Stop making excuses for the fact a child molester got away with it because of his celebrity and a good lawyer.<quoted text> Do you think that jurors are always in perfect agreement and that there aren't disputes among them? Or is that something you think is some sort of anomaly of the MJ jury?
Why are you offering sympathy for full grown adult men and women who knew full well the job they were expected to do as jurors, made their decisions, and then proceeded to whine about allegedly being 'pressured' by the mean, nasty old jurors who supported MJ's innocence? Again you have ignored the uncomfortable reality that some of those jurors had book deals which evaporated once the 'not guilty' verdict was handed down.
Like it or not, it's a fact of life that people are just as capable of understanding and digesting the exact same information, hearing the testimony, thinking it over, and then arriving at a very different conclusion than the one you have.
And because you didn't answer my question, the first time about NAMBLA-recommended books you defend, I'm going to ask you this question, again.
Why would you want to own a book filled with photos of nude and seminude children?