Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 312661 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

Katie

Maple Valley, WA

#301139 Jun 18, 2013
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text>Katie,YOU are being quoted(links and all). Why are you using your bigotry by bringing up his faith to cover it up?.
OWN what you say for once. What is with you people playing games with your own words?
Are you crazy? You can't even use the word BIGOT correctly.

Just what was I covering up? What was I being intolerant about? His crappy Xtian behavior? It is anything but Christ-like.

You wanna turn? Keep calling me a bigot.
sasylicious

Jackson, NJ

#301141 Jun 18, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Says who? Funny, in the REAL world, including the world on this forum, the discussion certainly HAS been about education and how to PREVENT abortion you dumbass.
<quoted text>
Since unwanted pregnancies still happen, and happen BECAUSE women dont know now the PROPER ways to prevent it, YES you fucking idiot, I DO think we NEED to discuss it.
What does it being 2013 have to do with it?
Do you think babies are born with the knowledge?
Osmosis maybe?
You say this stupid shit all the time Skankdawg.
If people are not educated PROPERLY, what does 2013 have to do with it?
I"ve asked you these questions before and you ignore them as if the issues dont exist.
Ignorant parents who dont know can't teach the children, and idiots like you want to PREVENT proper education in the schools.
<quoted text>
Oh stop acting like such a santimonious ass already. Not every woman KNOWS when they're fertile, many dont even know what that means you fool.
Women with irregular periods can't always tell.
Sperm can live up to FOURTEEN DAYS in a woman, so a woman not having sex during their "fertile" time, can STILL get pregnant.
Again, ITS NOT A ONE SIZE FITS ALL ISSUE you STUPID Skanky jackass.
<quoted text>
Really? I "cant"? Says who?
You're fond of making a fool of yourself aren't you?@@
My kids can educate you if you want. We are against premarital sex,artificial birth control and YET,we are educated. IMAGINE that?

""""" """Ignorant parents who dont know can't teach the children, and idiots like you want to PREVENT proper education in the schools""" """"" """

WHAT? A grown ass woman who goes to a Dr,get prescriped birth control pills doesn't know how to use it?

lol

What the heck is "NOT EDUCATED PROPERLY" mean? My kids can teach them.

You think that talking about preventing pregnancy on a message board is preventing disrespect for human life? Really? ALL the birth control in the world will NEVER prevent selfish people who don't give a damn about others. Killing your own flesh and blood (which YOU helped create by your act)has NOTHING to do with birth control education.

""""" "Oh stop acting like such a santimonious ass already. Not every woman KNOWS when they're fertile, many dont even know what that means you fool"""" ""

LOL many don't know what that means? WHAT?????? ADULTS HAVING SEX DON'T KNOW WHAT FERTILE MEANS?

You would be funny if you weren't so pathetically ignorant. IF a woman doesn't know what fertile means,then she shouldn't be having sex.
sasylicious

Jackson, NJ

#301142 Jun 18, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you crazy? You can't even use the word BIGOT correctly.
Just what was I covering up? What was I being intolerant about? His crappy Xtian behavior? It is anything but Christ-like.
You wanna turn? Keep calling me a bigot.
What does someone posting what YOU said(links to prove it)have to do with being a "Xtain" or not OR their behavior?

You are using your bigotry to cover up YOUR words that bury you.

No worries Katie,you're not the only one that does that. Your friend foo does it daily.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#301143 Jun 18, 2013
Teaching REAL sex ed, with practical knowledge of contraception and fertility, will give kids a working knowledge of how their bodies work and how to avoid pregnancy and disease.

There will always be abortions, both therapeutic and elective.

BTW--lesbians aren't sterile, many in fact DO "produce" children.
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text> Oh please! We are discussing ABORTION here not "let's educate each other here as to how to prevent it". Go educate yourself and the other MILLION other women who kill their unborn and then there will BE no abortions.
2013 and you think that we NEED to discuss how to prevent pregnancy? Holy CRAP,you people are so pro-contraception (with MULTIPLE options to prevent pregnancy)yet you still can't prevent pregnancy.
Gee,maybe sex leads to pregnancy when your fertile...so if you don't want to get pregnant,don't have sex at that time. Have it every other freakin day if your that horny. I think that you WILL survive @@
*sigh* I am talking to a lesbian who can't produce a child. Why am I wasting my time?
sasylicious

Jackson, NJ

#301144 Jun 18, 2013
R C Honey wrote:
She's pro-CHOICE in supporting whatever the pregnant woman wants to do..... k? OKAY?
EXACTLY. Thank you. Foo DENIES that.

