Sri Lanka's Northern Rail track to Ma...

Sri Lanka's Northern Rail track to Madhu opens

There are 17 comments on the Colombo Page story from May 14, 2013, titled Sri Lanka's Northern Rail track to Madhu opens. In it, Colombo Page reports that:

May 14, Medawchchiya: After a gap of 25 years, Sri Lankans paying homage to Madhu Church in Madhu can now take the train from Medawchchiya in Anuradhapura District.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Colombo Page.

Siva Sankaran Sarma

Heidelberg, Australia

#1 May 14, 2013
In time to settle more Sinhalese monkeys around sacred precinct of Madhu on illegally confiscated Eelam Tamil Catholic homes lands and farms
Tamule jackass

Ottawa, Canada

#2 May 14, 2013
no go to the corner and think about the killings you did. killer stateless vesi.
CrimeaRiver

UK

#3 May 15, 2013
Siva Sankaran Sarma wrote:
In time to settle more Sinhalese monkeys around sacred precinct of Madhu on illegally confiscated Eelam Tamil Catholic homes lands and farms
You understand of course that this mythical place called Eelam has never existed.

Forget the historical arguments. The term Eelam was only coined recently as a mono ethnic state for Tamils.

The old Jaffna chieftains and Lords had no concept of the term. They ruled under the Kotte Kingdom

So in reality, Eelam is just a concept. One which has never seen the light of day. If the LTTE had won, then Eelam would have been a reality, but in truth it only exists in the mind of seperatists like you.

It has never physically existed and now it never will.

so Sorry numbnuts
Siva Sankaran Sarma

Heidelberg, Australia

#4 May 15, 2013
CrimeaRiver wrote:
<quoted text>
You understand of course that this mythical place called Eelam has never existed.
Forget the historical arguments. The term Eelam was only coined recently as a mono ethnic state for Tamils.
The old Jaffna chieftains and Lords had no concept of the term. They ruled under the Kotte Kingdom
So in reality, Eelam is just a concept. One which has never seen the light of day. If the LTTE had won, then Eelam would have been a reality, but in truth it only exists in the mind of seperatists like you.
It has never physically existed and now it never will.
so Sorry numbnuts
If fairy tale Mahavamsa, Sinhalese Aryans and Arab origin Sri Lankan Moors can exist .Eealm also exists
Siva Sankaran Sarma

Heidelberg, Australia

#5 May 15, 2013
CrimeaRiver wrote:
<quoted text>
You understand of course that this mythical place called Eelam has never existed.
Forget the historical arguments. The term Eelam was only coined recently as a mono ethnic state for Tamils.
The old Jaffna chieftains and Lords had no concept of the term. They ruled under the Kotte Kingdom
So in reality, Eelam is just a concept. One which has never seen the light of day. If the LTTE had won, then Eelam would have been a reality, but in truth it only exists in the mind of seperatists like you.
It has never physically existed and now it never will.
so Sorry numbnuts
It existed that is whey Elu/Hela and the Eezhavas of Kerala exist and the Sinhalese exist. no amount of denying this by the Sinhalese and by their Indian and western backers will not change this.

“Hindu God- Dhanwantri”

Since: Mar 11

Location hidden

#6 May 15, 2013
Siva Sankaran Sarma wrote:
<quoted text>It existed that is whey Elu/Hela and the Eezhavas of Kerala exist and the Sinhalese exist. no amount of denying this by the Sinhalese and by their Indian and western backers will not change this.
When Tamils were concocting there so called history they went around calling Jaffna and the North the bastion of Tamil civilisation and pointed out all the Hindu structures as “proof”. Then when archaeological activity discovered the ruins of Buddhist temples as well the foundations of certain Hindu temples being built upon Buddhist temple structures (that had been destroyed and converted) they quickly spun the “Tamil Buddhist” stories.
The reality is of course Tamils have no history within Sri Lanka pre-dating Sinhala Buddhist history. The only “permanent” Tamil presence is from the 12th and 13th centuries revolving around the Chola invasions. These were repulsed and what was left of that (including the invaders/colonists) were concentrated in the peninsular submitting themselves to the Sinhala King, having to pay tribute, respect of authority and such.

