Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 311898 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

Ocean56

AOL

#304308 Jul 10, 2013
sassy JM wrote:
<quoted text> Dontwant another child then dont conceive one but if you are pregnant, your child HAS been conceived, developing and growing by the time you even find out that your pregnant.
Terminate means END your childs life in an inhumane way. WTF are YOU to procreate and then kill your child because YOU don't want to mother your developing son or daughter.
To answer your last stupid question, any woman who chooses to terminate a pregnancy is a woman who DOESN'T want to be pregnant. Whether YOU support a woman's decision to terminate an unwanted pregnancy is irrelevant.

Motherhood: OPTIONAL, not required.
Ocean56

AOL

#304309 Jul 10, 2013
Madam Kindle wrote:
Hey Ocean
I do understand what SASSY says,about abstaining .
Sex outside marriage is a,sin ...way back from 10 commandment ..Mises time.
I know what sASSy is saying too, and I REJECT the whole concept of "sin." I think teen sex is a BAD IDEA, but for practical reasons only, NONE of which are faith-based.
Ocean56

AOL

#304310 Jul 10, 2013
Mike Rodriquez wrote:
THE BIGOTRY BEHIND ROE V WADE
Oh PLEASE. There's nothing bigoted about giving EACH woman the right to decide for HERSELF, as an individual, whether or not to continue a pregnancy.

Motherhood: OPTIONAL, not required.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#304311 Jul 10, 2013
Susanm wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually there was, but I'm not surprised that you ignored it.
No, there really wasn't.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#304312 Jul 10, 2013
Madam Kindle wrote:
<quoted text>
WHO IS THAT gentleman/lady whoever ??
I detest when people use fake names. ROTF
Whoever they are, they're insane. They've posted under three screen names that I know of, none registered.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#304313 Jul 10, 2013
LineDazzle wrote:
<quoted text>
I am working hard in order to destroy feminism(The organization), so I feel I have made a success by turning a women from butch feminine, and turning her away from the evils of feminism.
In your delusional fantasy world, that might work. In the real world...you're nothing but an insane, lowlife piece of sh*t.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#304314 Jul 10, 2013
LineDazzle wrote:
<quoted text>
Offer proof that I am a piece of shit.
You've already given that proof, with your every post, Piece of Sh*t.

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#304315 Jul 10, 2013
Republicans have shown they can’t help themselves from pursuing an ideological agenda, and they are further alienating independent and moderate voters,” Israel said.“They are pulling themselves down on this issue.”

GOP officials say they do not expect abortion to become a decisive factor in upcoming races. Republican candidates will focus instead on economic issues and on controversy surrounding President Obama’s Affordable Care Act, they said.

Meanwhile, as North Carolina tacks excessive anti-abortion amendments to an unrelated bill when no one was watching, and Ohio Republicans snuck the verbiage into a budget bill and ignored the requirement for public debate, and Texas changed the rules to allow their restrictive measures to pass, but only after first curtailing mandated public hearings — what none of these states are telling you is that less than 2% of all abortions happen after the twenty weeks the GOP are using as their Trojan horse to make abortions at anytime impossible. And the majority of these are those cases you hear about of exceptional circumstances, often threatening the lives of mothers.

If, as they claim, a 'majority' of United States citizens oppose abortion so strongly, why are the Republican-sponsored pieces of legislation being passed by such nefarious means? If they must bypass the checks and balances provided in the rules for passing legislation, often committing fraud to do so, they must be worried that a genuine attempt to pass this legislation in the proper way would be an utter failure.

There's a reason for that.

Christian Sharia Law is alive and well in this country.
feces for jesus

Brooklyn, NY

#304316 Jul 10, 2013
Susanm wrote:
<quoted text>
There is no "belief" involved. Fact: the fetus is human. Fact: the fetus is alive. Fact: the fetus is purposely killed during an abortion. Fact: if the woman doesn't want to be pregnant there are ways to prevent it. Fact: we can make laws that prohibit the killing of human lives. Fact: we have the right to fight to pass those laws.
Fact: consent to sex is not consent to carry and have a child.

