Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Jan 22, 2008 Read more: Newsday 309,598
Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision. Read more
rosesz

Fort Lauderdale, FL

#295288 May 9, 2013
elise in burque wrote:
<quoted text>She would have given birth, anyway, or had an illegal abortion. She had a free choice of going to court to fight for her right to legal abortion. She could have said no. She wasn't a young girl and she wasn't intellectually or mentally challenged. She changed her personal view on abortion years later. So what? That doesn't make her a victim.
She was in her twenties in a society that had no sec ed..no legal knowledge..and ni real knowledge of abortion..AND YES IT WAS HER CHOICE..my only point in that part was that she thought she would get an abortion out of it.

A lot of you seem to think that illegal abortion was a norm before ROE. It wasn't. In the sixties..We didn't even use the word. Let alone go look for one..
by the seventies it may have been a word a lot of people knew but we didn't just go to the corner and get one..They were done I know but not thar often ..it was not common practice..

SO the lawyers had her thinking this was a way to get rid of her pregnancy..why they picked a second trimester Wkman..seems also strange..but she was still asking if the appeal would grant her an abortion..She thought she would get one.
AND if she had had the illegal route open to her..they sure precluded that by getting her as a plaintiff..It said they were looking for a 5 month PREGNANT woman.

Its only my opinions..but whatever else she was or did..they used her

Since: Jun 08

Atrisco Village

#295289 May 9, 2013
rosesz wrote:
<quoted text>
She was in her twenties in a society that had no sec ed..no legal knowledge..and ni real knowledge of abortion..AND YES IT WAS HER CHOICE..my only point in that part was that she thought she would get an abortion out of it.
A lot of you seem to think that illegal abortion was a norm before ROE. It wasn't. In the sixties..We didn't even use the word. Let alone go look for one..
by the seventies it may have been a word a lot of people knew but we didn't just go to the corner and get one..They were done I know but not thar often ..it was not common practice..the
SO the lawyers had her thinking this was a way to get rid of her pregnancy..why they picked a second trimester Wkman..seems also strange..but she was still asking if the appeal would grant her an abortion..She thought she would get one.
AND if she had had the illegal route open to her..they sure precluded that by getting her as a plaintiff..It said they were looking for a 5 month PREGNANT woman.
Its only my opinions..but whatever else she was or did..they used her
Wow. Okay, enjoy your opinion. Doesn't matter. She made her choice and millions of women are grateful and glad that she did. Whether she second-guessed herself or not is not our fault.
Gtown71

United States

#295290 May 9, 2013
elise in burque wrote:
<quoted text>That type of "Christian" doesn't take responsibility for anything, good or bad. It's all in his god's hands and out of his own. How convenient.
I see your reading comp hasn't improved.:)
I take much responsibility on how I conduct myself AFTER becomming a christian. Rewards and losses all depend on how I treat the grace that's been given me.
However when it comes to my salvation, I had very very very little to do with that. That way God gets the Glory -not me. He also gets the Glory for all the good I do as well, see how it works now.

You give YOURSELF the glory for all you do, and if you die this way -you will pay for your own mistakes and sin, which is really dumb since they were already paid for -you just never went and accept your redemtion.
Gtown71

United States

#295291 May 9, 2013
elise in burque wrote:
<quoted text>That type of "Christian" doesn't take responsibility for anything, good or bad. It's all in his god's hands and out of his own. How convenient.
By the way, you're answer is within your question. Those who put all their faith an trust in Christ are true Christians, any ANY group that teaches it takes what Christ did PLUS what you do in order to be saved are NOT teaching the way of Christ.

They do so in ignorance mainly, but not all.

They don't realize by saying this, it makes the people a CO - SAVIOR to themselves, and that don't cut it with God.

Eph. 2: 8-9 tells us how we are saved.
Luke 16 tells what happens after death to the lost and the saved.

One must choose before they die.

There is No going back.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#295292 May 9, 2013
The Prince wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey dimwit, Jesus dies on the cross for the sins of Jews and Gentiles alike. By his stripes we are all saved. You like to confuse the issue with your pagan inspired rants. Jesus is your Savior as much as he is mine.
Tomtom, stop being a moron for a moment. Your jebus is certainly NOT my savior in ANY way, shape or form. Its 100% meaningless to me as a Jew, as it is to ALL of those of the Jewish faith.

Again, this ISNT rocket science. And why your kind keep trying to shove that shit down others throats is a puzzle.

Frankly, if it WAS your savior, I'd reject it simply because the very idea of sharing something as important as a personal relationship with G-d with something like you is simply repulsive.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#295293 May 9, 2013
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
Who is the hypocrite? You keep bitching that we all supposedly "hate" Christians, yet you as a Christian don't mind spewing your own hate.
Exactly. Freaks like Tomtom are free to spew their OWN version of hatred in the name of their 'savior' of course, but dont see the splinter in their OWN eyes.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#295294 May 9, 2013
razzmatazz wrote:
<quoted text>Wow, you are sooooo ignorant, it is laughable.
If you think your jesus is the Jewish g-d, then its YOU that's not only laughable, but ignorant as well - you moron.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#295295 May 9, 2013
razzmatazz wrote:
<quoted text>You have no idea what a Christian is.
That's pretty funny - not to mention ironic - coming from the likes of you Knutter.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#295296 May 9, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>

Eph. 2: 8-9 tells us how we are saved.
Luke 16 tells what happens after death to the lost and the saved.
Neither mean shit to anyone that doesn't follow your version of "faith". You can't seem to understand that simple concept.
Katie

Auburn, WA

#295297 May 9, 2013
worships reality wrote:
<quoted text>
no it isn't. show me one post where i claimed the fetus has civil rights?
exactly what i've been saying? liar.
<gives finger>
So you don't think restrictions give fetuses limited rights?
And you do think state's rights are being protected by restrictions?

