Who will stand up to Limbaugh?

GOOD NIGHT, AND GOOD LUCK was the well-known signoff of Edward R. Murrow, "the face of television" in its early days. Full Story
First Prev
of 8
Next Last

Since: Aug 09

Van Nuys, CA

#150 Nov 20, 2009
Even the dems are fed up with Obama. Rep. David Obey, D-Wisc, who chair of the House appropriations Committee, issued a paper statement demanding that the recovery.gov Web site be updated.

"The inaccuracies on recovery.gov that have come to light are outrageous and the Administration owes itself, the Congress, and every American a commitment to work night and day to correct the ludicrous mistakes."

I like that man's choice of words. How very true!
Buford

Chico, CA

#151 Nov 20, 2009
Marianne 20 wrote:
Even the dems are fed up with Obama. Rep. David Obey, D-Wisc, who chair of the House appropriations Committee, issued a paper statement demanding that the recovery.gov Web site be updated.
"The inaccuracies on recovery.gov that have come to light are outrageous and the Administration owes itself, the Congress, and every American a commitment to work night and day to correct the ludicrous mistakes."
I like that man's choice of words. How very true!
Sum ah dem aint "mistakes" thaze inn tent ton all. Thay'ze ah claimin 110,000 jobs ah bin saved or creeated in Caliornia (that the weigh it ah spalled at tha Optimo on tha glass case holdin tha beer), an den thay claim 75,000 ah dem haz the zip code 95814.

Wuts 95814? Why dat bee cap it tole, dat whut...

“YESHUA IS LORD”

Since: Apr 07

GAWGIA (GEORGIA)

#152 Nov 20, 2009
The Hey Tony wrote:
<quoted text>
More like Choosing one ADDICT over another. Obama is addicted to cigaretts and possible other drugs. Speaks volumes about your reasoning skills.
ps: it has been proven that cigaretts are more adictive than even heroin. One big difference in the two; Limbaugh knows how to make money. Obama only knows how to spend it. Limbaugh spends his own money, Obama spends ours, our children's, our great granchildrens, great-great--------'s money.
Mr.Obama has a good heart. He is not a racist or full of hate like Rush. Limbaugh isn't fit to lick Obama's boots.

“YESHUA IS LORD”

Since: Apr 07

GAWGIA (GEORGIA)

#153 Nov 20, 2009
Dumbocrat Hater wrote:
I AGREE!!!
If I were President, I would support our trops in battle.
Obama is a spineless worm!!!!!
I would ban abortion and gay rights!!!!
I'd cut taxes and welfare.
There would be no "housing and urban developement"!!!
Liberals suck!!!
The next death in Afghanistan will be our gutless muslim President's fault, and our soldiers and their families should start a military coup!!!!!
Of course the GITMO detainees are coming to Illinois. Obama Bin Laden made that deal before he was sworn into office. How much money do you think Illinois is getting for that???
Obama Sucks!!!!!
<quoted text>
You're free to pack up and leave this country anytime you get the notion. And don't ever come back.
RUSH IS RIGHT

Philippines

#154 Nov 20, 2009
Tony17 wrote:
<quoted text>Mr.Obama has a good heart. He is not a racist or full of hate like Rush. Limbaugh isn't fit to lick Obama's boots.
Obozo is :
A FRAUD
A MARXIST
A PUPPET
A MENTAL LIGHTWEIGHT
A CHICAGO THUG
A PAL OF TERRORIST LIKE WILLIAM AYERS (author of both Obozo books)

Rush has more brains in his little toe, then Obammie has in his whole body.
Now, Go suck an egg, Commie.