When the topic of history and “Tamil history” begins, they are quick to attack and insult Sinhala history, culture and people. Yet Sinhalese never do this in return –either out of Sinhala kindness and soft attitudes or knowing they (Tamils) have no history anyway and do not want to “upset” them. As of late i have seen the argument pedalled that questioning Tamils (their lies and sob stories) is not good because it will “upset race relations” and is now “not good for reconciliation”.

So called Tamil history is based on attacking Sinhala history and trying to discredit it. Of course they struggle because all archaeological evidence supports what is contained within Mahavamsa (they try to silence Sinhalese from referring to or defending the Mahavamsa by blackening this great document as “racist”). Thus questioning them about anything including their bogus tales of “discrimination” and fraudulent “grievances” is “racism”. Intriguingly the moment the history debate turns sour for Tamils (upon citing the lack of archaeological evidence) they and their white backers are quick to state “history is not important, it is about the today and the now”.

When you dig up so called Tamil history in the North and East you find the ruins of Sinhala civilisation beneath.

Even the world “eelam” is the corrupted Tamil/South Indian word for “Sinhale”/”Sinhala”. As that is the name given to this land for its inhabitants by its inhabitants. It is only in 2007 they realised this “mistake” and changed it to Eezham or something like that. For all this time they had been demanding a “Tamil eelam” they were calling for a “Tamil land of the Sinhalese”. Their whole “homeland” project was nothing more than theft and deceit engraved in the name itself. That said Tamil culture is built on theft and deceit and they have no problem with doing so if it means self-advancement.
Siva Sankaran Sarma

Heidelberg, Australia

#7 May 15, 2013
naIan wrote:
<quoted text>
When Tamils were concocting there so called history they went around calling Jaffna and the North the bastion of Tamil civilisation and pointed out all the Hindu structures as “proof”. Then when archaeological activity discovered the ruins of Buddhist temples as well the foundations of certain Hindu temples being built upon Buddhist temple structures (that had been destroyed and converted) they quickly spun the “Tamil Buddhist” stories.
The reality is of course Tamils have no history within Sri Lanka pre-dating Sinhala Buddhist history. The only “permanent” Tamil presence is from the 12th and 13th centuries revolving around the Chola invasions. These were repulsed and what was left of that (including the invaders/colonists) were concentrated in the peninsular submitting themselves to the Sinhala King, having to pay tribute, respect of authority and such.
When the topic of history and “Tamil history” begins, they are quick to attack and insult Sinhala history, culture and people. Yet Sinhalese never do this in return –either out of Sinhala kindness and soft attitudes or knowing they (Tamils) have no history anyway and do not want to “upset” them. As of late i have seen the argument pedalled that questioning Tamils (their lies and sob stories) is not good because it will “upset race relations” and is now “not good for reconciliation”.
So called Tamil history is based on attacking Sinhala history and trying to discredit it. Of course they struggle because all archaeological evidence supports what is contained within Mahavamsa (they try to silence Sinhalese from referring to or defending the Mahavamsa by blackening this great document as “racist”). Thus questioning them about anything including their bogus tales of “discrimination” and fraudulent “grievances” is “racism”. Intriguingly the moment the history debate turns sour for Tamils (upon citing the lack of archaeological evidence) they and their white backers are quick to state “history is not important, it is about the today and the now”.
When you dig up so called Tamil history in the North and East you find the ruins of Sinhala civilisation beneath.
Even the world “eelam” is the corrupted Tamil/South Indian word for “Sinhale”/”Sinhala”. As that is the name given to this land for its inhabitants by its inhabitants. It is only in 2007 they realised this “mistake” and changed it to Eezham or something like that. For all this time they had been demanding a “Tamil eelam” they were calling for a “Tamil land of the Sinhalese”. Their whole “homeland” project was nothing more than theft and deceit engraved in the name itself. That said Tamil culture is built on theft and deceit and they have no problem with doing so if it means self-advancement.
Only thing that is being concocted are the extremist fairy tales and lies by Sinhalese extremist like you Nalan/KT cool
CrimeaRiver

UK

#8 May 15, 2013
Siva Sankaran Sarma wrote:
<quoted text>It existed that is whey Elu/Hela and the Eezhavas of Kerala exist and the Sinhalese exist. no amount of denying this by the Sinhalese and by their Indian and western backers will not change this.
Ok, if you can show me one single Tamils document before 1800 that mentions the word Eelam. Then maybe I'll be willing to concede to some of your arguments.