Oh,so does Bitner.

Why can't they just be honest?
Katie

Maple Valley, WA

#301145 Jun 18, 2013
RoSesz wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes I am stubborn..you bet.
Sorry but really the right is NOT making this up. If the right wanted to favor the right via the I R S..it would have done it..But it's only before this LAST election.
I do not want the I R S favoring anyone.
And your right...the 2Sides did used to work together.
The thing is we have much more big government now..and that is not good.
The big rant on Bush was the deficit..it has been hugely multiplied in the last few years.
And the worst is they DPRND so much time getting elected and making the other side look bad ..there is no cooperation at all.
You are afraid of the Religious right.. I am afraid of the socialists.
They are much more dangerous imo..And neither of us like people behind the scenes..But going after these people we don't like should not be the purview of the Fed..unless they break the law.
Now see I was young bug I liked Kennedy..He lowered taxes..both ghosts by in more money and stood up strong against the Commies..No wonder he got killed..congress used to work for us..now it's agsinst each other
When either party has too much power it's not good.
They kicked out Nixon for using His office and the gov for hit lists.
That was a good thing.
We should get rid of any one abusing power.
And yes this really gets to me..
As thinking abortion coukd be outlawed gets to you.
Trust me the latter won't happen..it's too ingrained and political.
So we each from opposite sides see danger ..my fears are already a reality.
Rose, a lot of my older posts discuss my dislike of socialism. My dislike of the Affordable Health Care Act. My dislike of blurring the separation between church and state. Most of all my posts are about disliking losing civil rights to personal privacy and bodily autonomy. This is what will be lost if Roe v Wade is overturned and sent back to the states. There will no more federal umbrella for my personal medical decisions that do not need a 3rd party's uninvited involvement at all.

We are not on opposite sides. That's what I've been telling you. But if you wish to believe it, then so be it. You can be fetus focused and I will be woman focused.

Now we are on opposite sides.
sasylicious

Jackson, NJ

#301146 Jun 18, 2013
R C Honey wrote:
<quoted text>Ummm Sasylicious,, it really doesn't take a Rocket Scientist to know what she thinks.
She supports CHOICE, which IS what the woman who's pregnant wants to do. If a woman is pregnant and decides to keep the pregnancy, and that is her choice to do so, Foofoo would support her CHOICE. If a woman is pregnant and decides not to keep the pregnancy, and she terminates the pregnancy, foofoo would support her CHOICE to do so. She supports women having the choice in either event.
My God, it's like you're accusing her of standing outside a Lamaze class holding up signs that read - Abort before it's too late!
"""IF she terminates the pregnancy, foofoo would support her CHOICE to do so."""" """

Oh Rachel,thank you for telling it like it is. Of COURSE it doesn't take a rocket scientist to know what she thinks. EXACTLY what you wrote is what she believes but is TOO COWARDLY to admit. THAT is what this is about.

THAT is what I've been saying the whole time and she is denying.

LOL

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#301147 Jun 18, 2013
So a woman who can't support herself should have a kid she ALSO can't support? Good thinking.
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text> Birth control is NOT a new concept Katie. It's been around for YEARS. MANY MANY MANY women and men use it daily.
50 million abortions later....
THOUSANDS of STD's....single parenting......
Doesn't appear like your "middle ground" for preventing killing as choice,works.
BTW...I most certainly do respect women. I am one. I actually HELP women. YOU don't. You just want them to kill as choice. How about you put your money where your mouth is. Help a desperate woman who feels that she has no CHOICE but to abort due to her circumstances(being alone,dumped by bf/husband,needing financial help,a loving shoulder to cry on,etc..). How about you steer a post-abortive woman who is suffering from her "choice" to abort years later?
pfft...NOT YOUR problem,right miss "I care about women" and you don't.
Katie

Maple Valley, WA

#301148 Jun 18, 2013
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text> EXACTLY. Thank you. Foo DENIES that.
Oh,so does Bitner.
Why can't they just be honest?
Now what are you babbling about?

That's what we've been telling you. How moronic can you be? Pro Choice means supporting the woman making her own choice. It doesn't mean supporting the choice, it means supporting that she makes her own choice.
sasylicious

Jackson, NJ

#301149 Jun 18, 2013
cpeter1313 wrote:
Teaching REAL sex ed, with practical knowledge of contraception and fertility, will give kids a working knowledge of how their bodies work and how to avoid pregnancy and disease.
There will always be abortions, both therapeutic and elective.
BTW--lesbians aren't sterile, many in fact DO "produce" children.
<quoted text>
I never insinuated that lesbians are sterile. Of course they can produce children. Do to their lifestyle choices,they don't sleep around with men and risk unwanted pregnancies and abortions. They NEED a man afterall,when they want to conceive.

