Goldman Family Subpoenas Simpson Reco...

Goldman Family Subpoenas Simpson Records

There are 11 comments on the The Associated Press story from Feb 12, 2007, titled Goldman Family Subpoenas Simpson Records . In it, The Associated Press reports that:

In a new attempt to get some of the estimated $40 million O.J. Simpson owes it, the family of Ron Goldman subpoenaed several Hollywood groups Monday for information on payments he may have received for 'The ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Associated Press.

“addicted”

Since: Jan 07

texas

#1 Feb 13, 2007
oj killed his wife, contrary to YOUR belief.
mad women

United States

#3 Feb 13, 2007
The Goldmens desevers NOTHING!!! His gay son was at the wrong place at the wrong time. Nicole was a tramp thats why she got what she got. LIVE WITH IT GOLDMENS!!!
Gomer

Medina, NY

#4 Feb 13, 2007
mad women wrote:
The Goldmens desevers NOTHING!!! His gay son was at the wrong place at the wrong time. Nicole was a tramp thats why she got what she got. LIVE WITH IT GOLDMENS!!!
Learn how to spel!
TB Chief

Decatur, IL

#5 Feb 13, 2007
Barbara Soto wrote:
To the Goldmans....
Let it go please let it go.
Not that I don't have heart, my brother was killed and the murderer is walking free and it wasn't until I let it go that I found peace.
Let it go.....being at peace is more fulfilling.
Hell No! Don't let it go! That would mean OJ wins and that is just what he wants to happen. I hope Fred Goldman is in OJ's ass for the rest of his life. That bastard murdered two people and got away with it and the civil penalty is the only way to make him pay... Hat's off to Fred Goldman. He is a good man...
TB Chief

Decatur, IL

#6 Feb 13, 2007
mad women wrote:
The Goldmens desevers NOTHING!!! His gay son was at the wrong place at the wrong time. Nicole was a tramp thats why she got what she got. LIVE WITH IT GOLDMENS!!!
You're a sick individual! Wish it were your family instead of Fred Goldman's. They don't deserve it but you do with your sick way of thinking.
R-Maak

Plymouth, MA

#7 Sep 28, 2007
Check it YO:

First off the Goldman's Oops!! The GOLDDIGGERS were awarded 30 plus million in a civil suit. hmm I thought OJ was not convicted and actually proven to be innocent. Our Judicial system is a sham and is a mochary of a real court. They who make the laws can bend or break the laws. The Goldman's should have never been able to sue him after he was proven innocent. And on another note, How can a court give away a person right to earn a living. OJ has kids he needs to support as well, What are they supposed to do. The Goldman's were on Opera a few weeks ago and I was ashamed she had them on there, these people said by stopping him from earning any funds is making them feel good about their son being murdered. Another thing is they should have never been allowed to write additional passages to the book, and another thing is once they have earned the settlement amount their right to OJ money making and the book should be over turned. basically once they reach 36 million or whatever the outlandish amount is they revoke all other earning privileges so that OJ can keep his name rights. These people tried to lie on opera by saying at first that they were only making a few cents on every book then as the interview went on it was un covered that they are making more but most of the money is being re-routed to theur other ventures. These funds must be counted as well toward that 36 million,( It's a white world and things aint' gon change, it'z a white world and it will remain the same, as modern day slavery and Oppression, dictate the day to day activities in a commoners life they haven't learned their lessons, they recruited black skin, to be amongst their army men, and woman, then the skin changed like Micheal jackson, We need leaders in the world to do whats right because it's the right thing to do, and not because the market said! Dude, The people make up the market let's stop buying stash, and make that S*** crash, Why does it take money to be president, when the best leader is poor, a green piece of paper in your pocket doesn't mean you know more, or know whats best for the public or human race, these people in office and congress get paid for doing nothing accept for making life hard for most of us, Check the stats on what they get paid you'll be surprised dun, We got Dems and republicans, their all drunk from drinking heinikins, they fight with each other, when their supposed to be watching our backs, they all need a smack....) Last note Nancy Palosi..While most the day of her appointment gave her props I did not because I knew when G. Bush said NO! she would not fight for the American people.. We gave the democrats office because the republicans were G.Bush followers, she is just the same..Hope yall liked the rhyme keep your head up, there's no one else to blame this is a white man in powers game...)