“YESHUA IS LORD”

Since: Apr 07

GAWGIA (GEORGIA)

#155 Nov 20, 2009
RUSH IS RIGHT wrote:
<quoted text>
Obozo is :
A FRAUD
A MARXIST
A PUPPET
A MENTAL LIGHTWEIGHT
A CHICAGO THUG
A PAL OF TERRORIST LIKE WILLIAM AYERS (author of both Obozo books)
Rush has more brains in his little toe, then Obammie has in his whole body.
Now, Go suck an egg,****.
LOL. I'm gay and I assure you that eggs are not what I'm accustomed to sucking,LMAO. And Rush's brains are indeed in his little toe which explains a lot about him.
Publius2

Chico, CA

#157 Nov 23, 2009
Tony17 wrote:
<quoted text>LOL. I'm gay and I assure you that eggs are not what I'm accustomed to sucking,LMAO.
That explains it all.
Howard r

AOL

#158 Nov 23, 2009
Publius2... you clearly missed the inference in #155. He is suggesting he and Rush Limbaugh have something in common, and it ain't eggs.
Publius2

Chico, CA

#159 Nov 23, 2009
Howard r wrote:
Publius2... you clearly missed the inference in #155. He is suggesting he and Rush Limbaugh have something in common, and it ain't eggs.
Consider the source.

Since: Apr 07

United States

#161 Nov 24, 2009
White Reverend Wright wrote:
Say no to Abortion
Say no to Gay Rights
Say no to Free Health Care
Obama Sucks!!!
1. If you made abortion illegal tomorrow, in five years the female populus of jails in this nation would double. Those women who were caught getting illegal abortions would be jailed, and those women who got abortions from those not qualified to give them would put their lives in grave danger. A percentage of them would die.

This is what happened before Roe Vs. Wade.

Right to lifers also never speak of the children born of people who cannot afford to have children. There is already an OVERFLOW of children who live in foster care facilities, and who will never have a normal childhood with a parent of legal guardian. These kids are subject to become criminals, addicts, or WELFARE recipiants.

2. Gay Rights... How you gonna say NO to human behavior?
You live in a country that has over ONE MILLION people in prisons and jails. So now you want put a limit on what gay people can do LEGALLY? Good luck with that. What you gonna do when the jails stack up with gays?

3. Free healthcare?
Sorry. You do not seem to understand that there is no such a thing a Free Healthcare. NOBODY has proposed FREE healthcare, and NOBODY in the Senate is voting on FREE healthcare. What is being proposed is healthcare provided by the government paid for by a large pool of Americans as an option to those companies who CONTROL the healtcare system. A system that railroads citizens via price and availablity.

I love the fact that those on the political right seem not to be informed of used to using COMMON sense when it comes to issues that affect us all.

This is a society that professes freedom for all who live here. Yet these wonderful people tell us that we should be free from Gays having the same freedoms that straight people do. That we should force women to have babies that cannot be properly raised, and that the HUMAN right to live without pain should not be addressed by the most powerful nation on the earth.

Dode Penrod

Lakewood, CA

#162 Nov 24, 2009
MarkL5 wrote:
<quoted text>
1. If you made abortion illegal tomorrow, in five years the female populus of jails in this nation would double. Those women who were caught getting illegal abortions would be jailed, and those women who got abortions from those not qualified to give them would put their lives in grave danger. A percentage of them would die.
This is what happened before Roe Vs. Wade.
Right to lifers also never speak of the children born of people who cannot afford to have children. There is already an OVERFLOW of children who live in foster care facilities, and who will never have a normal childhood with a parent of legal guardian. These kids are subject to become criminals, addicts, or WELFARE recipiants.
2. Gay Rights... How you gonna say NO to human behavior?
You live in a country that has over ONE MILLION people in prisons and jails. So now you want put a limit on what gay people can do LEGALLY? Good luck with that. What you gonna do when the jails stack up with gays?
3. Free healthcare?
Sorry. You do not seem to understand that there is no such a thing a Free Healthcare. NOBODY has proposed FREE healthcare, and NOBODY in the Senate is voting on FREE healthcare. What is being proposed is healthcare provided by the government paid for by a large pool of Americans as an option to those companies who CONTROL the healtcare system. A system that railroads citizens via price and availablity.
I love the fact that those on the political right seem not to be informed of used to using COMMON sense when it comes to issues that affect us all.
This is a society that professes freedom for all who live here. Yet these wonderful people tell us that we should be free from Gays having the same freedoms that straight people do. That we should force women to have babies that cannot be properly raised, and that the HUMAN right to live without pain should not be addressed by the most powerful nation on the earth.
Excelllent post!

