Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 310234 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#305724 Jul 25, 2013
LineDazzle wrote:
<quoted text>
Showing the world in pure people pleasing omega male style how you are effeminate, and to be pushed around by women, and get beat up by the real men?


Maybe gender confusion is something you should work on, in a personal sense....just a thought.

“GOD SO LOVED US”

Since: Aug 08

He Gave His SON to Save us

#305725 Jul 25, 2013
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>She had the choice, and made it: but wants to take it away from others because she made the wrong choice FOR HERSELF.
Her story is: "I had an abortion, I regretted it, and now I firmly believe it's wrong, for anyone and everyone else, to have one."
She's more than welcome to her opinion, but legally applying her opinion to every other woman in the country, would be ridiculous, wrong, and (thankfully) Unconstitutional, hypocrisy.
JMO
If I say I did something foolish as a young person..I regret it ..wish that choice had not been available to me .

She US Not being a hypocrite ..very honest. IMO..
sassy JM

Lake Grove, NY

#305726 Jul 25, 2013
NOBODY sent foo a death threat regardless of what she said. If so..let her show it.You are gullible. What's funny is that she wished ME dead when i has sepsis after a very severe situation when I almost died. So.....
Bringing up lalas abortion is not taunting. Its real. She still supports abortion. Therefore she, like SHE said, isnt sorry for havinv her child killed but for getting pregnant. SHE SAID THAT IN A POST.

Anyway...you judged my sister in law and the woman who threw her baby in the trash but you sugar coat what these people support daily.

No..my sister in law didnt call 911. She sat with her newborn alone til her parents came home. YOU think she is mental.

Question; are women who abort or escort babies to their death or support abortion as choice "mental cases" too? Or just this woman?.

Please answer Rose.
RoSesz wrote:
<quoted text>
Sassy
You brought up your relative ..I was,making the point that I am sure SHE called for help .
I have never said to you guys NOT TO DEBATE AGAINST ABORTION ..EVER
What I have a,problem with is using the name of OUR LORD. And then gloating if they have a physical problem ...And yes taunting LALA. in the mast way it was done .
I DUD NOT say it was you..But it certainly was,chRistian to say things about using PSIN pull a and lying about a,physical condition .
Some fool on here actually sent a death threat .
And don't even get me started on the nasty things about me and my family and my mental state and whether or nit I'm a real Christian
None if that personal stuff is either Christian or belongs on a debate board IMO.
USING Jesus name as a shield and then doing it are MoST certainly what I am in disagreement with ..You bet Sassy .
And again YOU DID BRING UP just today my being friendly with them.
Look at what J am saying
If a non believer says something disagreeable it is on them
If I act hateful while telling people what a great Christian J am..That is on me but also reflects on my Lord..
And if you can't see the duff e fence JM then we just dont agree..on how a person calling Jesus Saviuir US supposed to represent Him .
And YOU DID bring up ME joking with them .

“GOD SO LOVED US”

Since: Aug 08

He Gave His SON to Save us

#305727 Jul 25, 2013
LineDazzle wrote:
<quoted text>
Showing the world in pure people pleasing omega male style how you are effeminate, and to be pushed around by women, and get beat up by the real men?
Ummmm did you have some major surgery you forgot to mention ..SON.

it AM I the mental one here. Lol
sassy JM

Lake Grove, NY

#305728 Jul 25, 2013
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>She had the choice, and made it: but wants to take it away from others because she made the wrong choice FOR HERSELF.
Her story is: "I had an abortion, I regretted it, and now I firmly believe it's wrong, for anyone and everyone else, to have one."
She's more than welcome to her opinion, but legally applying her opinion to every other woman in the country, would be ridiculous, wrong, and (thankfully) Unconstitutional, hypocrisy.
JMO
So I suppose NA and AA leaders should keep silent about their pasts? They shouldn't let people know how alcohol destroyed their bodies and lives? They made their choice so they should not preach?

No girl will comprehend in full that her choice will destroy not only her childs life but hers as well. ONLY those sho have been there can give that girl the truth. A woman who has acknowledged her grave mistake can be honest enough. The rest who are in denial will deceive her because she is still living in denial.

The truth sets you free.

A woman who has regretted killing her child needs compassion and love in order to become whole again. She desperately needs Gods love and forgiveness. One day she will meet her child in heaven who is awaiting her.
Katie

Federal Way, WA

#305729 Jul 25, 2013
RoSesz wrote:
<quoted text>
If I say I did something foolish as a young person..I regret it ..wish that choice had not been available to me .
She US Not being a hypocrite ..very honest. IMO..
I disagree.

