Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 314710 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

Ink

Narberth, PA

#311300 Sep 17, 2013
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>Jesus is God. God condemns. The Holy Ghost, what, hangs out and boogies with the saints? I don't know. But since they're all the same thing, Jesus condemns. Or he doesn't. Whatever you say.
It's your story to enjoy.
You're welcome to keep it.
But I don't want laws which hinge on your story, to mandate how I live my life.
Thanks anyway.
Thanks for what? I didn't give you anything.
grumpy

Pomona, NY

#311302 Sep 17, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
I believe in an All Powerful God who can manifest Himself any way he wants. Consider it explained.
Suppose he manifested himself in FooFoo!
feces for jesus

Brooklyn, NY

#311305 Sep 17, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Jesus doesn't condemn. That is not convoluted.
Pretty hard for a dead man to condemn, I agree.
Ink

Narberth, PA

#311306 Sep 17, 2013
grumpy wrote:
<quoted text>Suppose he manifested himself in FooFoo!
That's funny.

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#311308 Sep 17, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks for what? I didn't give you anything.
You better not, either.

:)

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#311309 Sep 17, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
bHitler, you worship Brother Cricket and Sister Tree.
BTW, have you found a credible source that states "human" (noun) and "human being" are not synonyms b/c of 'philosophical differences'?
cPeterPrance can't find any sources to corroborate the smoke you're blowing out your oversized arse. He made an oversized azz out of himself on your behalf.
"bHitler, you worship Brother Cricket and Sister Tree."

I do not. You lie.

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#311310 Sep 17, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
No. I will just disregard your accusations unless you have some thing to back them up. Any body can say anything but that doesn't make it true.
I didn't accuse you of anything...

And I certainly have no intention of infringing upon your right to be intellectually slothful.

Carry on in your self-imposed ignorance.
But just so you know, Google is free.
Ink

Narberth, PA

#311311 Sep 17, 2013
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>I didn't accuse you of anything...
And I certainly have no intention of infringing upon your right to be intellectually slothful.
Carry on in your self-imposed ignorance.
But just so you know, Google is free.
These accusations.

>
Just to take on one, what did Sarah Palin do to curb your rights to an abortion?
Her efforts to put abortion out of reach for any number of Alaskan women, curb those rights. I may not live in Alaska, but many women do.

If you don't know, intimately, how Palin's pro-life stance affected her legislative decisions while Governor, perhaps you need to do a little more research on the lip-sticked pig.

Don't expect me to school you...your obtuse and literal-minded demeanor is tiring as hell. Figure it out for yourself.

Are you a bimbo?
Ink

Narberth, PA

#311312 Sep 17, 2013
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>You better not, either.
:)
Not a chance.
Ocean56

AOL

#311313 Sep 17, 2013
Ink wrote:
So we can just disregard the success and accomplishments of women who aren't pro abortion.
As I said, you can defend and worship them all you want. I don't have to go along with your demands to do the same.

I don't consider conservative, regressive women like Phyllis Schlafly, Michelle Bachmann, or Sarah Palin as being either successful or accomplished. Don't like my saying that? Too bleeping bad.

Motherhood: OPTIONAL, not required.

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#311314 Sep 17, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
These accusations.

>ink reposts my instructions to do her own research<

Are you a bimbo?
No.

Are you a brick?
sassy jm

Cresskill, NJ

#311315 Sep 17, 2013
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>And just exactly what did 'abortion as self-defense' suggest to you?
Oh, right....convenience.
It's inconvenient as all hell to have a pregnancy that threatens one's life, I'll grant you....but to act as if you didn't understand what 'ectopic' pregnancy is...?
Really? You didn't get that from 'My abortion saved my life'?
The thickness of your gray matter is only approached in scope by a black hole's density.
Sheesh.
You are not the first, nor the last to claim that your abortion saved your life. That line is much abused and I think we all know why. You people are afraid to admit to the fact that you didn't want yojr child. A girl that I was friends with years ago claimed that she had an abortion because she "had to". When I asked her why, she said "well, I told him that I drank alcohol and he said that that could potentially affect me or the fetus". That was her excuse that she used to justify killing her UNWANTED child.

Okay, you didn't specify that you had an *ectopic* pregnancy so I had no idea. Nevertheless,there is much controversy regarding what really constitutes a so called (oxymoron) "life saving" killing of another humans life.

No "gray matter" here.
sassy jm

Cresskill, NJ

#311316 Sep 17, 2013
shovelhead72 wrote:
<quoted text>
It was (first...originally...initiate d as) ectopic, and then it was removed...aborted...discontinu ed...defunct...non-extant...de ad...
Shall I go on?
Or do you care to continue in this vein, regardless of brutally pertinent embarrassment on your part?
I'll be happy to oblige...
LMAO! Too funny. Along comes....(cough) shovelhead out of the woodwork to answer a direct question about playa. I also mentioned Nastyass nana as one who aborted.

ALL three are from the same town and State. Tulsa,OK

::::giggle::::

Next.,...,

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#311317 Sep 17, 2013
sassy jm wrote:
<quoted text> You are not the first, nor the last to claim that your abortion saved your life. That line is much abused and I think we all know why. You people are afraid to admit to the fact that you didn't want yojr child. A girl that I was friends with years ago claimed that she had an abortion because she "had to". When I asked her why, she said "well, I told him that I drank alcohol and he said that that could potentially affect me or the fetus". That was her excuse that she used to justify killing her UNWANTED child.
Okay, you didn't specify that you had an *ectopic* pregnancy so I had no idea. Nevertheless,there is much controversy regarding what really constitutes a so called (oxymoron) "life saving" killing of another humans life.
No "gray matter" here.
What "controversy" is there over ending an ectopic pregnancy?
sassy jm

