Oh stop with the melodramatic bullshit. Its a medical procedure, not an act of violence.<quoted text>
WHY NOT DELIVER the baby who in your scenario is going to die anyway and let the mother and dad be with the child and hold and comfort the child as it takes its last breath. I realize some babies such as anencephalic or other genetically doomed children will die shortly after birth. Why make the only thing this baby ever knows be an act of violence..
I am using your example of a wanted child in dire circumstances. NO CHILD SHOULD SuFFER THAT Way..wanted or not.
Why dont you go here and beraate these women who've MADE their medical decision and ask THEM why.
You wont. None of you have the nerve to actally ask the women MAKING these decisions why they did it - because you KNOW its none of your business.
Its MUCH easier to come to a forum like this and meaninglessly harangue others who do NOTHING but support her choice to make her own medical decisions.
Anencephalic babies and other "genetically doomed" fetus's aren't going to "know" anything either way. Oftentimes a LTA is done in these cases for the WOMAN'S health. Not everyone wants to have an unnecessary medical procedure (in THIS case a C-section) to deliver a doomed child as you put it.
Who are YOU to judge? ANY of you?
Its a rhetorical question, not on of you will bother to even TRY to answer this honestly.
And fortunately, these women aren't forced to do so just to applease the sensiblities of people who's business it isnt to begin with.