Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 313989 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

Gtown71

United States

#297437 May 23, 2013
razzmatazz wrote:
<quoted text>You don't know the history of the Catholic Church, if you did, you would never have left the church.
Razz, I thank you for standing up against abortion, but when it comes to the truth on God /catholic faith, I believe you are bad wrong, and only going by what you were taught.

I was saved in my bed, and my life forever changed, and I've never stepped inside of a catholic church.

What I'm about to say, I say in love and truth.

I don't believe the catholic church "as a whole " is of God.
Unless from the god of this world satan "whom I believe started the catholic church "

It preaches "another gospel " that paul wrote about,

I DO BELIEVE THEY ARE SOME TRUE CHRISTIANS INSIDE OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH.

As far as priest and higher up positions, I believe there are christians there as well, and I'm not the judge, but I'm afraid of any pope ever being in heaven. No matter how nice they are. It is what they believe that counts.

Satan can transform himself into an angel of light.

God is alive and well, and those who repent, and agree with Him, and ask Him to save them from a pure heart cry, can be saved.

Jesus lives within my heart, HE IS ALWAYS GOING TO, AS HE LEADS MY TO MY HOME IN HEAVEN.

HE IS NOT a cookie inside of a box in some building many call THE CHURCH.

HE IS NOT something one must swallow each week, in order to have God in them.

I'm sorry, and realize many other people will not like me now, but THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IS A WORKS SALVATION BASED THING, THAT HAS MADE MUCH MONIES ON THEIR GIMMICKS.

AGAIN -I BELIEVE THERE ARE TRUE CHRISTIANS WITHIN THE CHURCH, BUT ONLY THERE BECOUSE THEY HANG ONTO TRADITIONS OF MEN.

I BELIEVE IT IS THE GREATEST EXAMPLE OF HOW SOOO MANY LOOK AT IT, AND THINK IT REPRESENTS GOD, WHEN GOD IS NOT PLEASED WITH IT AT ALL, AND EVEN ASK FOR PEOPLE TO COME OUT FROM AMONGER HER IN REV.

I SAY WHAT I SAY IN LOVE -GOD KNOWS AND SEES MY HEART.
rosesz

Pompano Beach, FL

#297438 May 23, 2013
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>I'm going to let you in on a little secret Rose. I too think that abortion can be hard on women, both physically and emotionally...but I also know that it usually isn't.
And what's more, if it is hard on women, I know that the hue and cry from the SCPL side isn't making it any easier....which is pretty much the point of the SCPL side. The agenda is to MAKE it hard on women....by manipulating that maternal instinct you're so sure should reside in every female.
Insidious.
Thanks for the honesty. In the physical side. Ok it has to be much harder on her insides to have an abortion than use BC.

And I am sorry ..I disagree on the other. It doesn't taKE A PL to create maternal feelings. They are natural and come along with the great benefits if womanhood..And if even years after a woman sees her ultrasound and cries fir the lost cHild..That is natural too.

One reason I am for ultrasounds IF SHE WANTS TO LOOK as true informed consent. Imo..also think they are valuable for doctor. But for the PC to be against them partly because she may see it hear something of life there and change her mind is kind of non choice imo.

Back to contraception. Most work . They are cheap. And much easier on everyone. And certainly less expensive financially..medically and mentally.

We are woman..Hear us roar..Let us protect ourselves and unborn children.
feces for jesus

Brooklyn, NY

#297439 May 23, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
No you read correct. Jesus knew English. He also knew you would be asking this question on topixs, and I pray you start understand just how much He loves you.
Now if you will excuse me, I'm about to bring on a whole nother level of enemies, but I must speak truth as I truly believe /know it.
Hel is an old English word similar to icelandic/ old norse heill. You honestly have no clue where the word comes from and what it really means.

Good to know your dead man-god was a time traveller and teleporter. He probably used those magical power to come and personslly visit you.

Let us know when your spaceship lands, jonnycakes.
Gtown71

United States

#297440 May 23, 2013
elise in burque wrote:
<quoted text>Lol. Bottom line is that no one can prove the existence of a god. Some people died, most didn't. Prayers had nothing to do with it, either way. Unless, you are the one that can prove it....get back to us on that:-)
Elise can you prove prayers did nothing good?
You know even if God wasn't real "yet He is " imo
Prayers help people on their end if nothing else.

Many pray to a false god, and yet they feel better.
Ever see them misguided folks dancing in an airport before chanting harry christmas or something :)
They feel better

Wicans feel better, after they pray, or do they pray? One for bitner :)

Maybe you will forgive me for whatever I've done :)
I miss you sharp sarcasim and other post.

