Church Leaders Vow Political Backlash if Gay Marriage Passes

Jan 7, 2013 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: NBC Chicago

Leaders of several Chicago-area African American churches on Monday urged state lawmakers to vote against pending legislation that would allow same-sex marriage in Illinois.

Comments (Page 113)

Showing posts 2,241 - 2,260 of17,568
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2353
Feb 11, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes it did, that was the whole issue.
Interracial marriages were legal in different parts of the country at different times prior to the Virginia ban.
And not everybody agreed that inter-racial sexual relationships should be called marriage. Why do you think there was a trial?
No Rose, not just interracial sexual relationships, but marriage. The idea of a "same sex marriage" was, and still is for many,inconceivble.

http://international.vlex.com/vid/colored-sco...

The marriage of John and Ellen Davis was one between a white woman and an African-American man, a Scottish immigrant and a native New Yorker, and two working class laborers. While one might assume that such relationships were rare in the nineteenth century, a close examination of United States Manuscript Census Records in New York City for 1850, 1860, and 1870 indicates that such interracial, cross-cultural marriages constituted five to seven percent of married couples living in predominantly black neighborhoods. The number of interracial marriages varied over the twenty year period under investigation but skyrocketed following the Civil War. Census records indicate that there were 29 interracial marriages in 1850, 19 in 1860, and 116 in 1870. The vast majority of such relationships occurred between black men and white women often between an African-American male born in the United States and a woman who had immigrated from Europe, most of whom were Irish, Scottish, or English.(2) While mixed-race couples in different regions and in different eras faced tremendous resistance, such couples were not uncommon in mid-nineteenth-century New York City. Interracial couples often married in black churches in New York, worked in the city, sent their children to local African schools, and successfully interacted with government institutions, including pension officials, local court representatives, and census takers.
Start a forum about it!
We have perfectly good forum right here, no need to let it goto waste.

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2355
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Black church leaders are right to be alarmed; same sex marriage brings a new standard of gender segregation to the perfect diversity of male/female marriage.

If you dislike apartheid and love segregation; keep marriage one man and one woman.

“Together for 24, legal for 5”

Since: Sep 07

Littleton, NH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2356
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

2

Brian_G wrote:
Black church leaders are right to be alarmed; same sex marriage brings a new standard of gender segregation to the perfect diversity of male/female marriage.
If you dislike apartheid and love segregation; keep marriage one man and one woman.
Doesn't single motherhood also segregate the sexes? Perhaps black church leaders should spend more time worrying about getting people to marry, and less time worrying about who marries.
sickofit

Austin, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2357
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

How about the religous nazi pukes mind there own business.....
sickofit

Austin, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2358
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Brian_G wrote:
Black church leaders are right to be alarmed; same sex marriage brings a new standard of gender segregation to the perfect diversity of male/female marriage.
If you dislike apartheid and love segregation; keep marriage one man and one woman.
SHUT UP HITLER......Why dont you bigots move to Iran...YOU WOULD FIT IN.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2359
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

1

nhjeff wrote:
<quoted text>
Perhaps black church leaders should spend more time worrying about getting people to marry, and less time worrying about who marries.
Valid point. Sadly marriage and motherhood in the black community have been divorced long ago.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2360
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

sickofit wrote:
<quoted text>
SHUT UP HITLER......Why dont you bigots move to Iran...YOU WOULD FIT IN.
Hey Sick-who-throws-a-hissy-fit how ya doing? Still spouting that Orwellian communist utopian philosophy I see.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2361
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Interracial marriages were legal in different parts of the country at different times prior to the Virginia ban.
<quoted text>
And now gay marriages are legal in different parts of the country, so what's your point?
Pietro Armando wrote:
No Rose, not just interracial sexual relationships, but marriage. The idea of a "same sex marriage" was, and still is for many,inconceivble.
http://international.vlex.com/vid/colored-sco...

The marriage of John and Ellen Davis was one between a white woman and an African-American man, a Scottish immigrant and a native New Yorker, and two working class laborers. While one might assume that such relationships were rare in the nineteenth century, a close examination of United States Manuscript Census Records in New York City for 1850, 1860, and 1870 indicates that such interracial, cross-cultural marriages constituted five to seven percent of married couples living in predominantly black neighborhoods. The number of interracial marriages varied over the twenty year period under investigation but skyrocketed following the Civil War. Census records indicate that there were 29 interracial marriages in 1850, 19 in 1860, and 116 in 1870. The vast majority of such relationships occurred between black men and white women often between an African-American male born in the United States and a woman who had immigrated from Europe, most of whom were Irish, Scottish, or English.
(2) While mixed-race couples in different regions and in different eras faced tremendous resistance, such couples were not uncommon in mid-nineteenth-century New York City. Interracial couples often married in black churches in New York, worked in the city, sent their children to local African schools, and successfully interacted with government institutions, including pension officials, local court representatives, and census takers.
<quoted text>
We have perfectly good forum right here, no need to let it goto waste.
And?

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2362
Feb 12, 2013
 
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
The institution you speak of, and the laws themselves, are based on the relationship of husband and wife. By removing one, the husband or wife, from the institution, it then is no longer the same institution, but something else. There is no marriage institution based on the relationship of two men, or two women.
<quoted text>
Noooooo...water down the membership eligibility.
<quoted text>
Uhhhhh...hellloooooo...gay and lesbian people are seeking different treatment...if they weren't they would marry like everybody else.
You argue out of both sides of your mouth. Some how it's "like everybody else" because people can only marry someone of the opposite sex, but it wold be "different treatment" if everyone could marry someone of either sex.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2363
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Brian_G wrote:
Black church leaders are right to be alarmed; same sex marriage brings a new standard of gender segregation to the perfect diversity of male/female marriage.
If you dislike apartheid and love segregation; keep marriage one man and one woman.
Gay marriage is now legal in several states. When are they going to make prison rape legal? You claimed that's what would happen. So, got a time line for us Brian?

