Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 312705 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#304843 Jul 14, 2013
ladida wrote:
<quoted text>You do not know anything about my church so stop posting about it, K? You have no right to post about someones annulment. You keep on harping not to judge yet you do. Tell me what is artificial about awoman's mucous? NFP is natural, therefore can be used. NFP has no barriors nor does it kill sperm or unborn babies. There is nothing wrong with avoiding sex during fertile periods where as using contraception , spermicides kill sperm, the pill kills an unborn child. All you are doing is bashing the church, so please stop bashing my church.
You bring up things about your church all the time..But you are right ..except for discussion on BC ..this is not the forum for it ..

But yo be clear ..I do not hate the CC.. They have dine much good in the world ..I live the nuns who helped raise me ..I just do not find my spiritual home there any more.

But we can continue that debate elsewhere ..:)

And that annulment was covered on NATIINAL NEWS,knit...it was,Nit private ...

If he is in heaven..God bless him...But he had done really bad stuff in his lifetime ..Nit the least of which was hurting His wife with the annulment ..But you are correct in that GOD will be the judge .

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#304844 Jul 14, 2013
cpeter1313 wrote:
How fortunate I am to merely be a promiscuous, gay atheist...I don't have any of those problems. What's WRONG with you heteros?
<quoted text>
Then I assume we will not find you in ANY church ..eh..

Since: Aug 09

Location hidden

#304845 Jul 14, 2013
ladida wrote:
<quoted text>You do not know anything about my church so stop posting about it, K? You have no right to post about someones annulment. You keep on harping not to judge yet you do. Tell me what is artificial about awoman's mucous? NFP is natural, therefore can be used. NFP has no barriors nor does it kill sperm or unborn babies. There is nothing wrong with avoiding sex during fertile periods where as using contraception , spermicides kill sperm, the pill kills an unborn child. All you are doing is bashing the church, so please stop bashing my church.
Good Morning "Knit!"

Happy Sunday! ;

Since: Feb 07

Location hidden

#304847 Jul 14, 2013
Christ have mercy on us wrote:
<quoted text>The priest is married to the Church so.... he can't be married.
And people think that gay marriage is strange.

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#304849 Jul 14, 2013
John-K wrote:
<quoted text>
Good Morning "Knit!"
Happy Sunday! ;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =fUspLVStPbkXX
Shame
Lol

That is horrid

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#304851 Jul 14, 2013
You need to stop using buzzwords you can't hope to understand.
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
You need to review subplate zone. Don't discount thalamus' involvement.
Keep up.
Thanks.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#304852 Jul 14, 2013
I tend to smolder...:)
Madam Kindle wrote:
<quoted text>
Then I assume we will not find you in ANY church ..eh..

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#304853 Jul 14, 2013
http://www.aish.com/ci/s/Zimmerman-Acquittal....

Good article

Hope there is no trouble incited by the media and the big mouths

Since: Aug 09

Location hidden

#304854 Jul 14, 2013
Madam Kindle wrote:
<quoted text>
Shame
Lol
That is horrid
Aye, Milady, "shameful--or, shameless," and "Horrid," are perfect descriptors of myself luv.

So...how many times have you watched it?

;P
Katie

Maple Valley, WA

#304855 Jul 14, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
You need to review subplate zone. Don't discount thalamus' involvement.
Keep up.
Thanks.
"The subplate is defined as a transient zone below the cortical plate and above the intermediate zone in the developing cortex (Bystron et al. 2008). It was first described in the human cortex (Kostovi&#263; & Molliver, 1974) and then in the fetal macaque (Rakic, 1977), carnivores (Luskin & Shatz, 1985) and rat (Rickmann et al. 1977). Marin-Padilla (1971) described the splitting of the earliest postmitotic cortical layer, the primordial plexiform zone, into the marginal zone and subplate in carnivores, a finding that was subsequently confirmed with birthdating studies by Luskin & Shatz (1985)."

<SNIP>

"Indeed, the subplate and cortical plate continue to generate spontaneous network activity dependent on the depolarizing action of GABA until shortly after birth in the human (Vanhatalo et al. 2005). The significance of this precocious development amongst a group of neurons deep in the subplate remains obscure at present. Further investigations of the gene expression, cell types and connectivity of the subcompartments within the large human subplate are required."
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2...

