Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 311489 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#302138 Jun 25, 2013
persnickety wrote:
<quoted text>Hey, look what I found Dan Wilmington, DE Reply »| Report Abuse | Judge it!|#451404 Thursday Jun 13 Judged:[Interesting] 2 [Brilliant] 1 [Agree] 1 rosesz wrote: Again I said they made copies and passed them along..they did not give out handouts at service. Under your assumptions ..there was,only one of each letter that magically turned up in Rome so the Church h could then add it to the official bible. Insisting on this gives those like Dear June her idea that the early scribes made up the book fro. Your tradition. Was the Church that sure of itself .it you that one document survived all the persecution..They would have assured that the WORD SURVIVED makes no sense .your way.unless you are saying the WORD can be anything less than it is And the all knowing CC is the source of all knowledge But if you like we can agree that we totally disagree. You insisting that copies were made and passed along (which means handed out) doesn't make it so. There's no evidence that there was any sort of mass copying and dissemination of these works. Insisting that things happened that didn't happen isn't disagreement-it's you making stuff up. Oral tradition carried God's word in the main for centuries. Bible scholars agree on this-you seem to want to rewrite history, for some reason, but you're on an island here. The Church DID preserve scripture. Even Martin Luther wouldn't attempt to deny that. What's your deal with this? Do you believe that oral teaching is invalid?
Read more at http://www.topix.com/forum/religion/catholic/...
And the folks on this forum care about a post on another forum. WHY..

You and Rose are from different churches..So what??

Well Madame tried knit. To tell you about looking foolish and bringing Church argument here...

Pfftttt. And Phooeyyy

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#302139 Jun 25, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
But I'm not. The church has changed quite a bit since it's inception, you brainwashed tool.
Hey Bitner can you see me in red yet.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#302140 Jun 25, 2013
I already disproved your little sanger/hitler lie. The vatican even admitted it cooperated with the nazi's.
persnickety wrote:
<quoted text>actually, your kind were friends with the nazis. YOUR KIND even photoshopped pictures to bear false witness . So why don't you go and find out how Margie Sanger thought Hitler was the cats pijamas.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#302142 Jun 25, 2013
There was no catholic church until centuries after your christ supposedly lived, after decades of religious rivalries being played out. The RCC--like every church--was created by men.

But keep going; the more hateful and self-righteous believers like you are, the more people are driven away and come to realize the worthlessness of your faith.
persnickety wrote:
<quoted text>You have been told you are wrong by othwer posters on this issue, you don't understand what the Pope said at all. And the Church was started by Christ, you can't change that. Who is renouncing Catholicism? YOU ARE, you are not only doing that , but you are blaspheming Christ. Why the heck would I renounce what I believe in? YOU are nuts.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#302143 Jun 25, 2013
So she judges others, but not the way you want?

You need to step back (off a cliff) before posting.
persnickety wrote:
<quoted text>YOU judge others a whole lot. YOU will not tell foo that blaspheming Christ is wrong, I think you need to step back and think before posting.

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#302145 Jun 25, 2013
persnickety wrote:
<quoted text>The Diocese of Mainz, where Luther was, offered indulgences (the easing of punishment after the guilt of sin is taken away through Confession) for people who donated money for the Vatican. Almsgiving is recommended by the bible in many places (Tobit 12:9, Sirach 3:30, Luke 12:33, Acts 10:4) for the atonement of sin. There is nothing wrong with almsgiving. The appearance of impropriety, however, where Luther saw all of this as the "selling of indulgences", is what precipitated his reformation. This perceived abuse was only in the diocese of Mainz, however, and was not widespread.
All one has to do today to see the same kind of abuse is to listen to protestant TV preachers asking for a "faith offering, if this show has been a blessing to you", in other words, "give me money for the blessing I have just given you through my preaching". And besides that, they tell their viewers that if they do give a sacrificial offering to them, then that is a seed that will help them become wealthy in this life, something that is NOT in the New Testament, anywhere. Real Christians know that the New Testament preaches against riches (James 1:11, James 5:1, Revelation 3:17), and only promises rewards in the next life (James 2:5, Luke 18:22).
AGAINST RICHES. YOU MUST be kidding ..Lol.

http://www.bing.com/images/search...

http://news.nationalpost.com/2013/03/08/wealt...

Shall I keep going

Do some Protestant churches collect more money than they may need to evangelize ..than their cost to spread the word on the internet and tv..possibly some do. Especially the megachurch ..possibly

My own church had to combine with a home church in order not to lose our modest building and fix ling overdue repairs.



But they are as a drop in the bucket compared to the CC.

WHOSE great wealth COULD be used to keep poorer parishes open.

Whose dioceses had to pay out money and then sell off real estate.

These poor people who had local churches whose language was in common ..now where absorbed into churches in different areas. With people they have no common roots with here k the Miami area

All over the country people have been losing their home churches with real estate sales going to the Diceses..while the Vatican of the One True Church sits on millions

And you dare to say anything about riches!!!

http://www.bing.com/search...