Eelam only exists in the hearts and minds of demalu. It never existed as a physical place and now it never will.
Sajeewi

Surry Hills, Australia

#9 May 15, 2013
No point arguing with a moron who talk rubbish far from the reality.

Tamil Eelam never was, never is and never will be!

Sri Lankan how wants their children to live without fear of suicidal tamil terror animals they have no choice but eradicate tamil pockets where tamil terror animals fester.

terrorist killed us Sri Lankans with no blind folding and just blasting us with suicide bombs and openly shooting at us at Anuradhapura the siri maha bodiya.
They blasted the temple of tooth in Maha Nuara (kandy)

That curse of the above atrocities going to be upon Tamils for generations to come!
Siva Sankaran Sarma

Heidelberg, Australia

#11 May 16, 2013
CrimeaRiver wrote:
<quoted text>
Ok, if you can show me one single Tamils document before 1800 that mentions the word Eelam. Then maybe I'll be willing to concede to some of your arguments.
Eelam only exists in the hearts and minds of demalu. It never existed as a physical place and now it never will.
Mad dog that is why you call old Sinhalese as Hela a Pali version of Elu Eelam. The Eezhavas of Kerala are the living evidence. Lots of Sinhalese are still named EelaPeruma
Still lying mad racist dog.
A famous Tamil poet was Eelathu Pothanar who lived poetry was included in Chankam literature. Understood racist dog
http://hif.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eelattu_Poothan...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eelam

“Hindu God- Dhanwantri”

Since: Mar 11

Location hidden

#12 May 16, 2013
Siva Sankaran Sarma wrote:
<quoted text>Mad dog that is why you call old Sinhalese as Hela a Pali version of Elu Eelam. The Eezhavas of Kerala are the living evidence. Lots of Sinhalese are still named EelaPeruma
Still lying mad racist dog.
A famous Tamil poet was Eelathu Pothanar who lived poetry was included in Chankam literature. Understood racist dog
http://hif.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eelattu_Poothan...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eelam
With regard to territorial claims made by the LTTE the word ILAM (Eelam), comes into much prominence. It is, apparently, being used to connote the impression of “a land of the Tamils”. Indeed, the Tamil word ILAM was never before used in that sense. On the contrary, this Tamil word ILAM did not refer to Tamil land but to the “Land of the Sinhala people”. None other establishes this than the Tamil lexicon published under the authority of the highest seat of Tamil learning - the University of Madras. Page 328 of this Tamil lexicon has the following entry: ILAM, n< Pali, Sinhala, 1. Ceylon. What it says is that ILAM means the land of the Sinhala people. The Tamil word given as the meaning of ILAM reads “SINHALUM”. The term ILA in Tamil means “SINHALA”, having its origin in the word HELA, by which term the ancient people of LANKA were known. Thus ILAKKACHU in Tamil means “Sinhala Coins”- ILA means Sinhala, Kachchu means Coins. Similarly, since NADU means LAND, ILANADU means the Sinhala land. According to the said lexicon the word ILANADU was derived from ILAM. The foregoing establishes the fact that the word ILAM (Eelam) never referred to any Tamil land but always signified the Sinhala land. Therefore, if one were to ask for ILAM (Eelam), what is being asked for is the traditional homeland of the Sinhala people. Therefore, such false claims cannot and will not succeed and that perhaps is one reason for the defeat of the LTTE.
Siva Sankaran Sarma