In layman's speak, this confirms what I claimed yesterday. The fetal brain, during development, does not process any internal/external messages and cannot send/receive messages regarding pain or feelings. IOW, the fetus is unaware of itself and surroundings. Is unknowing and unknown no matter how you try to romanticize fetal development or personify it by transferring your own experiences onto it. Your complete fetal focus to the exclusion of the woman pregnant with it is what's unrealistic.

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#304856 Jul 14, 2013
cpeter1313 wrote:
I tend to smolder...:)
<quoted text>
Well just so you know..God welcomes you ..

VLAD smoldering or not

Btw did you look up the Saberhagen books.

I love that VLAD But he is moral..But also

Really hard on those he thinks immoral..

Some if the best books I ever read ..But it was years ago.

I also read that book where the answer was,42 ..lol

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#304857 Jul 14, 2013
John-K wrote:
<quoted text>
Aye, Milady, "shameful--or, shameless," and "Horrid," are perfect descriptors of myself luv.
So...how many times have you watched it?
;P
Truth..I watched about half...did not like the kids be if in it ...But that's just me ..

Little kids singing about sperm is not to my taste.

I also hate see if them in any kind of protests ..just bugs me

Since: Aug 09

Location hidden

#304858 Jul 14, 2013
Madam Kindle wrote:
<quoted text>
Truth..I watched about half...did not like the kids be if in it ...But that's just me ..
Little kids singing about sperm is not to my taste.
I also hate see if them in any kind of protests ..just bugs me
Fair point, and understand completely, yet...it's Monty Python luv!!!
:)

To be honest, they frequently went out of their way to offend the established order usually with the intention of highlighting the established order's hypocrisy. Then again, if you think about it, so did Jesus...
No Relativism

Chicago, IL

#304859 Jul 14, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
"The subplate is defined as a transient zone below the cortical plate and above the intermediate zone in the developing cortex (Bystron et al. 2008). It was first described in the human cortex (Kostovi&#263; & Molliver, 1974) and then in the fetal macaque (Rakic, 1977), carnivores (Luskin & Shatz, 1985) and rat (Rickmann et al. 1977). Marin-Padilla (1971) described the splitting of the earliest postmitotic cortical layer, the primordial plexiform zone, into the marginal zone and subplate in carnivores, a finding that was subsequently confirmed with birthdating studies by Luskin & Shatz (1985)."
<SNIP>
"Indeed, the subplate and cortical plate continue to generate spontaneous network activity dependent on the depolarizing action of GABA until shortly after birth in the human (Vanhatalo et al. 2005). The significance of this precocious development amongst a group of neurons deep in the subplate remains obscure at present. Further investigations of the gene expression, cell types and connectivity of the subcompartments within the large human subplate are required."
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2...
In layman's speak, this confirms what I claimed yesterday. The fetal brain, during development, does not process any internal/external messages and cannot send/receive messages regarding pain or feelings. IOW, the fetus is unaware of itself and surroundings. Is unknowing and unknown no matter how you try to romanticize fetal development or personify it by transferring your own experiences onto it. Your complete fetal focus to the exclusion of the woman pregnant with it is what's unrealistic.
Katie V.: "In layman's speak, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2... confirms what I claimed yesterday."
_______

You are so layman that you don't realize it does not comfirm what you said yesterday.

Try again.

TIA.

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#304860 Jul 14, 2013
John-K wrote:
<quoted text>
Fair point, and understand completely, yet...it's Monty Python luv!!!
:)
To be honest, they frequently went out of their way to offend the established order usually with the intention of highlighting the established order's hypocrisy. Then again, if you think about it, so did Jesus...
Python was,never a,favorite ..But again that's,me.

And yes,Jesus was,very angry at the ESTABLISHED RELIGIOUS.

if you notice ..He did not give much notice to the Romans.
And that made some really ticked off as they expected Messiah to throw,of the Romans,

Mostly He did not like the Religious using the temple to cheat the little guy.

But if you believed as,I do that is understandable..They were desecrating God's GodS Tmple

“lightly burnt,but still smokin”

Since: Dec 06

in the corner of your mind,

#304861 Jul 14, 2013
"ladida"aka "knut" aka "oxygen thief"
Why is it your business? Why are you judging? It's not your place to judge, you know. Keep trying to work out your own problems. Don't worry about others.