I've told you I'm a jerk at times "ok many times " :(
Katie

Tacoma, WA

#297441 May 23, 2013
rosesz wrote:
<quoted text>
Well yuk on the experimentation for sure alternatives criminal. And thanks for the history.
But I lived through most of the Changes. abortion was not a part of the vocabulary. Maybe a small percentage had them ..But they had almost NOTHING at all to keep us from conceiving in the first place. And we had our babies and survived. We did not sacrifice a human life to do it.
And there was still in the sixties Not Much knowledge to be had. Unless docs had done surgeries during pregnancy..even they had very little idea what was happening stage by stage on a woman.
I think someplace in my home I still have Life magazine showing the first pictures from the womb. That was around 72'
The pill WAS seen as the great equalizer and I thought PP was a great organization pioneering in this miracle.
But then the focus became the legalization of abortion and even today women use.it for birth control.
To me ..who does believe life sacred..this is just crazy when so much else is available.
But on the women's rights issuer. It seems to be the battle cry today for groups like Naral etc. So it is part of it. And the numbers Do reflect a lack of responsibility. Face it. We expect that from men in general..sorry guys. But it's the women who usually have to deal. And so many are not. IMO
And I still think the states and the people should have had a vote.because this has had such a dividing effect on the country.
You seem to want women to remain ignorant. I find that sad.

I don't see abortion rights as a rallying cry for the women's movement per se. I do see that criminalizing abortion again will remove medical equality women currently share with men.

As for the experimentation, not sure what you're alluding to since I didn't bring it up in this discussion.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#297443 May 23, 2013
rosesz wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks for the honesty. In the physical side. Ok it has to be much harder on her insides to have an abortion than use BC.
And I am sorry ..I disagree on the other. It doesn't taKE A PL to create maternal feelings. They are natural and come along with the great benefits if womanhood..And if even years after a woman sees her ultrasound and cries fir the lost cHild..That is natural too.
One reason I am for ultrasounds IF SHE WANTS TO LOOK as true informed consent. Imo..also think they are valuable for doctor. But for the PC to be against them partly because she may see it hear something of life there and change her mind is kind of non choice imo.
Back to contraception. Most work . They are cheap. And much easier on everyone. And certainly less expensive financially..medically and mentally.
We are woman..Hear us roar..Let us protect ourselves and unborn children.
Rose, it's been explained to you many times that we are not against ultrasounds. We are against laws which mandate that the doctor must do one, even if it's not medically necessary, AND against laws that force a woman to HAVE TO look at one, or listen to a description of one.

Not one of us is against her looking at one IF she chooses.

Please stop saying this thing, it's not true.
rosesz

Pompano Beach, FL

#297444 May 23, 2013
not a playa1965 wrote:
Rally round the Duggars, too....unless there's going to be a discussion about them deliberately trying to get Linda pregnant again, knowing she's more likely to miscarry than not....
(Oh, wait, nobody gets pregnant just in order to kill...
er...
well...)
Oh man, I should really make some more popcorn...
Linda?? Ok now I'm confused. Read about Michelle on wiki.

Aside from being on tv..??? Obviously they are following their conscience. Personally I don't see anything wrong with BC unless it's an abirtifacient.

The thing on them is from wiki they seem to take good care of those children..AGaIN the reality show angle..I personally don't watch that stuff

Now my daughter in law unfortunately tried everything to have a baby. And had miscarriages miscarriages too. She woukd get preggers after they stopped trying and then lose them. Our granddaughter to me is a real miracle baby. Only one they will have. But on her she didn't even know she was pregnant !! Baby was premature but healthy thank God and the Apple of my son's eye (one more reason I thank God that abortion was not the norm when I was 16)

Guess I will have t o find out about Linda now lol

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#297445 May 23, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
Elise can you prove prayers did nothing good?
You know even if God wasn't real "yet He is " imo
Prayers help people on their end if nothing else.
Many pray to a false god, and yet they feel better.
Ever see them misguided folks dancing in an airport before chanting harry christmas or something :)
They feel better
Wicans feel better, after they pray, or do they pray? One for bitner :)
Maybe you will forgive me for whatever I've done :)
I miss you sharp sarcasim and other post.
I've told you I'm a jerk at times "ok many times " :(
Yes, Wiccans pray. And no, we do not pray to "false gods".

It's Hare Krishna, and that's not a prayer. More like a meditation.