Heidelberg, Australia

#13 May 16, 2013
naIan wrote:
<quoted text>
With regard to territorial claims made by the LTTE the word ILAM (Eelam), comes into much prominence. It is, apparently, being used to connote the impression of “a land of the Tamils”. Indeed, the Tamil word ILAM was never before used in that sense. On the contrary, this Tamil word ILAM did not refer to Tamil land but to the “Land of the Sinhala people”. None other establishes this than the Tamil lexicon published under the authority of the highest seat of Tamil learning - the University of Madras. Page 328 of this Tamil lexicon has the following entry: ILAM, n< Pali, Sinhala, 1. Ceylon. What it says is that ILAM means the land of the Sinhala people. The Tamil word given as the meaning of ILAM reads “SINHALUM”. The term ILA in Tamil means “SINHALA”, having its origin in the word HELA, by which term the ancient people of LANKA were known. Thus ILAKKACHU in Tamil means “Sinhala Coins”- ILA means Sinhala, Kachchu means Coins. Similarly, since NADU means LAND, ILANADU means the Sinhala land. According to the said lexicon the word ILANADU was derived from ILAM. The foregoing establishes the fact that the word ILAM (Eelam) never referred to any Tamil land but always signified the Sinhala land. Therefore, if one were to ask for ILAM (Eelam), what is being asked for is the traditional homeland of the Sinhala people. Therefore, such false claims cannot and will not succeed and that perhaps is one reason for the defeat of the LTTE.
Mad Sinhalese dog we all know you lie and as Tamil Sinhala threatened to murder me if I ever visit Sri Lanka. Piss off animal. Only genocidal Sinhalese dogs like Crimea River Chimp and the Karawa ayammah Sajeewi love you

“Hindu God- Dhanwantri”

Since: Mar 11

Location hidden

#14 May 16, 2013
Siva Sankaran Sarma wrote:
<quoted text>Mad Sinhalese dog we all know you lie and as Tamil Sinhala threatened to murder me if I ever visit Sri Lanka. Piss off animal. Only genocidal Sinhalese dogs like Crimea River Chimp and the Karawa ayammah Sajeewi love you
When Tamils were concocting there so called history they went around calling Jaffna and the North the bastion of Tamil civilisation and pointed out all the Hindu structures as “proof”. Then when archaeological activity discovered the ruins of Buddhist temples as well the foundations of certain Hindu temples being built upon Buddhist temple structures (that had been destroyed and converted) they quickly spun the “Tamil Buddhist” stories.
The reality is of course Tamils have no history within Sri Lanka pre-dating Sinhala Buddhist history. The only “permanent” Tamil presence is from the 12th and 13th centuries revolving around the Chola invasions. These were repulsed and what was left of that (including the invaders/colonists) were concentrated in the peninsular submitting themselves to the Sinhala King, having to pay tribute, respect of authority and such.

When the topic of history and “Tamil history” begins, they are quick to attack and insult Sinhala history, culture and people. Yet Sinhalese never do this in return –either out of Sinhala kindness and soft attitudes or knowing they (Tamils) have no history anyway and do not want to “upset” them. As of late i have seen the argument pedalled that questioning Tamils (their lies and sob stories) is not good because it will “upset race relations” and is now “not good for reconciliation”.

So called Tamil history is based on attacking Sinhala history and trying to discredit it. Of course they struggle because all archaeological evidence supports what is contained within Mahavamsa (they try to silence Sinhalese from referring to or defending the Mahavamsa by blackening this great document as “racist”). Thus questioning them about anything including their bogus tales of “discrimination” and fraudulent “grievances” is “racism”. Intriguingly the moment the history debate turns sour for Tamils (upon citing the lack of archaeological evidence) they and their white backers are quick to state “history is not important, it is about the today and the now”.

When you dig up so called Tamil history in the North and East you find the ruins of Sinhala civilisation beneath.

Even the world “eelam” is the corrupted Tamil/South Indian word for “Sinhale”/”Sinhala”. As that is the name given to this land for its inhabitants by its inhabitants. It is only in 2007 they realised this “mistake” and changed it to Eezham or something like that. For all this time they had been demanding a “Tamil eelam” they were calling for a “Tamil land of the Sinhalese”. Their whole “homeland” project was nothing more than theft and deceit engraved in the name itself. That said Tamil culture is built on theft and deceit and they have no problem with doing so if it means self-advancement.
CrimeaRiver

UK

#15 May 16, 2013
Siva Sankaran Sarma wrote:
<quoted text>Mad Sinhalese dog we all know you lie and as Tamil Sinhala threatened to murder me if I ever visit Sri Lanka. Piss off animal. Only genocidal Sinhalese dogs like Crimea River Chimp and the Karawa ayammah Sajeewi love you
Siva - I suggest you do what your ancestors did and convert to Buddhism and learn Sinhalese.

