NASCAR Bracketology: It's Dale Jr. vs...

NASCAR Bracketology: It's Dale Jr. vs. Kenseth for championship

There are 269 comments on the The Virginian-Pilot story from Apr 12, 2011, titled NASCAR Bracketology: It's Dale Jr. vs. Kenseth for championship. In it, The Virginian-Pilot reports that:

This is it. The final of the NASCAR Tournament matches Dale Earnhardt Jr. against Matt Kenseth this weekend at Talladega with the highest-finishing driver winning it all .

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Virginian-Pilot.

NCAG

South Gate, CA

#23 Apr 23, 2011
snow wrote:
<quoted text>Jim
you would disagree with a sign on the roadway. You always jump
on everyone's post looking for a fight. I have no use for you
or your crap...
Just pay Jim the asshole and self proclaimed idiot no attention. He thinks hes some kind of damn expert but hes as dumb as they come. Jr finished higher than Kenseth so hes the champ in this little make believe tourny. Matter of fact Jr is third in points with two top 5 finishes and 5 top tens out of the first eight races. You dont hear ol Jimmy boy or any of the other haters commenting on that. Turns out they are the ones who cant handle the truth, or cant stand the fact that Jr is competitive once again. the past is the past but Jr haters will hang on to yesterday while the rest of us live in todays reality, which simply is..........Jrs kickin ass!!!!!! So Jim, swallow a dose of reality boy, or can you handle it?????? Nope, you cant!!!
NCAG

South Gate, CA

#24 Apr 23, 2011
Jim wrote:
<quoted text>
That's a lie.
<quoted text>
That's another lie.
Why is the truth so hard for you?
<quoted text>
It's only crap to you because what I say is the truth and you can't deny it.
Now is about the time for jims flunkies to pipe in, Barnabus, JRNATIONMAKESMELAUGH, Wang,. these haters run in a pack and in reality they are the butt buddies who cant handle the truth. Nothin but arguements about Jr, its what they live for, But the truth is.....Jr is third in points, 2 top 5 finishes and 5 top ten finishes. Dont hear them mentioning any of that. Just talk about the past like it matters anymore. Jr is back and his haters cant stand it so you will see all kinds of shit written on posts that dont even relate to this year. So Jim, why is the truth so hard for you??? Cant stand it can you boy??? Jrs back, like we all knew he would be. stop being dillusinal jim, thats the truth....dipwad!!!

Since: Nov 09

Campbellsburg, IN

#25 Apr 23, 2011
Uhhhh... welcome back?...
I felt bad when you "left" Topix a while back, NCAG, but it would have been nice if you could have returned without spouting the same old venomous drivel.
Jim

Laconia, NH

#26 Apr 25, 2011
NCAG wrote:
<quoted text>Just pay Jim the asshole and self proclaimed idiot no attention. He thinks hes some kind of damn expert but hes as dumb as they come.
Profanity....words spoken by those who lack integrity.

Show me where I ever stated I was an "idiot"....why make up lies?

You belive I'm "dumb", but yet you can not disprove what I say.....facts don't lie.
NCAG wrote:
<quoted text>Turns out they are the ones who cant handle the truth, or cant stand the fact that Jr is competitive once again. the past is the past but Jr haters will hang on to yesterday while the rest of us live in todays reality, which simply is..........Jrs kickin ass!!!!!! So Jim, swallow a dose of reality boy, or can you handle it?????? Nope, you cant!!!
What truth can't I handle?

I hang on yesterday.....wow you really need a dose of reality.

Jr. is doing well right now...very well, but I have no doubt he will falter.....as his track record proves.

“How We Roll”

Since: Nov 08

Area 51, Nevada

#27 Apr 26, 2011
overr88ted wrote:
<quoted text>
what about when jr wrecked the field trying to get back at brian vickers ? thats ok i guess
haha yeah that was okay because it wasn't Jr's fault Vickers over-corrected and drove into the field.#JustSayin

“How We Roll”

Since: Nov 08

Area 51, Nevada

#28 Apr 26, 2011
Jim wrote:
<quoted text>
When Jr. took out BV and a bunch of other cars it was intentional just as CE taking out BK was.
There is a huge difference, but I'm sure you can't see that.
Biggest difference is Carl caused his own chaos and blamed Brad at Atlanta when Brad was clearly not at fault. They showed the replay and even Carl said "I really thought it was his fault but that replay doesn't look like it was as malicious as I thought." He later came back on the track to interfere with everyone else's race, some 100 or so laps down with little or no opportunity to advance his position, to settle his personal grievance with Brad. That's how you lose my respect.

Kurt Busch wrecking Gordon after being nudged out of the way, Carl wrecking Brad on the last lap in Nationwide - both not respectable actions, but none so much as what Carl did at Atlanta.

