Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 313195 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

No Relativism

Chicago, IL

#302287 Jun 27, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
YOU were the one claiming I made comments without links. Feel free to go first okay? <<<grin>>>
We'll wait....***cue Jeopardy music***
I posted links to our comments already.

Your turn. Please refrain from your Ariel Richards links dance. Provide links for your assertion.

TIA.

("[Ariel]had been beaten and had been held against her will. She was found Wednesday, and was returned to her home in Florida last night after time in an Atlanta hospital.".....and yet, not one solitary link to corroborate your trumped up, embellished, attention-seeking b.s. Not ONE.)
No Relativism

Chicago, IL

#302288 Jun 27, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
YOU were the one claiming I made comments without links. Feel free to go first okay? <<<grin>>>
We'll wait....***cue Jeopardy music***
As already pointed out (and everyone has witnessed), I provided links to your quotes.

It is your turn to provide links to your supposed quotes.

Please do us all a favor and don't lie, bob-and-weave, and make an ass out of yourself again. Okay, dear?
__________

Foo Flashback......

NR: "Foo, just let us know when you find an article about this fascinating Ariel Richards story! I'm sure it should be easy to find..........based on the details YOU shared."

"No Relevance you can, F*CKOFF or drop dead, I truly dont care. I dont have to show YOU shit No Relevance. You have NO meaning." - Honey Foo Foo
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/abortion/T833...
No Relativism

Chicago, IL

#302289 Jun 27, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
NR says, "If I do not see an adquate response from you, we will have a problem on our hands.
Am I clear?"
I say, what a little tyrant you think you are.
F off NR.
Katie V. posted: "I say, what a little tyrant you think you are.
F off NR."
_______

Oh noes.

Did you really just say "tyrant." Did you really just say that?
_______

"You are either stupid or insane to continue trying to make me or anyone else feel guilty for putting women first and foremost above undeveloped fetuses." - Katie V.

"LIFE STARTS when the circulatory system starts on its own and can support life WITHOUT AN UMBILICAL CORD...Until then that 'child's life' is nonexistent" - Katie V.

"Differentiating between fetus and baby, imo, is after delivery, after cord is cut, after the 1st breath" - Katie V.

"It definitely has no precedence over the woman's life. And I will not forsake women and their civil rights because you're in love with their fetuses." - Katie V.

"There is no "exact moment" as fetus changing to baby is a process begun during labor and continuing after delivery well into the first 24-48hrs after childbirth. The brain continues to adjust for life outside the womb, see." Katie V.

"You've deluded yourself into believing I hate all fetuses all the time." - Katie V.

"No, I don't think calling fetuses in general "a useless wad of cells" is belittling to anyone." - Katie V.

__________

How did Hitler refer to Jews? We know he didn't consider them human beings. He was a tyrant.
__________

"No, I don't think calling fetuses in general "a useless wad of cells" is belittling to anyone." - Katie V.
Katie

Maple Valley, WA

#302290 Jun 27, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Madam: "I do not like that word FOO used. And has not used lately...one she does not use it to me.."
_________
I don't address you about kidney stones. Yet, you reprimand me. You are a conflicted, two-faced mess.
_________
Here is another quote from your kind.....empathetic?.....not empathetic?.....Hmmmmm........ ..
"No, I don't think calling fetuses in general "a useless wad of cells" is belittling to anyone." - Katie
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/abortion/T833...
Put up the whole thing in context or none of it you dope. How is anyone going to know I am answering a question from one poster regarding another's opinion of a completely different poster? And all for the purposes of lame comparisons?

==========
No, I don't think calling fetuses in general "a useless wad of cells" is belittling to anyone. Especially when said woman has carried her own pregnancy and observed her daughter while pregnant. The fact that Chicky loves her grandchildren and announced there is another on the way shows she understands the difference between fact and fantasy. And until a healthy birth, any thoughts of baby is fantasy (excepting gender if known).

Read more at http://www.topix.com/forum/news/abortion/T833...