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#304318 Jul 10, 2013
not a playa1965 wrote:
Republicans have shown they can’t help themselves from pursuing an ideological agenda, and they are further alienating independent and moderate voters,” Israel said.“They are pulling themselves down on this issue.”
GOP officials say they do not expect abortion to become a decisive factor in upcoming races. Republican candidates will focus instead on economic issues and on controversy surrounding President Obama’s Affordable Care Act, they said.
Meanwhile, as North Carolina tacks excessive anti-abortion amendments to an unrelated bill when no one was watching, and Ohio Republicans snuck the verbiage into a budget bill and ignored the requirement for public debate, and Texas changed the rules to allow their restrictive measures to pass, but only after first curtailing mandated public hearings — what none of these states are telling you is that less than 2% of all abortions happen after the twenty weeks the GOP are using as their Trojan horse to make abortions at anytime impossible. And the majority of these are those cases you hear about of exceptional circumstances, often threatening the lives of mothers.
If, as they claim, a 'majority' of United States citizens oppose abortion so strongly, why are the Republican-sponsored pieces of legislation being passed by such nefarious means? If they must bypass the checks and balances provided in the rules for passing legislation, often committing fraud to do so, they must be worried that a genuine attempt to pass this legislation in the proper way would be an utter failure.
There's a reason for that.
Christian Sharia Law is alive and well in this country.
There is a huge difference in restricting late term abortion..

AND SHARIA LAW..sorry plays that is the new talking point Buzz word.

Under SHARIA law you would be wearing a Burks.

If a woman has a life threatening problem. And is pregnant. Efforts are made to save both ..if the baby dies..as in ectopic pregnancy ..Or any other reason such as early delivery yo save the mother's,life.

For the purposes if these laws it is not abortion ..No matter the medical terms now used ..

A mother whose life is in danger would nit go to an abortion clinic ....well let's hope not.

This,Sharia study since 911 is meant to scare people.

And quite frankly obnoxious imo.

Dismemberment ..burning ..whatever is used to kill a late term child before removal so it's dead ...Is cruel...

And since no one here remembers back that far no one can say they do nit feel pain.

Now in an emergency if labor is induced.....And the baby cannot survive ..That I'd sad but abortion makes sure there is no chance if life ..

EITHER WAY THE SICK MOTHER IS NO LONGER PREGNANT .purposely killing the child in those circumstances..does NITHING to help the mother that induced delivery without killing the child would

So the life of the mother ..saving a life has really NITHING to do with going to a clinic for an ABORTION..

They are two different things ..one woukd still be lawful..saving the life of mom...the thrilling the baby on purpose would not.

It's another false argument meant to portray pro-life as mercenary to mom..

Please things have gotten to the point where arguments are made that it's ok to kill a breathing child who survives abortion..

These laws are trying to put an actual boundary on willful killing if the prebirn...And NOTHING TO DO WITH SHARUA LAW.

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#304319 Jul 10, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
Whoever they are, they're insane. They've posted under three screen names that I know of, none registered.
Trying to figure a point ...his fantasies are all over the place.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#304320 Jul 10, 2013
Madam Kindle wrote:
<quoted text>
Trying to figure a point ...his fantasies are all over the place.
I'm not sure there is a point. Other than to spew hate that is.
feces for jesus

Brooklyn, NY

#304321 Jul 10, 2013
Susanm wrote:
<quoted text> Maybe the soul does enter before birth.
Maybe people need to better understand where the word soul comes from and how it evolved into a confusing mishmash of ideas.

Maybe there is no god.

Maybe pigs can fly.

Maybe people keep their minds open about things that can OT be proven.
feces for jesus

Brooklyn, NY

#304322 Jul 10, 2013
Susanm wrote:
<quoted text>
Maybe you should get out your blow-up doll.
Score 1 for Susan!
No Relativism

Chicago, IL

#304323 Jul 10, 2013
feces for jesus wrote:
<quoted text>
Fact: consent to sex is not consent to carry and have a child.
You know what causes pregnancy, right?
feces for jesus

Brooklyn, NY

#304324 Jul 10, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
You know what causes pregnancy, right?
Of course I do, numbnuts.

Do you understand that consent to sex does not equal consent to carry and have a child? I'm guessing you're too wrapped up in your petty beliefs to concede something so simple.
No Relativism

Chicago, IL

#304325 Jul 10, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
What makes us US is often referred to as a soul.
Or our inner being.
Or the light in our eyes.
All of it comes from our brains.
jmo
Katie V.: "What makes us US is often referred to as a soul.
Or our inner being. Or the light in our eyes."
_____

You live in darkness. You are dead inside. You try to personify your spiritual death by seeking to KILL those innocent little human beings in the womb.

