Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 312664 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

Gtown71

Cedar Park, TX

#312783 Oct 6, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
No, it's not. You just don't understand the theory of evolution. You've proven that with many posts.
I understand enough to know that it's just a theory, and never proven, as you and many others try and claim.

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#312784 Oct 6, 2013
Kaylee wrote:
<quoted text> That poster Bitner is a very ugly woman. I have read here for sometime (off and on) and can't believe what she displays here. She clearly is unhappy in her home life and takes it out on posters here(daily). Pray for her. She needs help. I don't like fighting but felt the need to write about how very disrespectful she is. That's not a sign of a stable person. I know that she will not be appreciative of my revealing her negativity and hateful being,but oh well. She needs to hear it and take a good look in the mirror. It's disheartening that she is a mom BC she is miserable. She need not defend her actions BC its indefensible.
Very well said. Clearly an extremely unhappy person. It's sad.
Major props to the poster Ink for always taking the high road, and not once resorting to the same mean spirited name calling she is subjected to from this angry individual on an almost daily basis.

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#312785 Oct 6, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Then why didn't they say that? It is very different than saying there was no flood.
Noah's flood as told in the Bible Ink, they have as much as told you half a dozen times "Noah's flood". If there were water on the earth, it's highly likely there were a few floods. But it's very unlikely it happened as the Bible says it did. It just doesn't make logical sense to some people. They require proof and a book that has been written and translated 1,000's of time is not proof.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#312786 Oct 7, 2013
Husker Du wrote:
<quoted text>My brother did die, you jack wagon. Do you and your family don the same mullet style? Even your grandkids? do you teach your grandkids to use the F word and words like moron and stupid? I bet you do, I have seen your type at the dollar store, you are truly a jack wagon.
No, you have not, you redneck.

Your brother may have died since then, but you said he was dead years ago, and then admitted he wasn't, and that you'd lied about it, you lying scum.

You're just jealous because I have a wonderful family that I can honestly talk about, you shallow, hate-filled creature.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#312787 Oct 7, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
I understand enough to know that it's just a theory, and never proven, as you and many others try and claim.
You know nothing, obviously. You are even confused about what the theory says, including things in your argument that are not even a part of it.

So is gravity "just" a theory. And there is just as much evidence of evolution, as there is of gravity. Such evidence has been shown here many times, but you obviously don't understand it, given that you keep posting about "no proof".

However, ask yourself this, if nothing evolves, why do humans have an appendix?

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#312788 Oct 7, 2013
It's always amusing, to see the self-righteous hypocrisy of the fetus worshippers, whenever one of their own has said something that's proven wrong. They can't deal with fact, and so must whine about the WAY people post, or how much they post. Apparently some of them are afraid to post under their regularly known screen name, too.

LOL, they're ridiculous.
Ocean56

AOL

#312789 Oct 7, 2013
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
Looking for something is not the same as finding something. Just ask all the UFO buffs, the people looking for Yeti and the people looking for the Loch Ness Monster. And don't forget all the people searching for Bat Boy.
Yep. And let's also remember the folks who insist they "found Bigfoot." lol
feces for jesus

Brooklyn, NY

#312790 Oct 7, 2013
Husker Du wrote:
<quoted text>Except there are myths, Egypts false gods are myths, not the same as Saints being mystics. Way different, you see Christ is at work with the Catholic mystics of the present and the past. The other so called pagan mystics are of the devil. If we believe in other mysticism, then we are breaking the first commandment.
Your religious beliefs are just that, beliefs. You yearn for your beliefs to be truth so much that you are incapable of keeping an open mind. Sad, really. Cling to this beliefs, Peggy.
feces for jesus

Brooklyn, NY

#312791 Oct 7, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
I understand enough to know that it's just a theory, and never proven, as you and many others try and claim.
Thank you for continuing to show us that you do not understand science or what a scientific theory is. Your ignorance knows no bounds.
feces for jesus

Brooklyn, NY

#312792 Oct 7, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
My argument was all about the dictionary definition. If you are honest you will see that it has recently changed to include same sex couples.
And you quoted the one definition that fell in line with your poin of view, conveniently leaving out all other defintions.
feces for jesus

Brooklyn, NY

#312793 Oct 7, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
How can you call something that really happened like the flood a myth?
The story of noahs ark is a fable or myth. You have admitted it likely isn't all true.
grumpy

Huntington Station, NY

#312794 Oct 7, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
I will answer you again. I believe there is somethingf in the story of Noah's Ark. That doesn't mean I take it literally. But something catastrophic happened and not everyone survived. Do I believe that God was involved? Yes, but I believe that He is involved in everything. My first response on this subject was to point out 'only' that there was evidence for a real flood and it might not be mythology.
Someone said gays face death daily due to someone else's whi.m. I said everybody faces death daily according to someone else's whim We see it everyday with random shootings and killings. We also see see it everyday when a woman chooses to abort her child. For any child conceived, her life depends on the whim of her mother.
I read your last paragraph. Is this the society God created? If so, abortion must be normal for a God-created society.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#312795 Oct 7, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
I will answer you again. I believe there is somethingf in the story of Noah's Ark. That doesn't mean I take it literally. But something catastrophic happened and not everyone survived. Do I believe that God was involved? Yes, but I believe that He is involved in everything. My first response on this subject was to point out 'only' that there was evidence for a real flood and it might not be mythology.
Someone said gays face death daily due to someone else's whim. I said everybody faces death daily according to someone else's whim. We see it everyday with random shootings and killings. We also see see it everyday when a woman chooses to abort her child. For any child conceived, her life depends on the whim of her mother.
"For any child conceived, her life depends on the whim of her mother."