The point being that the OP implied that people were saved BECAUSE they prayed. That is baseless speculation.
Gtown71

United States

#297446 May 23, 2013
rosesz wrote:
<quoted text>
IVF can be a blessing. But I do feel they destroy life when they dump them . So no not criminalize but maybe make less to go wasted. As I say I have no control on how they do it. But woukd definitely. Rather see them adopted. Or used again by the parents. Of course a good number die in the womb..so use them more maybe. Leave it to God if tgey implant.(Or fate if you rather) as I said letting them grOw further further to experiment Should be criminal for sure.
The frozen embryos though at the systemically frozen. Do not at that point have a hope of life where they are..
I ADMIT fully I have more care on abortion. For me it will akways be a woman killing her own child. If you see an ultrasound and hear a heartbeat how can anyone nit we it as her cHild.. IMo..though I know you disagree.
Women's pregnant bodies naturally nurture. And as I said a lot.
I think think abortions as bad for the mom..though not fatal as it is for the child. Imo
Agreed.
People must MUST believe things like abortion is no more killing of life, as a guy spilling his seed on the ground.
Or try and ask about frozen embryols.

It is all kinda playing God imo

People try to avoid the SIN question. Either they don't believe in SIN or they beileve its self inflicted nonsense.

Yet I believe when an abortion takes place, it effects many others, other then self.

God bless you rose! I must get my "play on ", since my daughter is out of school, and tells me, if we are going to get our play on, we better get started. Lol

I pray my remarks about the catholic faith, is taken in love, but I can only say what I believe.

I like the new pope, but just afraid of what he believes. I also do not see this trying to pull all religions together as a good thing.

I admit christians should pull together, but trying to say, christians, muslims, and others should unite, is a very dangerous thing.

I can kinda imagine the backlash I'll recieve after my comments, but any true christians should be able to see a major difference in grace and works.

I pray God guides my post much more now. I believe prayer does work :)
rosesz

Pompano Beach, FL

#297447 May 23, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
Rose, it's been explained to you many times that we are not against ultrasounds. We are against laws which mandate that the doctor must do one, even if it's not medically necessary, AND against laws that force a woman to HAVE TO look at one, or listen to a description of one.
Not one of us is against her looking at one IF she chooses.
Please stop saying this thing, it's not true.
Ok . Point taken. But why do some PC fight having to do them routinely. It is like doing an xray before setting a break. Certainly has to make it safer.
I do not think think she should be forced to look at it. But it's there fir her to do so.

And sorry arguments I have read in the news about protesting laws for them are against having them done . And the tone seems to be that it may force a woman to change her mind.

So sorry if I misunderstood fir people Here. It has to make it safer and to me should be included. I would imagine in practice at clinics they probably have ways to make the woman not see and hear. My opinion remains that she should fir true informed consent and no surprises with later pregnancies. But no she should not be forced to look.

After the abortion it's to late to bring back a lost life. Better she knows exactly what she is doing imo
rosesz

Pompano Beach, FL

#297448 May 23, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
Razz, I thank you for standing up against abortion, but when it comes to the truth on God /catholic faith, I believe you are bad wrong, and only going by what you were taught.
I was saved in my bed, and my life forever changed, and I've never stepped inside of a catholic church.
What I'm about to say, I say in love and truth.
I don't believe the catholic church "as a whole " is of God.
Unless from the god of this world satan "whom I believe started the catholic church "
It preaches "another gospel " that paul wrote about,
I DO BELIEVE THEY ARE SOME TRUE CHRISTIANS INSIDE OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH.
As far as priest and higher up positions, I believe there are christians there as well, and I'm not the judge, but I'm afraid of any pope ever being in heaven. No matter how nice they are. It is what they believe that counts.
Satan can transform himself into an angel of light.
God is alive and well, and those who repent, and agree with Him, and ask Him to save them from a pure heart cry, can be saved.
Jesus lives within my heart, HE IS ALWAYS GOING TO, AS HE LEADS MY TO MY HOME IN HEAVEN.
HE IS NOT a cookie inside of a box in some building many call THE CHURCH.
HE IS NOT something one must swallow each week, in order to have God in them.
I'm sorry, and realize many other people will not like me now, but THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IS A WORKS SALVATION BASED THING, THAT HAS MADE MUCH MONIES ON THEIR GIMMICKS.
AGAIN -I BELIEVE THERE ARE TRUE CHRISTIANS WITHIN THE CHURCH, BUT ONLY THERE BECOUSE THEY HANG ONTO TRADITIONS OF MEN.
I BELIEVE IT IS THE GREATEST EXAMPLE OF HOW SOOO MANY LOOK AT IT, AND THINK IT REPRESENTS GOD, WHEN GOD IS NOT PLEASED WITH IT AT ALL, AND EVEN ASK FOR PEOPLE TO COME OUT FROM AMONGER HER IN REV.
I SAY WHAT I SAY IN LOVE -GOD KNOWS AND SEES MY HEART.
Disagree on the modern Catholic church especially on John Paul. He did more to unite the various Christian faiths than anyone in the past.
He is also the first to acknowledge the wrongs done to the Jews in the past.