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2365
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
And now gay marriages are legal in different parts of the country, so what's your point?
The analogy to the ban on ssm and interracial marriage as being one and the same is weak....very weak.
And?
Interracial marriages were legal long before SSM.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2366
Feb 12, 2013
 
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
You argue out of both sides of your mouth. Some how it's "like everybody else" because people can only marry someone of the opposite sex, but it wold be "different treatment" if everyone could marry someone of either sex.
Exactly? Its all in how marriage is defined, is it "husband AND wife", or "spouses for life" regardless of gender composition?

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2367
Feb 12, 2013
 
Rose_NoHo wrote:
Gay marriage is now legal in several states. When are they going to make prison rape legal? You claimed that's what would happen. So, got a time line for us Brian?
I never claimed same sex marriage would make prison rape legal, unless that means forced prison marriage in our gender segregated prisons, where rape is already a problem.

If you care about people in gender segregated institutions, don't introduce marriage in the mix.
Rainbow Kid

Alpharetta, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2368
Feb 12, 2013
 
Pietro Armando wrote:
The institution you speak of, and the laws themselves, are based on the relationship of husband and wife. By removing one, the husband or wife, from the institution, it then is no longer the same institution, but something else

In all of the 8 years gay marriage has been legal in the US (9 States and DC); no husband or wife has ever been removed from a straight marriage because of gay people's legal right to marriage

[QUOTE who="Pietro Armando"]There is no marriage institution based on the relationship of two men, or two women
Then you don't know about this:
http://makeitequal.org/
Rainbow Kid

Alpharetta, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2369
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Brian_G wrote:
If you care about people in gender segregated institutions, don't introduce marriage in the mix.
We introduced marriage in the mix 8 years ago and it includes jailbirds in these states and DC:
http://makeitequal.org/
.
So make sure you know what state you're in when you do crimes and fall in love with a jailbird

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2370
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rainbow Kid wrote:
<quoted text>
Then you don't know about this:
http://makeitequal.org/
That doesn't address the points I made. Is there room on the flag for plural marriage equality? Or are they not flag worthy?
Rainbow Kid

Alpharetta, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2371
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
That doesn't address the points I made. Is there room on the flag for plural marriage equality? Or are they not flag worthy?
Pride Parades Inc. rents spaces to pro-gay polygamist organizations who abide by the contract
.
Can we expect you to enter your polygamist float in our next big parade?
.
Its going to be a thriller
.
We will be celebrating the BIG GAY EXPLOSION!

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2372
Feb 12, 2013
 
Rainbow Kid wrote:
<quoted text>
Pride Parades Inc. rents spaces to pro-gay polygamist organizations who abide by the contract
"Pride Parades Inc"? Lions have incorporated? Before ya know it the peacocks will b unionized.

"Pro gay polygamist organizations".... ya don't say. Who would'be of thunk it.
.

[QUOTE[
Can we expect you to enter your polygamist float in our next big parade?
[/QUOTE]

I wanna sit on the one with Kody and the wives. They are invited I presume.
.
Its going to be a thriller
Oh a "Michael Jackson" theme....makes sense.
.
We will be celebrating the BIG GAY EXPLOSION!
Make sure you have a permit, and a hazmat clean up crew on standby.

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2373
Feb 12, 2013
 
Rainbow Kid wrote:
We introduced marriage in the mix 8 years ago and it includes jailbirds in these states and DC:[URL deleted]
An unelected court introduced same sex marriage to America, in DC, the administration has refused requests for referendum on same sex marriage law. Same sex marriage is often antidemocratic; that's why I oppose same sex marriage.

.
Rainbow Kid wrote:
So make sure you know what state you're in when you do crimes and fall in love with a jailbird
If you oppose jailbait rape, keep marriage male/female to keep forced marriage out of our prisons.

Since: Jun 11

AOL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2374
Feb 12, 2013
 
Equal rights were never intended to depend on popular opinion or vote. That is why we have a constitution.

The 14th amendment says no state shall "deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

The U.S. Supreme Court said: "The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities and officials and to establish them as legal principles to be applied by the courts. One's right to life, liberty, and property, to free speech, a free press, freedom of worship and assembly, and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections."

Attorneys Theodore B. Olson and David Boies wrote in their prop.8 filing: "Fourteen times the Supreme Court has stated that marriage is a fundamental right of all individuals. This case tests the proposition whether the gay and lesbian Americans among us should be counted as ‘persons’ under the 14th Amendment, or whether they constitute a permanent underclass ineligible for protection under that cornerstone of our Constitution.”

The difference in our positions is that we want the same rights you have while you seek to deny us those rights you reserve for yourself. Denial of equality causes harm to those denied both directly through denial of legal equality and through the stigmatization and dehumanization that inescapably results from being worth less under the law.

Allowing gay people to participate under the same rules you apply to yourself does not take away any rights from you and therefore does not harm you. It won't require any change in the rules and rights for straight people or their families.

Gay people are already forming families. Denial of the same rights you have won't change that fact. It will only harm those families. Yet allowing us the same opportunities you have won't harm you. Your position results in needless suffering, while ours harms no one.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 2,241 - 2,260 of17,568
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••