Well I know its not to me...but I think if we are faced with abortion as a rule of law...restrictions should be there...<quoted text>
that's only because the total exercising of that right could possibly infringe on the rights of others. that is not the case with pregnancy. post viability nothing changes. it is still the woman's pregnancy, still her body, still her personal medical decision, and the fetus inside her is still a parasitic entity with no rights whatsoever.
why should she be forced into "any" window at all???
that's no answer. i'm fine with the speed limit at 55mph. doesn't mean i wouldn't like to see it raised to 65.
do you or do you not agree that a woman should have the right to choose to legally abort for "any" reason whatsoever, both pre and post viability?
yeah i noticed the term restrictions. that's why i used it.
don't get bogged down with semantics. there is no obsession. don't like the word support? use "agree"
that remains to be seen. we'll see how you answer the direct question posed to you above. if you do.
Lets not even look at some of the horrid procedures to to LTA..NOT EMERGENCY DELIVERIES..but purposely killing a baby who you have felt kicking you..aside from the effect on the baby...some of those things have to be hard on the mom..like those sticks.
and what if the baby comes out alive..are you ok with killing it then???or letting doc do it???
Where does it stop..wasn't Roe just supposed to be first trimester??
Personally I wish there were none at all..but the Pbs of those sticks thingys are barbaric. IMHO