Children with autism have elevated levels of steroid hormones in the womb

Jun 3, 2014 Full story: EurekAlert! 34

Scientists from the University of Cambridge and the Statens Serum Institute in Copenhagen, Denmark have discovered that children who later develop autism are exposed to elevated levels of steroid hormones in the womb.

Full Story
First Prev
of 2
Next Last
A CON

Winnipeg, Canada

#1 Jun 3, 2014
Its garbage from Denmark and Barin Cohen.
ric99

Lincoln, UK

#2 Jun 3, 2014
It would be a waste of time to ask Ross Coe where his evidence is that this study is "garbage". We know that all we will get back is zero evidence and a load of insults, and this coming from someone who is so dim that he can't even spell 'Baron-Cohen', despite the fact that the article spells it for him.
ricMORON99

Winnipeg, Canada

#3 Jun 4, 2014
ric99 wrote:
It would be a waste of time to ask Ross Coe where his evidence is that this study is "garbage". We know that all we will get back is zero evidence and a load of insults, and this coming from someone who is so dim that he can't even spell 'Baron-Cohen', despite the fact that the article spells it for him.
who cares about spelling some provac liar's name. Baron Cohen and Denmark has been producing stool samples and misinfo for vaccine makers for years so parents can be fooled into believing they are harmless.
ric99

Grimsby, UK

#4 Jun 4, 2014
Exactly as predicted, no evidence of misinfo from Ross Coe as usual.
PHARMA maims kils

Winnipeg, Canada

#5 Jun 4, 2014
ric99 wrote:
Exactly as predicted, no evidence of misinfo from Ross Coe as usual.
ricDUH99 has elevated levels of crapola
ric99

Lincoln, UK

#6 Jun 4, 2014
Also exactly as predicted here are the insults from Ross Coe, and still no evidence.
ricHAWKINS99

Winnipeg, Canada

#7 Jun 4, 2014
ric99 wrote:
Also exactly as predicted here are the insults from Ross Coe, and still no evidence.
and typical NOTHING from UK TROLL
ric99

Lincoln, UK

#8 Jun 5, 2014
It seems that Ross Coe's memory is worse than ever. He appears to have 'conveniently' forgotten the links to REAL scientific studies that friend and I have linked to, to which he responded by calling the studies "junk science" or "garbage", without once being able to give any scientific evidence for them to be labeled as such.
ricDUH99

Winnipeg, Canada

#9 Jun 5, 2014
ric99 wrote:
It seems that Ross Coe's memory is worse than ever. He appears to have 'conveniently' forgotten the links to REAL scientific studies that friend and I have linked to, to which he responded by calling the studies "junk science" or "garbage", without once being able to give any scientific evidence for them to be labeled as such.
ricDUH has spammed one trash study and just like all provcs claims there are all these studies. But then they dont supply them. ricDUH thinks his one study proves it all when it doesn't. ricDUH is only 15 and acts like a teen. When he grows up he may see things like a mature person des, but he seems pretty dumb, so no promises.
ric99

Lincoln, UK

#10 Jun 5, 2014
A classic response from Ross Coe, with a combination of memory loss and insults. He only has to look back through the posts I have made on this forum to see that I have posted a number of links to studies showing that there is no link between vaccination and autism (not just one as he is now claiming), all of which he claimed (without any evidence) were "junk science". The only thing that is 'junk' around here is Ross Coe's brain.
NO F WAY

Winnipeg, Canada

#11 Jun 5, 2014
ric99 wrote:
A classic response from Ross Coe, with a combination of memory loss and insults. He only has to look back through the posts I have made on this forum to see that I have posted a number of links to studies showing that there is no link between vaccination and autism (not just one as he is now claiming), all of which he claimed (without any evidence) were "junk science". The only thing that is 'junk' around here is Ross Coe's brain.
poor 15 year old ricDUH Has his own memory laspes to worry about
ric99

Spilsby, UK

#12 Jun 6, 2014
If I'm having memory problems, as Ross Coe suggests, then how come I remember posting several links to real studies such as the ones below, whereas Ross Coe (with his selective dementia) claims I never posted more than one link to one study:-

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/...

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j....

http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/48/4/45...

http://www.ucdmc.ucdavis.edu/publish/news/new...