==========

Well, what can be expected from the same poster who claimed to be a physician here when he started? Then he claimed to be a student in med school. And now he only claims to be a little tyrant. Dream big, honey, dream big. In the meantime, women are still enjoying the civil rights of bodily autonomy and personal privacy.
No Relativism

Chicago, IL

#302291 Jun 27, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong No Relevance - it would be YOU that's full of shit.
<quoted text>
By all means, lets look at them - but IN context, shall we?
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/abortion/T833...
This quote, was me discussing the mother dying, and the ability of doctors to NOT LET HER DIE by allowing her an abortion she wants - such as the case in Ireland.
You dishonestly, as usual, pulled a few words from my post out of context. Lets read it IN context:
"Uh no. My plan says if the mother WANTS the abortion, then save the mothers life and to hell with the embryo or fetus.
If its GOING TO DIE, if that's a known and forgone conclusion? They yes,'rip him apart, crush his skull, squich his beating heart' if it saves the mother and she ASKS for the abortion - ABSOFUCKINGLUTELY!"
Note the words "IF IT SAVES THE MOTHER'S LIFE"
<quoted text>
What's your point Nor Relevance? Yes, the POINT of abortion is to remove the unwanted fetus. You act like there's some unknown meaning for "abortion" here and that EVERYONE doesn't know what it means.
<quoted text>
Again, lets look at the CONTEXT: Not YOU trying to compare the medical choice of abortion to the Holocaust in your usual moronic way:
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/abortion/T833...
"No actually I'm not. I'm intolerant of idiots like you that want to impose your religious rhetoric on others in your sad attempts to control women's medical choices.
I dont give two shits about those ZEFS, neither do you - only I'm honest enough to admit it. I care MORE about the living, breathing, "walking around women" (to paraphrase Judge Scalia) and THEIR right to make their own medical decisions than I am about the unwanted zygotes and embryo's that make up over 98% of abortions that are done."
<quoted text>
Gee, that sounds like a threat son.
LOL Threats from the impotent little boy. How amusing!
Madam's obsession is w/ "empathy," or lack there of. For example: Her selective designation of "unempathic" towards those w/ kidney stones. We already know how you've demonstrated repeated disrespect & lack of for the those human beings in utero via your quotes. "ABSOFUCKINGLUTELY!" we do.
_______

But, here are the links I've requested you to provide:

Foo: "some of your kind were saying to hell with the woman's life - let her die WITH The zef since that's that's G-d's will?"

http://www.topix.com/forum/news/abortion/T833...

Where's the link(s), dear? Are they in your "Ariel Richards" file? Hmmm?
________
Katie

Maple Valley, WA

#302292 Jun 27, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Katie V. posted: "I say, what a little tyrant you think you are.
F off NR."
_______
Oh noes.
Did you really just say "tyrant." Did you really just say that?
_______
"You are either stupid or insane to continue trying to make me or anyone else feel guilty for putting women first and foremost above undeveloped fetuses." - Katie V.
"LIFE STARTS when the circulatory system starts on its own and can support life WITHOUT AN UMBILICAL CORD...Until then that 'child's life' is nonexistent" - Katie V.
"Differentiating between fetus and baby, imo, is after delivery, after cord is cut, after the 1st breath" - Katie V.
"It definitely has no precedence over the woman's life. And I will not forsake women and their civil rights because you're in love with their fetuses." - Katie V.
"There is no "exact moment" as fetus changing to baby is a process begun during labor and continuing after delivery well into the first 24-48hrs after childbirth. The brain continues to adjust for life outside the womb, see." Katie V.
"You've deluded yourself into believing I hate all fetuses all the time." - Katie V.
"No, I don't think calling fetuses in general "a useless wad of cells" is belittling to anyone." - Katie V.
__________
How did Hitler refer to Jews? We know he didn't consider them human beings. He was a tyrant.
__________
"No, I don't think calling fetuses in general "a useless wad of cells" is belittling to anyone." - Katie V.
"Did you really just say "tyrant." Did you really just say that?"

