Gay Marriages Begin in Wisconsin Afte...

Gay Marriages Begin in Wisconsin After Ruling

There are 500 comments on the EDGE story from Jun 6, 2014, titled Gay Marriages Begin in Wisconsin After Ruling. In it, EDGE reports that:

Rich Gillard, left, and Andrew Petroll kiss after their marriage ceremony at the Milwaukee County Courthouse.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at EDGE.

DNF

“Judge less, Love more”

Since: Apr 07

Born in Newark Ohio

#453 Jul 10, 2014
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Lol, pointing out obvious, glaring reality is "frustratingly obtuse and ignorant?"
It is piercingly annoying, hence the gay troll attacks.
Smile.
You keep refusing to explain why your wife was able to marry a woman yet you oppose other women marrying a woman. Is it because what I say upsets your apple cart?

You keep going on about parts and gender roles. What gender role does a half man half woman portray in a marriage?

Twirl on Smirky Smurfette.

DNF

“Judge less, Love more”

Since: Apr 07

Born in Newark Ohio

#454 Jul 10, 2014
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
If that were true, my comments would not even be annoying. Nor would anyone need to make a personal assault on my deformity.
The fact is that sex, gender and procreation are fundamental identities of marriage and at any point of comparison, ss marrage is devastatingly inferior.
Smile.
You keep refusing to explain why your wife was able to marry a woman yet you oppose other women marrying a woman. Is it because what I say upsets your apple cart?

You keep going on about parts and gender roles. What gender role does a half man half woman portray in a marriage?

Twirl on Smirky Smurfette.
Strel

Tallahassee, FL

#455 Jul 10, 2014
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
If that were true, my comments would not even be annoying. Nor would anyone need to make a personal assault on my deformity.
The fact is that sex, gender and procreation are fundamental identities of marriage and at any point of comparison, ss marrage is devastatingly inferior.
Smile.
I don't expect you have a deformity, I expect it is something you made up to get attention.

That's all your posting is about, getting attention.

And if your story is true, then your marriage is "devastatingly" inferior to mine. Should I be arguing that your marriage should be illegal?

Or making arbitrary comments about how marriage is quantifiable in the first place?

Being an alleged hemaphrodite is no excuse for being a moron.

DNF

“Judge less, Love more”

Since: Apr 07

Born in Newark Ohio

#456 Jul 10, 2014
Strel wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't expect you have a deformity, I expect it is something you made up to get attention.
That's all your posting is about, getting attention.
And if your story is true, then your marriage is "devastatingly" inferior to mine. Should I be arguing that your marriage should be illegal?
Or making arbitrary comments about how marriage is quantifiable in the first place?
Being an alleged hemaphrodite is no excuse for being a moron.
YUP

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#457 Jul 10, 2014
KiMare wrote:
And still only ever, the fact is ss marrage is a mutually sterile, pointlessly duplicate gender half of marriage.
Clearly inferior.
Smile.
Your mother would had aborted you had she known.
Did she tell you how inferior she thinks you are?
:)

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#458 Jul 10, 2014
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
If that were true, my comments would not even be annoying. Nor would anyone need to make a personal assault on my deformity.
The fact is that sex, gender and procreation are fundamental identities of marriage and at any point of comparison, ss marrage is devastatingly inferior.
Smile.
Things can be untrue and annoying at the same time, stupid.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#459 Jul 10, 2014
And still, not one rational argument against same sex marriage!
No wonder more and more states are recognizing them.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#460 Jul 11, 2014
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
If that were true, my comments would not even be annoying. Nor would anyone need to make a personal assault on my deformity.
The fact is that sex, gender and procreation are fundamental identities of marriage and at any point of comparison, ss marrage is devastatingly inferior.
Smile.
Strel wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't expect you have a deformity, I expect it is something you made up to get attention.
That's all your posting is about, getting attention.
And if your story is true, then your marriage is "devastatingly" inferior to mine. Should I be arguing that your marriage should be illegal?
Or making arbitrary comments about how marriage is quantifiable in the first place?
Being an alleged hemaphrodite is no excuse for being a moron.
Moronic?

