First Australian gay couples to legal...

First Australian gay couples to legally marry

There are 1727 comments on the Chambersburg Public Opinion story from Dec 5, 2013, titled First Australian gay couples to legally marry. In it, Chambersburg Public Opinion reports that:

A state lawmaker and his partner plan to fly 3,500 kilometers across Australia to become one of the nation's first same-sex couples to legally marry at an after-midnight ceremony in the Australian capital.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chambersburg Public Opinion.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#2100 Apr 15, 2014
TomInElPaso wrote:
<quoted text>
You'll take your medicine if you like it or not. Ain't equal rights a bitch?
Most men would not be proud about taking benefits and privileges meant for women and children...

Smirk.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#2101 Apr 15, 2014
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Most men would not be proud about taking benefits and privileges meant for women and children...
Smirk.
We're not taking bennies from anyone. Nice attempted distraction.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#2102 Apr 15, 2014
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
We're not taking bennies from anyone. Nice attempted distraction.
BS.

Most benefits and protections were intended for mothers and children, as is the cultural constraint of marriage.

You can't even qualify for half the identity of marriage.

Since: Dec 08

El Paso, TX

#2103 Apr 15, 2014
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Most men would not be proud about taking benefits and privileges meant for women and children...
Smirk.
You're just stupid enough to not realize many, many women are marrying women.

Smirk that.

Since: Dec 08

El Paso, TX

#2104 Apr 15, 2014
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
BS.
Most benefits and protections were intended for mothers and children, as is the cultural constraint of marriage.
You can't even qualify for half the identity of marriage.
Your really losing your mojo big time. Benefits and protections were intended for families, the sexual make up of the surviving spouse doesn't matter one iota.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#2105 Apr 15, 2014
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Most men would not be proud about taking benefits and privileges meant for women and children...
Smirk.
TomInElPaso wrote:
<quoted text>
You're just stupid enough to not realize many, many women are marrying women.
Smirk that.
So you agree that two men should man up.

But now you excuse a double dip by two lesbians???

See how confused you get when you try to impose a fraud?

SMirk.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#2106 Apr 15, 2014
TomInElPaso wrote:
<quoted text>
Your really losing your mojo big time. Benefits and protections were intended for families, the sexual make up of the surviving spouse doesn't matter one iota.
You need to learn the history of marriage from some place other than the a gay twirl site...

Marriage benefits and rights were established for a biological family with a stay at home mother and biological children.

Man up dude. You don't qualify for marriage.

Since: Dec 08

El Paso, TX

#2107 Apr 15, 2014
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Most men would not be proud about taking benefits and privileges meant for women and children...
Smirk.
<quoted text>
So you agree that two men should man up.
But now you excuse a double dip by two lesbians???
See how confused you get when you try to impose a fraud?
SMirk.
Any married couples, Gay or straight should receive the same benefits. Manning up has nothing to do with the issue.

You're the fraud.

Since: Dec 08

El Paso, TX

#2108 Apr 15, 2014
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You need to learn the history of marriage from some place other than the a gay twirl site...
Marriage benefits and rights were established for a biological family with a stay at home mother and biological children.
Man up dude. You don't qualify for marriage.
Sorry honey history moves on even without your permission. Stay at home mothers? You've been watching too much Leave It To Beaver or I Love Lucy. Working mothers are very mush the norm for a majority of today's families and women are now often the primary wage earner.

My marriage certificate is quite clear on the state of who qualifies for marriage and you can't do a damned thing to change it.

Smirk

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#2109 Apr 15, 2014
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Most men would not be proud about taking benefits and privileges meant for women and children...
Smirk.
<quoted text>
So you agree that two men should man up.
But now you excuse a double dip by two lesbians???
See how confused you get when you try to impose a fraud?
SMirk.
See what you get when a psychotic hermaphrodite tries to think logically? Pure bat shit crazy and irrelevance.

Troll on, Hunty

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#2110 Apr 16, 2014
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Most men would not be proud about taking benefits and privileges meant for women and children...
Smirk.
<quoted text>
So you agree that two men should man up.
But now you excuse a double dip by two lesbians???
See how confused you get when you try to impose a fraud?
SMirk.
TomInElPaso wrote:
<quoted text>
Any married couples, Gay or straight should receive the same benefits. Manning up has nothing to do with the issue.
You're the fraud.
So now you give up on reasons, and just demand the benefits.

You clearly are past manning up, you need to grow up...

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#2111 Apr 16, 2014
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You need to learn the history of marriage from some place other than the a gay twirl site...
Marriage benefits and rights were established for a biological family with a stay at home mother and biological children.
Man up dude. You don't qualify for marriage.
TomInElPaso wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry honey history moves on even without your permission. Stay at home mothers? You've been watching too much Leave It To Beaver or I Love Lucy. Working mothers are very mush the norm for a majority of today's families and women are now often the primary wage earner.
My marriage certificate is quite clear on the state of who qualifies for marriage and you can't do a damned thing to change it.
Smirk
Now you need to learn comprehension along with history.