Foo is obviously not "fertile" any more at nearly age 50 either.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#301150 Jun 18, 2013
Sex ed from a nun. Good idea. The biggest sex problem they have is dusting it occasionally.
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text> Just how many YEARS have you people been discussing preventing pregnancy by using artificial birth control? LOL I mean,you haven't comprehended it by now?
I remember a few years back hearing Mother Angelica on one of her tv shows discussing sex ed. She said that her mom told her about the birds and the bees. It took ONE time for her to "get it". She doesn't understand all the EDUCATION for years to learn a simple concept. I remember laughing so hard. SO true.
MOST of the education as far as our kids are concerned is not about the actual "sex act" but more self-respect,learning to love yourself as God loves you,that you are not a toy for some selfish boy,that sex/love making is a beautiful act for a married couple not just for procreation-but for bonding. THEN you discuss the consequences of that act outside its proper boundaries the way God intended. DISASTER,HEARTACHE,ETC...
sasylicious

Jackson, NJ

#301151 Jun 18, 2013
cpeter1313 wrote:
So a woman who can't support herself should have a kid she ALSO can't support? Good thinking.
<quoted text>
Unexpected circumstances arise in life,ones we are not always prepared for.

Just the same,a pregnant woman IS having a baby. TOO late for what "ifs". Is it wrong to help a woman who temporarily needs assistence after finding herself in a bad situation of no money and being abandoned?

If the MAN who impregnanted her acted responsibly,he'd help her and she wouldn't NEED outside help. But hey.....who cares if he got his jollys out and sexually enjoyed himself right? THAT is all that matters since sex is natural right?

I know married couples,who were well-to-do who met with tough circumstances. Should they kill their kids if they can't support them?

GOOD thinking.

“GO BLACKHAWKS!!”

Since: Dec 07

Home of Lord Stanley!

#301152 Jun 18, 2013
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text>I know. Thing is,people on here constantly make remarks about Catholics thinking sex is dirty if not for procreating,or that we are rigid and ONLY have sex for procreation. NONE of which is true. I hear it all the time. I wonder if most of that way of thinking in your family was all a fact or was it a misconception.
For what it's worth, there are many who *do* feel sex is dirty(particularly oral/anal sex and masturbation) and/or should mainly be had for procreation sake because of religious beliefs. I've seen people on these boards proclaim that. I may not agree with them but they're free to believe whatever they wish and live life as they see fit.

In *my* family, the women were taught that they must be pure yet it was ok if a man slept around. In fact, it was a given, and often encouraged, that a man sow his wild oats before he got married. Women were taught to believe that sex was dirty and something you had to put up with in order to keep your husband happy. I think that point of view was perpetuated throughout the years as a combination of religious beliefs and pure Mexican macho bullshit.

“GOD SO LOVED US”

Since: Aug 08

He Gave His SON,JESUS Christ

#301153 Jun 18, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
Rose, a lot of my older posts discuss my dislike of socialism. My dislike of the Affordable Health Care Act. My dislike of blurring the separation between church and state. Most of all my posts are about disliking losing civil rights to personal privacy and bodily autonomy. This is what will be lost if Roe v Wade is overturned and sent back to the states. There will no more federal umbrella for my personal medical decisions that do not need a 3rd party's uninvited involvement at all.
We are not on opposite sides. That's what I've been telling you. But if you wish to believe it, then so be it. You can be fetus focused and I will be woman focused.
Now we are on opposite sides.
Well we agree on the socialism ..And R O E will never be overturned..And we agree on the Healthcare act. Having a steaming bunch of bureaucrats working on my death wishes ain't my idea if a good thing

But it's not us,Christians taking over..it is socialism

YES I hate the ending if life in the womb..But it also woukd be much healthier mentally and physically for the baby NOT to get there
sasylicious

Jackson, NJ

#301154 Jun 18, 2013
R C Honey wrote:
and when I say ALL OPTIONS... I mean keeping it/ aborting it/ adopting it etc.
Foo considers those all "medical decisions". I wish she was repeat after you. THAT is so simple. So real.

But,she won't.

LOL didn't know adopting out is a "medical decision".

Keeping your baby alive is a "medical decision" too apparently.

Foo to adopted parents..."Yes,I have medically decided to give you my child for adoption".

