Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 310174 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

“GOD SO LOVED US”

Since: Aug 08

He Gave His SON to Save us

#306595 Aug 1, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
No one has to stop using any screen name you are known as, especially when you aren't registered, and change names all the time.
Stop being pissy, we all know it's you anyway, changing your name won't change that.
Exactly..it's a name she gave herself ..not anything nasty.

Have to be sure I'm addressing the right person.

The names,change every day ..And any one she posts to

Calling me names,should know who she is each time she does it .

Would hate anyone to think I had that many people who actually hate me
Katie Still Not Reading

United States

#306596 Aug 1, 2013
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>Katie didn't ask you to prove a negative.
Of course she did.
She told you to prove her assertion a fallacy.
Fallacy ( fallacious -- wrong or false ) in and of itself is a negative. She was asking me to prove what she said was false.
If she'd said "Prove it is NOT a fallacy," that would be asking you to prove a negative.
Wrong. That would have been a double negative. She would have been asking to prove that it was NOT false, I..e. that it was true.
Think about what she said for a second , imbecile.
She said RvW protects you against forced abortion.
How would anyone prove that a fallacy? By showing in the decision where it does NOT address forced abortion? It would be much easier for her to show us all where it DOES address forced abortion.
But of course YOU can't prove anything at all, except that you are a moron.
Next...
You SO wanted to show me up. To expose me as a moron. But instead you crapped out. You ended up looking like more of a schmuck than Katie did.

Too bad for you.
No Relativism

Huntington, IN

#306597 Aug 1, 2013
just choose life wrote:
<quoted text>I wonder if rose is foo. Where is foo anyway? wonder if she is that poster who used the *c* word A LOT.
Just Choose Life posted: "Where is foo anyway?"

Maybe she took a vacation to Bannedville, USA.
No Relativism

Huntington, IN

#306598 Aug 1, 2013
Cookie_Parker wrote:
<quoted text>
A fetus is not a child nor a human life. We don't spend our days inside another, not breathing oxygen but taking in fluid and getting fed with a tube in our stomach from the sac of food around us....you aren't using reality in describing life.
Your soul is a religious belief..not a physical presence.
Cookie: "A fetus is not a child nor a human life."
________

DNA analysis results of preborn baby indicates that s/he is a unique, distinct human being.
Tamara

New York, NY

#306599 Aug 1, 2013
Katie Still Not Reading wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry Cook. You can say the fetus is not a "child" or a "human being" or a "person", or any other subjective philosophical term you want. But when you say it's not human, not alive, or not a unique developing human life, then you are contradicting science.
Stupid gone wild? Ridiculous people with no brains.

“GOD SO LOVED US”

Since: Aug 08

He Gave His SON to Save us

#306600 Aug 1, 2013
FYI

FOR anyone who actually cares,

Foo has been in and out of the hospital ..with complications,..

Would not post this..however some of her friends,here do not have sign ins .

Her page on here comes up just fine

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#306601 Aug 1, 2013
Katie Still Not Reading wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course she did.
<quoted text>
Fallacy ( fallacious -- wrong or false ) in and of itself is a negative. She was asking me to prove what she said was false.

Roe v Wade affirms that it is a woman's choice whether or not to get an abortion - and that no one else can make that choice for her. Therefore, it protects women, legally, from being forced to abort by their significant others, parents, doctor, or anyone else.

You can wriggle around it all you like, but you can't get past those facts...and you're still a moron.

Next...
Tamara

New York, NY

#306602 Aug 1, 2013
RoSesz wrote:
FYI
FOR anyone who actually cares,
Foo has been in and out of the hospital ..with complications,..
Would not post this..however some of her friends,here do not have sign ins .
Her page on here comes up just fine
We know. She's never kept her addiction a secret. Warm thoughts are with her.
Gtown71

Rockwall, TX

#306603 Aug 1, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
It's not a guess. That's my point.
The Scientific Method does not change. And the bible HAS changed, given how many times it's been translated, even added to. That was an incredibly ignorant comment.
No matter how much you wish, you can't change the fact that science has evidence on it's side, and your bible is merely belief.
I'm sorry little bit, but I'm not wrong. The word of God has never changed, which perhaps I should've stated, since you're such a technical lady.
No matter how many times "man" wants to try and "correct "God, or try and tell God how He should've wrote His Word.

