Study: Radiation for breast cancer ca...

Study: Radiation for breast cancer can harm hearts

There are 4 comments on the story from Mar 13, 2013, titled Study: Radiation for breast cancer can harm hearts. In it, reports that:

Women treated with radiation for breast cancer are more likely to develop heart problems later, even with the lower doses used today, troubling new research suggests.

Join the discussion below, or

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12


#1 Mar 13, 2013
Um, duh, radiation can harm people, not shocking news. But when you have the choice of certainly dying a horrible and painful death, and maybe having to limit activity, which would you choose? I'd prefer the radiation in that situation, yeah, I'd rather have a few more years than none at all.

Malolos, Philippines

#2 Mar 14, 2013
This is indeed troubling to know. Hopefully they can find a way to lessen or remove this side effect.

Since: Feb 10

Saint Petersburg, FL

#3 Mar 14, 2013
I stopped when the article started blaming the patient by saying they should keep their blood pressure, weight and cholesterol under control. If they didn't CONTROL for those factors in the research, they should zip their lips.

This is a perfect example of the medical bias in breast cancer that says, "Have this treatment no matter what. I think it wokrs."

You want to avoid radiation? Many times you can by having a mastectomy. If you have some lymph node involvement, you may still have to have some radiation, but not in a way that will put your heart at risk.

Don't want a mastectomy? I understand, but I didn't want radiation on top of surgery, three kinds of chemo, Herceptin and an aromatase inhibitor. I was able to avoid six weeks of radiation and I jumped at hte chance. But each woman has to decide for herself.

However, articles that draw issues in that weren't in the research only reveal the medical bias toward the treatment in question -- in this case, radiation. That article tried to sugar-coat the truth, and as someone who could well have breast cancer again -- I don't appreciate it.

Since: Feb 10

Saint Petersburg, FL

#4 Mar 14, 2013
nurseamy12 wrote:
This is indeed troubling to know. Hopefully they can find a way to lessen or remove this side effect.
Unfortunately they tried by reducing the radiation. That didn't work, so now they're hiding the truth behind cholesterol, etc. Many times a mastectomy will allow you to avoid radiation -- but it's not guaranteed.

It worked for me.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Oncology Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Vaccine may cut HPV infections, an oral cancer ... May 18 HPV conjob 1
News Parker Hughes Cancer center suspending operations (Feb '08) Apr '17 Laura 17
Benign tumor Mar '17 Bharath k 1
News Myriad Genetics Announces an Assay that Identif... (Nov '16) Feb '17 Purplemouse2 8
News Holzer receives donation from Fruth pharmacies Jan '17 Steve 1
News New team players: Palliative care specialists f... Jan '17 Death 3
News Should Gerard Depardieu Have Worn Adult Diapers... (Aug '11) Jan '17 kirton 2
More from around the web