I found it quite ironic that they had that video of drivers having enormous respect for safety in prerace recently, because it was Carl's name that came up as having showed the least amount of respect for the stupidest reason: Because Brad was NOT at fault at Atlanta and Carl disregarded that, concerns for safety, AND consideration for everyone else when he interrupted their race in the final laps.

“How We Roll”

Since: Nov 08

Area 51, Nevada

#29 Apr 26, 2011
Jim wrote:
<quoted text>
It's only crap to you because what I say is the truth and you can't deny it.
Lets have a little fun, shall we?
snow wrote:
<quoted text>Jim
you would disagree with a sign on the roadway. You always jump
on everyone's post looking for a fight. I have no use for you
or your crap...
I'm sure his driving record would prove you correct.

The context in which you use the word 'jump' suggests that the very purpose would be 'looking for a fight' so even boldly claiming he 'always' does is still a safe bet you're correct.

I believe its crap regardless of whether its true or who's saying it because of the purpose for saying it - which is to instigate a fight.

Jim, I'm sorry. You need to practice your trolling. You're looking about as guilty as a cheater still wearing the condom.
Wang

Cleveland, TN

#30 Apr 26, 2011
JrNationMakesMeLaugh wrote:
Uhhhh... welcome back?...
I felt bad when you "left" Topix a while back, NCAG, but it would have been nice if you could have returned without spouting the same old venomous drivel.
Raughing out roud!!

Gabby get Gabby panties in knot within 5 minute of letuln and Gabby still balking.

Ancient plovelb say: "Out of a dog's mouth wirr nevel come ivoly tusks."
Jim

Manchester, NH

#32 Apr 26, 2011
alpinedigital wrote:
<quoted text>
Biggest difference is Carl caused his own chaos and blamed Brad at Atlanta when Brad was clearly not at fault. They showed the replay and even Carl said "I really thought it was his fault but that replay doesn't look like it was as malicious as I thought." He later came back on the track to interfere with everyone else's race, some 100 or so laps down with little or no opportunity to advance his position, to settle his personal grievance with Brad. That's how you lose my respect.
Kurt Busch wrecking Gordon after being nudged out of the way, Carl wrecking Brad on the last lap in Nationwide - both not respectable actions, but none so much as what Carl did at Atlanta.
I found it quite ironic that they had that video of drivers having enormous respect for safety in prerace recently, because it was Carl's name that came up as having showed the least amount of respect for the stupidest reason: Because Brad was NOT at fault at Atlanta and Carl disregarded that, concerns for safety, AND consideration for everyone else when he interrupted their race in the final laps.
Causing a intentional wreck, wether it's by a slightest nudge or extreme shove is still causing a wreck no matter how you look at it.

Were I lose respect is when there I hear lame excuses and/or not taking ownership of what you did.
Jim

Manchester, NH

#33 Apr 26, 2011
alpinedigital wrote:
<quoted text>
Lets have a little fun, shall we?
<quoted text>
I'm sure his driving record would prove you correct.
The context in which you use the word 'jump' suggests that the very purpose would be 'looking for a fight' so even boldly claiming he 'always' does is still a safe bet you're correct.
I believe its crap regardless of whether its true or who's saying it because of the purpose for saying it - which is to instigate a fight.
Jim, I'm sorry. You need to practice your trolling. You're looking about as guilty as a cheater still wearing the condom.
When one feels as though I'm "looking for a fight" or that I "jump" on someones post, it stems from them not liking what I said, not because what I said was wrong.

They don't disprove or provide evidence to show what I said was incorrect they usually just fly off the handle, use profanity, or just create false statments to try and discredit the truth.

Which is fine with me it just shows what kind of person they are.

As for your last statement about trolling and the condom, you are doing exactly what you are condeming me for......looking for a fight.
NCAG

South Gate, CA

#34 Apr 26, 2011
Jim wrote:
<quoted text>
When one feels as though I'm "looking for a fight" or that I "jump" on someones post, it stems from them not liking what I said, not because what I said was wrong.
They don't disprove or provide evidence to show what I said was incorrect they usually just fly off the handle, use profanity, or just create false statments to try and discredit the truth.
Which is fine with me it just shows what kind of person they are.
As for your last statement about trolling and the condom, you are doing exactly what you are condeming me for......looking for a fight.
Are you God?? What gives you the right to judge somebody iffin they cuss a little bit?? Are you with out blame??? I think not, none of us are. I could care less what you or anybody else on here thinks of me! I quit doing that about 60 years ago, it really gets you know where to give a shit what people percieve of you. As long as one can live with hisself then you or nobody else has the right to judge! You come across as a bully, whether you realize it or not you do. Your so matter of factly about everything, like your the Racing God or something. You only have an opinion, just like us all, and you argue your opinion to the point it pissess folks off. Its only your opinion, its not wrote in stone cause jim said it. But where the rubber meets the road is that you can be you and I can be me, you are you for a reason and Im me for a reason. I think you really have a knowledge of racing, but your bias towards Jr is kinda pety. Jr is not the worst driver on the track, he aint the best either, that goes to JJ cause hes the damn champ, five times in a row. Jr is guilty of nothin no other driver has done during their career. Nothing!! They all have done stuff that made some likem and some hatem, thats stockcar racing pal!!So you cant be real about Jr, just biased and critical. I give every driver credit when its due, even ones I dont care much for. You cant do that, your bias wont let you!!
NCAG