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#302146 Jun 25, 2013
cpeter1313 wrote:
So she judges others, but not the way you want?
You need to step back (off a cliff) before posting.
<quoted text>
Madame tried to tell her to keep this inter religious discussion off thus thread ..it belongs in the proper venue..

Any how dies Madame look red to you. I changed my pic

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#302147 Jun 25, 2013
Madam Kindle wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey Bitner can you see me in red yet.
Not yet. Sometimes it takes a while for pics to show up :)

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#302148 Jun 25, 2013
I didn't sleep through anything; I just didn't let the cult take over my mind.
persnickety wrote:
<quoted text>I will keep going. You must have slept through your history classes or your brain cells have long been dead.
Gtown71

United States

#302149 Jun 25, 2013
cpeter1313 wrote:
There was no catholic church until centuries after your christ supposedly lived, after decades of religious rivalries being played out. The RCC--like every church--was created by men.
But keep going; the more hateful and self-righteous believers like you are, the more people are driven away and come to realize the worthlessness of your faith.
<quoted text>
True, it started about 130 years after.. yes Catholic church was in bed with hitler, they even was "privately " in with the start of muslim faith, trying to help themselves, but it backfired on them, so they say no proof. They were not there :)
Kinda like the hitler thingy.

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#302150 Jun 25, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
Not yet. Sometimes it takes a while for pics to show up :)
Yes I found that out when I had my blue feathers..a girl can't get boring ya know.

Must change her wardrobe ..keep the mystery I say...

And I ammmm absolutely lovely in Red..

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#302152 Jun 25, 2013
Southern Reaper wrote:
The red looks glorious on you, Madame.
Ahh thank you my dear Reaper.

How goes things by you?

SO Glad my arraignment meets with your approval.

Blue is my absolute fave..But red is a close second.:)

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#302153 Jun 25, 2013
Still liking the blue better Madame....but that's just me.

G'night...

:)

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#302154 Jun 25, 2013
not a playa1965 wrote:
Still liking the blue better Madame....but that's just me.
G'night...
:)
Oh don't worry dear..my blue feathers will be back..just felt like a change

Gnite

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#302155 Jun 25, 2013
Gnite all

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#302156 Jun 25, 2013
Madame has a new app

Think it's for foreground devices.

It's cal me Akinator.

you think of a person real or fictional. It's,asks you questions ..amazing the amount of times it guesses correctly.
I have only defeated it 5 times!!!
pencil

Arlington, TX

#302157 Jun 26, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text> Obviously you do, since you keep arguing with me about MY faith's beliefs and facts ABOUT the Jewish faith.
<quoted text>
YOU believe your jebus and some ghost is ALSO g-d. Your jebus had NOTHING do to with that.
<quoted text>
Proof that G-d makes mistakes when it comes to some of you.o
<quoted text>
ROFLMAOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!
Bullshit. You think YOUR version of g-d is for everyone. Those of the Jewish faith NEVER said OR believed that He was ONLY for Jews.
G-d has ALWAYS been for everyone, and there's never been a need for what those of the Jewish faith know is a false messiah.
Christians effectively made a g-d OUT of christ, because they didn't like the structure or rules OF the Jewish faith.
<quoted text>
Here we go AGAIN, you trying to rewrite history and tell ME about MY faith when you clearly dont know shit.
People that follow Christ have turned away from the Jewish faith, both back then AND now - that's a FACT.
Yes Stupid Inkstain, they certainly DID turn ONE HUNDRED PERCENT away from Judaism. Jews that followed what those of the Jewish faith knew to be a FALSE MESSIAH were no longer of the Jewish faith. They turned away from Judaism and EVERYTHING it stands for, same as messianics do today.
Messianics who call themselves Jews are fooling no-one other than themselves, they are NOT of the Jewish faith, they are CHRISITANS who have turned FROM the Jewish faith.
<quoted text>
ROFLMAO There was NEVER any controversy about "how to include gentiles". Gentiles are NOT OF THE JEWISH FAITH you ass.
That's what "gentile" MEANS you idiot.
<quoted text>
Not by actual people of the JEWISH FAITH they weren't.
<quoted text>
LOLOLOLOL!! COMPLETE bullshit. If they accepted christ, or ANYONE that was a false messiah, they were NOT living the Torah.
<quoted text> After the word was invented, sure.
They were NEVER considered of the Jewish faith once they started believing in a false messiah however.
BTW, you DO know that more ROMANS than Jews followed christ right?
<quoted text>
LOL Typical Inkstain revisionist stupidity 101 is more like it.
Sorry Inkstain, you dont get to lie about the Jewish faith to tell your tales.
Sorry mam, but you can't. Have your cake and eat it to. You can't. Claim to love god and live in sin.
It really doesn't. Matter what you think, only what god says! Many former jews have learned the truth. You love sin more than god. It shows in all your post.atleast the other gays o. Here dont claim to know god. You seem to be the worst. You want your sin yet claim some sort of godlness just in case.
It won't. Work
Death is certain, hell is hot, you still have a choice.
All these horrid post of yours will not help you.
Ocean56

