Come up with something new, Ink. I answered all your questions in this post you are ignoring...<quoted text>
Then what is the effect the bitter water on an unfaithful wife who isn't pregnant?
Here's the deal, if you can asow me in your translation where it says, under the cover of some other word that the woman is pregnant, then I will agree with you. It must be there for your translation to make sense.
STO: It's a given if she miscarried, she was pregnant. The translation for "rot" includes abortion.
Ink: <quoted text>You never answered how it is possible for a non pregnant woman to abort.
STO: Never made that claim.
You never answered how sterility could prove infidelity.
You'd rather keep going round and round, applying the faith-based view when it suits you and the secular view when it suits you.
AyakaNeo rightly pointed out that the bitter water would only affect the guilty woman, even if the innocent woman were also pregnant. That is the faith based view -- that God would reveal the truth.
The secular view is the bitter water would affect both guilty and innocent women the same, if both were pregnant. That is the view you are arguing.
I've argued (in the past) the husband better have been damn sure his wife cheated, else he may be forcing her to miscarry a potential hier. That goes with the secular view.
I've already said the only sure test that could prove a woman cheated is if the priest took a swab from her vagina and found another man's DNA. Again, secular view.
I think we've exhausted all "what ifs", yet you still pretend the translation does not exist, even though I've shown it to you several times.
I'm bored with it.
I suppose there's really no use in getting into the 7 days creation question. You'd dismiss the translations without explanation, as you've done here, and I'd be just wasting my time.