South Gate, CA

#35 Apr 26, 2011
alpinedigital wrote:
<quoted text>
haha yeah that was okay because it wasn't Jr's fault Vickers over-corrected and drove into the field.#JustSayin
Hell yeah its alright, just like what Carl did was ok, they told them to have at it, whats the problem??

“How We Roll”

Since: Nov 08

Area 51, Nevada

#36 Apr 26, 2011
Jim wrote:
<quoted text>
When one feels as though I'm "looking for a fight" or that I "jump" on someones post, it stems from them not liking what I said, not because what I said was wrong.
They don't disprove or provide evidence to show what I said was incorrect they usually just fly off the handle, use profanity, or just create false statments to try and discredit the truth.
Which is fine with me it just shows what kind of person they are.
As for your last statement about trolling and the condom, you are doing exactly what you are condeming me for......looking for a fight.
Wrong.'Jump' suggests you weren't the first one talking, which you werent. You jumped with 'You're just a jealous hater.' so u can stop pretending to be innocent.

And there's nobody obligated to disprove or show you are incorrect since that would suggest you said something significant in the first place. Which you didnt.

And condemning you? No, I'm just playing ref to your little childish games, which they are. You opened with insult and accusation, and then pretend you're all innocent. That said, I submit again - your trolling needs practice.

“How We Roll”

Since: Nov 08

Area 51, Nevada

#37 Apr 26, 2011
Jim wrote:
<quoted text>
Causing a intentional wreck, wether it's by a slightest nudge or extreme shove is still causing a wreck no matter how you look at it.
Were I lose respect is when there I hear lame excuses and/or not taking ownership of what you did.
To me, causing a wreck suggests it was a direct result with no alternative. All Jr did was cause a momentary loss of control, which had BV regained it and drove away, then apparently now Jr did NOT cause a wreck. It cant be both ways. He either DID or he DIDN'T cause a wreck.(That's called examining the situation from both sides to make sure your details are accurate.)

Jr caused a momentary loss of countol, leaving Vickers in a compromising position from which he failed to escape. lol But there were other possible outcomes: Most natural of outcomes: slide counterclockwise away from traffic, or regain control. Vickers reaction caused the outcome of being in that position, not Jr.
NCAG

South Gate, CA

#38 Apr 26, 2011
Jim wrote:
<quoted text>
Profanity....words spoken by those who lack integrity.
Show me where I ever stated I was an "idiot"....why make up lies?
You belive I'm "dumb", but yet you can not disprove what I say.....facts don't lie.
<quoted text>
What truth can't I handle?
I hang on yesterday.....wow you really need a dose of reality.
Jr. is doing well right now...very well, but I have no doubt he will falter.....as his track record proves.
Well, I was gonna say, the fact Jr is doing very well this season was the truth you cant handle. But, you covered your ass by stating that in your comment with the usual its a fluke attitude. See, you give him credit for his good run so far but shoot him down in flames with that shit you said. And it was a different thread where you were doing your trolling and were tryin to give someone else some of your childish shit you said sarcasticly you were the idiot, I was just agreeing with you jimbo. ill look it up for you and show you since thats the next step with you.
Wang

Louisville, TN

#39 Apr 27, 2011
NCAG wrote:
<quoted text>Are you God?? What gives you the right to judge somebody iffin they cuss a little bit?? Are you with out blame??? I think not, none of us are. I could care less what you or anybody else on here thinks of me! I quit doing that about 60 years ago, it really gets you know where to give a shit what people percieve of you. As long as one can live with hisself then you or nobody else has the right to judge! You come across as a bully, whether you realize it or not you do. Your so matter of factly about everything, like your the Racing God or something. You only have an opinion, just like us all, and you argue your opinion to the point it pissess folks off. Its only your opinion, its not wrote in stone cause jim said it. But where the rubber meets the road is that you can be you and I can be me, you are you for a reason and Im me for a reason. I think you really have a knowledge of racing, but your bias towards Jr is kinda pety. Jr is not the worst driver on the track, he aint the best either, that goes to JJ cause hes the damn champ, five times in a row. Jr is guilty of nothin no other driver has done during their career. Nothing!! They all have done stuff that made some likem and some hatem, thats stockcar racing pal!!So you cant be real about Jr, just biased and critical. I give every driver credit when its due, even ones I dont care much for. You cant do that, your bias wont let you!!
Mole dog balking.
NCAG