I believe the Reformation had to happen. We all have bibles today because if it. And the RCC had actual bible study. I believe all of this is a work of God to unite His people
razzmatazz

Falls City, NE

#297449 May 23, 2013
Brilliant Chicky wrote:
Not that I give a rats behind what the current head of the catholic cult says but this will send some heads spinning:
“They complain,” the Pope said in his homily, because they say,“If he is not one of us, he cannot do good. If he is not of our party, he cannot do good.” And Jesus corrects them:“Do not hinder him, he says, let him do good.” The disciples, Pope Francis explains,“were a little intolerant,” closed off by the idea of &#8203;&#8203;possessi ng the truth, convinced that “those who do not have the truth, cannot do good.”“This was wrong ... Jesus broadens the horizon.” Pope Francis said,“The root of this possibility of doing good – that we all have – is in creation”
and
"The Lord created us in His image and likeness, and we are the image of the Lord, and He does good and all of us have this commandment at heart: do good and do not do evil. All of us.‘But, Father, this is not Catholic! He cannot do good.’ Yes, he can... "The Lord has redeemed all of us, all of us, with the Blood of Christ: all of us, not just Catholics. Everyone!‘Father, the atheists?’ Even the atheists. Everyone!".. We must meet one another doing good.‘But I don’t believe, Father, I am an atheist!’ But do good: we will meet one another there.”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/22/pope...
So while it's true that Christ redeemed all people, even atheists, that doesn't mean all atheists have accepted this gift or will be saved hey chicko, what happened to your posts, hmm?
razzmatazz

Falls City, NE

#297450 May 23, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
Rose, it's been explained to you many times that we are not against ultrasounds. We are against laws which mandate that the doctor must do one, even if it's not medically necessary, AND against laws that force a woman to HAVE TO look at one, or listen to a description of one.
Not one of us is against her looking at one IF she chooses.
Please stop saying this thing, it's not true.
yeh, your kind are, why would your ilk get sooo upset over laws that say a woman has to have an ultrasound? You object to ultrasounds because your afraid the mother would see the child as a child. You say an ultrasound is too evasive, its as evasive as putting a tampon in, LOL.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#297451 May 23, 2013
rosesz wrote:
<quoted text>
Ok . Point taken. But why do some PC fight having to do them routinely. It is like doing an xray before setting a break. Certainly has to make it safer.
I do not think think she should be forced to look at it. But it's there fir her to do so.
And sorry arguments I have read in the news about protesting laws for them are against having them done . And the tone seems to be that it may force a woman to change her mind.
So sorry if I misunderstood fir people Here. It has to make it safer and to me should be included. I would imagine in practice at clinics they probably have ways to make the woman not see and hear. My opinion remains that she should fir true informed consent and no surprises with later pregnancies. But no she should not be forced to look.
After the abortion it's to late to bring back a lost life. Better she knows exactly what she is doing imo
Who better to decide if an ultrasound is needed, the medical professional based upon his knowledge and experience, or a politician pandering to constituents who want to manipulate a woman's decision?

Why should a doctor be made to do one when he knows it is not medically necessary?
razzmatazz

Falls City, NE

#297452 May 23, 2013
rosesz wrote:
<quoted text>
Disagree on the modern Catholic church especially on John Paul. He did more to unite the various Christian faiths than anyone in the past.
He is also the first to acknowledge the wrongs done to the Jews in the past.
I believe the Reformation had to happen. We all have bibles today because if it. And the RCC had actual bible study. I believe all of this is a work of God to unite His people
For the past two thousand years our church has had bible study through the readings in the Mass. Gosh I feel so sorry for you whomever taught you about being a Catholic didn't do a good job, you need to relook at Catholicism. Please quit the so called innocent Catholic bashing. don't say Catholics did this or that until you study Catholicism.
Gtown71

United States

#297453 May 23, 2013
feces for jesus wrote:
<quoted text>
Hel is an old English word similar to icelandic/ old norse heill. You honestly have no clue where the word comes from and what it really means.
Good to know your dead man-god was a time traveller and teleporter. He probably used those magical power to come and personslly visit you.
Let us know when your spaceship lands, jonnycakes.
I've said before Jesus didn't use the word Hell, but He said what He meant, abd meant what He said. Even the part about rising from the dead FOR YOU!

maybe He did use His powers to visit me, but that's ok, becouse He saved my soul from Hell.
He can also save yours. He is God the Son, and knows everything.

