Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Full story: Newsday 308,989
Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision. Full Story

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#313158 Oct 14, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
So, what if the majority was against legalized abortion?
Plus, perhaps instead of the word crime, I should've used the word morals.
Our morals keep going down, despite the fact that we are "supppse" to be more and more civilized.
Your 'morals' should have nothing whatever to do with my health care choices, fella. I don't give a flying fornication at a rotund rat's hind portion, about your morals. I have my own, thanks. And they don't include giving the rights of a sentient entity to her insentient cell mass.

And the majority be damned, regardless of at which point in the swing this particular political pendulum has currently arrived.

Just my opinion.

:)
Gtown71

United States

#313162 Oct 14, 2013
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>Your 'morals' should have nothing whatever to do with my health care choices, fella. I don't give a flying fornication at a rotund rat's hind portion, about your morals. I have my own, thanks. And they don't include giving the rights of a sentient entity to her insentient cell mass.
And the majority be damned, regardless of at which point in the swing this particular political pendulum has currently arrived.
Just my opinion.
:)
It's clear about how much you care, when you have no problem calling the stopping of a heartbeat, as simply a medical choice.
Gtown71

United States

#313163 Oct 14, 2013
feces for jesus wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, our morals were great back in the 40s and 50s when beating your children was the norm, women couldnt vote and people of color were discriminated against
Many still beat their kids. Many women still don't vote, and people of color are still discriminated.

Kids that starve is one thing. I would assume most mothers do all they can to prevent this.
Having an unborn child snuffed out in the land of plenty , becouse it would cause an inconvienice is a totally different thing.
feces for jesus

Westbury, NY

#313164 Oct 14, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
It's clear about how much you care, when you have no problem calling the stopping of a heartbeat, as simply a medical choice.
Kill any flies, spiders or ants recently?
Did you eat any meat or fish recently?

Im going to guess you couldnt care less about the snuffing out of lives to appease and saisfy your own desires.
feces for jesus

Westbury, NY

#313165 Oct 14, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
Many still beat their kids. Many women still don't vote, and people of color are still discriminated.
Kids that starve is one thing. I would assume most mothers do all they can to prevent this.
Having an unborn child snuffed out in the land of plenty , becouse it would cause an inconvienie is a totally different thing.
You're just too dense and closed minded to consider something that dares oppose your opinion.

Why dont you ask your god to stop ending the lived of fetuses that he has aborted?
Ink

Levittown, PA

#313166 Oct 14, 2013
feces for jesus wrote:
<quoted text>
The saying "the end of the earth" that we use today is not literal. If you want to claim that people 2000+ years ago used the same slang we use; then go for it, but I highly doubt that is the case.
I am not saying that people spoke that way I'm saying it is an interesting tidbit said by God according to the Bible.

I don't think the possible roundness of the world is mention any where else at the time.

I can't remember the bible verse but there is one that quotes Jesus as saying that when the Kingdom of God arrives some people will be awake going about there business and some will be sleeping in there beds. That tends to indicate a revolving world, dark on one side and light on the other.
Ink

Levittown, PA

#313167 Oct 14, 2013
feces for jesus wrote:
<quoted text>
Kill any flies, spiders or ants recently?
Did you eat any meat or fish recently?
Im going to guess you couldnt care less about the snuffing out of lives to appease and saisfy your own desires.
You aren't really callous enough to compare insects to children, are you?
Ink

Levittown, PA

#313168 Oct 14, 2013
feces for jesus wrote:
<quoted text>
Get back to me when you care about the approximate 15 million BORN children who die from hunger each year.
Do you have a solution? I am assuming that you are talking about third world countries where the is a repressive totalitarian government.
Ink

Levittown, PA

#313169 Oct 14, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
What facts?
The fact that our world is getting worse, with moral decay?
The fact that over 3000 unborn lives will be ended this very day?
The fact that you really don't care, since it's legal?
The fact that we will all meet our maker on day?
the fact that you and many "including me for many years " don't believe we have a maker?
Just so you know salvation is one person making a choice at a time, kinda like abortion. Many will do what pleases them, but a few will make the right choice.
They don't see it because all the things you list as reason to see the 'moral decay' they think are all good and since there is no God to them, anything goes.