The author, Carol Brown, was not being honest when insisting terms of endearment are "truth" as opposed to the medical names. She uses this difference as proof of her false claim that the abortion industry uses manipulative language.

SHE is trying to manipulate even as she tries to purge herself of her prior abortion. It's her personal experience. It is not every woman's personal experience. She is not everywoman. Her feelings on her own actions should not be a basis for criminalizing induced abortion.

If you think her emotions *should be* a basis for criminalizing induced abortion, please explain why.
Katie

Federal Way, WA

#305730 Jul 25, 2013
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>Oh, but manipulation of folks to 'Read's point of view is fine as frog hair...it's manipulation of folks to a point of view 'Read' doesn't approve of, which grinds his (and sASSy's) gears.
Hypocrisy. It's what's for breakfast, lunch AND dinner, with the SCPL....which, of course, is why sassyjm is scrambling to find examples of it on the pro-choice side of the argument, however spurious her so-called examples may be.
Actually, I think it's kinda cute...
:)
Yeah, well, wait a while. It doesn't remain cute for long.

I think you're right. The hypocrisy's okay so long as it's agreeable to their POVs. Just saw that one in action.
hjhkh

Baldwin Park, CA

#305731 Jul 25, 2013
hjjhhj
Katie

Federal Way, WA

#305732 Jul 25, 2013
sassy JM wrote:
<quoted text>So I suppose NA and AA leaders should keep silent about their pasts? They shouldn't let people know how alcohol destroyed their bodies and lives? They made their choice so they should not preach?
No girl will comprehend in full that her choice will destroy not only her childs life but hers as well. ONLY those sho have been there can give that girl the truth. A woman who has acknowledged her grave mistake can be honest enough. The rest who are in denial will deceive her because she is still living in denial.
The truth sets you free.
A woman who has regretted killing her child needs compassion and love in order to become whole again. She desperately needs Gods love and forgiveness. One day she will meet her child in heaven who is awaiting her.
"So I suppose NA and AA leaders should keep silent about their pasts? They shouldn't let people know how alcohol destroyed their bodies and lives? They made their choice so they should not preach?"

NA/AA "leaders" aren't trying to criminalize alcohol sales and consumption. If they were, would you listen and nod in agreement with them?

“GOD SO LOVED US”

Since: Aug 08

He Gave His SON to Save us

#305736 Jul 25, 2013
sassy JM wrote:
NOBODY sent foo a death threat regardless of what she said. If so..let her show it.You are gullible. What's funny is that she wished ME dead when i has sepsis after a very severe situation when I almost died. So.....
Bringing up lalas abortion is not taunting. Its real. She still supports abortion. Therefore she, like SHE said, isnt sorry for havinv her child killed but for getting pregnant. SHE SAID THAT IN A POST.
Anyway...you judged my sister in law and the woman who threw her baby in the trash but you sugar coat what these people support daily.
No..my sister in law didnt call 911. She sat with her newborn alone til her parents came home. YOU think she is mental.
Question; are women who abort or escort babies to their death or support abortion as choice "mental cases" too? Or just this woman?.
Please answer Rose.
<quoted text>
If anyone sends a death threat it's,wrong ...You .Foo..
Anyone

This is a forum. It's words and not worth sentiments like that IMO.

I did NOT SAY YOUR SIL WAS MENTAL. Stop putting words in my mouth

YOU asked if I thought she was MENTAL since she had her baby alone .
Thankfully she had her baby just fine and God bless them both . I assumed she called someone for help

Why she did not call You at least..who is a nurse ..no clue .

asking ladi,stupid disgusting questions about black masses and baby sacrifice is WRONG ...AND taunting and disgusting .
You DON'T agree?? probably one reason the poster got banned..just a guess.

And I am trying to answer you .

Jesus said to love one another ..That is no way to show love ..IMO
If you cannot say something nice ..PERSONALLY..be quiet about their health problems. IMO.

Disagree with abortion ...And everything yo do with it.

But can you not see that insulting people while saying you love Jesus is so wrong .

Btw..sorry you had sepsis ..hope all is,well .

And yes some fool made up a sign in and told FOO to die the day BEFORE her FIRST SURGERY .

As for the woman in the story ..I did not judge her...the JUDGE did ..said to get counselling ...

I agreed that she likely had a mental problem of some sort or at least should and would be evaluated for one .

She broke the law..But maybe there is a reason WE DO NOT KNOW ..as to why ..

