Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions

Nov 30, 2010 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: CBS2

The Illinois House has approved a measure to legalize civil unions for same-sex couples.

Comments
32,821 - 32,840 of 49,465 Comments Last updated 14 min ago
Quest

Drakes Branch, VA

#38245 Mar 22, 2013
KiMare wrote:
At it's most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
...
LOL. Hardly.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#38246 Mar 22, 2013
KiMare wrote:
At it's most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
Quest wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL. Hardly.
Denial.

LOL

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#38247 Mar 22, 2013
KiMare wrote:
At it's most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
Simple science.
Smile.
And yet, you've never been able to prove this statement. You've been verbose beyond anyone's wildest imagination, but you haven't been able to back this sh1t up. Essentially, that makes it your opinion.

Happy trolling, Kuntmary.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#38248 Mar 22, 2013
KiMare wrote:
At it's most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
Simple science.
Smile.
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
And yet, you've never been able to prove this statement. You've been verbose beyond anyone's wildest imagination, but you haven't been able to back this sh1t up. Essentially, that makes it your opinion.
Happy trolling, Kuntmary.
Already been proved.

Even a non-functioning brainless vagina knows that.

Smirk.
Drawing lines somewhere

Midlothian, IL

#38249 Mar 23, 2013
I agree, nobody has been convincing but what would you say if father marries daughter, sister marries brother, mother Marries son? If 2 people love each other what's the difference?
huh

Marion, IL

#38255 Mar 24, 2013
the real fact king wrote:
<quoted text>Dear fake fact king see you changed your name are you really that stupid to get sued you are as stupid as always go back to being the dog jacker that you are and we think Jan is calling your name she needs her depends changed again
Let the family sue him....he deserves whatever he gets.
train

Marion, IL

#38258 Mar 25, 2013
Heard it was coming your way...hahaha
whats next

Bolingbrook, IL

#38259 Mar 26, 2013
fix the budget... lower my taxes
Repeating Reaper

Saint Louis, MO

#38260 Mar 26, 2013
I declare this thread dead.....AGAIN!

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#38262 Mar 26, 2013
http://blog.heritage.org/2013/03/25/
morning-bell-the-marriage-deba te-through-a-childs-eyes/

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#38263 Mar 26, 2013
http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2013/03/962...

Same-sex marriage will not expand rights and freedoms in our nation. It will not redefine marriage. It will undefine it.

This isn’t the first time our society has undefined marriage. No-fault divorce, instituted all across our country, sounded like a good idea at the time. Its unintended consequence was that it changed forever the definition of marriage from a permanent relationship between spouses to a temporary one. Sadly, children became collateral damage in the selfish pursuits of adults.

Same-sex marriage will do the same, depriving children of their right to either a mom or a dad. This is not a small deal. Children are being reduced to chattel-like sources of fulfillment. On one side, their family tree consists not of ancestors, but of a small army of anonymous surrogates, donors, and attorneys who pinch-hit for the absent gender in genderless marriages. Gays and lesbians demand that they have a “right” to have children to complete their sense of personal fulfillment, and in so doing, are trumping the right that children have to both a mother and a father—a right that same-sex marriage tramples over.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#38264 Mar 26, 2013
KiMare wrote:
bunch of crap
In spite or your very best efforts, this is still NOT about children.

From http://www.astrostyle.com/Love/His_Sign_in_Lo...

"Be sure to keep him a little in check, though. Sagittarius is the know-it-all sign, and he can be quite a bulldozer" (and a bullsh1tter).

Wow, I guess astrology does have some merit, eh?

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#38265 Mar 26, 2013
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
In spite or your very best efforts, this is still NOT about children.
From http://www.astrostyle.com/Love/His_Sign_in_Lo...
"Be sure to keep him a little in check, though. Sagittarius is the know-it-all sign, and he can be quite a bulldozer" (and a bullsh1tter).
Wow, I guess astrology does have some merit, eh?
You are not qualified to even engage what children are about, are you.

Smirk.
The King

Mattoon, IL

#38267 Mar 26, 2013
KiMare wrote:
http://www.thepublicdiscourse. com/2013/03/9622
Same-sex marriage will not expand rights and freedoms in our nation. It will not redefine marriage. It will undefine it.
This isn’t the first time our society has undefined marriage. No-fault divorce, instituted all across our country, sounded like a good idea at the time. Its unintended consequence was that it changed forever the definition of marriage from a permanent relationship between spouses to a temporary one. Sadly, children became collateral damage in the selfish pursuits of adults.
Same-sex marriage will do the same, depriving children of their right to either a mom or a dad. This is not a small deal. Children are being reduced to chattel-like sources of fulfillment. On one side, their family tree consists not of ancestors, but of a small army of anonymous surrogates, donors, and attorneys who pinch-hit for the absent gender in genderless marriages. Gays and lesbians demand that they have a “right” to have children to complete their sense of personal fulfillment, and in so doing, are trumping the right that children have to both a mother and a father—a right that same-sex marriage tramples over.
"...and in so doing, are trumping the right that children have to both a mother and a father—a right that same-sex marriage tramples over."

