We did answer, your questions are meaningless speculation, not food for thought. That is the answer. And you are certainly not the first person to pose such a meaningless question. Giving you the reverse answer is not always looking at the "negative" side.<quoted text>
Possibly, but why always look at the negative side there, "Dad"?(BTW peckerwood, thanks for calling me "son" as I'm old enough to be a grandfather, and soon will be). And of course you would find it meaningless..... as you and several others are clearly for abortion. But no Thomas Edison, no Abraham Lincoln and the list could go on. How would history have been changed if just a handful that have influenced it so greatly, were simply aborted? But alas, this is another rhetorical question. Just like the first one I posted. Because not a single one of you can provide a answer. All that you and many others on here are mentally capable of doing is bash a person offering food for thought. The "thought" process is seemingly foreign to yourself, as well as a few others on here.
But shucks,(old man/woman),I just find it amusing that certain people are so set in there ways... that they simply refuse to even look at it from any other perspective other than black and white.
Have a great and wonderful day.
And no, we are no "for" abortion. We support a woman's right to make her own choice regarding her uterus and pregnancy. That makes us "for" choice. By the way, most women do still make the choice to continue even unplanned pregnancies. Your side tends to ignore that in your attempt to demonize the opposition in this debate.
And guess what? It's your side that sees this as a black and white issue, not the pro-choice side.