Yes.
No Relativism

Chicago, IL

#302293 Jun 27, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong No Relevance - it would be YOU that's full of shit.
<quoted text>
By all means, lets look at them - but IN context, shall we?
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/abortion/T833...
This quote, was me discussing the mother dying, and the ability of doctors to NOT LET HER DIE by allowing her an abortion she wants - such as the case in Ireland.
You dishonestly, as usual, pulled a few words from my post out of context. Lets read it IN context:
"Uh no. My plan says if the mother WANTS the abortion, then save the mothers life and to hell with the embryo or fetus.
If its GOING TO DIE, if that's a known and forgone conclusion? They yes,'rip him apart, crush his skull, squich his beating heart' if it saves the mother and she ASKS for the abortion - ABSOFUCKINGLUTELY!"
Note the words "IF IT SAVES THE MOTHER'S LIFE"
<quoted text>
What's your point Nor Relevance? Yes, the POINT of abortion is to remove the unwanted fetus. You act like there's some unknown meaning for "abortion" here and that EVERYONE doesn't know what it means.
<quoted text>
Again, lets look at the CONTEXT: Not YOU trying to compare the medical choice of abortion to the Holocaust in your usual moronic way:
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/abortion/T833...
"No actually I'm not. I'm intolerant of idiots like you that want to impose your religious rhetoric on others in your sad attempts to control women's medical choices.
I dont give two shits about those ZEFS, neither do you - only I'm honest enough to admit it. I care MORE about the living, breathing, "walking around women" (to paraphrase Judge Scalia) and THEIR right to make their own medical decisions than I am about the unwanted zygotes and embryo's that make up over 98% of abortions that are done."
<quoted text>
Gee, that sounds like a threat son.
LOL Threats from the impotent little boy. How amusing!
Regarding my quote "Preborn baby is clearly affected by abortion...to death," Foo responded above:

"What's your point Nor Relevance? Yes, the POINT of abortion is to remove the unwanted fetus."
__________

Now, let's take a look at what Foo actually said in response to my quote when originally posted:

"Yes dear, that IS the point of abortion. Did you think ANYONE, including EVERY WOMAN THAT HAS ONE does NOT realise this?
Thank you for repeating it obsessively. Just in case ANYONE was unsure, lets make it even MORE clear, shall we?"
__________

Conclusion: Foo realizes she has no respect, empathy, or concern for those little human beings in the womb. She realizes her OWN WORDS prove how "unempathetic" she is towards innocents. She sees for herself - in her own posts - just now outright hateful & dishonorable she is towards preborn babies.

So....in true Foo fashion, she tries to subtly change it. In full view of posters - prolife & proabort.

You see, Foo clumnsily tried to "tone down" her pro-death rhetoric. From 'Death is the point of abortion' to 'Removing the fetus is the point of abortion.' Her actions imply her awareness of how true my accusations are.

Boy, Foo validates proves my points for me. Every time. Like the damn fool she is.

Next..........
No Relativism

Chicago, IL

#302294 Jun 27, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
Put up the whole thing in context or none of it you dope. How is anyone going to know I am answering a question from one poster regarding another's opinion of a completely different poster? And all for the purposes of lame comparisons?
==========
No, I don't think calling fetuses in general "a useless wad of cells" is belittling to anyone. Especially when said woman has carried her own pregnancy and observed her daughter while pregnant. The fact that Chicky loves her grandchildren and announced there is another on the way shows she understands the difference between fact and fantasy. And until a healthy birth, any thoughts of baby is fantasy (excepting gender if known).
Read more at http://www.topix.com/forum/news/abortion/T833...
==========
Well, what can be expected from the same poster who claimed to be a physician here when he started? Then he claimed to be a student in med school. And now he only claims to be a little tyrant. Dream big, honey, dream big. In the meantime, women are still enjoying the civil rights of bodily autonomy and personal privacy.
Katie V. posted: "women are still enjoying the civil rights of bodily autonomy"

Not baby women. You are killing them.

^^^ "Feminist" supports execting baby females. Fake Feminist.^^^
__________

KatieV: "women are still enjoying the civil rights of privacy"

Your right to "privacy" ends where another's body begins.
No Relativism

Chicago, IL

#302295 Jun 27, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, I know NR and his gang do not reflect real Christian behavior. That's why I refer to them as Xtians. Those are the ones who talk the hypocritical talk without actually walking the walk of Christianity. It's the same with the Religious Right group, imo.
(have to agree with NAP, blue looks better on you)
I dunno, Jesus whipped money-changers out of the synagogue. I'm doing fine. Thanks for stopping by, tho.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#302297 Jun 27, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
You live in Indiana.
Oh noes!
Yer gonna have to move, fatass.
Oh go waggle your weenie somewhere else Oh Impotent Freak of No Relevance. Nobody's that matters, cares about your bitter, lonley, loser ass.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#302298 Jun 27, 2013
pencil wrote:
<quoted text>
Well put!!!
These pagans. And pagan lovers will not ever get it!
Oh lookie, Tommy figured out how to change his ISP! LOL
Katie

Maple Valley, WA

#302299 Jun 27, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
I dunno, Jesus whipped money-changers out of the synagogue. I'm doing fine. Thanks for stopping by, tho.
You are not Jesus. You're just a little tyrant wanting to control that which is not yours to control. You don't even bother to pretend to behave in Christian manner. You are nothing but a hypocritical Xtian. A fake. A phony on a soapbox thinking he's got some control over what's not his to control.