You're the one that's putting faith and trust, into a method, that's only a few thousand years old TOPS, to gauge things back to millions or billions of years, which is incredibly ignorant, if you ask me.

Just so you know, I think you highly intelligent, among many other pro choice folks here, but I just don't believe you're very wise.

“GOD SO LOVED US”

Since: Aug 08

He Gave His SON to Save us

#306604 Aug 1, 2013
Tamara wrote:
<quoted text>We know. She's never kept her addiction a secret. Warm thoughts are with her.
Whoever you are that is,an awful thing to say..

She has,had,surgery .twice ....And if you have been here you know,that .And I can see you wish her well ..

Terrible thing to say lady

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#306605 Aug 1, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm sorry little bit, but I'm not wrong. The word of God has never changed, which perhaps I should've stated, since you're such a technical lady.
No matter how many times "man" wants to try and "correct "God, or try and tell God how He should've wrote His Word.
You're the one that's putting faith and trust, into a method, that's only a few thousand years old TOPS, to gauge things back to millions or billions of years, which is incredibly ignorant, if you ask me.
Just so you know, I think you highly intelligent, among many other pro choice folks here, but I just don't believe you're very wise.
I'm sorry, but the bible HAS changed. And is, itself, less than 2000 years old.

It's not a matter of faith, but one of fact. No matter how much you wish to make the claim, the scientific method works, and it produces facts. There is evidence.

What you think of me personally is irrelevant.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#306606 Aug 1, 2013
Exploitation is a loaded term but not evil:
1.use or utilization, especially for profit: the exploitation of newly discovered oil fields.
2.selfish utilization: He got ahead through the exploitation of his friends.
3.the combined, often varied, use of public-relations and advertising techniques to promote a person, movie, product, etc.

Every person who has a job is exploited. Every celebrity is exploited. Are women exploited in playboy? Sure--just like the writers, artists, etc. These aren't the bad old days of actual porn.

Humans have a sex drive; adolescents become aware of this regardless of whether they see a magazine or not. The women in playboy are there willingly and get paid well. And what is wrong with "self-pleasure?" It's healthy and absolutely normal.

I haven't read one in years, but in fact it used to be very good about instructing readers about sex and other topics.
sassy JM wrote:
<quoted text> Women are expolited in playboy for a reason. It's not a sex education pamplet.
Wakey up! It's to sexually turn men on. They then get horny and look to seek self pleasure or seek out woman..ANY woman who will fill that desire. God forbids sex outside of marriage.
Sins of the flesh is what sends most to hell.
Even if you want to argue that married men enjoy it to and having sex with their wife is good ..still doesn't make it right. Number one, the woman is STILL expolited and degraded AND secondly, what does it say for the direspect towards the wife when her husband is seeking out OTHER women to fulfill his sexual desires?

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#306607 Aug 1, 2013
I've BEEN on life support, snookums, and at no point did they put me in the body of another person.

And please, don't overreach. You can't educate anyone.
sassy JM wrote:
<quoted text> I guess if you end up in a hospital on life support( oxgen, breathing tube, tube in stomache to nourish you, etc), you aren't a human.
Let me educate you. A pregnant woman conceived her offspring. They are our children.
Oh, and last time I checked, a human does indeed have a human offspring.
Gnite now.
feces for jesus

Westbury, NY

#306608 Aug 1, 2013
sassy JM wrote:
<quoted text>Proaborts are prodeath. They have no respect for the lives of their child if they don't want them.NO boundaries - in or out of the womb.
Lol at these nonsense phrases "culture of death" and "pro death" This from someone who would rather her daughter die rather than her daughter have an abortion.