AOL

#302158 Jun 26, 2013
Too many girls/women are PRESSURED into having children by family members and/or religious community, and purposely aren't told just how very HARD motherhood is until AFTER they have had a baby. I think it is high time that changed. Some of the hardships mothers of all ages will face once a baby arrives include -- but are not limited to -- the following:

HARDSHIP #1: LOSS OF FREEDOM - Having a baby really does change everything, including the freedom that girls and women used to have in abundance. Once the baby arrives, that freedom will be gone, for at least the next five or six years and possibly longer. Teen girls and young women who become moms can forget about going out with friends, whether to the movies, to hang out at their favorite restaurant or coffee shop, or anywhere else for that matter. If they do go out, they’ll have to take the baby with them if their parents refuse to babysit. If the baby is sick or very cranky for any number of reasons, girls will end up staying home instead of going out. Girls who are still in middle or high school will find it much harder to do their homework assignments or study for exams when they have to care for a baby as well. It will be a very long time before women/girls get any of their former freedom back.

HARDSHIP #2: LOSS OF SLEEP - The first thing girls and women have to know about motherhood is that newborn babies do NOT sleep eight hours a night. All mothers, myself included, can honestly say that babies can – and do – wake up during the night as many as two or three times. Each time the baby wakes up, mom has to get up with the baby, feed the baby, change the baby’s diaper (which could be a messy one), and then get the baby back to sleep. When my son was a newborn baby, there were nights where I got NO sleep whatsoever. Luckily for me, I had completed high school and post-high school education long before that, so I didn’t have to get up at 5:00am to go to school after having almost no sleep. Those who are teen moms will not be so lucky.
Ocean56

AOL

#302159 Jun 26, 2013
HARDSHIP #3: LOSS OF MONEY - Whatever money a girl/woman used to spend on herself will have to be spent on the baby, and that cost is far more than most girls could begin to anticipate. These costs include diapers, food, clothing, baby equipment (car seat, crib, stroller, baby carriers, baby and child toys, etc.) and so much more. Anyone who wants to do the math can begin their research now, by going to their local grocery store and checking out the baby food and diaper sections. Just make sure you have a notebook and calculator, because you will need to multiply those costs for each item several times per week. That’s just for food and diapers, you haven’t even started on the costs for clothing, baby equipment and toys. That will add a staggering amount to your calculations, and the sum will be far higher than you could imagine. If you plan to put the baby in day care for any amount of time during the week, you will have to add up those costs too. Get the picture now? Having a baby costs a HUGE amount of money, which many girls and young women simply do not have, unless they have wealthy parents.

HARDSHIP #4: LOSS OF EDUCATION AND JOB/CAREER OPPORTUNITIES – As hard as it is to acknowledge, a working mother of any age cannot have the same kind of freedom, flexibility or mobility as a woman without children has. If a girl cannot complete high school due to the demands of motherhood, she will not be able to go to college or vocational school, as both typically require a high school diploma — or a GED if she had to drop out of high school — first. That automatically limits her ability to find good employment, and she may well have to settle for a minimum wage job, which pays far less than what is needed to raise a child comfortably. Girls and women who complete high school may find that many jobs require a college degree or vocational school certificate, and without those, she may still not be able to get a job that pays a decent salary. A high school diploma alone is no guarantee of good employment, but all girls need one if they hope to advance to higher levels of education that their chosen job or career requires.

HARDSHIP #5: LOSS OF MOBILITY – Those who don’t have children have a rather naïve idea that parents can just as easily take a baby with them whenever they go out. They are half right. Yes, parents can take a baby out with them, but it is far from easy. Even going to the grocery store with a baby can be a huge hassle. First they have to get the baby dressed, which can be difficult when the little one is happy being home and doesn’t want to be dressed to go out. After getting baby dressed, which can take much longer than mom expected, mom then has to put baby into the car seat, get baby out of the car seat when she arrives at the store, then carry baby around until she can find a cart with an infant carrier. Most grocery stores have very few of those, as I personally discovered long ago. Some may not have any. Going to a restaurant with a baby can also be very stressful, especially if baby suddenly begins crying or screaming for unknown reasons. Mothers who walk into restaurants with screaming or crying babies will find themselves the object of hostile stares, which usually last until they finally have to leave.
pencil

Arlington, TX

#302160 Jun 26, 2013
Madam Kindle wrote:
<quoted text>
Well well ..methinks someone has been lurking. Lol
Madame a gain says,PFFFFT PHOOEY.. YOUR WRONG LOL
How about you pick a side? Stop trying to please all.

You can't. Walk with darkness and light.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

NCAA Basketball Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min The Donald_ 1,403,957
News Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 2 hr Thinking 255,965
What role do you think humans play in global wa... (Sep '14) 6 hr litesong 9,989
News Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex ma... (Aug '10) 11 hr NotInPotatoQuality 201,878
News UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) Jul 23 Trojan 32,307
legitimate loan lender (Oct '13) Jul 21 Ceren 7
What Ever Happen To Niagara Basketball (May '15) Jul 17 Disappointed PE 3
More from around the web