South Gate, CA

#40 Apr 27, 2011
Wang wrote:
<quoted text>
Mole dog balking.
Mole dog balking?????I dont know what a mole dog is but I bet it barks real funny, your so silly bucktoothed squint eyed Wang. Is it true what they say about asain women??????????Just wonderin???????
Jim

Franklin, NH

#41 Apr 28, 2011
NCAG wrote:
<quoted text>Are you God?? What gives you the right to judge somebody iffin they cuss a little bit?? Are you with out blame??? I think not, none of us are.
Am I god.....no and I never claim to be, but thanks for asking.

I didn't judge, I mearly stated that profanity shows what kind of person you are, as does typing words like "iffin".
NCAG wrote:
<quoted text>I could care less what you or anybody else on here thinks of me! I quit doing that about 60 years ago, it really gets you know where to give a shit what people percieve of you. As long as one can live with hisself then you or nobody else has the right to judge!
It's obvious you do care or you wouldn't have written such a lenghty post.
NCAG wrote:
<quoted text>You come across as a bully, whether you realize it or not you do. Your so matter of factly about everything, like your the Racing God or something. You only have an opinion, just like us all, and you argue your opinion to the point it pissess folks off. Its only your opinion, its not wrote in stone cause jim said it.
I come across as a bully....really?

Then you must consider yourself one too with your profanity name calling!
NCAG wrote:
<quoted text>I think you really have a knowledge of racing, but your bias towards Jr is kinda pety. Jr is not the worst driver on the track, he aint the best either, that goes to JJ cause hes the damn champ, five times in a row. Jr is guilty of nothin no other driver has done during their career. Nothing!! They all have done stuff that made some likem and some hatem, thats stockcar racing pal!!So you cant be real about Jr, just biased and critical. I give every driver credit when its due, even ones I dont care much for. You cant do that, your bias wont let you!!
You also have a bias towards Jr. you will support him no matter what.

BTW, when he does well I will and have said so.

So I ask you to reread your post and ask yourself who's judging who.
Jim

Franklin, NH

#42 Apr 28, 2011
alpinedigital wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong.'Jump' suggests you weren't the first one talking, which you werent. You jumped with 'You're just a jealous hater.' so u can stop pretending to be innocent.
Ohhhhh....now I get it.

Jump is what NCAG did to my post #23 (I wonder why you didn't tell him/her the same thing) and you did to my post #28 and #29.

I guess you didn't see the sarcasm in my "jealous hater" statement.
alpinedigital wrote:
<quoted text>And there's nobody obligated to disprove or show you are incorrect since that would suggest you said something significant in the first place. Which you didnt.
And condemning you? No, I'm just playing ref to your little childish games, which they are. You opened with insult and accusation, and then pretend you're all innocent. That said, I submit again - your trolling needs practice.
They are obligated when they create lies.

As far as significance goes....it must be somewhat significant since you "jumped" in and keep repling to me.

Again, you condem me for childish games and trolling while you're doing the same thing to me.

I just love those hypocritical double standards.
Jim

Franklin, NH

#43 Apr 28, 2011
alpinedigital wrote:
<quoted text>
To me, causing a wreck suggests it was a direct result with no alternative. All Jr did was cause a momentary loss of control, which had BV regained it and drove away, then apparently now Jr did NOT cause a wreck. It cant be both ways. He either DID or he DIDN'T cause a wreck.(That's called examining the situation from both sides to make sure your details are accurate.)
Jr caused a momentary loss of countol, leaving Vickers in a compromising position from which he failed to escape. lol But there were other possible outcomes: Most natural of outcomes: slide counterclockwise away from traffic, or regain control. Vickers reaction caused the outcome of being in that position, not Jr.
Ohhhh.....I see.

Jr. didn't turn into BV which caused BV to lose control and take out a lot of cars.

Thanks for clearing that up.

Did you catch that sarcasm?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Matt Kenseth Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Harvick, Logano renew feud with Daytona confron... Feb '15 MrTinkertrain24 1
News Keselowski And Stewart Fined After Charlotte Sc... (Oct '14) Oct '14 Let it go 12
News Where will free agent Carl Edwards land? (May '14) Jun '14 GO TONY GO 56
News The number 17 DeWalt race car driven by Wiscons... (May '14) May '14 Lola24 2
News Jimmie Johnson dynasty deserves more fans than ... (Nov '13) Apr '14 hello1 28
News Johnson widens points lead on Kenseth's bad day (Nov '13) Nov '13 WHOYAKIDDING 7
News Jeff Gordon still in title contention, looking ... (Oct '13) Nov '13 Whoyakidding 5
More from around the web