Peace
Reading is fundamental

Santa Ana, CA

#8 Sep 28, 2007
jennifer polar wrote:
oj killed his wife, contrary to YOUR belief.
Where you there?????? How do you know??????? Just guessing HUH!!! THE LAW said he was NOT Guilty. I don't care what you think he was tired by 12 of his peers who found him NOT GUILTY. Plus MONEY is not going to bring these two people back. I can understand the Goldmans wanted him to suffer but how will they move on???????
Red Bone

Albemarle, NC

#9 Oct 2, 2007
R-Maak wrote:
Check it YO:
First off the Goldman's Oops!! The GOLDDIGGERS were awarded 30 plus million in a civil suit. hmm I thought OJ was not convicted and actually proven to be innocent. Our Judicial system is a sham and is a mochary of a real court. blah blah blah, affirmative action I hate white people blah blah...I am a moron. Peace
R-Maak, you don't even know what you are talking about. He was found 'Not Guilty' as it requires a unanimous vote by the jury to convict you idiot. If one person doesn't agree then that's it and they have to settle for 'Not Guilty'. Innocent means all the jurors find him innocent. This was not the case. The majority found him guilty but only in a civil court does that matter. In a criminal court it must be unanimous. Why don't you stop looking at the color of your skin and blaming the white man and blame yourself for not getting a better education.
Red Bone

Albemarle, NC

#10 Oct 2, 2007
Reading is fundamental wrote:
<quoted text>
Where you there?????? How do you know??????? Just guessing HUH!!! THE LAW said he was NOT Guilty. I don't care what you think he was tired by 12 of his peers who found him NOT GUILTY. Plus MONEY is not going to bring these two people back. I can understand the Goldmans wanted him to suffer but how will they move on???????
Not so. The majority found him guilty and had to settle for not guilty as there were a few that wouldn't convert to guilty and the judge would not allow a mistrial or hung jury. He killed his wife! How else could he be held responsible in a civil suit genius? The prosecution screwed up a few times with the glove for one, and the police didn't get a warrant when they searched his property the next day, which violated the 4th amendment right of OJ, and all evidence collected was for the most part inadmissable. Did you even watch the trial. If you did you would only have the reason of either insanity or stupidity to believe he was innocent. OR, you are of the same race and think it's cute to see a black man kill some white people and get away with it for the most part, civil judgment aside. Either way you aren't very smart, black or white or whatever color as if that means anything anymore.
Reading is fundamental

Anza, CA

#11 Oct 3, 2007
Red Bone wrote:
<quoted text>
Not so. The majority found him guilty and had to settle for not guilty as there were a few that wouldn't convert to guilty and the judge would not allow a mistrial or hung jury. He killed his wife! How else could he be held responsible in a civil suit genius? The prosecution screwed up a few times with the glove for one, and the police didn't get a warrant when they searched his property the next day, which violated the 4th amendment right of OJ, and all evidence collected was for the most part inadmissable. Did you even watch the trial. If you did you would only have the reason of either insanity or stupidity to believe he was innocent. OR, you are of the same race and think it's cute to see a black man kill some white people and get away with it for the most part, civil judgment aside. Either way you aren't very smart, black or white or whatever color as if that means anything anymore.
He was foudn NOT GUILTY. I don't give a damn what you think. You don't know he killed his wife. The civil suit was for MONEY! PERIOD. For your information i'm mixed black and white bitch and dont you ever forget. I think it's dumb that you are so upset. Where they kin to you? I watch the whoel trial and had write my thesis on dumb ass. It's your stupidy that took you straight to race card. You must be a lonely white woman sitting at her computer wanting someone to write something so you can get so mad you have use what you think is a great statement. Get a life and go live to the Goldman and see if you can get some money from OJ's rolex.
Red Bone

Charlotte, NC

#12 Feb 24, 2008
Reading is fundamental wrote:
<quoted text>
He was foudn NOT GUILTY. I don't give a damn what you think. You don't know he killed his wife. The civil suit was for MONEY! PERIOD. For your information i'm mixed black and white bitch and dont you ever forget. I think it's dumb that you are so upset. Where they kin to you? I watch the whoel trial and had write my thesis on dumb ass. It's your stupidy that took you straight to race card. You must be a lonely white woman sitting at her computer wanting someone to write something so you can get so mad you have use what you think is a great statement. Get a life and go live to the Goldman and see if you can get some money from OJ's rolex.
Ignorance upsets me and alot of other people. Do your homewwork and stop letting the media and your peers paint your reality. Discover the truth. Occam's Razor. You are still a slave whether you know it or not. That's harse but think about it. I do not look at color unless stereotypes are evident and then I simply laugh at the sheep, white or black or mexican. Oh and I am sorry I called you names. OJ was guilty as hell. If I had 10 million I would bet every penny.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

The Towering Inferno Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News O.J. Simpson On 'Anger Management'? It's A Poss... (Jul '13) Jul '13 Dr J 2
News Fatalities continue as Chicago defends Fire Codes (Jan '13) Jan '13 Southern Cool 2
News Bank foreclosing on O.J. Simpson's Florida house (Jan '12) Oct '12 MK-SKS 11
News Hollywood's Most Beautiful Women Part VI (May '10) Dec '11 frank d 3
navy outank firechief? (Dec '10) Dec '10 dave 1
News Happy Birthday, Fred Astaire, Dancing Film Star... (May '09) Jan '10 Janet 4
News We think: O.J. Simpson may cry foul but his con... (Oct '08) Oct '08 Grandma Fudd 3
More from around the web