Go suck on your phallus-like pipedream of eternal life., ms paradox.
feces for jesus

Westbury, NY

#306609 Aug 1, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm sorry little bit, but I'm not wrong. The word of God has never changed, which perhaps I should've stated, since you're such a technical lady.
No matter how many times "man" wants to try and "correct "God, or try and tell God how He should've wrote His Word.
You're the one that's putting faith and trust, into a method, that's only a few thousand years old TOPS, to gauge things back to millions or billions of years, which is incredibly ignorant, if you ask me.
Just so you know, I think you highly intelligent, among many other pro choice folks here, but I just don't believe you're very wise.
Awwwww, christard get angry, huh? How arrogant that you think your opinion and beliefs are "truth".
Get back to us when you can't prove that your favorite storybook is "the word of god". Until then you're just talking out of your rear end.

i guess you just ignore the changes made to your storybook.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#306610 Aug 1, 2013
That's not harassment, idiot. It's obviously YOU who can't stand what's on this forum.
just choose life wrote:
<quoted text>You have called me knut and prey. yes you did. you have called me *it*, please.... I told you to stop using my former name, yet you still do , that is harassment. You know what? You can't take what is on this forum, you shouldn't be on this forum.
feces for jesus

Westbury, NY

#306611 Aug 1, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
The Grand Canyon is a Grand example :)
If you go outside and pour a cup of water on a dirt spot, notice what it does? Kinda makes a little trench, and all you need do is imagine enough water to cover the earth, as it ran off.
I realize you believe it was formed over millions of years, from the little creek bellow :(
Where is your evidence to back up your claim that the grand canyon was formed by the worldwide flood that your storybook speaks up?

You have no evidence and certainly do not understand what objective, empirical evidence is.

You have nothing but empty claims and empty words.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#306613 Aug 1, 2013
If you pour water on dirt, you do not get a canyon; you get mud. Canyons are formed by water erosion of ROCK not soil; they require a constant flow of water, not a 40-day flood. The sides show ample evidence of slow, gradual erosion. BTW--that "little creek" is the colorado river, THE major river of the southwest.
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
The Grand Canyon is a Grand example :)
If you go outside and pour a cup of water on a dirt spot, notice what it does? Kinda makes a little trench, and all you need do is imagine enough water to cover the earth, as it ran off.
I realize you believe it was formed over millions of years, from the little creek bellow :(

Since: Jun 08

Atrisco Village

#306614 Aug 1, 2013
RoSesz wrote:
<quoted text>
And THAT is why as,a cradle Catholic brought up by nuns and priests
I told NR I was deeply disappointed .
My other mothers were great to me and my sis ..
No matter what these schmos want to think, having legitimate criticism of the Church doesn't make one anti-Catholic. That's a simple-minded accusation made by simple-minded people.That's why they're called sheep. Most of my friends and neighbors are Catholic and they are highly critical and disappointed in the Church regarding the sex scandals.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#306615 Aug 1, 2013
sassy JM wrote:
I don't understand. You "don't want to join in me or knit insulting people" yet you join in with the proaborts who insult us.
You hate when prolifers say something you don't approve of but you think proaborts are nice when they do it?;
Sorry but that's bull. Be fair.
Yes you did apologize for accusing me of being knit. I didn't want to get invoved in your fight eith knit. I asked you to not bash knit to me. Here you are still.doing it.
I readnthe forum where knit copied and pasted my post. She is correct Rose. How can you think its evil for what happened to young children in the church but not with playa showing such filth like playboy? It IS comparable.
I asked you questions that you didnt answer. Why?
<quoted text>
Did it ever occur to you and Knut that since both of you and Rose are all Christians and she may think your shitty behavior reflects badly on your religion? The same religion Rose also practices? Do the choicers on here do anything to poorly represent YOUR religion? No, not at all. We're not posting things about following Jesus blah blah and then acting like hypocritical bast@rds...like you and Knut...and NR.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

NCAA Basketball Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
What role do you think humans play in global wa... (Sep '14) 15 min Earthling-1 6,277
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 24 min USAsince1680 1,251,819
News Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 34 min Knowledge- 243,425
The Email Address Debacle: Did Hillary Do Somet... 39 min GoGoGrandMaHillary 1,653
News Trail Blazers 'like what Tim Frazier brings' at... 13 hr Fartman 2
News UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) 19 hr tom wingo 29,828
News Giddens Leads New Mexico Over UNLV, 59-45 (Mar '08) Jul 2 Fartman 24
More from around the web