Giffords, Kelly group launches vetera...

Giffords, Kelly group launches veterans initiative for gun control

There are 9 comments on the CNN story from Nov 8, 2013, titled Giffords, Kelly group launches veterans initiative for gun control. In it, CNN reports that:

Dozens of retired senior military veterans are signing onto Americans for Responsible Solutions, the pro-gun control group of former Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and her husband, Mark Kelly.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CNN.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#1 Nov 9, 2013
Yeah, right....

"Dozens". HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa HaHaHa!!!
I will

Beckley, WV

#3 Nov 10, 2013
Thanks for the information, I will buy another firearm to add to my arsenal.
SatanRules

Phoenix, AZ

#4 Nov 10, 2013
I will wrote:
Thanks for the information, I will buy another firearm to add to my arsenal.
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4106/499209290...

how many does that make now?

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#5 Nov 10, 2013
SatanRules wrote:
<quoted text>
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4106/499209290...
how many does that make now?
ZERO for you, as always.
Capt Obvious

Greenville, TX

#6 Nov 10, 2013
Since Giffords cannot hold public office anymore, due to her injuries and brain damage, she is now being paid and supported by the gun control freaks to be their puppet. Sad and pathetic.

The gun control and people control freaks sure are evil and vile to use people that way to take away American's freedoms and right to protect themselves from gangs that the police just ignore.
SatanRules

Phoenix, AZ

#7 Nov 11, 2013
Capt Obvious wrote:
Since Giffords cannot hold public office anymore, due to her injuries and brain damage, she is now being paid and supported by the gun control freaks to be their puppet. Sad and pathetic.
The gun control and people control freaks sure are evil and vile to use people that way to take away American's freedoms and right to protect themselves from gangs that the police just ignore.
appreciate your input, now don't forget to wipe.(and stop sniffing your skid marks)....

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#8 Nov 11, 2013
SatanRules wrote:
<quoted text>
appreciate your input, now don't forget to wipe.(and stop sniffing your skid marks)....
"But by what provision of the constitution is that right conferred which does not equally apply to the amendment in question? The plain truth is, that a law authorising the people of a territory to form a constitution and state government, partakes of the nature of propositions to form with them a treaty or compact. The citizens of Missouri have certain rights, of which congress cannot deprive them. The following are examples: a right of protection in the free enjoyment of their liberty, property, and religion; a right of trial by jury; of the writ of habeas corpus; of freedom of speech and a free press, of petitioning government for a redress of grievances; of keeping and bearing arms; of security in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures; and many more that might be mentioned. Possessing these rights of which we cannot deprive them, they petition for a grant of others. In deciding on their application, we are bound to consider the subject in relation to the general welfare, embracing that of the particular territory. We grant the application upon specified conditions, not inconsistent with the principles of the constitution. The people of the territory examine these conditions and decide thereon; if approved they ratify the treaty, and succeed to its advantages; if rejected, they continue in the enjoyment of all the rights previously possessed."--U.S. Representative Mr. John W. Taylor, Thursday, January 27, 1820 Debate In The United States House Of Representatives,[Niles' Weekly Register, FROM MARCH TO SEPTEMBER, 1820--VOL. XVIII. OR, VOLUME VI.--NEW SERIES Supplementary To No. 1--Volume VI..--New Series. March 4, 1820, Missouri Question. Baltimore: Printed For The Editor By William Ogden Niles, At The Franklin Press, Water-Street, East Of South-Street. Pg. 19]
SatanRules

Dallas, TX

#9 Nov 11, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
<quoted text>
"But by what provision of the constitution is that right conferred which does not equally apply to the amendment in question? The plain truth is, that a law authorising the people of a territory to form a constitution and state government, partakes of the nature of propositions to form with them a treaty or compact. The citizens of Missouri have certain rights, of which congress cannot deprive them. The following are examples: a right of protection in the free enjoyment of their liberty, property, and religion; a right of trial by jury; of the writ of habeas corpus; of freedom of speech and a free press, of petitioning government for a redress of grievances; of keeping and bearing arms; of security in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures; and many more that might be mentioned. Possessing these rights of which we cannot deprive them, they petition for a grant of others. In deciding on their application, we are bound to consider the subject in relation to the general welfare, embracing that of the particular territory. We grant the application upon specified conditions, not inconsistent with the principles of the constitution. The people of the territory examine these conditions and decide thereon; if approved they ratify the treaty, and succeed to its advantages; if rejected, they continue in the enjoyment of all the rights previously possessed."--U.S. Representative Mr. John W. Taylor, Thursday, January 27, 1820 Debate In The United States House Of Representatives,[Niles' Weekly Register, FROM MARCH TO SEPTEMBER, 1820--VOL. XVIII. OR, VOLUME VI.--NEW SERIES Supplementary To No. 1--Volume VI..--New Series. March 4, 1820, Missouri Question. Baltimore: Printed For The Editor By William Ogden Niles, At The Franklin Press, Water-Street, East Of South-Street. Pg. 19]
‘In America, You Have a Right to Be Stupid,’ Kerry Says in Defense of Free Speech

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#10 Nov 11, 2013
SatanRules wrote:
<quoted text>
‘In America, You Have a Right to Be Stupid,’ Kerry Says in Defense of Free Speech
"Gentlemen of the Jury--I repeat what I said before, that the wearing of arms by citizens within the jurisdiction of their state, and in the bosom of society, is an evidence of the weakness and degeneracy of their government. The object of government is to protect the good and the virtuous against the bad and the vicious portion of mankind. When the good wear arms it is evidence that they cannot confide in the government for protection, and are obliged to rely upon their own vigilance and energies to save themselves from the bad. And whenever good men use their arms efficiently and successfully, and tragically if you please, against the mob or a conspiracy by which they are assailed, instead of the animadversion of the government they are entitled to its thanks and its gratitude. Sirs, I speak the language of soberness and truth when I tell you that the fall of Meeks and Rothwell,(which we all deplore,) by the arms of the assailed, has done more, by ten-fold, to repress and put down mobs and conspiracies in Louisville, and throughout the state of Kentucky, than the execution of those ill fated men by the government for the killing of one or all of the accused, had the accused fallen by their hands. There would be no mobs if it were certain that one or more of those who form the mob would certainly be killed. The principle of combination in a mob is, as I have before told you, COWARDICE. Each would fear that he might be slain, and thus, and for the same reason, every other man of them would abstain from the combination. Those assailed therefore by a mob should be considered by the people of every state as authorized by the government to kill as many as possible of the assailants; and so indeed they are to be considered, under a wise and just interpretation of our laws, which, when they cannot protect the citizen leave him to protect himself under the paramount authority of the law of nature...."--Hon: Judge Rowan, TRIAL OF JUDGE WILKINSON, DR. WILKINSON AND MR. MURDAUGH, IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MERCER COUNTY, KY. Monday, March 4th, 1839.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Military Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Japanese leader to visit Pearl Harbor with Obam... 2 hr Plumz3898 5
Brutal Air by Patricia L. McGurk 12 hr PatriciaMcGurk 1
News Japanese leader Abe to visit Pearl Harbor with ... 15 hr Le Jimbo 2
News White House announces support for women in mili... 22 hr Cupcake4854 17
News Can WWII tale of love on U.S. base in USSR insp... Sun Cassandra_ 3
News Bergdahl seeks pardon from Obama to avert deser... Sun Charm2176 5
News What's new in the business scene (Dec '11) Dec 2 sal obama lover 3
More from around the web