Obama: We Don't Know All Facts Yet on...

Obama: We Don't Know All Facts Yet on Navy Yard Shooting

There are 566 comments on the The Wall Street Journal story from Sep 16, 2013, titled Obama: We Don't Know All Facts Yet on Navy Yard Shooting. In it, The Wall Street Journal reports that:

President Barack Obama speaks from the White House about the shootings at the U.S. Navy Yard in Washington September 16, 2013.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Wall Street Journal.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#462 Sep 24, 2013
SirPrize wrote:
<quoted text>
So, what's the problem? Gun sales are being denied. What else do you think is needed?
Let's see:

Two tables.

One requires background check.

The other has a sign above it "Private sales: No identification. No waiting period. No record. No questions asked. Cash on the table, and you're gone with the gun."

Where is the felon going to shop?

No if you think you have the answer, ask yourself this:

What would be a simple solution to keep the felon from going to the second table?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#463 Sep 24, 2013
SirPrize wrote:
<quoted text>
Aw gee!
I was just beginning to believe you had managed to crawl out of the gutter.
Well, keep trying.
Don't dish it out if you can't take it, Shug.

“Trump fixing Obama's mess”

Since: Mar 09

& Making America Great Again!

#464 Sep 25, 2013
Keep the guns, get rid of the loonies!!

Adam 36

Since: Aug 13

Location hidden

#465 Sep 25, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!
Poor Au Dumbo... not happy to lose the 2012 election, he has run out of new material and restarting the 2008 whine.
Off topic...FLAGGED
Could you post any article written by Obama for the Harvard Law review?

Take all the time you need

Adam 36

Since: Aug 13

Location hidden

#466 Sep 25, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Let's see:
Two tables.
One requires background check.
The other has a sign above it "Private sales: No identification. No waiting period. No record. No questions asked. Cash on the table, and you're gone with the gun."
Where is the felon going to shop?
No if you think you have the answer, ask yourself this:
What would be a simple solution to keep the felon from going to the second table?
HARVARD STUDY: NO CORRELATION BETWEEN GUN CONTROL AND LESS VIOLENT CRIME

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/...

Exposing the looney left strawman argument about gun shows...

The Facts about Gun Shows

http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/f...

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#467 Sep 25, 2013
American_Infidel wrote:
Keep the guns, get rid of the loonies!!
Find the guns, find the loonies.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#468 Sep 25, 2013
Adam 36 wrote:
<quoted text>
Could you post any article written by Obama for the Harvard Law review?
Could you post any article written by you for the Harvard Law review?

PS: editors for newspapers generally don't write for the papers they edit.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#469 Sep 25, 2013
Adam 36 wrote:
<quoted text>
HARVARD STUDY: NO CORRELATION BETWEEN GUN CONTROL AND LESS VIOLENT CRIME
.

YOU CAN FIND A STUDY TO SUPPORT ANYTHING, GUMDROP.

How many people were shot in Japan last year?

“Bullsh*% Detector Enabled”

Since: Dec 08

Brooklyn, New York

#470 Sep 25, 2013
Adam 36 wrote:
<quoted text>HARVARD STUDY: NO CORRELATION BETWEEN GUN CONTROL AND LESS VIOLENT CRIME

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/...

Exposing the looney left strawman argument about gun shows...

The Facts about Gun Shows

http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/f...
Right wing nut propaganda.
Responsibility

Petaluma, CA

#471 Sep 25, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Find the guns, find the loonies.
Are those two somehow mythically connected? LOLL

“Happiness comes through giving”

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#472 Sep 25, 2013
American_Infidel wrote:
Keep the guns, get rid of the loonies!!
May I help you pack?

“Happiness comes through giving”

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#473 Sep 25, 2013
Adam 36 wrote:
<quoted text>
Could you post any article written by Obama for the Harvard Law review?
Take all the time you need
Obama was not a writer for The Harvard Law review. He was its editor. Now please cite your credentials.