Instead of dealing with the debate, you make ignorant personal attacks. A clear sign of a troll with no real argument.

I am fully a male and fully a female. The male has been married for 37 years with two sons and ten foster children. The female is not married.

Noting the relational difference in gender, sex and procreation is 'arbitrary'??? You should be embarrassed to write such idiotic things.

The reality is, ss marrage is exactly that, a marring of a unique relationship. An obvious, seriously inferior fraud.

Now see if you can respond with a reasoned response and without the bully troll attack.

Smile.
Strel

Tallahassee, FL

#461 Jul 11, 2014
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Moronic?
Instead of dealing with the debate, you make ignorant personal attacks. A clear sign of a troll with no real argument.
I am fully a male and fully a female. The male has been married for 37 years with two sons and ten foster children. The female is not married.
Noting the relational difference in gender, sex and procreation is 'arbitrary'??? You should be embarrassed to write such idiotic things.
The reality is, ss marrage is exactly that, a marring of a unique relationship. An obvious, seriously inferior fraud.
Now see if you can respond with a reasoned response and without the bully troll attack.
Smile.
Yes, moronic, and you do not deserve the respect afforded to someone seriously trying to discuss this issue. You know next to nothing about it, cannot respond to the simplest questions or counterpoints, and continue to simply bleat the same refuted and irrelevant nonsense.

Yes, moronic. Uneducated. Ignorant.

I won't address, once again, the same argument you have made in every post that has been countered and refuted many ways by many posters here - because you have already been proven wrong. The fact that you cannot address a single counterpoint made or answer the simplest of questions regarding the fundamental issues involved indicates that you really don't have anything else to say. One can only assume that this is because you are simply too dumb to think about the issue at anything but the most superficial (and irrelevant) level.

It is you that is the troll here, but not quite good enough to even be a bully at it.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#462 Jul 11, 2014
o
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Moronic?
Instead of dealing with the debate, you make ignorant personal attacks. A clear sign of a troll with no real argument.
I am fully a male and fully a female. The male has been married for 37 years with two sons and ten foster children. The female is not married.
Noting the relational difference in gender, sex and procreation is 'arbitrary'??? You should be embarrassed to write such idiotic things.
The reality is, ss marrage is exactly that, a marring of a unique relationship. An obvious, seriously inferior fraud.
Now see if you can respond with a reasoned response and without the bully troll attack.
Smile.
Strel wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, moronic, and you do not deserve the respect afforded to someone seriously trying to discuss this issue. You know next to nothing about it, cannot respond to the simplest questions or counterpoints, and continue to simply bleat the same refuted and irrelevant nonsense.
Yes, moronic. Uneducated. Ignorant.
I won't address, once again, the same argument you have made in every post that has been countered and refuted many ways by many posters here - because you have already been proven wrong. The fact that you cannot address a single counterpoint made or answer the simplest of questions regarding the fundamental issues involved indicates that you really don't have anything else to say. One can only assume that this is because you are simply too dumb to think about the issue at anything but the most superficial (and irrelevant) level.
It is you that is the troll here, but not quite good enough to even be a bully at it.
The evidence of who has a reasoned response is obvious above.

Smile.

“Marriage Equality”

Since: Dec 07

Lakeland, MI

#463 Jul 11, 2014
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
The evidence of who has a reasoned response is obvious above.
Yep! Strel. Definitely Strel. You're just babbling on and looking for attention from the grown ups. Little ones often do that.