AND ONE MORE TIME you equated her to your relative
.Not ME

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#305737 Jul 25, 2013
sassy JM wrote:
<quoted text>So I suppose NA and AA leaders should keep silent about their pasts? They shouldn't let people know how alcohol destroyed their bodies and lives? They made their choice so they should not preach?
No girl will comprehend in full that her choice will destroy not only her childs life but hers as well. ONLY those sho have been there can give that girl the truth. A woman who has acknowledged her grave mistake can be honest enough. The rest who are in denial will deceive her because she is still living in denial.
The truth sets you free.
A woman who has regretted killing her child needs compassion and love in order to become whole again. She desperately needs Gods love and forgiveness. One day she will meet her child in heaven who is awaiting her.
The truth is, that not every woman (or girl, as the case may be) who has an abortion, will regret her abortion, and those same women/girls may very well regret getting pregnant in the first place instead. Their feelings are every bit as valid as those of women who DO regret having an abortion.

Don't even try to act like you offer women who do regret it, Christian love and understanding. Frankly, I'm sure it pisses you off when your side can't manipulate them into becoming suicidal over it.

You idiots disgust me.

“GOD SO LOVED US”

Since: Aug 08

He Gave His SON to Save us

#305738 Jul 25, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
I disagree.
The author, Carol Brown, was not being honest when insisting terms of endearment are "truth" as opposed to the medical names. She uses this difference as proof of her false claim that the abortion industry uses manipulative language.
SHE is trying to manipulate even as she tries to purge herself of her prior abortion. It's her personal experience. It is not every woman's personal experience. She is not everywoman. Her feelings on her own actions should not be a basis for criminalizing induced abortion.
If you think her emotions *should be* a basis for criminalizing induced abortion, please explain why.
I do not think Roe SHOUKD ever HSVE become law in the first place 50 million deaths later
.I still do not think so.

And we have run into the language thing right here.

I sed the child in the womb as a baby ..up until the abortion debate it WAS a baby .

If I say the word abortion ..it is equated to miscarriages ..when everyone knows J mean the deliberate act of ending the life of the offspring in the mother's womb by killing it .

These language things may be medical ..But serve to make the debate run off track as we then have yo clarify what we mean..

Which is a waste of time ..And the whole idea behind what the w Oman is saying .

She was told at twenty it was a clump of cells that were being vacuumed out ..She has since realized it was her child she was having killed .

She makes a most valid point .

It's easier to push for ideas that are controversial if you can obscure the language in th e debate.

Pro choice ..And Pro life ..We all know exactly EHAT we are t s liking about .

It's all in the talking points that have become do popular in politics ..

Imo

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#305741 Jul 25, 2013
Lets choose life wrote:
Found this he Apocalypse of Peter
"And near that place I saw another strait place ... and there sat women.... And over against them many children who were born to them out of due time sat crying. And there came forth from them rays of fire and smote the women in the eyes. And these were the accursed who conceived and caused abortion" (The Apocalypse of Peter 25 [A.D. 137]).
Fire coming from premature, miscarried, stillborn, and aborted babies, to smite the eyes of their feckless and undoubtedly sex-crazed mothers, eh?

Peter was an avowed misogynist, who drank to excess. No wonder he had such fantasies.

You, I don't know - but you sound like Sassy, who would cheerfully criminalize abortion, and would then relish the agony of women who were driven to dirty kitchen tables in back alleys.

How very Christian.

Next...

“GOD SO LOVED US”

Since: Aug 08

He Gave His SON to Save us

#305742 Jul 25, 2013
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>Fire coming from premature, miscarried, stillborn, and aborted babies, to smite the eyes of their feckless and undoubtedly sex-crazed mothers, eh?
Peter was an avowed misogynist, who drank to excess. No wonder he had such fantasies.
You, I don't know - but you sound like Sassy, who would cheerfully criminalize abortion, and would then relish the agony of women who were driven to dirty kitchen tables in back alleys.
How very Christian.
Next...
That is,NOT even in the Catholic bible ..And I'm pretty sure not even read in their Church .

Lot of early stuff out there that was,NOT considered scripture.

And you don't know the poster??

And Peter was married .

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#305743 Jul 25, 2013
sassy JM wrote:
<quoted text>
And your *opinion* has what to do with the specific conversation?
I could ask you the same thing.

“GOD SO LOVED US”

Since: Aug 08

He Gave His SON to Save us

#305745 Jul 25, 2013
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>Fire coming from premature, miscarried, stillborn, and aborted babies, to smite the eyes of their feckless and undoubtedly sex-crazed mothers, eh?
Peter was an avowed misogynist, who drank to excess. No wonder he had such fantasies.
You, I don't know - but you sound like Sassy, who would cheerfully criminalize abortion, and would then relish the agony of women who were driven to dirty kitchen tables in back alleys.
How very Christian.
Next...
Some supposed early writings,are considered as fiction ..And not written by the author .

