Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions

Nov 30, 2010 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: CBS2

The Illinois House has approved a measure to legalize civil unions for same-sex couples.

Comments (Page 1,952)

Showing posts 39,021 - 39,040 of48,818
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

Since: Apr 09

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#45371
Nov 24, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

mahz_ wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow! I've seen some retarded shite posted on this thread, but you take the cake. You are the dumbest individual to come here as of yet.
This state has gay marriage. Perhaps you should move someplace more to your liking. I hear Uganda is nice and they put their gays to death. You would love it.
Just ignore him/her/it. Anyone who ends their posts with "let the ranting begin, etc." is just looking for attention.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#45372
Nov 24, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

ChugALug wrote:
REALLY have you watched any made for TV movies ...?
Really? REALLY???

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#45373
Nov 24, 2013
 

Judged:

12

12

12

Finally, I'll address another ridiculous comment you've been echoing: Why is behavior centered around reproduction so important?

For the "little reason" that THE ENTIRE HUMAN RACE DEPENDS ON IT.

Every person you see around you came about from the heterosexual method; obviously this includes YOU. For you to be brazen enough to minimize the very process that created you but instead support the behavior that actually bottle caps procreation, is truly a disgrace. Talk about biting the hand that fed you!

Really you can't possibly be this dim.
Quest wrote:
<quoted text>
And fortunately, gay folks falling in love, marrying, and forming families won't stop a single heterosexual from having sex and making babies. Not ANYWHERE in the world.
And we are very good at raising the abandoned and unwanted offspring from all that heterosexual breeding, so it's a win-win for everyone, especially the kids.
Thought I'd give context to the question you supposedly answered.

Especially since it exposes ss marriage as an oxymoron.

Smile.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#45375
Nov 24, 2013
 

Judged:

12

12

12

mahz_ wrote:
Once again little guy, procreation is not the only goal of sex.
Now go ahead and ignore that point for the third time since we both know it completely and totally destroys your silly argument, troll.
Honey, who said it was?

However, from a evolutionary viewpoint, yes, it is.

Moreover, from the point of mating behavior, and the purpose of marriage, procreation is the basic essence.

Smile.
boe

Saylorsburg, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#45377
Nov 24, 2013
 

Judged:

12

12

12

who cares

Since: Mar 07

The entire US of A

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#45378
Nov 24, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

KiMare wrote:
Finally, I'll address another ridiculous comment you've been echoing: Why is behavior centered around reproduction so important?
For the "little reason" that THE ENTIRE HUMAN RACE DEPENDS ON IT.
.........
Smile.
Yes, and gay folks marrying legally won't stop anyone from procreating.

If you are going to argue that heterosexuals will stop having sex if gay folks marry, PLEASE present your proof. So far, you haven't posted a word that proves your arguments.

Since: Mar 07

The entire US of A

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#45379
Nov 24, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Honey, who said it was?
However, from a evolutionary viewpoint, yes, it is.
Moreover, from the point of mating behavior, and the purpose of marriage, procreation is the basic essence.
Smile.
Except that no one is required to procreate, or to even WANT to procreate, to obtain a marriage license.

You can't get around that simple truth, no matter how you twist and squirm.

Now, back to the real question. Do you believe that having married parents can help to contribute to added security for children? And can you prove this does not apply equally to children with gay parents?

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#45380
Nov 24, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Honey, who said it was?
.
you're impotent, dear. limp. little. powerless. impotent.
KiMare Clone

Kenosha, WI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#45382
Nov 24, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

KiMare wrote:
Every person you see around you came about from the heterosexual method; obviously this includes YOU. For you to be brazen enough to minimize the very process that created you but instead support the behavior that actually bottle caps procreation, is truly a disgrace. Talk about biting the hand that fed you!
but i'm your clone.
i didn't come from your parents. I was cloned from you.
thanks to you a new race is starting.
Not needing hetero parents.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#45383
Nov 24, 2013
 

Judged:

13

13

13

mahz_ wrote:
There you go claiming your opinions are fact again.
Poor little guy. You've been bested so many times and you're just not quite smart enough to get it.
http://www.psy.cmu.edu/~rakison/bussandschmit...

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#45384
Nov 24, 2013
 

Judged:

13

13

12

Finally, I'll address another ridiculous comment you've been echoing: Why is behavior centered around reproduction so important?

For the "little reason" that THE ENTIRE HUMAN RACE DEPENDS ON IT.

Every person you see around you came about from the heterosexual method; obviously this includes YOU. For you to be brazen enough to minimize the very process that created you but instead support the behavior that actually bottle caps procreation, is truly a disgrace. Talk about biting the hand that fed you!

Really you can't possibly be this dim.
Quest wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, and gay folks marrying legally won't stop anyone from procreating.
If you are going to argue that heterosexuals will stop having sex if gay folks marry, PLEASE present your proof. So far, you haven't posted a word that proves your arguments.
First, who would believe that it is even possible for gays to stop procreation?

Second, who said heteros will stop having sex for any reason?

Who are you responding to???

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#45386
Nov 24, 2013
 

Judged:

13

13

13

Quest wrote:
<quoted text>
Except that no one is required to procreate, or to even WANT to procreate, to obtain a marriage license.
You can't get around that simple truth, no matter how you twist and squirm.
Now, back to the real question. Do you believe that having married parents can help to contribute to added security for children? And can you prove this does not apply equally to children with gay parents?
The rare exception does not disprove the rule.