It's funny how you pretended you were NOT talking about abortion, and now you clearly implied it again.

So, are you suggesting that EVERY woman might decide to have an abortion? Including you when you were pregnant?
Katie

Pacific, WA

#312797 Oct 7, 2013
Husker Du wrote:
<quoted text>I am not jealous of your family. You are the hate filled creature, you say a woman has the right to slaughter their unborn child, now how hate filled is that? Those kids of yours are soooo scared of you, they think you will put a hex on them, and I bet they wonder how many children you aborted.. I hope your children find true happiness, away from you and go back to the Catholic Church.
"you say a woman has the right to slaughter their unborn child, now how hate filled is that?"

This is *your* falsehood. It's all yours. Own it. And then, when you're mature enough (capable enough), admit you're projecting *your* false beliefs onto Bitner and other PCers.

What we say is that pregnant women have the right to determine their pregnancy's outcome. Continuing to malign Bitner and others who believe in women's civil rights only highlights your immaturity. You're obviously afraid of women deciding for themselves when they choose to decide differently than you would. That is the epitome of selfishness. To add insult injury, you choose deceit over reality to drive your points home. That makes you nothing but a childish bully. A control freak. A fear monger. It's despicable!

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#312798 Oct 7, 2013
Husker Du wrote:
<quoted text>I am not jealous of your family. You are the hate filled creature, you say a woman has the right to slaughter their unborn child, now how hate filled is that? Those kids of yours are soooo scared of you, they think you will put a hex on them, and I bet they wonder how many children you aborted.. I hope your children find true happiness, away from you and go back to the Catholic Church.
LOL, of course you're jealous. That's why you keep talking about superficial, unimportant things, like appearance. That is what is hateful.

I've never said any such thing, liar.

My children have no reason to fear me.

I've never had an abortion.

They have always been free to be whatever religion they choose. They've always known this.

You are 100% wrong.
Ink

Havertown, PA

#312799 Oct 7, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
How narrow-minded is *that*? You think there's only one dictionary definition?
Do you remember the other day when I asked you, specifically, if you meant the 1940/1950s definition of marriage following WWII?
Here it is again to refresh your memory. That was your opportunity to admit what you're fishing for here... but you passed.
<quoted text>
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/abortion/T833...
I did pass because it was a pretty snarky question that had nothing to do with the subject. But yes the definintion from the fifties and sixties and seventies and eighties and nineties has been changed to include same sex marriage in the dictionary.
Ink

Havertown, PA

#312801 Oct 7, 2013
AyakaNeo wrote:
<quoted text>Noah's flood as told in the Bible Ink, they have as much as told you half a dozen times "Noah's flood". If there were water on the earth, it's highly likely there were a few floods. But it's very unlikely it happened as the Bible says it did. It just doesn't make logical sense to some people. They require proof and a book that has been written and translated 1,000's of time is not proof.
Of course the Bible isn't proof. These people don't admit that 'anything' written in the Bible happened but I find it interesting that what so many people call myths and stories , scientists are finding actually have some basis in fact. I have never said that the story of Noah is 'literal'. I only said that it seems that there was a 'mother of all floods' and it occurred in Noah's day. The Ark may represent something totally different.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#312802 Oct 7, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
I did pass because it was a pretty snarky question that had nothing to do with the subject. But yes the definintion from the fifties and sixties and seventies and eighties and nineties has been changed to include same sex marriage in the dictionary.
The dictionary can only reflect what people think to put in it. That is not the be all and end all. The meaning of marriage has NOT been changed, and that has nothing to do with the dictionary.

You're still acting like there is only one definition of any given word, and that's nonsense.
Ink

Havertown, PA

#312803 Oct 7, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
"For any child conceived, her life depends on the whim of her mother."
It's funny how you pretended you were NOT talking about abortion, and now you clearly implied it again.
So, are you suggesting that EVERY woman might decide to have an abortion? Including you when you were pregnant?
I am saying that every woman has that option. Isn't that what you want.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#312804 Oct 7, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
I am saying that every woman has that option. Isn't that what you want.
No, that's not what you said. You said "faces the possibility", not that every woman has the right. Stop trying to backpedal.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

NCAA Basketball Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 11 min UIDIOTRACEMAKEWOR... 1,457,903
News UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) 4 hr Brew In 32,590
News Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 9 hr Eagle 12 258,039
News Western Michigan heads to Illinois as a favorite Fri Go Blue Forever 57
What role do you think humans play in global wa... (Sep '14) Nov 28 Local Warming 10,372
Should child beauty pageants be banned? (Sep '14) Nov 22 Heatherfeather 780
legitimate loan lender (Oct '13) Nov 20 Sandra Tillman 16
More from around the web