Doctors call for review of cancer treatments

There are 4 comments on the Jan 18, 2009, The Sydney Morning Herald story titled Doctors call for review of cancer treatments. In it, The Sydney Morning Herald reports that:

CANCER treatments should be independently reviewed to ensure toxic, expensive and ineffective drugs are not being overused at the expense of patients and taxpayers, oncologists say.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Sydney Morning Herald.



#1 Jan 18, 2009
It is a shame that we do not consider using Genetics to help with the cure of cancer. I have received treatment tailored to the genes that have caused my cancer along with other treatments, and I am in remission!Prior to this treatment, I was give a few months to live. I had to pay my treatment out of pocket, because it is not FDA approved in the U.S.A WHAT A SHAME WE PUT THE ALMIGHTY DOLLAR AHEAD OF MEDICAL CURES!!!


#2 Jan 19, 2009
What is the name of the treatment you used? I found this article - about alternative cancer treatments, and I would like to know what else is there.

Since: Dec 05

Union, NJ

#3 Jan 19, 2009
Dr. Haines has been saying that cancer sufferers are taking doses of expensive and potentially toxic treatments that are possibly well in excess of what they need (reported in the Journal of Clinical Oncology).

Emerging evidence shows that many of the highly expensive "targeted" cancer drugs (Herceptin, Avastin and Rituximab) may be just as effective and produce fewer side effects if taken over shorter periods and in lower doses.

Dr. Haines stated in the Journal that "it would seem that pharmaceutical companies are attracted to studies looking at the maximum tolerated dose of any treatments." He suggested the we make the search for minimum effective doses of these treatments one of the key goals of cancer research.

He gave as an example, Avastin, used to fight colon and lung cancers, the dose being tested is 15 milligrams per kilogram of body weight, despite other research showing it may work with 3 milligrams per kilogram.

As the Haines study suggested more must be spent on analyzing drug data, we also need larger and more detailed studies to figure out why there is an association between pharmaceutical involvement and positive results.
#4 Sep 23, 2013
I have ordered 2 times from this website PILLSMEDSHOP. COM . I called yesterday the customer care and asked for a discount as i was about to order twice the regular amount.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Oncology Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News To battle cancer, choose oncologist with care (May '08) Apr 11 VoteJoe 31
News Valerie Harper to Keynote Extraordinary Healer ... Apr 10 _Learsi 1
News Author Robert B. Marcus Jr. Promotes His Politi... Apr 6 Waffle_Eris 1
News What doctor thinks about 'Jolie effect' Mar 29 Disclaimer 5
Oncologists, take my brief survey on rehabilit... Mar '15 no_scrubs_ 1
News Knee pain leads to bone cancer diagnosis (May '14) Feb '15 Website Operator 9
Should I be concerned? Feb '15 Happyone 1
More from around the web