What we are witnessing is the eternal struggle for man to have control over other humans. Organized religion validates man's God-given right to do this.

“Government IS the problem.”

Since: Jan 08

Chico, CA

#163 Nov 24, 2009
Dode Penrod wrote:
<quoted text>
Excelllent post!
What we are witnessing is the eternal struggle for man to have control over other humans. Organized religion validates man's God-given right to do this.
What do you call the government having control over us? If you give the government control over your health care, your choices and your control will be gone. Donít you understand that the more money you pay in taxes, one goal of the healthcare takeover and cap n trade is tax increases, the more indebted you become to the government, you become a serf. The government decides how much you will pay them, they decide how much they will pay you, what kind of health care you can have access to, what kind of vehicle you can drive, what kind of food you can eat.



http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Publius2

Chico, CA

#164 Nov 24, 2009
MarkL5 wrote:
<quoted text>
1. If you made abortion illegal tomorrow, in five years the female populus of jails in this nation would double. Those women who were caught getting illegal abortions would be jailed, and those women who got abortions from those not qualified to give them would put their lives in grave danger. A percentage of them would die. This is what happened before Roe Vs. Wade.
How do you account for the dramatic increase in the female prison population since Roe v Wade?
MarkL5 wrote:
Right to lifers also never speak of the children born of people who cannot afford to have children. There is already an OVERFLOW of children who live in foster care facilities, and who will never have a normal childhood with a parent of legal guardian. These kids are subject to become criminals, addicts, or WELFARE recipiants [sic].
or Presidents. Are you saying that a lack of opportunity justifies the murder of the unborn?
MarkL5 wrote:
2. Gay Rights... How you gonna say NO to human behavior?
Since when did aberrant behavior become the standard for society? Thatís exactly the same reasoning the North American Man-Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) is using to push for the right to push their criminal activity. So are you going to be an advocate for NAMBLA too? How about the shoplifter?ďHow you gonna say NO to human behavior?Ē
MarkL5 wrote:
You live in a country that has over ONE MILLION people in prisons and jails. So now you want put a limit on what gay people can do LEGALLY? Good luck with that. What you gonna do when the jails stack up with gays?
Itís legal to be gay and today its beneficial since gays are a protected minority under current hate crimes legislation. So what are you talking about? Gay couples in many states have equal rights (domestic partnerships) with heterosexual couples except the terminology of marriage. So far, most voters donít want to re-define the traditional meaning of the word. Can you understand that?
MarkL5 wrote:
3. Free healthcare?
Sorry. You do not seem to understand that there is no such a thing a Free Healthcare. NOBODY has proposed FREE healthcare, and NOBODY in the Senate is voting on FREE healthcare.
The proposed plan puts legislators in charge, throws privacy out the door and as you said, itís not FREE. It is not a Constitutional inalienable right, but it will create a dozen-plus government agencies that will take money away from other government plans that are also running in the red. It does nothing to curb waste and fraud in the system.
MarkL5 wrote:
This is a society that professes freedom for all who live here. Yet these wonderful people tell us that we should be free from Gays having the same freedoms that straight people do.
I already rebutted that at the state level.
MarkL5 wrote:
That we should force women to have babies that cannot be properly raised,
eugenics
MarkL5 wrote:
and that the HUMAN right to live without pain should not be addressed by the most powerful nation on the earth.
It is being addressed. It is even a topic on these threads, town councils etc.
Paradise