It worked for your forefathers who now have a homeland.

Why are YOU still stateless?
Siva Sankaran Sarma

Heidelberg, Australia

#16 May 16, 2013
CrimeaRiver wrote:
<quoted text>
Siva - I suggest you do what your ancestors did and convert to Buddhism and learn Sinhalese.
It worked for your forefathers who now have a homeland.
Why are YOU still stateless?
If I Am stateless so are you and most Sinhalese and Muslim bloggers here. The only Tamils who became Sinhalese are Immigrants from India, as they were either poor low castes like Sajeewis's and the Sri Lankan's ancestors,who fled India to escpae povertu or forcibly brought in here by the Portuguese or Dutch. They were settled or settled in the Sinhalese south and knew they will never return to thought it was a better option. The rest like yours and PA's ancestors were upper castes or aristocrats who gradually took on a Sinhalese Buddhist identity when it suited them in order to safeguard their wealth and land in the island. They also were not able to return and now enjoyed a better life style and wealth here. They were minor royals/aristocrats and the poor relations of the upper castes who had moved out to make good and had done well here. Just like most us in the west who will never return and will gradually assimilate.
All this happened over many centuries. The migration was gradual and the assimilation was also gradual. When a whole lot like when the estate Tamils more or less came within a shirt span and lived isolated they never assimilated or took the Sinhalese identity, as they came in huge numbers and lived amongst themselves.
Now for the Eelam Tamils why should we? We live in our own ancient land and ruled ourselves until European colonisation. So why should we be forced to loose our own identity by a now genocidal Sinhalese majority due to the fault of the British. Why to the English ask the Scottish or the Welsh to loose their identity and become English in Britain. We belong to the land like the Sinhalese and follow a far superior and advanced culture, speak a far more ancient rich and advanced language that is spoken by around 100 million in the world. Tamil has given birth to many languages including Sinhalese and the Indian culture and Hindu religion is 75% Tamil/Dravidian. SO go and take a hike. Even most Indian origin estate Tamils will now refuse to become Sinhalese

“Hindu God- Dhanwantri”

Since: Mar 11

Location hidden

#17 May 16, 2013
Siva Sankaran Sarma wrote:
<quoted text>If I Am stateless so are you and most Sinhalese and Muslim bloggers here. The only Tamils who became Sinhalese are Immigrants from India, as they were either poor low castes like Sajeewis's and the Sri Lankan's ancestors,who fled India to escpae povertu or forcibly brought in here by the Portuguese or Dutch. They were settled or settled in the Sinhalese south and knew they will never return to thought it was a better option. The rest like yours and PA's ancestors were upper castes or aristocrats who gradually took on a Sinhalese Buddhist identity when it suited them in order to safeguard their wealth and land in the island. They also were not able to return and now enjoyed a better life style and wealth here. They were minor royals/aristocrats and the poor relations of the upper castes who had moved out to make good and had done well here. Just like most us in the west who will never return and will gradually assimilate.
All this happened over many centuries. The migration was gradual and the assimilation was also gradual. When a whole lot like when the estate Tamils more or less came within a shirt span and lived isolated they never assimilated or took the Sinhalese identity, as they came in huge numbers and lived amongst themselves.
Now for the Eelam Tamils why should we? We live in our own ancient land and ruled ourselves until European colonisation. So why should we be forced to loose our own identity by a now genocidal Sinhalese majority due to the fault of the British. Why to the English ask the Scottish or the Welsh to loose their identity and become English in Britain. We belong to the land like the Sinhalese and follow a far superior and advanced culture, speak a far more ancient rich and advanced language that is spoken by around 100 million in the world. Tamil has given birth to many languages including Sinhalese and the Indian culture and Hindu religion is 75% Tamil/Dravidian. SO go and take a hike. Even most Indian origin estate Tamils will now refuse to become Sinhalese
Challenged and made helpless by the hard evidences in the form of archeological remains found length and breath of north east which are corroborated by the chronicles of their existences, the Eelamist have gone to the extent of resorting to claim an existence of a Tamil Buddhist culture in Sri Lanka. Case in point is Kadurugoda Viharaya Tamilnized as Kanthrodai

The parallels between the LTTE and Nazi ideology are also revealing. Examples: a false exclusive mono-ethnic traditional homelands, ethnic cleansing, indoctrination of the gullible by raw racist propaganda, undisputed rule by one man, brainwashing of the young through a fictional history.

