did he 'fulfill' the part where god said it is OK to own slaves? that was always one of my favorite parts of the cult...<quoted text>you don't know? but you make the accusation anyway.
let me help you out.
<quoted text>#3 "17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil."
"The law was not superseded by the Christian dispensation"
[these came from your post]
your idea that a "Christian dispensation supersedes the law" is flawed.
first of all the law is our teacher that shows us our need of a savior because no of us can keep [fulfill] the law.
[this comes from Galations 3 of the Bible]
second of all Christ is the only person who could fulfill the law. he was tempted in all points like as we are yet without sin.
[this comes from Hebrews 4 of the Bible]
but he also is the only person who fulfilled the law in all of its prophesies concerning the promised redeemer.
so yes, he did not destroy the law but rather fulfilled it.
those are my sources. you see i still read the Book.
how does a god say it is Ok to own another human?