He also forgets that he dismissed them all as being “junk/trash science”, without giving any scientific reason for saying so. Of course we all know his real reason. He just doesn't like the results from these peer reviewed studies, because they all show that there is no causative link between vaccines and any type of autism (including regressive autism).
WHAT

Winnipeg, Canada

#13 Jun 6, 2014
ric99 wrote:
If I'm having memory problems, as Ross Coe suggests, then how come I remember posting several links to real studies such as the ones below, whereas Ross Coe (with his selective dementia) claims I never posted more than one link to one study:-
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/...
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j....
http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/48/4/45...
http://www.ucdmc.ucdavis.edu/publish/news/new...
He also forgets that he dismissed them all as being “junk/trash science”, without giving any scientific reason for saying so. Of course we all know his real reason. He just doesn't like the results from these peer reviewed studies, because they all show that there is no causative link between vaccines and any type of autism (including regressive autism).
No Wikpedia?
COMPLETE TRASH SCIENCE

Winnipeg, Canada

#14 Jun 6, 2014
ric99 wrote:
If I'm having memory problems, as Ross Coe suggests, then how come I remember posting several links to real studies such as the ones below, whereas Ross Coe (with his selective dementia) claims I never posted more than one link to one study:-
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/...
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j....
http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/48/4/45...
http://www.ucdmc.ucdavis.edu/publish/news/new...
He also forgets that he dismissed them all as being “junk/trash science”, without giving any scientific reason for saying so. Of course we all know his real reason. He just doesn't like the results from these peer reviewed studies, because they all show that there is no causative link between vaccines and any type of autism (including regressive autism).
You've really shown how dumb you are by posting this trash. The Davis Studt confirms regressive autism is separate from non-regressive. You and friend have claimed over and over there is only one autism and no regressive at all. Thanks for clearing that up and showing you two bozo's don't know what you're talking about. Oxforf Journal say no new variant of autism and claim a baby could handle thousands of vaccines. Yes Paul offit is involved and shows he's deranged and a danger to babies. Wiley "online Library no better than Wikipedia, not a science journal at all. Japan study, the one that states MMR was stopped but then single does given in one visit instead, with an increase in autism . What a con, talk about fraud, claiming no connection to MMR but then giving separate vaccines instead, but not making that clear. Lancet, sold out to GSK, credibility zero. So hilarious Hawkins just a bunch of trash science from pro-vacs, NOT independant researchers.
ric99

Horncastle, UK

#15 Jun 7, 2014
So given the evidence, Ross Coe no longer insists that I have only posted one link.

I have always agreed that there are a number of types of autistic conditions within the autistic spectrum, including Regressive, Aspergers, etc. Concerning regressive autism, the Davis study results show that boys who later went on to regress into autism had enlarged brains from birth (or before), long before any vaccinations, so by simple logic, vaccines could not have been the cause of the very type of autism that Ross Coe claims is vaccine caused.

As for the Wiley reported evidence, Ross Coe failed to notice that the Japanese study was first published in the Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry Volume 46, Issue 6, pages 572–579, June 2005, which clearly shows that when MMR vaccination was stopped in Japan, the autism rate continued to rise, thus providing clear evidence that MMR could not have been responsible for the rise in autism rates, as anti-vaxxers like Ross Coe claim.

Still no scientific evidence from Ross Coe that any of these studies are “junk/trash science” I notice.

Since: Jan 07

Location hidden

#16 Jun 7, 2014
I have never said 'there is only one autism and no regressive at all'. What I have sais is autism is autism no matter the onset. Hello.

As for the Japan study, clearly Ross Coe cant comprehend what the study states. The MMR vaccination rate in the city of Yokohama declined significantly in the birth cohorts of years 1988 through 1992, and not a single vaccination was administered in 1993. Cumulative incidence of ASD up to age seven increased significantly in the birth cohorts of years 1988 through 1996 and most notably rose dramatically beginning with the birth cohort of 1993. The reform of the Immunization Law was in 1994. And a monovalent vaccine certinly does not confirm an MMR connection! Hello!
ricMORON99

