Conn. shootings spark mental health debate
Liza Long's writings about her own experiences went viral after the Connecticut shootings, a byproduct of a country desperate for insight into the mentally unstable.
Join the discussion below, or Read more at KSDK NewsChannel 5.
#1 Dec 19, 2012
No science to the mental health industry. No medical model. No evidence based medicine and no test for chemical imbalance of the brain. The mental health industry is based on hearsay and is political. Protect your children and love one from these false diagnoses leading to toxic mind drugging by the Mental Health Industry.
Death, violence, erratic behavior and the suicide by mind drugs
#2 Dec 29, 2012
The mental health industry has been politically drugging American since the Republican Bush Sr presidency (1989).
#3 Dec 29, 2012
Allen Frances: Is Government Intervention Needed to Prevent an Unsafe DSM 5?
Inside the Battle to Define Mental Illness
Every so often Al Frances says something that seems to surprise even him. Just now, for instance, in the predawn darkness of his comfortable, rambling home in Carmel, California, he has broken off his exercise routine to declare that “there is no definition of a mental disorder. It’s bullshit. I mean, you just can’t define it.” Then an odd, reflective look crosses his face, as if he’s taking in the strangeness of this scene: Allen Frances, lead editor of the fourth edition of the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (universally known as the DSM-IV), the guy who wrote the book on mental illness, confessing that “these concepts are virtually impossible to define precisely with bright lines at the boundaries.” For the first time in two days, the conversation comes to an awkward halt.
Pasted from < http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/12/ff_dsmv... ;
There are no genetic tests, no brain scans, blood tests, chemical imbalance tests or X-rays that can scientifically/medically prove that any psychiatric disorder is a medical condition.
#4 Dec 29, 2012
Death, violence and mind drugs
#6 Jan 17, 2013
The mental health and pharmaceutical industry created insanity by the mind drugs for social control that goes against the values of our constitution.
#7 Jan 17, 2013
24 deaths (20 infants) and the cause is mental health drugs (just like all the other mass murders and violence in the society) and the mental health industry calls the shots gets more funding and the erosion of the Constitutional rights for the people including the rights (no doubt) to license psychologist to prescribe mind drugs for more addiction and instability and political reasons of policing the public. A NAZI state of mind.
#8 Jan 18, 2013
Why don't you do some simple research before making ignorant claims.
#9 Jan 18, 2013
Psychiatry: An industry of death
Psychiatry No Science
#11 Mar 11, 2013
Thousands people and children dead by the mental health industry from pharmacutical mind drugs.
#12 Mar 11, 2013
Obviously, this peculiar person who declares himself/herself as "Human Spirit" has completely hijacked this column. Please do not let this charlatan mislead you into any sort of therapy without consulting an actual person close to you.
#13 Mar 12, 2013
The articles presented are opinions. I don't claim expertise.
Not into providing therapy .
#14 Mar 12, 2013
Psychiatric Diagnosis: Too Little Science, Too Many Conflicts of Interest [i]
Paula J. Caplan, Ph.D.
There is a lot of pain and suffering in the world, and it is tempting to believe that the mental health community knows how to help. It is widely believed, both by mental health professionals and the general population, that if only a person gets the right psychiatric diagnosis, the therapist will know what kind of measures will be the most helpful. Unfortunately, that is not usually the case, and getting a psychiatric diagnosis can often create more problems than it solves, including a lifetime of being labeled, difficulties with obtaining affordable (or any) health insurance (due to now having a pre-existing condition), loss of employment, loss of child custody, the overlooking of physical illnesses and injuries because of everything being attributed to psychological factors, and the loss of the right to make decisions about one’s medical and legal affairs. The creation and use of psychiatric diagnosis, unlike, for instance, psychiatric drugs, is not overseen by any regulatory body, and rarely does anyone raise the question of what role the assignment of a psychiatric label has played in creating problems for individuals.[ii]
The Problematic History
These serious limitations have not prevented the authors of the American Psychiatric Association’s (APA) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), sometimes known as “the therapist’s Bible,” from making expansive claims about their knowledge and authority and wielding enormous power to decide who will and will not be called mentally ill and what the varieties of alleged mental illness will be. The DSM’s current edition is called DSM-IV-TR, and it was preceded by the original DSM (in 1952), then DSM-II (1968), DSM-III (1980), DSM-III-R (Third Edition Revised)(1987), DSM-IV (1994), and DSM-IV-TR (2000). The DSM-V is currently in preparation and slated for 2013 publication. Each time a new edition appears, the media ask whichever psychiatrist is the lead editor why a new edition was necessary, and like clockwork, each editor replies that it was because the previous edition really wasn’t scientific (Caplan, 1995). And each time a new edition appears, it contains many more categories than does the previous one. For instance, DSM-III-R contained 297 categories, and DSM-IV contained 374 (Caplan, 1995).
