"don't get bogged down with semantics"<quoted text>
that's only because the total exercising of that right could possibly infringe on the rights of others. that is not the case with pregnancy. post viability nothing changes. it is still the woman's pregnancy, still her body, still her personal medical decision, and the fetus inside her is still a parasitic entity with no rights whatsoever.
why should she be forced into "any" window at all???
that's no answer. i'm fine with the speed limit at 55mph. doesn't mean i wouldn't like to see it raised to 65.
do you or do you not agree that a woman should have the right to choose to legally abort for "any" reason whatsoever, both pre and post viability?
yeah i noticed the term restrictions. that's why i used it.
don't get bogged down with semantics. there is no obsession. don't like the word support? use "agree"
that remains to be seen. we'll see how you answer the direct question posed to you above. if you do.
That's laughable since that is exactly what happens with the PL fundies on here. You asked a question and I answered, and so you whine about my answer, bitch out your dissatisfaction, rewrite the question a different way, and then try to manipulate until you get the answer you want....hmmm, now how many times has THAT happened before?
Don't like my answer? Oh well, I hope it doesn't cost you any sleep.