Ok, Rose. You know you're not answering my questions. You are giving scenarios.<quoted text>
The key word is IF IT BECAME LIFE THREATENING ..
IF so she goes to a hospital not an abortion clinic and is treated by her doctor who will try to save her life and her babies,as,most life threatening situations are late term with mom s who want them
The idea,in a,LIFE THREATENING SITUATION is saving life .
In an ectopic pregnancy ..which is life threatening ..again the idea,is save mom and no way to save baby ..they remove it and tube or ovary ...again not Done in a clinic
A,LIFE THREATENING SITUATION IS TREATED as,soon as,possible .
Does THaT help.
Having had miscarriages,does not mean you abort for health reasons ..thank God . I'm sure women have had babies nice and healthy after several miscarriages..I know that for a fact
Let's try rewording the question: If a pregnancy will be aborted, do you think it better for that abortion to take place sooner or later?
AND, do you think it is Pro-Life to continue creating embryos/fetuses with the knowledge they will expire because the MD has told the woman she cannot carry to term?