Cresskill, NJ

#311318 Sep 17, 2013
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>Accepted.
Hey, shove. Long time no see. I heard you were dead.
How's Nana?
lol
sassy jm

Cresskill, NJ

#311319 Sep 17, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
Nonsense, Stupid Sassy. You're clueless, or YOU are the one being deceptive. The embryo may, or may not still be alive at the time, but the removal of an ectopic pregnancy is as much an abortion as any other termination of a pregnancy is.
Wrong. An abortion is a deliberate procedure meant to end the life of the humans life. An ectopic pregnancy is a miscarriage and/ or a procedure to remove "INDIRECTLY" the misplaced life.
JBH

Surrey, Canada

#311320 Sep 17, 2013
Syria rebels had sarin gas: CIA
Full story: Tehran Times
The classified document obtained by WorldNetDaily, confirms that poison gas was confiscated earlier this year from members of the al-Nusra Front, a militant group that has been responsible for some of the most gruesome terrorist attacks directed at both Syrian soldiers and civilian population.
+++++

----------

From the above report, when rebels have Sarin gas, what does that mean if it appears to suggest the issue could be reconsidered if Syria violates an agreement on abandoning its chemical weapons, by just looking at one side of Syria regime?

How is it possible, to do again by looking for chemical weapons in Syria to destroy as if is like in Iraq for repeated cycle again?

How do they know that Syria really has chemical weapons for sure when they say if Syria violates an agreement on abandoning its chemical weapons to strike, by just looking at one side?

No one wants to do any more Iraq by pursing chemical weapons to destroy by saying even Syria violates an agreement on abandoning its chemical weapons by not letting them come in to inspect places and weapons to dismantle, because they don't know if Syria has chemical weapons now,or might destroy them before they strike.

If they invade by using ground troops, then it will be disasters because that will be fought against by Syrian people fiercely as they are well prepared.

The silly joke of invading for nothing as based on absolute unknown and uncertainty is very troubling and sickening in the paradox of logical thinking.

It is not amazing that Russia calls US as just being of exceptionalism as a pathetic, silly joke, of shaking all over downout again, that US would even say to strike and to dismantle chemical weapons as if never has learned from Iraq case.

That is very bad--What a dumb foolish joke that is, as only silly fools would keep on taking that radical Obama's SAYING of CHEMICAL WEAPONS AND to chase and destroy like another Iraq drama cycle, and would SEEM NOT being ABLE TO STOP on chemical weapons pursuit?
The proposal in attempt to check into Syria to dismantle chemical weapons is impossible, and is a violation of sovereignty of Syria, of which it imposes serous threats to the stability of Syria and the ME region.
As All that is with some clear mind, that is so simple to reject the trouble making calling chemical weapons issue by the irresponsible foolish Obama by passing the buck in the boiling hole he digs for himself, because IT IS A DEAD-end STREET OF GOING nowhere, to repeat like Iraq WMD dismantling.

Nobody should listen to Obama by passing the buck as one can do any way, but there are just dumb idiots on the planet who are of foolish stupidity by taking what says, by Obama doing Bush thing by taking on Syria to do Iraq CYCLE again--NOBODY WANTS RECYCLING ANOTHER silly disastrous IRAQ DRAMA CYCLE.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#311321 Sep 17, 2013
sassy jm wrote:
<quoted text>Wrong. An abortion is a deliberate procedure meant to end the life of the humans life. An ectopic pregnancy is a miscarriage and/ or a procedure to remove "INDIRECTLY" the misplaced life.
Wrong. An abortion is the ending of a pregnancy, whether spontaneous or induced, by the removal of the products of conception.

The removal in an ectopic pregnancy is direct, and deliberate, whether or not the embryo is alive. Period. It's certainly not being moved to an alternate location to continue gestation, and everyone knows the embryo will die as a result, just like any other induced abortion.

Your church wanting to dance around this issue that they know can't end any other way, is just that, a dance to justify it without changing it's own dogma.
sassy jm

Cresskill, NJ

#311322 Sep 17, 2013
Ocean56 wrote:
<quoted text>
"Don't want a baby, don't have sex" is one of the most STUPID things anti-choicers say. But since you are one of the most stupid posters here, that is no surprise, to me anyway.
NO woman has to punish herself by denying herself sex for a lifetime if she NEVER wants children. Nor does a woman who has had the number of kids SHE wants have to pop out any more kids. But that's exactly what backward morons like you would prefer. Luckily, a woman who NEVER wants pregnancy or children, or who is DONE with the whole procreation thing after having only one or two kids, has to listen to you.
Motherhood: OPTIONAL, not required.
Well Gollyyy! When cpeter told some poster to not have sex or use a condom in order to prevent pregnancy,you thought it was sane advice. So why is "one of the STUPIDEST things anti-choicers say"?.

Educate yourself sweetheart. A woman is not fertile EVERYDAY so nobody is being "punished" for denying herself sex. Nobody is forcing you to "pop out" kids that you don't want. Calm down before your blood pressure goes up.

I feel that somebody abused or mistreated you. You have deep rooted issues that you can't seem to come to terms with. Did somebody control you or victimize you?. I'm serious Ocean.
sassy jm

Cresskill, NJ

#311323 Sep 17, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
What "controversy" is there over ending an ectopic pregnancy?
None.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

NCAA Basketball Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 3 min sonicfilter 1,548,857
News UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) 20 hr What phartze 33,188
What role do you think humans play in global wa... (Sep '14) Jun 13 Patriot 11,181
News Tragedy strikes family members of Leasure (Jul '08) Jun 9 Evidence phart 9
News Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) May 29 Into The Night 258,476
Penn State University & State College May '17 Truechange 1
I got my loan from [email protected] (Jun '13) Apr '17 GLOBAL FUNDING SO... 43
More from around the web