Nor does it open the door for absolute barrenness.

The very best contribution to children's well being is protecting the marriage of their mother and father.

None fo this changes the fact that ss marriage is an oxymoron.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#45387
Nov 24, 2013
 

Judged:

13

13

13

mahz_ wrote:
<quoted text>
Except I'm not gay. Which means you're a twit.
You lie.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#45390
Nov 24, 2013
 

Judged:

13

13

13

mahz_ wrote:
<quoted text>
Not to mention that if there was evolutionry driving force behind marriage then other animals would have marriage contracts as well.
LOL, that there is some real gay logic!

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#45391
Nov 24, 2013
 

Judged:

13

13

13

mahz_ wrote:
<quoted text>
Illinois has gay marriage. Maybe it is you who should move to a state where things are more to your liking dipstick. At least until this goes federal and there's no longer any place for you small minded bigots to hide.
IL has an oxymoron.

Smile.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#45392
Nov 24, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

KiMare wrote:
"Continually a kind of 'desperate logic' from you.
When you bring up the instances where some heterosexuals are infertile and use that to rationalize homosexuality you are demonstrating very poor critical thinking skills. Sorry to be so blunt but it's bleeding far too heavy to leave unaddressed.
I've already discussed the two components nature uses to promote itself: ability and willingness. In the example of the infertile heterosexual, there is indeed a biological defect: he does not have ability to reproduce.
It's been long established that nature is not without flaw -this is hardly a surprise. In ALLl members, straight or gay, there are persons who are infertile (and in both sexualities there are members that don't care to date or just end up alone, etc..,)-WE GET THAT.
But the difference that is SHOUTINGLY obvious even considering cases of infertility, is that the heterosexual method may result in reproduction say, 90% of the time. In the homosexual method reproduction has never, let me emphasize: N E V E R occurred.
It's baking with 9 pieces coming out and the 10th a failure versus the method where the tray ALWAYS comes out empty.
Homosexuality cannot produce offspring. In procreation the genes of the parents are passed (naturally or even artificially) to the child. AGAIN this is why there can be NO QUESTION: homosexuality is an evolutionary defect.
Which brings us to another absurd comment of yours; gays can procreate.
Even in an artificial scenario, HOW are the parents of those two gay men or two gay women passed to the child? Maybe gay Rob might use Sara as a surrogate to simulate a sexual reproduction (notice a member of the opposite sex is involved). BUT either way, WHERE IS ROB'S BOYFRIEND'S genes in this equation?!? The child that results will have NO RELATION WHATSOEVER TO ROB'S boyfriend; not even the tiniest twinkle in his eye.
So even in artificially induced conditions, two dads or two moms ARE NOT producing a child together. If the champion to the homosexual's way to obviate reproduction is through artificial means, the best that can come of it is one parent doomed to have no genetic relation to the child whatsoever. This is HARDLY "homosexual procreation" (and I can imagine for the one member who has the genetic relation to the child that is equivalent to a perfect stranger; it must be often be disheartening).
Again, heterosexuality potentially can and usually does result in reproduction -and a reproduction that enjoys having both parents genetic legacy in the child, homosexuality cannot do EITHER.
I can't imagine why you brought up such squalid reasoning?
Finally, I'll address another ridiculous comment you've been echoing: Why is behavior centered around reproduction so important?
For the "little reason" that THE ENTIRE HUMAN RACE DEPENDS ON IT.
Every person you see around you came about from the heterosexual method; obviously this includes YOU. For you to be brazen enough to minimize the very process that created you but instead support the behavior that actually bottle caps procreation, is truly a disgrace. Talk about biting the hand that fed you!
Really you can't possibly be this dim.
Who do you think you are kidding?!

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#45393
Nov 24, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
IL has an oxymoron.
Smile.
You really do need to learn what an oxymoron is.

Illinois has marriage equality, and your opinions have no effect on that. You're still powerless, limp, impotent, and otherwise completely useless.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#45394
Nov 24, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

KiMare wrote:
Finally, I'll address another ridiculous comment you've been echoing: Why is behavior centered around reproduction so important?
For the "little reason" that THE ENTIRE HUMAN RACE DEPENDS ON IT.
Every person you see around you came about from the heterosexual method; obviously this includes YOU. For you to be brazen enough to minimize the very process that created you but instead support the behavior that actually bottle caps procreation, is truly a disgrace. Talk about biting the hand that fed you!
Really you can't possibly be this dim.
<quoted text>
Thought I'd give context to the question you supposedly answered.
Especially since it exposes ss marriage as an oxymoron.
Smile.
My children are around me, and they didn't come from any mythical heterosexual "method". Seems you've been proven to be a dolt yet again.

Oh, and do let us know when our marriages begin to affect the population growth!!! Stupid cur, who do you think you are kidding?!!

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#45395
Nov 24, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Honey, who said it was?
However, from a evolutionary viewpoint, yes, it is.
Moreover, from the point of mating behavior, and the purpose of marriage, procreation is the basic essence.
Smile.
Who do you think you are kidding?!! Until its a requirement of marriage, you got NU-THING!!! You never will!!

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#45396
Nov 24, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

KiMare wrote:
Who do you think you are kidding??!! You're beloved 20 year old theory has nothing to do with marriage. Stupid cur!!

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 39,021 - 39,040 of48,818
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••