Winnipeg, Canada

#18 Jun 7, 2014
ric99 wrote:
So given the evidence, Ross Coe no longer insists that I have only posted one link.
I have always agreed that there are a number of types of autistic conditions within the autistic spectrum, including Regressive, Aspergers, etc. Concerning regressive autism, the Davis study results show that boys who later went on to regress into autism had enlarged brains from birth (or before), long before any vaccinations, so by simple logic, vaccines could not have been the cause of the very type of autism that Ross Coe claims is vaccine caused.
As for the Wiley reported evidence, Ross Coe failed to notice that the Japanese study was first published in the Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry Volume 46, Issue 6, pages 572–579, June 2005, which clearly shows that when MMR vaccination was stopped in Japan, the autism rate continued to rise, thus providing clear evidence that MMR could not have been responsible for the rise in autism rates, as anti-vaxxers like Ross Coe claim.
Still no scientific evidence from Ross Coe that any of these studies are “junk/trash science” I notice.
There has been no evidence to prove enlarged brains cause autism or what it indicates, so ricDUh is jumping to convulsions. The Japan study as I ALREADY said was bogus because they stopped the MMR but then gave separate M, M, And R vaccines in the same visit. But they don't say so in ricDUH'S junk science.
ricMORON99

Winnipeg, Canada

#19 Jun 7, 2014
friend wrote:
I have never said 'there is only one autism and no regressive at all'. What I have sais is autism is autism no matter the onset. Hello.
As for the Japan study, clearly Ross Coe cant comprehend what the study states. The MMR vaccination rate in the city of Yokohama declined significantly in the birth cohorts of years 1988 through 1992, and not a single vaccination was administered in 1993. Cumulative incidence of ASD up to age seven increased significantly in the birth cohorts of years 1988 through 1996 and most notably rose dramatically beginning with the birth cohort of 1993. The reform of the Immunization Law was in 1994. And a monovalent vaccine certinly does not confirm an MMR connection! Hello!
That's meaningless babble. Not a single vaccine? What vaccine or vaccines did they not give? MMR? Yeah goof then they gave singles, plus other vaccines. There was never a time no vaccine was given.
ric99

Lincoln, UK

#20 Jun 8, 2014
If there is no evidence that enlarged brain from birth (or earlier) is the cause of regressive autism in boys, then how does Ross Coe explain the fact that ONLY those boys who went on to regress into autism had enlarged brains from birth, whereas boys who did not go on to get regressive autism, but were later diagnosed with classic autism or other ASD conditions did NOT have enlarged brains from birth. Also, non-autistic boys did not have enlarged brains from birth.

Ross Coe also 'conveniently' forgets that the vast majority of vaccinated boys do NOT regress into autism, or get any other type of ASD, so the correlation between vaccines and regressive autism is very small, whereas the correlation between enlarged brain from birth and regressive autismin boys is extremely large.
ricDUH99

Winnipeg, Canada

#21 Jun 8, 2014
ric99 wrote:
If there is no evidence that enlarged brain from birth (or earlier) is the cause of regressive autism in boys, then how does Ross Coe explain the fact that ONLY those boys who went on to regress into autism had enlarged brains from birth, whereas boys who did not go on to get regressive autism, but were later diagnosed with classic autism or other ASD conditions did NOT have enlarged brains from birth. Also, non-autistic boys did not have enlarged brains from birth.
Ross Coe also 'conveniently' forgets that the vast majority of vaccinated boys do NOT regress into autism, or get any other type of ASD, so the correlation between vaccines and regressive autism is very small, whereas the correlation between enlarged brain from birth and regressive autismin boys is extremely large.
Once again ricDUh jumps to conclusions and exaggerates the evidence of a single study whose variables are not fully explained. or understood. But that won't stop ricDUH'S misinformation campaign. Enlarged brains have not been explained, and what happened suddenly to "correlation does not ean causation"? ricDUH must have forgot that he like tha little sayin to refute everythng he doesn't support.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Medicine Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Male Sexual Enhancement Products: Immediate Pub... (Jun '14) 36 min jeffery05 10
The Best Ed Medicine (May '09) 1 hr renais 104
Who will care for children with autism when the... (Aug '13) 1 hr XTC 97
Pregnancy Symptoms - 12 Very Early Symptoms of ... (Jun '07) 2 hr Haley 6,114
WildomarHEALTH: Anti-vaccine parents defend bel... 5 hr Chiropractor From... 6
Some doctors won't see patients with anti-vacci... 6 hr Sam 1
Linking care to the community 7 hr preemie mom 3
More from around the web