BINGO! you should take your own advice.....
Katie

Maple Valley, WA

#304862 Jul 14, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Katie V.: "In layman's speak, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2... confirms what I claimed yesterday."
_______
You are so layman that you don't realize it does not comfirm what you said yesterday.
Try again.
TIA.
Then you didn't read the entire article. Probably too long for your short attention span.

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#304863 Jul 14, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
Then you didn't read the entire article. Probably too long for your short attention span.
Katie

I know you believe what you do

http://m.youtube.com/#/watch...

http://m.youtube.com/#/watch...

Here a 're just two from that page.

Can you honestly say as a human being ..not a religious person. Just a human

That you could watch babies like this violently killed.
Just because they were in a womb instead of our of it.

Tell me these babies do not react ...are not aware

They are at the same stAge if development that your side is fighting to be able to kill them legally

THIS HAS NOTHING to do with anyone wanting a theocracy. Or the SO CAKKED Religious Right or God even..

If you can look honestly at these, children and give an ok to a doctor to kill them in the violent manner...

Then I fear we will never agree..

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#304864 Jul 14, 2013
But...but....SUBPLATE!

NR will worry a word like a terrier will worry a bone.
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
"The subplate is defined as a transient zone below the cortical plate and above the intermediate zone in the developing cortex (Bystron et al. 2008). It was first described in the human cortex (Kostovi&#263; & Molliver, 1974) and then in the fetal macaque (Rakic, 1977), carnivores (Luskin & Shatz, 1985) and rat (Rickmann et al. 1977). Marin-Padilla (1971) described the splitting of the earliest postmitotic cortical layer, the primordial plexiform zone, into the marginal zone and subplate in carnivores, a finding that was subsequently confirmed with birthdating studies by Luskin & Shatz (1985)."
<SNIP>
"Indeed, the subplate and cortical plate continue to generate spontaneous network activity dependent on the depolarizing action of GABA until shortly after birth in the human (Vanhatalo et al. 2005). The significance of this precocious development amongst a group of neurons deep in the subplate remains obscure at present. Further investigations of the gene expression, cell types and connectivity of the subcompartments within the large human subplate are required."
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2...
In layman's speak, this confirms what I claimed yesterday. The fetal brain, during development, does not process any internal/external messages and cannot send/receive messages regarding pain or feelings. IOW, the fetus is unaware of itself and surroundings. Is unknowing and unknown no matter how you try to romanticize fetal development or personify it by transferring your own experiences onto it. Your complete fetal focus to the exclusion of the woman pregnant with it is what's unrealistic.
Katie

Maple Valley, WA

#304865 Jul 14, 2013
Madam Kindle wrote:
<quoted text>
Katie
I know you believe what you do
http://m.youtube.com/#/watch...
http://m.youtube.com/#/watch...
Here a 're just two from that page.
Can you honestly say as a human being ..not a religious person. Just a human
That you could watch babies like this violently killed.
Just because they were in a womb instead of our of it.
Tell me these babies do not react ...are not aware
They are at the same stAge if development that your side is fighting to be able to kill them legally
THIS HAS NOTHING to do with anyone wanting a theocracy. Or the SO CAKKED Religious Right or God even..
If you can look honestly at these, children and give an ok to a doctor to kill them in the violent manner...
Then I fear we will never agree..
We won't agree so long as your focus remains on the fetus to the exclusion of the woman gestating it.

Do you mind providing anything posted by me that would lead you to think I believe this issue is only about "kill[ing] them [embryo/fetuses] in the violent manner..." ????????

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

NCAA Basketball Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min sonicfilter 1,458,691
News UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) 11 hr Bruin For Life 32,599
News Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 16 hr New Age Spiritual... 258,040
legitimate loan lender (Oct '13) Mon Yin 17
News Western Michigan heads to Illinois as a favorite Dec 2 Go Blue Forever 57
What role do you think humans play in global wa... (Sep '14) Nov 28 Local Warming 10,372
Should child beauty pageants be banned? (Sep '14) Nov 22 Heatherfeather 780
More from around the web