Adam 36

Since: Aug 13

Location hidden

#474 Sep 25, 2013
Black Rhino wrote:
<quoted text>
Right wing nut propaganda.
Facts confuse you

Adam 36

Since: Aug 13

Location hidden

#475 Sep 25, 2013
Lawrence Wolf wrote:
<quoted text>Obama was not a writer for The Harvard Law review. He was its editor. Now please cite your credentials.
Are you saying the Editor doesn't write any editorials?

Adam 36

Since: Aug 13

Location hidden

#476 Sep 25, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
.
YOU CAN FIND A STUDY TO SUPPORT ANYTHING, GUMDROP.
How many people were shot in Japan last year?
Didn't Obama do that with Obamacare?

Thanks
Psych med shooter

Tampa, FL

#477 Sep 25, 2013
Before the late nineteen eighties, mass shootings and acts of senseless violence were relatively unheard of. Prozac, the most well known SSRI (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor) antidepressant, was not yet on the market. When Prozac did arrive, it was marketed as a panacea for depression which resulted in huge profits for its manufacturer Eli Lilly. Of course other drug companies had to create their own cash cow and followed suit by marketing their own SSRI antidepressants.

Subsequently, mass shootings and other violent incidents started to be reported. More often than not, the common denominator was that the shooters were on an antidepressant, or withdrawing from one. This is not about an isolated incident or two but numerous shootings. The question is, during the past twenty years is the use of antidepressants here a coincidence or a causation?

There have been too many mass shootings for it just to be a coincidence.

Read some more........ http://www.cchrflorida.org/blog/antidepressan...

“Yeah, but...”

Since: Sep 11

MILKY WAY

#478 Sep 25, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Let's see:
Two tables.
One requires background check.
The other has a sign above it "Private sales: No identification. No waiting period. No record. No questions asked. Cash on the table, and you're gone with the gun."
Where is the felon going to shop?
No if you think you have the answer, ask yourself this:
What would be a simple solution to keep the felon from going to the second table?
The 2nd table doesn't exist. It is illegal for felons to possess, let alone purchase a firearm.
In any case, Alexis was not a felon and had undergone background checks. His employers were even notified of his erratic (psychotic?) behavior. Yet, he not only was allowed into a secure facility he was allowed to bring a shotgun with him.

So, I am still maintaining that background checks are not the answer since it has been demonstrated time and again that the Government is not able to perform them satisfactorily.

“Hillary, thirty years of lying”

Since: Nov 08

Paris

#479 Sep 25, 2013
kuda wrote:
I’m on sabbatical again, this time to watch Ted Cruz’ marathon explicitly pubic self-gratification show. It’s all about his shameless commitment to self-exposure to demonstrate of how long he’s able to keep it up. He’s always had a narcissistic side and he loves that about himself, but his electoral dysfunction — that could just be a matter of cash flow.

Perhaps once this Cruz distraction has ended, the House might deem it appropriate to address the problem of the increasing rate of mass murders by introducing legislation for better gun control.
I wonder if Cruz's filibuster will be as long as the liberals filibuster against the civil rights act of nineteen sixy four which was fifty seven hours. They wanted blacks still hanging from trees. Now that was mass murder from your liberal buddy's the KKK.

“Hillary, thirty years of lying”

Since: Nov 08

Paris

#480 Sep 25, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>Find the guns, find the loonies.
We need to find the 1.7 billion bullets Obama bought first.

“Hillary, thirty years of lying”

Since: Nov 08

Paris

#481 Sep 25, 2013
Lawrence Wolf wrote:
<quoted text>Obama was not a writer for The Harvard Law review. He was its editor. Now please cite your credentials.
Yes, which historically wrote many of the articles. Obama wrote zero, zilch, nada.

He is a moron.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Military Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News CNN's Richard Quest Won't Believe Mass Shooting... 2 hr Get Out 2
News White House says Donald Trump has asked for mil... 4 hr Trump is a joke 6
News Navy officer: US won't be bullied by China in S... 8 hr Fatherchronica 7
News Failed missile test off of Kauai costs the US $... 8 hr Fatherchronica 1
News Agency managing vast US lands experiences year ... Mon Sandy 2
News The Latest: White House has Democrats' memo in ... Feb 13 spocko 179
News 'Tiger' Williams charged with sexual assault du... Feb 11 Cabin Fever time eh 1
More from around the web