Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Full story: Newsday 308,914
Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision. Full Story

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#295181 May 8, 2013
The Prince wrote:
<quoted text>
Cosmic dust, star dust was brought together to form the earth and inevitably, man. You are still an azzclown vile pagan.
Fairy tales and moonbeams were brought together in your head as a child, and (evidently) inevitably formed stalagtites in your brain as an adult. You are still a fetus worshiper, vile eunuch.
grumpy

Teaneck, NJ

#295182 May 8, 2013
rosesz wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually if a person could Not change their mind on anything ..especially someone whose own life had such an impact on the unborn...this definitely would not be a free country..
Or are you in favor of censorship as well as abortion..a woman has the right to have an abortion..but she should shut up if she has feelings..about that same thing later on...so then she is a hypocrite...Did you ever change your mind of feelings over a period of 40 years??? Your statements make very little sense to me coming from a person out for women's rights..only my opinion of course.
actually I think the expense came from proabortion advocates who used her case. Not even sure she had an abortion
She never had an abortion. An abortion was never expected by anyone involved. They all had to know that the case would take longer to settle than the gestation period.
rosesz

Fort Lauderdale, FL

#295183 May 8, 2013
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>Found this on some website, the name of which I can't remember, but it was about Elizabeth Smart, kidnapped and repeatedly brutalized by her captors, as a young girl... and in the news lately for her subsequent strength in her recovery. It spoke volumes about your point above:
"...Our culture deliberately socializes women to be taken in. We condition girls (explicitly! Not even covertly!) to believe that if they're not sexually attractive, they're nothing. They're garbage. They might as well not exist. We reinforce, over and over, that their attractiveness has an expiration date, so the only thing they can do is desperately leverage that attractiveness while they can. If they resist that conditioning, we sexualize them against their will, and if they give in to that conditioning —or worse, if they are raped by a predator — we reveal the trap: Now you're a slut, and it's your fault. Now you're tainted. Now you're worse than nothing. Now you might as well not even cry out when your rapist takes you to the gas station in a wig and sunglasses."
She's on a speaking tour, promoting the abolition of 'abstinence only' education, in favor of thorough and frank sex ed, in public schools.
Ugh topic just timed me out.

Short answer I agree about the sexuslization..Hollywood and these so called celebs should be way more responsible as role models..Problem is they ARE told models.

AS fir sec ed..even the programs they have must be giving them information on what NOT to do.
But these kiddies get stuff from biology class..the net. From Tv..and judging by what I see know more about sec than I did at 30!!

BUT I am all for graphic videos of births...StDs. and abortions..(which they will never show).

SAWsomething on the web for proposed sec ed telling about G SPOTS. SORRY but really. So we want 12 year OlDs learning to get more pleasure from sec...We should want to educate them out of hook up mentalities. I mean if you have multiple partners on middle d hook...what is there left yo make you feel special.Later in life..IMHO
rosesz

Fort Lauderdale, FL

#295184 May 8, 2013
grumpy wrote:
<quoted text>She never had an abortion. An abortion was never expected by anyone involved. They all had to know that the case would take longer to settle than the gestation period.
Even according to this less then flattering article she seemed to think she could get one. She was young. They were lawyers "looking for a plaintiff"

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#295185 May 8, 2013
rosesz wrote:
<quoted text>
Even according to this less then flattering article she seemed to think she could get one. She was young. They were lawyers "looking for a plaintiff"
Which only proves that it would have happened at some point, with her or another woman, and it really doesn't matter what she "thought" then OR what she thinks now.

“lightly burnt,but still smokin”

Since: Dec 06

in the corner of your mind,

#295187 May 8, 2013
"razzmatazz"
You know abortion is sacrificing the child to Satan. As bizarre as that sounds its the truth.

yes that sounds bizzare,you are an idiot
rosesz

Fort Lauderdale, FL

#295188 May 8, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
Which only proves that it would have happened at some point, with her or another woman, and it really doesn't matter what she "thought" then OR what she thinks now.
I am sure you are right..they wohkx have used someone..but they did use her and she naively thought it would happen.

The Tampa poster brought this all up and food article made for a lively discussion..
I still feel sorry for her..

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#295189 May 8, 2013
rosesz wrote:
<quoted text>
I am sure you are right..they wohkx have used someone..but they did use her and she naively thought it would happen.
The Tampa poster brought this all up and food article made for a lively discussion..
I still feel sorry for her..
She also used them. And clearly stated later that she would have had the abortion if time had permitted.

She says she thought it would happen, but I tend not to believe that. It's so easy for her to say now, but then again, she's lied before. Why should she be automatically believed now?
rosesz

Fort Lauderdale, FL

#295190 May 8, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
She also used them. And clearly stated later that she would have had the abortion if time had permitted.
She says she thought it would happen, but I tend not to believe that. It's so easy for her to say now, but then again, she's lied before. Why should she be automatically believed now?
I said she did want one..Beck in the 80s ..ghost would a young person with no real education ghat I saw know how long a law case would take..and her reasons right then. Could not have been fame. THEY used s different name..She was the one pregnant. SHE obviously did noy Want The baby. We are a lot mord savvy on things like this now..She was not.

SHE diduse the Roe name later for sure. Personally I am glad her baby was born and glad it hes had anonymity ..bug having that child was hog her intent ss far as I can see frlmehat they wrote

SORRY still think she was used..and feel sorry for her.
rosesz

Fort Lauderdale, FL

#295191 May 8, 2013
The 70's...sorry..There was no law stuff on Tv except maybe Perry Mason..
feces for jesus

Westbury, NY

#295192 May 8, 2013
rosesz wrote:
<quoted text>
I am aware..Science has theories. That can change..God created man..which has never been disproven by science..