DNF

“Judge less, Love more”

Since: Apr 07

Born in Newark Ohio

#465 Jul 11, 2014
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
If that were true, my comments would not even be annoying. Nor would anyone need to make a personal assault on my deformity.
The fact is that sex, gender and procreation are fundamental identities of marriage and at any point of comparison, ss marrage is devastatingly inferior.
Smile.
<quoted text>
Moronic?
Instead of dealing with the debate, you make ignorant personal attacks. A clear sign of a troll with no real argument.
I am fully a male and fully a female. The male has been married for 37 years with two sons and ten foster children. The female is not married.
Noting the relational difference in gender, sex and procreation is 'arbitrary'??? You should be embarrassed to write such idiotic things.
The reality is, ss marrage is exactly that, a marring of a unique relationship. An obvious, seriously inferior fraud.
Now see if you can respond with a reasoned response and without the bully troll attack.
Smile.
So you subjected 10 foster children to the confusion of having a 1/2 female 1/2 male for a step-dad and want to claim that SSM will cause gender confusion?

LMAO.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#466 Jul 11, 2014
DNF wrote:
<quoted text>So you subjected 10 foster children to the confusion of having a 1/2 female 1/2 male for a step-dad and want to claim that SSM will cause gender confusion?
LMAO.
Silly girl, you don't know what a genetic chimera is.

Those kids got my wife, a lesbian and me. Three people.

Clearly you've never counted that high.

SMirk smile.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#467 Jul 11, 2014
eJohn wrote:
<quoted text>
Yep! Strel. Definitely Strel. You're just babbling on and looking for attention from the grown ups. Little ones often do that.
You are consistent in the level of reasoning in your responses...

Smile.
Strel

Tallahassee, FL

#468 Jul 11, 2014
Lies.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#469 Jul 11, 2014
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
If that were true, my comments would not even be annoying. Nor would anyone need to make a personal assault on my deformity.
If you weren't a monster your mom wished she had aborted you.
She's told you that!
:)

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#470 Jul 11, 2014
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Silly girl, you don't know what a genetic chimera is.
Something your mom wish she had aborted.
:)

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#471 Jul 12, 2014
Ss marrages are vastly inferior to the gender complexity, the natural, normal sexual union, and the fruitfulness of real marriage.

Moreover, normally marriage provides a child with their natural mother and father. A natural family unit rather than the abnormal, partial arrangement of a ss marrage.

A fraud perpetrated on marriage so extreme, it can only be called an oxymoron.

“Marriage Equality”

Since: Dec 07

Lakeland, MI

#472 Jul 12, 2014
KiMare wrote:
Ss marrages are vastly inferior to the gender complexity, the natural, normal sexual union, and the fruitfulness of real marriage.
Moreover, normally marriage provides a child with their natural mother and father. A natural family unit rather than the abnormal, partial arrangement of a ss marrage.
A fraud perpetrated on marriage so extreme, it can only be called an oxymoron.
Normally?? Less than 30% of children in the U.S. are being raised by their two, married, bio parents. That's anything but "normal". It's far less than even half. That's definitely the exception, not the norm.

But, again, don't let the facts sway your delusions. Carry on.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#473 Jul 12, 2014
eJohn wrote:
<quoted text>
Normally?? Less than 30% of children in the U.S. are being raised by their two, married, bio parents. That's anything but "normal". It's far less than even half. That's definitely the exception, not the norm.
But, again, don't let the facts sway your delusions. Carry on.
Yeah, lets see the reference for that claim.

Smile.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Wedding Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Some upset over National Cathedral's decision t... 1 hr Cabbage 6
News Anti-gay Atlanta bishop Eddie Long, who was acc... 19 hr Wholly Silicon Wafer 3
News What would Jesus say about same-sex marriage? (Jul '15) Sun crucifiedguy 4,942
News Marriage in a Paradise Island: Mauritius - Some... (Aug '09) Jan 13 Peter Cheng 105
[Guide] Funny maid of honor speech (Sep '14) Jan 13 Pouyan 259
News A Pakistani Woman on Sex in Pakistan (Mar '10) Jan 13 Shah 37
News Jessica Alba shows off her stunning complexion ... Jan 11 uomsp4 2
More from around the web