I served as an advisor to two of the DSM-IV committees, before resigning due to serious concerns after witnessing how fast and loose they play with the scientific research related to diagnosis (Caplan, 1995). The DSM is widely used, not only in the mental health system, but also in general medical practice, in schools, and in the courts. I have been involved since 1985 in trying to alert both therapists and the public to the manual’s unscientific nature and the dangers that believing in its objectivity poses. Since then, I have watched with interest a national trend toward gradually increasing openness to the idea that psychiatric diagnosis (A)is largely unscientific,(B)is highly subjective and political, and (C)can cause untold harm, ranging from the patients’ lowered self-confidence to loss of custody of children to loss of health insurance (because any psychiatric label can be considered evidence of a pre-existing condition) to loss of the right to make decisions about their medical and legal affairs.
More of this article:
#15 Mar 12, 2013
These Popular Drugs Can Make You Violent – Avoid Them
Some medications have been linked to an increased risk for violent, even homicidal behavior. A recent study identified 31 drugs that are disproportionately linked with violent behavior. Time Magazine lists the top ten offenders: 1. Varenicline (Chantix): The number one violence-inducing drug on the list, this anti-smoking medication is 18 times more likely to be linked with violence when compared to other drugs 2. Fluoxetine (Prozac): This drug was the first well-known SSRI antidepressant 3. Paroxetine (Paxil): Another SSRI antidepressant, Paxil is also linked with severe withdrawal symptoms and a risk of birth defects 4. Amphetamines:(Various): Used to treat ADHD 5. Mefoquine (Lariam): A treatment for malaria which is often linked with reports of strange behavior 6. Atomoxetine (Strattera): An ADHD drug that affects the neurotransmitter noradrenaline 7. Triazolam (Halcion): This potentially addictive drug is used to treat insomnia 8. Fluvoxamine (Luvox): Another SSRI antidepressant 9. Venlafaxine (Effexor): An antidepressant also used to treat anxiety disorders 10. Desvenlafaxine (Pristiq): An antidepressant which affects both serotonin and noradrenaline
Sources: Time Magazine January 7, 2011 PLoS One December 15, 2010; 5(12)
Pasted from < http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/ar... ;
#16 Mar 12, 2013
APA Admits there is no test for "chemical imbalance"
American Psychiatric Association admitted it lied to the American Public
THE CANDLELIGHT PROJECT by Bob Collier
29 September 2003 Issue 61
This week, a few representative excerpts from an article that I discovered on my internet travels only a matter of days ago, concerning the area in which biopsychiatry has, it seems to me, most comprehensively misled the world at large.
Please go to the website linked to below the excerpts and read the complete article. Then you will not be bamboozled should a doctor, teacher, journalist, ad man, politician, family member, friend, some bloke in your local pub, or whoever, start waffling on at you about 'mental illness' being caused by 'chemical imbalances' in the brain. You will know better!
There Are No "Chemical Imbalances"
"The hypothetical disturbances of neurochemical function that are said to underlie "mental illness" are just that: hypothetical. No experiment has ever shown that anyone has an "imbalance" of any neurotransmitters or any other brain chemicals. Nor could any conceivable experiment demonstrate the existence of a "chemical imbalance," simply because no one, least of all the biopsychiatrists, has the slightest idea what a proper and healthy chemical "balance" would look like."
"...the views and beliefs of biopsychiatry have nothing to do with the answers to scientific questions in any case: the hunt for biological "causes" of "mental illness" is an entirely fallacious enterprise in the first place; the non- existence of data to support its assertions is quite beside the point."
"The latest edition of one pharmacology text has this to say about the status of depression as a disease: "Despite extensive efforts, attempts to document the metabolic changes in human subjects predicted by these [biological] hypotheses have not, on balance, provided consistent or compelling corroboration." This is a long-winded way of admitting that not even a scrap of evidence supports the idea that depression results from a "chemical imbalance." Yet patients are told every day - by their doctors, by the media, and by drug company advertising - that it is a proven scientific fact that depression has a known biochemical origin. It follows directly that millions of Americans are being lied to by their doctors; and people surely can't give informed consent for drug treatment when what they're being "informed" by is a fraud.... To sum up: there is no evidence whatsoever to support the view that "mental illness" is biochemical in origin; in other words, things like "Unipolar Disorder" and "Attention Deficit Disorder" simply do not exist."
Read the complete article, There Are No "Chemical Imbalances" by Eaton T. Fores, at the Eaton T. Fores Research Center:
#17 Mar 12, 2013
Here is the agenda of the Mental Health in the take over of the Judiciary Branch of government (by state) on the problem the industry caused in the USA.(Drug America) This is a similar takeover to what happen in the Public School System.
Mental Health Courts State Links
Mental Health Court by links
Add your comments below
|Psychology Around the Net: April 21, 2018||Apr 23||Its reality||1|
|Male abuse victims seek place||Apr 23||Its reality||1|
|Recognizing the signs of autism||Apr 17||Its reality||1|
|Maybe We Should Call Psychiatry Something Else (Oct '16)||Apr 14||Its reality||2|
|Behind the List: Highest-paid county positions ... (Jan '15)||Apr 14||Its reality||5|
|John Rosemond: No one has proven ADHD is real (Apr '17)||Apr 12||C Kersey||2|
|What happened when I took my teenager to a gend...||Apr 11||Its reality||1|
Find what you want!
Search Psychiatry Forum Now
Copyright © 2018 Topix LLC