In order to disprove such a thing, you and your fellow religious wackos would first have to prove your claim that god created man. Science has, and will continue to show that you were created by your mother and father. Try dealing in reality, not your wishful speculation.

You and your fellow christards obviously don't understand what a scientific theory is. It is painfully obvious.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#295193 May 8, 2013
rosesz wrote:
<quoted text>
True we believe by faith.
But even with science..there are theories..they change. I can look at the sky. Or if I was s scientist look into subatomics..and see there is order. GOD or some intelligent designer is for me the only possible answer that makes sense..the more we know bu science..the more order we see.
Like the pieces of an old time watch. All those intricate pieces put together by a watchmaker..and the pieces were tolled by someone else...
He set the natural laws going..He does not have to say ok Fla gets rain today..etc. Dna is real. Ours did not come from any place else...or other creatures..or fish or whatever each generation of science said Man was made man..He has a soul..
Do we have similar Dna to other species ..most likely. But they are them. We are us. THERE IS NO MISDING LINK..Did man change like kn lifespan or number of teeth..yes it occurred naturally ... and environment anchor lifestyles changed also.
Believing by faith is fine. But the fact still remains that there's no proof. My argument is with Gtown telling me that God is real when there is no proof, only his faith. To Gtown God is real, but not to me.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#295194 May 8, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't know. Does it matter. Viable fetuses and babies were killed. tiller also killed viable fetuses.
And it was illegal. So what more is there to say?

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#295195 May 8, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you refer to all religions as cults?
No.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#295196 May 8, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
Fair enough.
I do pray however, that you take into consideration "how" I met God. You know, the One I was sure didn't exsist.
I do, but how much credit do you give yourself for your transformation?

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#295197 May 8, 2013
The Prince wrote:
<quoted text>
What do you care since all of you "prochoice" proabortion pagans, believe a woman can kill the unborn child up until the child takes its first breath. Why are you walking on her right to "her body, her choice"?
You guys make no sense and that is at the crux of the so-called "prochoice but against abortion" nonsense. Prochoice is proabortion, no matter how you try and pretend it isn't.
You know it but hate the fact that it is the truth.
We don't make any sense to you because you refuse to comprehend what we are telling you. I think you enjoy wallowing in your anger and ignorance.
Katie

Auburn, WA

#295198 May 8, 2013
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
And it was illegal. So what more is there to say?
Dr. Tiller did nothing illegal.
What are you trying to say here?
worships reality

United States

#295199 May 8, 2013
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh stop whining already. How many times do I have to try and get through to you cement-head fundies.
Read this slowly so you can finally understand: Everything...has...restriction s.
Why should someone who has had too much to drink not be allowed to drive his/her car? It's still his car, right? What don't you get??
it's still his car ? how stupid is that ? he's not allowed to drive because he is a potential health/life threat to others. his driving while under the influence is a very real threat to the rights of others. is your brain even semi functional?

read this slowly so you can finally understand :

everything... has... restrictions...for...a...reaso n....and...the... reason...is...the...potential. ..adverse...impact....on...the ...rights of others.

just whose rights are being protected when we restrict abortions post viability?

post viability it is still the woman's pregnancy, it is still her body, it is still her private medical decision and the fetus she carries is still a parasite with no rights at all.

so I ask you again --- why should a woman be restricted to "any" window in order to exercise her right to a make a private medical decision?
rosesz

Fort Lauderdale, FL

#295200 May 8, 2013
feces for jesus wrote:
<quoted text>
In order to disprove such a thing, you and your fellow religious wackos would first have to prove your claim that god created man. Science has, and will continue to show that you were created by your mother and father. Try dealing in reality, not your wishful speculation.
You and your fellow christards obviously don't understand what a scientific theory is. It is painfully obvious.
And I say you cannot prove with your theories that God or an intelligent designer if you prefer fir not set onto motion the natural laws which would account for my parents conceiving me

I prrrsonslly accept by faith the account on the Bible.. you do not..But your theories do not disprove my belief..You prefer to put YOUR FAITH in changing theories. Fair enough. I do not
Gtown71

United States

#295201 May 8, 2013
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
I do, but how much credit do you give yourself for your transformation?
I had very very little to do with my salvation. All I did was surrender to what God wanted me to do that night. He was tightening up the "screws" and I was trying to bargain with Him. He don't bargain! When I finaly said ok God, but You're going to have to help me. I believe that was the momment I was saved "Justified", now as far as how I live, act, think, it is up to how much I feed my new spirit "man", which is called sanctification. Many many many Christians try and make the two words the same, and they try and say one must live up to a certain snctification in order to have justification, and each denomination has their own little or big "list" of things one must do. The thing is the leaders themselves will not and cannot live up to the very standards they try and put on the backs of the people.

I am Justified by Christ, sanctified by the renewing of my mind by His word.

Either one MUST not just be a head knowledge, but a heart knowledge.

Some of the largest denominations that claim to be christian, although they have many christians within them, they are anything but a christian denomination.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

NCAA Basketball Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 14 min Bluestater 1,190,343
What role do you think humans play in global wa... 53 min LonePalm 4,127
Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 1 hr thewordofme 235,589
Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex ma... (Aug '10) 9 hr Pietro Armando 201,370
NCSU vs UNC from the Coach's Perspective by Jam... Sat IdeasandTruth 1
Kecoughtan High teacher resigns after drug charges (Nov '07) Fri KHS Alumni 69
UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) Fri Trojan 29,057
More from around the web