LOL
Katie

Maple Valley, WA

#301155 Jun 18, 2013
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text>What does someone posting what YOU said(links to prove it)have to do with being a "Xtain" or not OR their behavior?
You are using your bigotry to cover up YOUR words that bury you.
No worries Katie,you're not the only one that does that. Your friend foo does it daily.
It's called provoking. Are Christians supposed to be provoking right out of the gate when attending a social gathering?

What did I say or post to or about NR that necessitated pulling old posts that had no bearing on today's conversation regarding the Religious Right?

Did I shrink from these? Deny these? No. Did I set the record straight? You bet.

And what is your response to this? Calling me a bigot. In three or more different posts. Are Christians supposed to be calling others bigots without provocation?

When they know how to use the word correctly, I mean. No. Of course not. Neither you nor NR behaves as a Christian is instructed to. You are nothing but a bully in the name of Jesus. That makes you both Xtian. Don't forget, bullies get bullied, Amen.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#301156 Jun 18, 2013
I suspect rose is like my mother. She hated abortion, but believed just as strongly in minding her own business. I wouldn't classify her as pro-choice as much as non-interference--the essence of a free society.
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text>
"""IF she terminates the pregnancy, foofoo would support her CHOICE to do so."""" """
Oh Rachel,thank you for telling it like it is. Of COURSE it doesn't take a rocket scientist to know what she thinks. EXACTLY what you wrote is what she believes but is TOO COWARDLY to admit. THAT is what this is about.
THAT is what I've been saying the whole time and she is denying.
LOL
Katie

Maple Valley, WA

#301157 Jun 18, 2013
RoSesz wrote:
<quoted text>
Well we agree on the socialism ..And R O E will never be overturned..And we agree on the Healthcare act. Having a steaming bunch of bureaucrats working on my death wishes ain't my idea if a good thing
But it's not us,Christians taking over..it is socialism
YES I hate the ending if life in the womb..But it also woukd be much healthier mentally and physically for the baby NOT to get there
No, it's not YOU Christians taking over. I have not once said or implied it.

The organization is called The Religious Right. It is an organization, Rose. Been in existence as long as Roe v Wade has been. I gave you the link with the entire history and still you reflect no new knowledge of what the organization is about.

We do agree that preventing pregnancy is far better than terminating it.

But you are still fetus focused and I am still woman focused. The fetus has no awareness of itself. The woman is aware of herself, her life, her circumstances. She is the only one, imo, with any authority on dealing with unwanted/unhealthy pregnancy.
sasylicious

Jackson, NJ

#301158 Jun 18, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
It's called provoking. Are Christians supposed to be provoking right out of the gate when attending a social gathering?
What did I say or post to or about NR that necessitated pulling old posts that had no bearing on today's conversation regarding the Religious Right?
Did I shrink from these? Deny these? No. Did I set the record straight? You bet.
And what is your response to this? Calling me a bigot. In three or more different posts. Are Christians supposed to be calling others bigots without provocation?
When they know how to use the word correctly, I mean. No. Of course not. Neither you nor NR behaves as a Christian is instructed to. You are nothing but a bully in the name of Jesus. That makes you both Xtian. Don't forget, bullies get bullied, Amen.
YOU made the posts. How is showing them "provoking"?

Why are you so embarrassed of your beliefs now? You were fierce at the time(I remember)to prove your intelligence regarding the subject.

I have been shown posts from YEARS ago of mine. I don't call you or anyone a fake this or that. I OWN my words. UNLESS I made myself look stupid,then I'd lash out,otherwise,they are MY WORDS,MY POSTS. Someone showimg me them is not a bad person.

LOL you are imbalanced Katie. WHAT is wrong with you?

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#301159 Jun 18, 2013
She would need sperm; she'd never need the man himself.
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text>I never insinuated that lesbians are sterile. Of course they can produce children. Do to their lifestyle choices,they don't sleep around with men and risk unwanted pregnancies and abortions. They NEED a man afterall,when they want to conceive.
Foo is obviously not "fertile" any more at nearly age 50 either.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

NCAA Basketball Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 3 min Earl 1,457,609
News UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) 8 hr Lavar Ball 32,588
News Western Michigan heads to Illinois as a favorite 13 hr Go Blue Forever 57
News Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) Nov 29 New Age Spiritual... 258,038
What role do you think humans play in global wa... (Sep '14) Nov 28 Local Warming 10,372
Should child beauty pageants be banned? (Sep '14) Nov 22 Heatherfeather 780
legitimate loan lender (Oct '13) Nov 20 Sandra Tillman 16
More from around the web