You suffer from a mental illness. You try to remain close to your deadly defects through killing most vulerable.

^^ Sociopath ^^

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#304326 Jul 10, 2013
Especially since it's a totally unnecessary procedure 99% of the time. If an adult male wants to do it, great; it should never be done to a child unless necessary. About 200 babies a year die from complications of circumcision.
Susanm wrote:
<quoted text>
And how sad is that when we KNOW that they feel the pain.

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#304327 Jul 10, 2013
Madam Kindle wrote:
<quoted text>
There is a huge difference in restricting late term abortion..
AND SHARIA LAW..sorry plays that is the new talking point Buzz word.
Under SHARIA law you would be wearing a Burks.
If a woman has a life threatening problem. And is pregnant. Efforts are made to save both ..if the baby dies..as in ectopic pregnancy ..Or any other reason such as early delivery yo save the mother's,life.
For the purposes if these laws it is not abortion ..No matter the medical terms now used ..
A mother whose life is in danger would nit go to an abortion clinic ....well let's hope not.
This,Sharia study since 911 is meant to scare people.
And quite frankly obnoxious imo.
Dismemberment ..burning ..whatever is used to kill a late term child before removal so it's dead ...Is cruel...
And since no one here remembers back that far no one can say they do nit feel pain.
Now in an emergency if labor is induced.....And the baby cannot survive ..That I'd sad but abortion makes sure there is no chance if life ..
EITHER WAY THE SICK MOTHER IS NO LONGER PREGNANT .purposely killing the child in those circumstances..does NITHING to help the mother that induced delivery without killing the child would
So the life of the mother ..saving a life has really NITHING to do with going to a clinic for an ABORTION..
They are two different things ..one woukd still be lawful..saving the life of mom...the thrilling the baby on purpose would not.
It's another false argument meant to portray pro-life as mercenary to mom..
Please things have gotten to the point where arguments are made that it's ok to kill a breathing child who survives abortion..
These laws are trying to put an actual boundary on willful killing if the prebirn...And NOTHING TO DO WITH SHARUA LAW.
So why the bee in your bonnet? Apparently, you felt that screaming at me would validate your wrath over my use of the phrase "Sharia Law."

I suspect your bonnet's resident bee, is there as a result of the truth of my statement, which you so nimbly sidestepped: This version of Sharia is promulgated by Christians, who desire their religious precepts (no sex before marriage, women submitting to their husbands, woman's place solely in the home, pregnancy as Eve's curse) to be codified into law. The violence against women advocated in Sharia, is simply more openly practiced in Iran than in America. Christians would happily return women to the subjugation of men, because that's what the Bible advocates. This is the main reason, if not the ONLY real reason, for removing the right to an abortion from the many rights recognized over the last hundred years. If it was about babies, there would be more support from you SCPL, for taking care of those babies once they make the magical trip through the birth canal....yet THOSE sorts of PRO-LIFE actions via the government you want to push into this decision, are universally decried by the SCPL as 'sponsoring laziness'.

And you know it.

And nothing you posted has anything to say about the primary point of my post: which is that corrupt practices are being used to put these laws into place.

Why not?

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#304328 Jul 10, 2013
And for thousands of years, babies have died, suffered massive infections, been scarred, and rendered sterile over it. It's a meaningless procedure; completely unnecessary 99% of the time. The foreskin isn't just a flap of skin; it produces lubrication and protection AND is replete with nerve endings.
Madam Kindle wrote:
<quoted text>
I am sure they at least use that spray freeze stuff or lidocaine gel.
They have done it for thousands of years.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

NCAA Basketball Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 1 hr Cheech the Conser... 1,432,844
News Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 1 hr Bob of Quantum-Faith 257,131
What role do you think humans play in global wa... (Sep '14) 2 hr Patriot 10,108
News UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) 4 hr Chosen Traveler 32,404
News Western Michigan heads to Illinois as a favorite Sep 18 Go Blue Forever 1
News Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex ma... (Aug '10) Sep 10 yess 201,881
News UCLA Basketball: Grad Transfer Octeus to Bruins (Jun '14) Aug 31 Trojan 2
More from around the web