Most civil rights gains by discriminated against minorities start with legal victories, Brian. If the majority was prejudiced against the minority o start with, they wouldn't enact the legislation that causes discrimination. Duh. Further, the judiciary is a constitutionally established branch of government and therefore is explicitly a manifestation of the consent of the governed who established the constitution.Note how it grows by court order instead of legislation; same sex marriage started by court order, without the consent of the governed.
They aren't being sued for refusing an invitation to attend a wedding, Brian. They're being sued for breaking the law for refusing to provide goods and services to a member of the general public as all businesses that are deemed public accommodations are required to do.That's why they sue Christian's who don't consent to attend their religious same sex marriage celebrations.
Why do you lie?
Aren't most weddings a celebration? Why would you stupidly think a same sex wedding would be any different than an opposite sex wedding? And to be clear, unless a business owner happens to be a close friend of the wedding party, they are neither invited to attend or "celebrate" at the wedding reception; they're merely being asked to provide goods and services that enable the invited guests to do so.They don't want tolerance, they want celebration.
On he contrary, you want Christians o be above the law; shove your Christian dominionist claptrap up your ass, Brian. It has no place in a constitutional republic.Same sex marriage is antidemocratic elitism.