That passage,does,not even sound like Pete's, other writings,
sassy JM

Lake Grove, NY

#305746 Jul 25, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
"So I suppose NA and AA leaders should keep silent about their pasts? They shouldn't let people know how alcohol destroyed their bodies and lives? They made their choice so they should not preach?"
NA/AA "leaders" aren't trying to criminalize alcohol sales and consumption. If they were, would you listen and nod in agreement with them?
Drinking alcohol is not wrong. Drinking and driving is because SOMEONE might die. Abuse of alcohol destroys lives. Those leading groups will behonest enough to tell the ugly truths about it. An alcoholic in denial will be offended and DENY they have a problem or that their lives have become unmanagable.

A woman who is still in denial,sill convince herself and the world that she is okay with what she did.

Abortion=one dead, one wounded.
sassy JM

Lake Grove, NY

#305747 Jul 25, 2013
RoSesz wrote:
<quoted text>
Sassy
You brought up your relative ..I was,making the point that I am sure SHE called for help .
I have never said to you guys NOT TO DEBATE AGAINST ABORTION ..EVER
What I have a,problem with is using the name of OUR LORD. And then gloating if they have a physical problem ...And yes taunting LALA. in the mast way it was done .
I DUD NOT say it was you..But it certainly was,chRistian to say things about using PSIN pull a and lying about a,physical condition .
Some fool on here actually sent a death threat .
And don't even get me started on the nasty things about me and my family and my mental state and whether or nit I'm a real Christian
None if that personal stuff is either Christian or belongs on a debate board IMO.
USING Jesus name as a shield and then doing it are MoST certainly what I am in disagreement with ..You bet Sassy .
And again YOU DID BRING UP just today my being friendly with them.
Look at what J am saying
If a non believer says something disagreeable it is on them
If I act hateful while telling people what a great Christian J am..That is on me but also reflects on my Lord..
And if you can't see the duff e fence JM then we just dont agree..on how a person calling Jesus Saviuir US supposed to represent Him .
And YOU DID bring up ME joking with them .i
You are so sure that because you pick and choose WHO you will call "mental cases" or "using drugs" and who you choose to chit chat with, that you are most Christlike. That's your opinion...not fact.

For instance, if i call a woman who aborts, escorts babies to death or supports this evil as choice "mental cases"....you call me unChristlike but it was OK that you called the woman and my SIL who didn't cal 911 "mental cases or on drugs" ...then your e OK *because you are friendly to proaborts.

WTH?

I may be a very poor Christian in your eyes but I am not here to win anyones approval. I am here to SAY IT LIKE IT IS. Human lives are at stake.

www.abortionno.org this is what YOUR friends suppoort. I think that I have DUTY to defend these little, innocent ljves...good Christian or not.

Now go pat yourself on the back for being a gokd example when YOU choose to.

My SIL didnt call 911 okay?????? So you ASSUMED wrong. You don't know her circumstances yet you judged her
sassy JM

Lake Grove, NY

#305748 Jul 25, 2013
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
I could ask you the same thing.
I didnt offer my opinion. In fact that conversation wasnt about me.

Now stop dancing around what you said. It was dumb.PERIOD.
sassy JM

Lake Grove, NY

#305749 Jul 25, 2013
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>Fire coming from premature, miscarried, stillborn, and aborted babies, to smite the eyes of their feckless and undoubtedly sex-crazed mothers, eh?
Peter was an avowed misogynist, who drank to excess. No wonder he had such fantasies.
You, I don't know - but you sound like Sassy, who would cheerfully criminalize abortion, and would then relish the agony of women who were driven to dirty kitchen tables in back alleys.
How very Christian.
Next...
Youre damn right I would cheerfully rejoice if abortion is legally criminalized. No more killing innocent victim sure makes me cheer. ALL deserve the right to their life.

I wouldn't relish anyones agony. Not even a woman who kills her baby in a back alley. I don't relish women dying in comfy cozy sterile abortion mills either. I wouldn't relish Susan Smith had she got stuck in the door of her car as it was rolling down the hill into the lake in her attempt to drown her two unwanted kids either(had she died with them).

See i am prolife. I assure you that I have comforted more post abortive women then all proaborts.com bined.

You people don't care about them nor do you care about girls and women in crisis pregnancies. Actions speak louder than words.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

NCAA Basketball Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 2 min Thinking 247,752
News UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) 2 hr Bruin For Life 29,959
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 hr Incognito4Ever 1,278,293
What role do you think humans play in global wa... (Sep '14) 8 hr Emily 6,966
News Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex ma... (Aug '10) Sep 1 Pastor Pete 201,864
Conn's Appliances (Nov '07) Aug 20 Jcrombie67 282
Hoophall Invitational - Miami Aug 17 Hoophall 1
More from around the web