Not only did He save my soul, but He cleaned up my life in many ways. I was once more vile then any on here. I could teach some of you new cuss words. Lol

He can change all bad things in me, if I would yeild to Him and His word.

Nowadays the word sick "which used to mean not well," may mean an awsome skateboard trick. The bible was written when yea meant yea, and nay meant nay.

I pray you get a clue, and stop looking for those who write things that condone your Sin, and read where your Sin is condemed.

That way -you might turn to a God, that has the power to make you a saint.:)

We tend to judge ourselves by others worse then ourselves. This way of thinking makes it tough for certain people like aka "good girl" and others see themselves like God does. Filthy sinners, that HE COULD SAVE.

HE CAN SAVE ANYONE THAT CALLS UPON THE NAME OF THE LORD, OUT OF A REPENTENT HEART.
razzmatazz

Falls City, NE

#297454 May 23, 2013
rosesz wrote:
<quoted text>
Disagree on the modern Catholic church especially on John Paul. He did more to unite the various Christian faiths than anyone in the past.
He is also the first to acknowledge the wrongs done to the Jews in the past.
I believe the Reformation had to happen. We all have bibles today because if it. And the RCC had actual bible study. I believe all of this is a work of God to unite His people
Modern? Hey, the Church is timeless. Our doctrine has stayed the same since Christ strate the Church. Canon law has changed but notthe Doctrine.
razzmatazz

Falls City, NE

#297455 May 23, 2013
rosesz wrote:
<quoted text>
See last post lol can't keep up.
There should be rules on how many made and implanted.
Octomoms is a crime imo. And so are the reality tv that spawned her lunacy
IVF is against what God wants, it is not of God.
rosesz

Pompano Beach, FL

#297456 May 23, 2013
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>I'm going to let you in on a little secret Rose. I too think that abortion can be hard on women, both physically and emotionally...but I also know that it usually isn't.
And what's more, if it is hard on women, I know that the hue and cry from the SCPL side isn't making it any easier....which is pretty much the point of the SCPL side. The agenda is to MAKE it hard on women....by manipulating that maternal instinct you're so sure should reside in every female.
Insidious.
Ok my turn fir a hypothetical if I may. And let me say again I know this won't happen
Fir many reasons including financial ones sadly.

And let's keep this in regard to healthy pregnancies.

What if a woman coming in fir an abortion was told before and on follow up. This is the Only abortion you can have. Before the abortion she must have a class on prevention. She is given birth control preferably long term on her follow up.

How many repeat pregnancies do you suppose she would have? How much easier. on her body. How much less expense on her body..her wallet and her mind.

One more less drastic. In order to have the abortion ..before it she must take a class on prevention and agree by contract to get and use BC of some sort.

I am betting the numbers would go down.

I'd also live to see graphic videos if birth..STUds and yes abortions required in ever high school for both girls and boys. Might stop some of those multiple partner hookups.

Just saying I wonder.

And please no one throw tomatoes or eggs ..lol
razzmatazz

Falls City, NE

#297457 May 23, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
No you read correct. Jesus knew English. He also knew you would be asking this question on topixs, and I pray you start understand just how much He loves you.
Now if you will excuse me, I'm about to bring on a whole nother level of enemies, but I must speak truth as I truly believe /know it.
Of course Christ would know English, after all Christ is God and God knows everything.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

NCAA Basketball Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 3 min RoxLo 1,523,436
News UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) 18 min El Phartss 32,922
I got my loan from [email protected] (Jun '13) Apr 20 GLOBAL FUNDING SO... 43
How to Recover Deleted or lost Contacts from Sa... (Dec '14) Apr 20 DelucaKoehn 11
What role do you think humans play in global wa... (Sep '14) Apr 18 RNC 11,137
Conn's Appliances (Nov '07) Apr 8 Allycat1999 290
News Buzzer-beating shot lifts Florida over Wisconsi... Mar '17 BuzzerPhartss 2
More from around the web