Abortion is a good thing
No God or religion is a good thing
Women not raising the own kids is a good thing
Divorce is a good thing
Hooking up is a good thing
Having your 12 year old on the pill is a good thing.
I could go on.
Facts

Fountain Hills, AZ

#313170 Oct 14, 2013
Len wrote:
<quoted text>
The choice is NOT always death, that's why it is a choice. Look at China, they're aborting left and right over there. Why don't the anti-choice people take their signs and their self-righteousness and go picket over there ???
China is also extremely socialist, but hey look where we are headed with Obama running this country maybe that's where you guys want to go... Free healthcare and all Americans paying for abortion even if they're not getting one are 2 easy examples off the top of my head; it's crazy to think how far we've gone from Bush to Obama regarding the issue of abortion. Bush brought abortion numbers down and nearly 80,000 babies were gifted the "right" to take their first breaths. Obama on the other hand has an unheard of exponential statistic for his total number of abortions during his presidency so far. What does that tell you?
Ink

Levittown, PA

#313171 Oct 14, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
Nobody thinks "women should have to abort and not give life." That's your false premise. The entire entity of the PLM -- funded by your clergy first and foremost -- is built on one false premise after another.
Simply put, the option to terminate an unwanted/unhealthy pregnancy should be available in a sterile, safe environment for every single woman worldwide. That's it. I know, I know... not quite the "death" drama you were hoping for was it.
Just a point clarification.

You are terminating a child in the womb usually healthy and perfect.

Pregnancy is only a condition while carrying a child.
Ink

Levittown, PA

#313172 Oct 14, 2013
Facts wrote:
<quoted text>
China is also extremely socialist, but hey look where we are headed with Obama running this country maybe that's where you guys want to go... Free healthcare and all Americans paying for abortion even if they're not getting one are 2 easy examples off the top of my head; it's crazy to think how far we've gone from Bush to Obama regarding the issue of abortion. Bush brought abortion numbers down and nearly 80,000 babies were gifted the "right" to take their first breaths. Obama on the other hand has an unheard of exponential statistic for his total number of abortions during his presidency so far. What does that tell you?
It tells me that people are more careless because abortion is easily available. It also tells me that kids are surrounded by sex and indulging way before they are mentally mature.

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#313173 Oct 14, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Just a point clarification.
You are terminating a child in the womb usually healthy and perfect.
Pregnancy is only a condition while carrying a child.
Nobody's perfect.
Ink

Levittown, PA

#313174 Oct 14, 2013
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>Nobody's perfect.
Another excellent reason for aborting your son or daughter.
Katie

Seattle, WA

#313175 Oct 14, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
You aren't really callous enough to compare insects to children, are you?
The comparison is heartbeats, not "insects to children".

The heartbeats of insects and animals are snuffed out more often than in embryos and fetuses. But what FFJ didn't elaborate on is that those hearts in insects and animals are fully developed and working properly, unlike in embryos and fetuses.
Katie

Seattle, WA

#313176 Oct 14, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Just a point clarification.
You are terminating a child in the womb usually healthy and perfect.
Pregnancy is only a condition while carrying a child.
That's your false premise, not a clarification at all.

I'll clarify again. Any termination of unwanted/unhealthy pregnancy needs to be available to all women worldwide in a legal, safe, sterile environment.

Women don't need the PLM's false premises stealing their rights to their own bodies. Women don't need the clergy, the gov't, or nosy parkers determining their pregnancies outcomes.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#313177 Oct 14, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
It tells me that people are more careless because abortion is easily available. It also tells me that kids are surrounded by sex and indulging way before they are mentally mature.
Abortion wasn't legal and easily available when Bush was president, Moron?

Learn to read. The other poster, whose info is incorrect anyway (abortion rates have declined steadily since 1990, so there are fewer per year now than when Bush was president), was talking about the time period since 2000.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#313178 Oct 14, 2013
Pregnancy is a process every woman can decide to continue or terminate. She has no obligation to gestate if she doesn`t want to.
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Just a point clarification.
You are terminating a child in the womb usually healthy and perfect.
Pregnancy is only a condition while carrying a child.
Ink

Levittown, PA

#313179 Oct 14, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
The comparison is heartbeats, not "insects to children".
The heartbeats of insects and animals are snuffed out more often than in embryos and fetuses. But what FFJ didn't elaborate on is that those hearts in insects and animals are fully developed and working properly, unlike in embryos and fetuses.
You don't value a child's heart or life over an insect's?
Ink

Levittown, PA

#313180 Oct 14, 2013
cpeter1313 wrote:
Pregnancy is a process every woman can decide to continue or terminate. She has no obligation to gestate if she doesn`t want to.
<quoted text>
Who said otherwise? We do all know that it is a fetus being terminated even if we don't use the word.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

NCAA Basketball Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 3 min Grey Ghost 1,192,785
Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex ma... (Aug '10) 7 min HitMan 201,430
What role do you think humans play in global wa... 20 min Science Says 4,352
Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 49 min New Age Spiritual... 235,809
Should child beauty pageants be banned? 50 min squeezers 759
UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) 2 hr Robert C 29,079
How to recover lost data from iPhone/iPad/iPod- (Jan '14) 16 hr alvina haynes 13
More from around the web