“lightly burnt,but still smokin”

Since: Dec 06

in the corner of your mind,

#295298 May 9, 2013
more for knutter,another misunderstood priest
http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/home-news/...
Gtown71

United States

#295299 May 9, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Neither mean shit to anyone that doesn't follow your version of "faith". You can't seem to understand that simple concept.
Yes I know this foo, that is why I tell others about my God, becouse my God is REAL. He has power to not only change lives, but also save souls.

He can take drunks and drug addicts, and make them into dads and moms.

Is your God real? Does He change lives and save souls? If so -why would you not want to tell others about Him?

You say you wouldn't accept my God, becouse you wouldn't want to have the same God as me and others, but My God loves you as well as all.

You may pick and choose who You deem unfit, but just know you're not so hot yourself when it comes to bring vile.

There is only One true God, and that God is only pleased with what His Son has done. Only faith in His Son, will help you.
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#295300 May 9, 2013
rosesz wrote:
<quoted text>
True
And my empathy mine..It seems her lover. Or whoever was not averse to airing lŠundry either.
Sounds like life wasn't all that loving for either of them..
And I feel worry for her also..
For them both. and have to say for all the unborn since the lawyers found ROE and used her situation for a cause.
Is she a hero..probably not..but a victim. Yes..and people who carry burdens for a long time rarely do it well..Sounds like. And only from that reporter but if true..she was pushed into a point in history because she was desperate for help..She then was on the spotlight..I am nit sure if was just money..We can not know till we walk a mile..but no ind can ever walk that particular mile again.
She was very much a hero in 1973 to the same people trashing her now. She was terrific when she was useful to their abortion cause.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#295301 May 9, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes I know this foo, that is why I tell others about my God, becouse my God is REAL. He has power to not only change lives, but also save souls.
He can take drunks and drug addicts, and make them into dads and moms.
Is your God real? Does He change lives and save souls? If so -why would you not want to tell others about Him?
You say you wouldn't accept my God, becouse you wouldn't want to have the same God as me and others, but My God loves you as well as all.
You may pick and choose who You deem unfit, but just know you're not so hot yourself when it comes to bring vile.
There is only One true God, and that God is only pleased with what His Son has done. Only faith in His Son, will help you.
There may very well be one Divine Source of all creation, but NO ONE knows the real nature of that source, or what it wants from us, if anything. After all, why would an omniscient being need ANYTHING?

One of my favorite quotes is "All the faces the Divine shows us are true, and none of them are all truth."

Why wouldn't we want to bother people constantly with our own versions? Very simple, because some people know that religious beliefs are personal, and that our own are not the only valid beliefs. Some people also know that if a Deity is worthy of worship, no proselytizing is necessary.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#295302 May 9, 2013
LOL, that should have said ".....omniscient/omnipote nt being....."
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#295303 May 9, 2013
AyakaNeo wrote:
<quoted text>Not at all. There is nothing criminal about being poor. They were victims of circumstance first and I'm just not going to judge them for that. It's not my place.
They broke the law.
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#295304 May 9, 2013
feces for jesus wrote:
<quoted text>
In order to disprove such a thing, you and your fellow religious wackos would first have to prove your claim that god created man. Science has, and will continue to show that you were created by your mother and father. Try dealing in reality, not your wishful speculation.
You and your fellow christards obviously don't understand what a scientific theory is. It is painfully obvious.
And the first man was created how?
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#295305 May 9, 2013
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
No.
Which ones are ot cults in your opinion?
Katie

Auburn, WA

#295306 May 9, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
She was very much a hero in 1973 to the same people trashing her now. She was terrific when she was useful to their abortion cause.
well, so was the guy yesterday after kicking down the door in ohio. then they brought up his criminal past... it's life, ink. judge not lest ye be judged, right?!
you are one who judges others, too. you should know...

=====

"Please refrain from posting profanity or offensive material.
Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator."

=====

REALLY??
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#295307 May 9, 2013
worships reality wrote:
<quoted text>
you have no way of knowing that. only thing we do know for certain is that he was not proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
how dare you make a definitive statement you have no idea is true?
We do know that his second opinion person lost her license for using generic computer diagnosis for the need for the late term abortions without ever seeing the patient. Tiller was willing to abort viable fetuses for financial compensation.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

NCAA Basketball Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 6 min John Galt 1,216,590
News Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 7 min Aura Mytha 237,672
What role do you think humans play in global wa... (Sep '14) 10 min SpaceBlues 5,216
News UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) 3 hr Bruin Nation 29,515
News Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex ma... (Aug '10) Thu ocean 201,862
News Kecoughtan High teacher resigns after drug charges (Nov '07) Apr 14 tom wingo 73
Should child beauty pageants be banned? (Sep '14) Apr 13 Da King 777
More from around the web