United States

#165 Nov 24, 2009
Publius2 wrote:
<quoted text> How do you account for the dramatic increase in the female prison population since Roe v Wade?
<quoted text> or Presidents. Are you saying that a lack of opportunity justifies the murder of the unborn?
<quoted text>Since when did aberrant behavior become the standard for society? Thatís exactly the same reasoning the North American Man-Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) is using to push for the right to push their criminal activity. So are you going to be an advocate for NAMBLA too? How about the shoplifter?ďHow you gonna say NO to human behavior?Ē
<quoted text> Itís legal to be gay and today its beneficial since gays are a protected minority under current hate crimes legislation. So what are you talking about? Gay couples in many states have equal rights (domestic partnerships) with heterosexual couples except the terminology of marriage. So far, most voters donít want to re-define the traditional meaning of the word. Can you understand that?
<quoted text> The proposed plan puts legislators in charge, throws privacy out the door and as you said, itís not FREE. It is not a Constitutional inalienable right, but it will create a dozen-plus government agencies that will take money away from other government plans that are also running in the red. It does nothing to curb waste and fraud in the system. <quoted text> I already rebutted that at the state level. <quoted text> eugenics <quoted text> It is being addressed. It is even a topic on these threads, town councils etc.
Doesn't change the fact the Rush Limbaugh is a pig.

“Government IS the problem.”

Since: Jan 08

Paradise, CA

#166 Nov 25, 2009
Dode Penrod wrote:
<quoted text>
What we are witnessing is the eternal struggle for man to have control over other humans. Organized religion validates man's God-given right to do this.
The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.

~H. L. Mencken
Dode Penrod

Lakewood, CA

#167 Nov 25, 2009
Brad II wrote:
<quoted text>
The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.
~H. L. Mencken
Yep, H.L.M. got it right. Like I said, "What we are witnessing is the eternal struggle for man to have control over other humans. Organized religion validates man's God-given right to do this." (It says right there in the Bible that Brad and Pub are "special."

“Government IS the problem.”

Since: Jan 08

Chico, CA

#168 Nov 25, 2009
Dode Penrod wrote:
<quoted text>
Yep, H.L.M. got it right. Like I said, "What we are witnessing is the eternal struggle for man to have control over other humans. Organized religion validates man's God-given right to do this." (It says right there in the Bible that Brad and Pub are "special."
Actually it says in the Bible that all God's children are special. You are one of God's children as well.

The quote applies to government control as well.
TNC37412

Chattanooga, TN

#169 Nov 30, 2009
I think Bill Murray would be a good guest to have on Raw Nerve.

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#170 Dec 1, 2009
Paradise wrote:
<quoted text>
Doesn't change the fact the Rush Limbaugh is a pig.
Yes, but a pig who oinks the truth...

With the revelations about the hoax perpetrated against America the other day regarding man made Globe-bull Warmin his accuracy rating had the biggest jump ever....went from being accurate 99.2% of the time to 99.5% in one day....that was because he'd been calling the global warming thing a hoax for 2 decades based primarily on who was promoting it.

It has almost become comical as the left holds onto lie after lie. You guys should start a cartoon network and have the global warming thing led by a cartoon buffoon character named Fat Albert.
kelly carr

Clearwater, FL

#172 May 19, 2010
brad jenks wrote:
<quoted text>
Rush is not from Fox "News" as you allege. His contract is with Clear Channel Communications.
THAT'S your comparison? Really? Hah.
waterford, mi?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 8
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Good Night, and Good Luck. Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Actor Tate Donovan now one of the "Good Peop... (Jun '11) Jul '12 babyr antonioh 2
Affleck takes a wife for 'Argo' (Dec '11) Jan '12 Babyr 2
Film review: The Ides of March (Oct '11) Oct '11 bien 1
The Ides Of March (Oct '11) Oct '11 WOODCHUCK 1
George Clooney hopes 'Ides of March' scores pol... (Sep '11) Sep '11 MCJ5050 1
Films with smoking scenes may need adult rating... (Aug '11) Aug '11 Village Mystery 1
Tate Donovan to Join Frances McDormand in MTC's... (Jul '10) Jul '10 rhirt 1
More from around the web