The Nazis were in power for its propaganda only for a period of 12 years from 1933 to 1945 compared with the nearly 35 years of propaganda the separatist forces carried out among Tamils in Sri Lanka. This propaganda extended to a massive invention of history. For example, the Royal Asiatic Society (RAS) findings of Sinhala Buddhist remains at Kandarodai in Jaffna in 1917 by Paul Pieris and Rasanayagam, the author of Ancient Jaffna were changed by Jaffna academics during the LTTE control to be "Tamil Buddhist" unconnected with the rest of Sri Lanka. A total new fictional history indirectly justifying separatism was created and fed to the Northern population for several decades.

The lessons learnt from Germany are very clear. Decades long, brainwashing does not vanish after a military victory. The problem is not with the Diaspora, it is here among the brainwashed. Concerted efforts should be made to clear the virus. In our case, it is to remove teaching a false invented history with fictional traditional homelands. All those who subscribe to this should be removed from government and university employment. Indian Tamil separatism was stopped after the 1962 China war through its 16th Amendment banning separatism.
CrimeaRiver

UK

#18 May 16, 2013
naIan wrote:
<quoted text>
Challenged and made helpless by the hard evidences in the form of archeological remains found length and breath of north east which are corroborated by the chronicles of their existences, the Eelamist have gone to the extent of resorting to claim an existence of a Tamil Buddhist culture in Sri Lanka. Case in point is Kadurugoda Viharaya Tamilnized as Kanthrodai
The parallels between the LTTE and Nazi ideology are also revealing. Examples: a false exclusive mono-ethnic traditional homelands, ethnic cleansing, indoctrination of the gullible by raw racist propaganda, undisputed rule by one man, brainwashing of the young through a fictional history.
The Nazis were in power for its propaganda only for a period of 12 years from 1933 to 1945 compared with the nearly 35 years of propaganda the separatist forces carried out among Tamils in Sri Lanka. This propaganda extended to a massive invention of history. For example, the Royal Asiatic Society (RAS) findings of Sinhala Buddhist remains at Kandarodai in Jaffna in 1917 by Paul Pieris and Rasanayagam, the author of Ancient Jaffna were changed by Jaffna academics during the LTTE control to be "Tamil Buddhist" unconnected with the rest of Sri Lanka. A total new fictional history indirectly justifying separatism was created and fed to the Northern population for several decades.
The lessons learnt from Germany are very clear. Decades long, brainwashing does not vanish after a military victory. The problem is not with the Diaspora, it is here among the brainwashed. Concerted efforts should be made to clear the virus. In our case, it is to remove teaching a false invented history with fictional traditional homelands. All those who subscribe to this should be removed from government and university employment. Indian Tamil separatism was stopped after the 1962 China war through its 16th Amendment banning separatism.
That is what I find the funniest. 5 years ago there was no talk of Tamil Buddhists. All of a sudden Tamilnet and Siva's posts are awash with such theories.

They don't see how preposterous these claims are.

And the Sinhalese simply stand back and laugh at all the flip-flopping and u-turns the Tamils make year on year

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Anuradhapura, Sri Lanka Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Sri Lanka cabinet expands with swearing-in of a... (Nov '13) Feb '15 Demalu R killers 3
News Sri Lankan President assures completion of coun... (Jan '15) Jan '15 Tamil Chimp 2
News Alien evidence:A team of 'white gentlemen' atte... (Nov '14) Nov '14 CrimeaRiver 1
News Buddhist monk who abducted a 9-year-old boy in ... (Oct '14) Oct '14 Punc 4
News Sri Lanka: Terracotta artefacts of folk culture... (Jul '14) Jul '14 Tamils r terrorists 7
News Sri Lanka: SL Army conducts archaeology, The Hi... (Jun '14) Jun '14 Brave Tamil 2
News Hardline monks rally Sri Lanka as Buddhist front (Jan '14) Mar '14 Punc 43
More from around the web