Notice the word 'were'. We were talking about the basis of marriage benefits and protections.

Again, duplicate gendered couples do not need the benefits and protections of marriage, and they certainly don't qualify for marriage.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#2112 Apr 16, 2014
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Most men would not be proud about taking benefits and privileges meant for women and children...
Smirk.
<quoted text>
So you agree that two men should man up.
But now you excuse a double dip by two lesbians???
See how confused you get when you try to impose a fraud?
SMirk.
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
See what you get when a psychotic hermaphrodite tries to think logically? Pure bat shit crazy and irrelevance.
Troll on, Hunty
Oh please, Dick, explain why it's crazy and your reply is not pure hateful troll stupidity.

Smile.

Since: Dec 08

El Paso, TX

#2113 Apr 16, 2014
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Most men would not be proud about taking benefits and privileges meant for women and children...
Smirk.
<quoted text>
So you agree that two men should man up.
But now you excuse a double dip by two lesbians???
See how confused you get when you try to impose a fraud?
SMirk.
<quoted text>
So now you give up on reasons, and just demand the benefits.
You clearly are past manning up, you need to grow up...
Pretty funny coming from someone whose sandwich is made from two different kinds of bread.

Smirk

Since: Dec 08

El Paso, TX

#2114 Apr 16, 2014
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You need to learn the history of marriage from some place other than the a gay twirl site...
Marriage benefits and rights were established for a biological family with a stay at home mother and biological children.
Man up dude. You don't qualify for marriage.
<quoted text>
Now you need to learn comprehension along with history.
Notice the word 'were'. We were talking about the basis of marriage benefits and protections.
Again, duplicate gendered couples do not need the benefits and protections of marriage, and they certainly don't qualify for marriage.
Thank you for your opinion, for what that's worth. The battle is all but over and you can't do anything to change it. Too bad, for you.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#2115 Apr 16, 2014
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Most men would not be proud about taking benefits and privileges meant for women and children...
Smirk.
<quoted text>
So you agree that two men should man up.
But now you excuse a double dip by two lesbians???
See how confused you get when you try to impose a fraud?
SMirk.
<quoted text>
So now you give up on reasons, and just demand the benefits.
You clearly are past manning up, you need to grow up...
So you're holding up egocentric sexist chauvinism as a virtue worth supporting ?

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#2116 Apr 16, 2014
snyper wrote:
<quoted text>
So you're holding up egocentric sexist chauvinism as a virtue worth supporting ?
LOL, PC stupidity...
All but one of 19 female marines failed THE FIRST DAY of training for combat.
This AFTER the standards were lowered for them.
You bet I am.
SMile.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#2117 Apr 16, 2014
TomInElPaso wrote:
<quoted text>
Thank you for your opinion, for what that's worth. The battle is all but over and you can't do anything to change it. Too bad, for you.
LOL, mutually sterile, pointlessly duplicate gendered halves of marriage got off the ground.

Maybe a limp wristed waving of your paper and stamping your feet will change reality???

Smile.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#2118 Apr 16, 2014
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL, PC stupidity...
All but one of 19 female marines failed THE FIRST DAY of training for combat.
This AFTER the standards were lowered for them.
You bet I am.
SMile.
That's because young females (and most young males these days, too) are not provided forms of play that actually use muscles, especially upper-body.

Again, yet another form of sexism, and one in this case results in the atrophy of those muscles that are essential to so many activities.

It's cultural, not intrinsic to sex.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#2119 Apr 16, 2014
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL, mutually sterile, pointlessly duplicate gendered halves of marriage got off the ground.
Maybe a limp wristed waving of your paper and stamping your feet will change reality???
Smile.
Maybe our joint filing at both the state and federal level will change your "reality". Ya got nuthing', Greg. You're still powerless over anyone or anything (except, perhaps, your Sandy vagina).

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Wedding Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Bill Clinton tells a love story to make his cas... 22 hr Le Jimbo 4
News Our recommendation: Springboro voters should sa... (Feb '08) 23 hr GUILTY 31,933
News Imam: No such thing as temporary marriage in Islam Wed Muslim convert 9
News Bristol Palin: Breaking abstinence pledge again... (Jun '15) Tue Keynes 12
News Ben Carson Warns Gay Couples Against Pushing Ba... (Jan '15) Tue Divorce Lawyer 77
News Prince Harry Engaged: Marriage To Camilla Thurl... (Sep '14) Mon hillary 2
News More gay people can now get legally married. Th... (Oct '14) Mon Jake 55
More from around the web