If you hate women have civil rights and the ZEF doesn't, move to one of those Catholic countries that let women die for fear of offending the laws written by man who claim to base it on God's laws which are just interpretations by man.

What a conundrum you've created for yourselves. Still, you're trying to force me and others to live the way you choose to live. But we have civil rights to protect us from little tyrants like you. And we have the Constitution continuing to protect us.

Happy early Fourth of July!!

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#302300 Jun 27, 2013
pencil wrote:
<quoted text>
You know nothing of being born again since you know nothing about the one true faith.
I pray god helps you with your ignorance.
LOLOLOL TOO Funny!! Well at least you're an equal opportunity azzhole. LOL One HAS to laugh at fools like you that attack even those on your OWN "side" of a given issue.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#302301 Jun 27, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
NR says, "If I do not see an adquate response from you, we will have a problem on our hands.
Am I clear?"
I say, what a little tyrant you think you are.
F off NR.
ROFLMAO Isn't he a funny little thing?? As if ANYONE is threatened by his impotent ass?

I wonder if he really thinks he's impressing anyone by threatening Rose or anyone else? LOL!!!
feces for jesus

Brooklyn, NY

#302302 Jun 27, 2013
persnickety wrote:
<quoted text>Satan exists honeypie, and you will find that out on your own. You don't scare me, you never did. You are of the devil and you reek of evil. Yep, I bet you have molested many young women, that's what happens in your rituals according to ex wiccans. You have an unhealthy life and lifestyle.
Why do you always post about molestation? Is it because you support the catholic church who is well known for their sexual perversions, child molestation and abuse of power? Monkey see, monkey do, you damn dirty ape.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#302303 Jun 27, 2013
Madam Kindle wrote:
<quoted text>
I am sure someone is taking lessons from other tyrants of illiterate who think they are better than us peons.
Katie ..people like this do nit reflect the vast majority of Christians ..just so you know..And nit even sure this one knows who GOD is.
And now I'm off to better things.
Will return this forum to MADAME.
WHO SAYS
Day long in my day we called people like this squeaks.
pfft
That's the difference between your generation and mine. <<wink>> We just call fools like him meaningless azzholes.

There's even a medical term for idiots like that - "Napoleon complex" or "little man syndrome".

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#302304 Jun 27, 2013
persnickety wrote:
<quoted text>Well... what about you ? You post about sunshine and fluff when Foo degraded Christ. YOU have a problem.
I"m not degrading Christ at all Knutbar, I'm degrading you and that thing you claim to call a g-d - its NOT Jesus.

Jesus HIMSELF would spit on you, you phony.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#302305 Jun 27, 2013
persnickety wrote:
<quoted text>I am not afraid of the future
Obviously you are.,
I believe in Christ and He watches over me and is with me always.
If you did, you wouldn't have a need to bastardize him or use him as a weapon.

Its very clear you have little or no "Faith".

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#302306 Jun 27, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
.
You can't make this shit up.^^^
Yet you do. Its not like anyone actually takes your stupid ass serioussly, but its fun to watch your increasingly pathetic attempts! LOL!
feces for jesus

Brooklyn, NY

#302307 Jun 27, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Gay agenda FORCING society to accept their lifestyle will backfire. Push-back is hell. Ya'll over did it.
You had to first UNdefine marriage in blablahblahstupidBS........
Tsk...tsk.....over 90% of you gays support killing babies in the womb.
Tolerance my ass.
Hey look, the shining beacon of stupidity is back!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

NCAA Basketball Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 1 min TeaRumpster 1,479,376
What role do you think humans play in global wa... (Sep '14) 23 min Rudolpho Laspari 10,675
News UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) 3 hr Trojan 32,714
News Western Michigan heads to Illinois as a favorite 10 hr Go Blue Forever 75
legitimate loan lender (Oct '13) 12 hr louis 19
News Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex ma... (Aug '10) Jan 15 RiccardoFire 201,892
News Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) Jan 15 Rosa_Winkel 258,461
More from around the web