Marin Voice: 'Clunkers' and obesity l...

Marin Voice: 'Clunkers' and obesity linked

There are 5 comments on the Marin Independent Journal story from Aug 17, 2009, titled Marin Voice: 'Clunkers' and obesity linked. In it, Marin Independent Journal reports that:

AMERICANS don't like being told what to do. Nor do we much appreciate moralizing or taxes.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Marin Independent Journal.

Fedup Citizen


#1 Aug 18, 2009
Who will operate the facility? Novato Veolia? Novato Sanitary- camel's nose in the tent. Desal - head and shoulders inside. Wake up Marin.
Diane Livia

San Bruno, CA

#2 Aug 18, 2009
I'm very disappointed in the League of Women Voters on this issue. More supply is not the answer. There is only one answer, and that is conservation.

As for desal, so far Marin's plan for the toxic effluent is to dump it in the Bay. And I believe the method of extracting the water from the Bay will cause massive entrainment of most of the living organisms. Completely unacceptable to everyone else around the Bay, and across the State.

Marin, get with it. You have the best general plan in CA, probably the country. Don't sell out your excellent environmental past at this juncture.

Double plumb all new construction with grey water and create incentives to upgrade exsiting structures, quit watering lawns and other wet landscaping, fine your egregious water users, and you'll have plenty of water.
Diane Livia

San Bruno, CA

#3 Aug 18, 2009
MIJ is posting these comments to the wrong article. The correct article is "Desalination part of the problem."
Water watcher

Mill Valley, CA

#4 Aug 18, 2009
Umm, Diane... you have a desalination facility over in Hayward that produces a large part of the water for your water district. In addition, you have access to Delta water and Hetch Hetchy water, which Marin does not. The brine from your plant goes into the Bay, with no detrimental impacts. So, it strikes me as a bit disingenuous for you to complain about Marin trying to secure a reliable supply. This is particularly true in light of the fact that far more water is used for irrigation of lawns in your district than is used in Marin. And Marin has many more buildings with double-plumbing that does your water district.
Concerned Citizen

San Rafael, CA

#5 Aug 18, 2009
Water watcher is disingenuous. The Hayward facility is for brackish groundwater - not surface water from the bay as proposed for Marin. The Hayward facility is for only 10% of supply. A 15 MGD facility for Marin would be more than a 50% increase in supply, when none is actually needed. The energy use would be much higher for Marin and the brine saltier.

Marin has plenty of low cost, environmentally friendly options for improving supply reliability. Desal is being sold under false pretenses. If desal is so badly needed for Marin, why does MMWD have to cook the figures to attempt to prove it? The public should be outraged at the blatant misinformation provided by MMWD.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Preventive Medicine Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Mumps Outbreak Tied to Vaccine Shortfalls (Mar '17) Mar '17 Hide the Kids 1
News Pasadena will spend $1.5M to combat smoking amo... (Nov '16) Nov '16 Raymond Cyst 1
News Remote and poor Australians at greater risk of ... (Oct '16) Oct '16 Dawson 4
News Many gay and bisexual men unaware that PrEP med... (Oct '16) Oct '16 Xstain Spot Remover 1
News Wellness Committee of Thousand Oaks Presents "1... (Jul '16) Jul '16 Udo 1
News E-cigarettes don't help people quit smoking (Apr '16) Apr '16 Setton U Strait 2
News 10 Ways to Lower Cholesterol (Jan '12) Sep '15 carterbn 7