Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 310344 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#288721 Mar 13, 2013
grumpy wrote:
<quoted text>So conversion is not a question of morality. It's just an easier path to heaven without facing punishment for your moral violation.
No it's a message of hope that God loves everyone and is patiently waiting for sinners to change their lives and turn to Him for forgiveness. It's about love.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#288722 Mar 13, 2013
cpeter1313 wrote:
Or really primo weed.
<quoted text>
I'm sure they smoke only the best in Pedophile City.
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#288723 Mar 13, 2013
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
Religious claptrap. Even if there is a God I would not believe that he would run Heaven like some exclusive country club that only allows in certain kinds of people.
Sorry, I took you at your word, that all you wanted was to be well remember by the folks. Either you believe in God or you don't, which is it? Why would there be a heaven for non believers.
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#288724 Mar 13, 2013
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm sure they smoke only the best in Pedophile City.
Boy you and cpeter are of the same mind. Congrats.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#288725 Mar 13, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry, I took you at your word, that all you wanted was to be well remember by the folks. Either you believe in God or you don't, which is it? Why would there be a heaven for non believers.
I think this was very clear..."Even if there is a God I would not believe that he would run Heaven like some exclusive country club that only allows in certain kinds of people."

I never said there would be a heaven for non-believers. I said that I wouldn't believe God would exclude people from heaven.

The way your religion tells it ONLY Christians are getting in...and I think that is just religious b.s.

I don't think there is a God. I think that you and your fellow Christians think there is a God who only wants to let Christians into his heaven....and that comes from what your religion teaches you. Everybody else is barred from entering Heaven. Do you really want to portray God as being that way?

Religion and God are 2 very different things.

worships reality

United States

#288726 Mar 13, 2013
cpeter1313 wrote:
Why waste A material on a Z-list troll?
<quoted text>
your material is far from 'a' grade. regardless why waste "any" material or "any" time for that matter, on a z-list troll?
i'll tell you why. like I said, pavlov's moron.
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#288727 Mar 13, 2013
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
I think this was very clear..."Even if there is a God I would not believe that he would run Heaven like some exclusive country club that only allows in certain kinds of people."
I never said there would be a heaven for non-believers. I said that I wouldn't believe God would exclude people from heaven.
The way your religion tells it ONLY Christians are getting in...and I think that is just religious b.s.
I don't think there is a God. I think that you and your fellow Christians think there is a God who only wants to let Christians into his heaven....and that comes from what your religion teaches you. Everybody else is barred from entering Heaven. Do you really want to portray God as being that way?
Religion and God are 2 very different things.
All religions believe in God. Number one requirement for heaven.

You say that you don't believe in God and all you want is to be remembered well. When I agree that you will get what you want, you get mad and talk about an exclusive club that doesn't include non believers. Are you confused about what you really believe?
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#288728 Mar 13, 2013
I should have said all religions that believe in heaven, believe in God.
STO

Vallejo, CA

#288729 Mar 13, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
What is your translation of 'rot' if the woman isn't pregnant?
Same.

STO

Vallejo, CA

#288730 Mar 13, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Until the Bible according to STO makes sense, I would suggest everyone reads it for themselves and come away with there own understanding.
Why bother?
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#288731 Mar 13, 2013
STO wrote:
<quoted text>
Same.
Abortion, even if she isn't pregnant. How does that make sense?
STO

Vallejo, CA

#288732 Mar 13, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
I can show just one of many verses that shows you're wrong on your first sentence.-Isaiah 50:6
I gave my back to the smiters, and my cheeks to them that plucked off the hair : I hid not my face from shame and spitting.
Who did this many many years later?
You don't want to consider any god, becouse of your sin.
If there is a God, then you are in trouble.
There is and you are.
When the "duhderp - A'm jus a humble soul who done came to tell of how God woke me up one night" approach doesn't work, then plan B is to threaten the atheists with "yer in big trouble! yer goin' tuh Hay-ul!".

Has that ever worked for ya?

Did God happen to mention plan B the night He "woke you up"?
STO

Vallejo, CA

#288733 Mar 13, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Abortion, even if she isn't pregnant. How does that make sense?
Already told you.

