Cy Young winner Dickey, Mets still ne...

Cy Young winner Dickey, Mets still negotiating

There are 5 comments on the SFGate story from Dec 12, 2012, titled Cy Young winner Dickey, Mets still negotiating. In it, SFGate reports that:

In this Sept. 27, 2012, file photo, New York Mets starting pitcher R.A. Dickey delivers against the Pittsburgh Pirates during the first inning of a baseball game at Citi Field in New York.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at SFGate.

flbadcatowner

“I call it as I see it.”

Since: Jul 09

Retirement City

#1 Dec 13, 2012
One good season and he wants to be paid an elite pitcher's salary. How do we know he isn't a one year wonder? He does deserve a substantial raise, but if he wants to be paid like one of the elite, perhaps he should have a bonus laden contract that will allow him to make an eleite pitcher's pay only if he reaches certain levels of performance.
milla

Hicksville, NY

#2 Feb 10, 2013
Unfortunately, flbadcatowner, MLB contracts cannot include performance-based bonuses. They may include bonuses for "x" amount of innings pitched, but they cannot contain bonuses based on the quality of those innings.

More important, though, there's nothing wrong with rewarding a pitcher for past performance, nor are there any rules against it. Dickey put in three (not one) well-above-average seasons with the Mets. "One good season" is hardly an accurate assessment.

flbadcatowner

“I call it as I see it.”

Since: Jul 09

Retirement City

#3 Feb 10, 2013
milla wrote:
Unfortunately, flbadcatowner, MLB contracts cannot include performance-based bonuses. They may include bonuses for "x" amount of innings pitched, but they cannot contain bonuses based on the quality of those innings.
More important, though, there's nothing wrong with rewarding a pitcher for past performance, nor are there any rules against it. Dickey put in three (not one) well-above-average seasons with the Mets. "One good season" is hardly an accurate assessment.
Innings are still a bonus as an ineffective pitcher will likely get less work than one who shuts the opposition down with regularity.
milla

Hicksville, NY

#4 Feb 10, 2013
flbadcatowner wrote:
<quoted text>Innings are still a bonus as an ineffective pitcher will likely get less work than one who shuts the opposition down with regularity.
Your argument is logical on the surface. I wish the topic could be debated, but it's the rule of law when it comes to writing MLB contracts. The number of innings a pitcher pitches means little these days in regard to effectiveness....especially these days, what with pitch counts, specialty relievers, etc. Pretty soon, we may be seeing bonuses come in the form of inning caps, heh.

flbadcatowner

“I call it as I see it.”

Since: Jul 09

Retirement City

#5 Feb 11, 2013
Starters who can't get hitters out are always in danger of being relegated to the role of lost cause mop up man in the bullpen or worse which definitely will impact innings bonuses for a starting pitcher.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Major League Baseball Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News New York Mets should try to convince Seattle Ma... Dec 9 Trade Phartss 2
News Marlins fire sale begins? Mariners get Dee Gord... Dec 8 Second pharts 2
News Yankees Rumors: Alex Cobb choosing between two ... Dec 4 Need Pharts 4
News Mariners sign RHP Hisashi Iwakuma to minor-leag... Nov 28 Sign phart 2
News Washington Nationals could make blockbuster tra... Nov 28 Could phart 2
News Seattle Mariners Interested in Free Agent Jon Jay Nov 23 Free farts 2
News Could Carlos Beltran be the next Yankees manager? Nov 17 Fart Petrol 4
More from around the web