911 were very very religious as well, thinking they were doing the work of God.
When paul met God on that road, and yeilded to Him, then he went from being a very religious "Godless " man, to a Godly man, that had very little tolerance for religion.
I don't think that Paul was part of a Godly religion to begin with. He joined forces with some who where not "of God",therefore,displaying unGodly behavior. Was his belonging to this group intentionally meant to be anti-God/Christ? Who knows. Only God know,I suppose.

"BY THE FRUITS YOU WILL KNOW THEM"

When Paul had his conversion,he indeed followed him religiously(he became a Christian. He then belonged to Christs church here on earth. What he became intolerant about was unGodly religions where they didn't obey the teachings of God/Christ...hence,his making of so many enemies,..as well as followers :)
sassyjm

Cresskill, NJ

#314786 Nov 5, 2013
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
To me Jesus was probably a very charismatic and assertive person who made an impression on a great many people. I think he was probably a pacifist with an idealized vision of how civilized people should interact in a world where we have our humanity in common. Sort of a "we're all in this together so we should all just get along" philosophy. However, if Jesus was walking around telling folks he was the Son of God or the King of Kings then he may have been a touch delusional, too.
Even to those who didn't follow him,it still was recorded that he healed the sick,raised the dead,performed many miracles. He SURE did make an impression :)
Doo Doo on Stinky Feces

New York, NY

#314787 Nov 5, 2013
feces for jesus wrote:
<quoted text>
I gladly admit that I dont know how the universe began. If only others would put aside their "beliefs" and personal bias and admit things that they truly dont know.
You now gladly acknowledge that you DON'T KNOW how the universe began yet the sum of your existence on this forum has been to degrade, humiliate, dismiss and reject with extreme prejudice, the notion by those who also acknowledge that they don't know for sure and can offer now concrete proof, but whose faith and belief tells them that the universe is the result of intelligent design and that intelligent design was initiated by a Christian deity.
We now know that you know not of what you speak.

If you admit you do not know how the universe began then it is self evident that you cannot be certain how it did NOT begin.

You may now cease and desist with your uninformed attacks on those you now acknowledge, may in fact be right.
feces for jesus

Brooklyn, NY

#314788 Nov 5, 2013
sassyjm wrote:
<quoted text>Even to those who didn't follow him,it still was recorded that he healed the sick,raised the dead,performed many miracles. He SURE did make an impression :)
Please provide objective sources that show him raising the dead.... Or STFU.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

NCAA Basketball Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 3 min Panks 1,482,560
What role do you think humans play in global wa... (Sep '14) 31 min Not My Fault 10,793
News UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) 40 min Trojan 32,717
Conn's Appliances (Nov '07) Fri Sue 286
News Western Michigan heads to Illinois as a favorite Jan 17 Go Blue Forever 75
legitimate loan lender (Oct '13) Jan 17 louis 19
News Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex ma... (Aug '10) Jan 15 RiccardoFire 201,891
More from around the web