Read my post, again.
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#288734 Mar 13, 2013
STO wrote:
<quoted text>
Already told you.
Read my post, again.
I read all your posts and not one explained how a woman who isn't pregnant can have a miscarriage.
STO

Vallejo, CA

#288735 Mar 13, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
I read all your posts and not one explained how a woman who isn't pregnant can have a miscarriage.
Never made that claim.
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#288736 Mar 13, 2013
STO wrote:
<quoted text>
Never made that claim.
Then what is the effect the bitter water on an unfaithful wife who isn't pregnant?
STO

Vallejo, CA

#288737 Mar 13, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Then what is the effect the bitter water on an unfaithful wife who isn't pregnant?
Come up with something new, Ink. I answered all your questions in this post you are ignoring...

Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Here's the deal, if you can asow me in your translation where it says, under the cover of some other word that the woman is pregnant, then I will agree with you. It must be there for your translation to make sense.

STO: It's a given if she miscarried, she was pregnant. The translation for "rot" includes abortion.


Ink: <quoted text>You never answered how it is possible for a non pregnant woman to abort.

STO: Never made that claim.

You never answered how sterility could prove infidelity.

You'd rather keep going round and round, applying the faith-based view when it suits you and the secular view when it suits you.

AyakaNeo rightly pointed out that the bitter water would only affect the guilty woman, even if the innocent woman were also pregnant. That is the faith based view -- that God would reveal the truth.

The secular view is the bitter water would affect both guilty and innocent women the same, if both were pregnant. That is the view you are arguing.

I've argued (in the past) the husband better have been damn sure his wife cheated, else he may be forcing her to miscarry a potential hier. That goes with the secular view.

I've already said the only sure test that could prove a woman cheated is if the priest took a swab from her vagina and found another man's DNA. Again, secular view.

I think we've exhausted all "what ifs", yet you still pretend the translation does not exist, even though I've shown it to you several times.

I'm bored with it.

I suppose there's really no use in getting into the 7 days creation question. You'd dismiss the translations without explanation, as you've done here, and I'd be just wasting my time.
huskerlicious

Falls City, NE

#288738 Mar 13, 2013
cpeter1313 wrote:
There is absolutely no mention of any other aspect of the trinity until the NT--because that's where they made it up. If jesus is god then what's with all the whininng in gethsemane and other entries? He'd know exactly what and why and how.
<quoted text>
I have a feeling you are either brain damaged or only fourteen.
huskerlicious

Falls City, NE

#288739 Mar 13, 2013
VIVA POPE FRANCIS!!!!!!!!!! Hooray!
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#288740 Mar 13, 2013
STO wrote:
<quoted text>
Come up with something new, Ink. I answered all your questions in this post you are ignoring...
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Here's the deal, if you can asow me in your translation where it says, under the cover of some other word that the woman is pregnant, then I will agree with you. It must be there for your translation to make sense.
STO: It's a given if she miscarried, she was pregnant. The translation for "rot" includes abortion.
Ink: <quoted text>You never answered how it is possible for a non pregnant woman to abort.
STO: Never made that claim.
You never answered how sterility could prove infidelity.
You'd rather keep going round and round, applying the faith-based view when it suits you and the secular view when it suits you.
AyakaNeo rightly pointed out that the bitter water would only affect the guilty woman, even if the innocent woman were also pregnant. That is the faith based view -- that God would reveal the truth.
The secular view is the bitter water would affect both guilty and innocent women the same, if both were pregnant. That is the view you are arguing.
I've argued (in the past) the husband better have been damn sure his wife cheated, else he may be forcing her to miscarry a potential hier. That goes with the secular view.
I've already said the only sure test that could prove a woman cheated is if the priest took a swab from her vagina and found another man's DNA. Again, secular view.
I think we've exhausted all "what ifs", yet you still pretend the translation does not exist, even though I've shown it to you several times.
I'm bored with it.
I suppose there's really no use in getting into the 7 days creation question. You'd dismiss the translations without explanation, as you've done here, and I'd be just wasting my time.
What happens to the wife that is unfaithful but not pregnant?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

NCAA Basketball Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min Yeah 1,263,623
News Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 2 min thetruth 244,919
What role do you think humans play in global wa... (Sep '14) 1 hr Earthling-1 6,476
I got my loan from [email protected] (Jun '13) 19 hr bernarlyn 33
News UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) 22 hr tom wingo 29,852
News Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex ma... (Aug '10) Jul 29 RiccardoFire 201,846
News San Diego State basketball: Four-star prospect ... Jul 25 Fart news 2
More from around the web