No. 1 Tar Heels cruise past UNCA

[Boot Leg]

tarheelborn wrote:

<quoted text>
Why do you even participate in conversation on this forum if all you do is 'hate' on people?
-flagged-

The thing about responding to a comment you want removed by flagging is that everyone can now still see it. While I agree with your objections to the comment, you allow the post (which was removed) to stay on for all to see in the subject of your post.

[notafan]

us vet wrote:

<quoted text> ACT looking for a new comic and cartoon writer. You sound like the man to fill this position,
I have not laugh like that in a while , seriously you are good.

__
You're best is an idiot. I'd be amazed if you even knew anything about college athletics.

[Boot Leg]

Sorry...in the body of your post, not the subject.

[notafan]

EDogg wrote:

Funny -- I seem to recall Bulldog fans talking smack before last year's game about how they were gonna take down those giant Tar Heels. Now folks are asking why they are even playing UNC? My, how things do change in a year....
But don't feel bad, I wouldn't want none of us either! Just imagine what it would have been if Hansbrough had played -- Ouch!!
Go Heels!!

You're an idiot. Really. Nobody said anything about questions why UNCA played UNC except the meat bags at the beginning.

[notafan]

pork n beans wrote:

<quoted text>maybe next time they play it should be a five on four game to make it interesting.

___

Maybe you should learn something about how college programs operate before putting yourself on ignorant display. I mean do you even have a clue besides from your X Box? The small programs play the bigger ones for the experience, money and recruiting. Too bad the only big picture you understand is in your coloring books.

[pork n beans]

notafan wrote:

<quoted text>
___
Maybe you should learn something about how college programs operate before putting yourself on ignorant display. I mean do you even have a clue besides from your X Box? The small programs play the bigger ones for the experience, money and recruiting. Too bad the only big picture you understand is in your coloring books.

your a bad banana with a greasy black peel.

[rebel to the last]

methinks tarheelborn mistakes facts for hate. bet he cant name one top college team or pro team that does not have a majority of black players on the team. i mean usually a big majority. and i bet the nba champs this year as well as last will have a majority of black players. they are just more athletic and more suited to play sports than to participate in real life work and jobs.

disagree if you will, but the facts are undeniable. pro football has almost become just as bad. but i dont know enough facts about that to comment on.

[tarheelborn]

us vet wrote:

<quoted text> ACT looking for a new comic and cartoon writer. You sound like the man to fill this position,
I have not laugh like that in a while , seriously you are good.

Glad I could supply you with some endorphins, vet. But what's even MORE funny is your obvious lack of knowledge about the college game. Keep watching, though. One day you just might get it!

[tarheelborn]

rebel to the last wrote:

methinks tarheelborn mistakes facts for hate. bet he cant name one top college team or pro team that does not have a majority of black players on the team.

Notre Dame
Davidson
Purdue
Gonzaga
Duke

Next?

[rebeltothelast]

tarheelborn, i doubt any of the teams you listed make the top 16 this year. dont know how you know the makeup by race of teams but my point is still valid. the reat majority of teams in players are majority black and they tend to succeed as far as winning games in a bigger percentage than the schools with equal ratios of white to black players or maybe even 1 or 2 more white players than black.

the starters is another issue a team could 6 blacks and 8 or 9 whites and start an all black squad and have whites substitute. of course that is coaches choice but that tells you the coach thinks his black players are better basketball players than the whites. it all goes to the prove the point that blacks are better athletes therefore comprise the majority of players on most teams.

[tarheelborn]

rebeltothelast wrote:

tarheelborn, i doubt any of the teams you listed make the top 16 this year. dont know how you know the makeup by race of teams but my point is still valid. the reat majority of teams in players are majority black and they tend to succeed as far as winning games in a bigger percentage than the schools with equal ratios of white to black players or maybe even 1 or 2 more white players than black.
the starters is another issue a team could 6 blacks and 8 or 9 whites and start an all black squad and have whites substitute. of course that is coaches choice but that tells you the coach thinks his black players are better basketball players than the whites. it all goes to the prove the point that blacks are better athletes therefore comprise the majority of players on most teams.

Dude, you need to stick to topics like the "Arian brotherhood" and such 'cause your knowledge of sports is quite lacking. All those teams I mentioned are already in the top20, so your opening sentence just popped like a zit.

[EDogg]

notafan wrote:

<quoted text>
You're an idiot. Really. Nobody said anything about questions why UNCA played UNC except the meat bags at the beginning.

I believe it is you who appears to be the idiot. Did you even notice that my comment also was at the beginning? If I had made it later, as you did, then you might have a case.

Pay more attention next time. That way you won't wind up making yourself look like the idiot you are proposing someone else to be....

[tarheelborn]

hikerusa wrote:

Why waste the time, energy, efforts of a large university on and underling and a 'junior college'?

"Williams also has scheduled games with the Bulldogs in Chapel Hill the past three seasons, which helps the program financially. Sunday's 116-48 loss to the top-ranked Tar Heels earned UNCA $75,000."

^ That is why. Try getting familiar with how the system works between the 2 schools before criticizing their relationship.

http://citizen-times.com/apps/pbcs.dll/articl...

[notafan]

EDogg wrote:

<quoted text>
I believe it is you who appears to be the idiot. Did you even notice that my comment also was at the beginning? If I had made it later, as you did, then you might have a case.
Pay more attention next time. That way you won't wind up making yourself look like the idiot you are proposing someone else to be....

___

It doesn't matter when your post was put up, it still smacks of being written by someone who knows jack *$$& about college basketball. Too bad you think otherwise.

[pork n beans]

Money Makin wrote:

<quoted text>You obviously did not watch the game, as UNC had many white players out there. The best collegiate player is a white guy you ignoramus. I think you need a black snake to bore you out!

thats okay your mama already has that job.

[EDogg]

notafan wrote:

<quoted text>
___
It doesn't matter when your post was put up, it still smacks of being written by someone who knows jack *$$& about college basketball. Too bad you think otherwise.

It does matter when it was posted because that was what YOUR criticism was based upon. It's called context, and it plays a vital role in understanding the relevance and meaning of any post. You should study up on it before you embarass yourself anymore.

As for my knowledge of college basketball, what in my post suggests that it's lacking? I'd be willing to pit myself against somebody like you any day...

[EDogg]

notafan wrote:

<quoted text>
___
It doesn't matter when your post was put up, it still smacks of being written by someone who knows jack *$$& about college basketball. Too bad you think otherwise.

And one more thing, I bet you're a Dookie. Or maybe a Woofie. That would explain your motivation: jealousy!!

GO HEELS!!!

[Mtnbred]

tarheelborn wrote:

<quoted text>
Notre Dame
Davidson
Purdue
Gonzaga
Duke
Next?

Any Spanish-Americans on these teams?

[rebeltothelast]

UNC should have beaten UNCA. i think that what we should do is pass a federal law requiring college teams to have x number of ------ players, x number of ---------, x number of mexicans and x number of various other minority groups on team roster and like the little league require the colleges to give them a certain amount of playing time. that was we can extend the political correctness mantra into our college sports systems and make things really fair and equal.

we cant make schools feel bad because they suck in college sports. that aint pc.