And through what means is this "right" deliniated? Not the Constitution, or the Christian bible. I don't disagree with everything you've stated, but this right does not exist.
For years the evangelicals have decried homosexuality as a "sin against God", with Pat Robertson going so far as to blaming 9/11 for it. It just doesn't make any sense. I too, would prefer children to have male and feamle parents. But, this isn't 1955. As long as people abide by law, and respect the rights of others, they have a right to live their lives the way they want.
Bottom line, we have to emphasise tolerance. Not everyone subscribes to the moral code we, ourselves hold.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#38268 Mar 27, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You are not qualified to even engage what children are about, are you.
Smirk.
Oh, but I am. More than you'll ever know.

You're not qualified to make broad sweeping generalizations about everything, while making up "science" (epi-markers, my snatch), all the while thinking that your helping and impressing people.

You've done neither, Kuntmary. Really. You haven't.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#38269 Mar 27, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You are not qualified to even engage what children are about, are you.
Smirk.
By the way, your "Myspace" profile is woefully out of date. You've probably even forgotten your login information.
elephant in room

Granite City, IL

#38270 Mar 27, 2013
Chad
bobby

Kankakee, IL

#38271 Mar 27, 2013
perhaps 'the king' needs to hear a little something about some soul train.

your left side & your right side.
the left has an L .. thus L for latin

since latin is used for the right, present or future can be said from the right side.

you don't find a list of primal essence of innocence in the constitution or the bible, particularly why morality has gone to shit.. because there isn't enough of a grip to focus on it (or no place to report the instance).

there isn't a clear definition between primal instincts & freedoms because it would create a road map, usually leading to a decent view of how disgusting people are with action or inaction.

here's a meal ticket..
the stupid constitution and bill of rights and most other political nonsense has been around for what? more than 100 years .. but nobody has had the decency to make it all clearly understood for civilization.
that certainly should tell you something of the large gap & void there.

it isn't much different if there are teachings of difference or definition aside from leaving the rest of the world to remain clueless because the list of resolution remains short & indecent, to the degree of negligence & abuse & oppression & ostracism too.

you don't see a lick of definition for when somebody is truly pumped up on the rage virus you see in movies, then goes around killing people with charges of murder racking up.
the prosecutors would then be beyond worthless to simply absorb life because of the value of wrongdoing when the primal instinct takes over.
and i dont want to hear any nonsense about 'temporary insanity' pleas, because there is no such room for tolerance implying the virus & reaction is unknown.

as a general consumer, you don't know if the person is mindlessly physically beating on anything living the infected person encounters or if their mind has been expanded to serious amounts of math to that which can be seen in the movie 'limitless'

that is like a person with a DNA problem is starving to the point where they steal food (or eat too much and neglect another member in the house)
yet you arrest the person for theft or adjust the social security profile of the person as if prosecution.

as long as you continue to respond to a response, you don't know the source of the problem.. and that brings up the phrase 'you don't know the half of it'

such negligence & abuse & oppression & ostracism can be worth more prosecution than the instance that sparked the response.
bobby

Kankakee, IL

#38272 Mar 27, 2013
it is more than knowing a situation all the way down to the DNA .. because first of all, if you are browsing DNA but not viewing all of it.. then there is a good chance something gets missed.

the only way to stay on track is to view the track.
and that is to know the entire structure of a person, as well as the entire structure of all contact with said person.

and when you think you've got those two completely figured out, i remind you of thoughts.. because thoughts aren't necessarily within the physical proximity of said person, yet closer to said person than the couch they are sitting on.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#38274 Mar 27, 2013
The King wrote:
<quoted text>
"...and in so doing, are trumping the right that children have to both a mother and a father—a right that same-sex marriage tramples over."
And through what means is this "right" deliniated? Not the Constitution, or the Christian bible. I don't disagree with everything you've stated, but this right does not exist.
For years the evangelicals have decried homosexuality as a "sin against God", with Pat Robertson going so far as to blaming 9/11 for it. It just doesn't make any sense. I too, would prefer children to have male and feamle parents. But, this isn't 1955. As long as people abide by law, and respect the rights of others, they have a right to live their lives the way they want.
Bottom line, we have to emphasise tolerance. Not everyone subscribes to the moral code we, ourselves hold.
This right is delineated through, as the Constitution is based, laws of nature and nature's God.

Moreover, the most base moral code is to seek the best for others. Most certainly children would rank at the front. To not consider that, is not a 'different moral code', it is immorality.

You sir have been dethroned.

Smile.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Wedding Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Women dish on their most embarrassing wardrobe ... (Sep '13) 4 hr Kelly DJ 281
Testimony wraps up in former Va. governor trial 11 hr Natural Disasters 1
At the McDonnell trial, sidewalk visuals drive ... 11 hr Gary 1
Church firing stirs up controversy over same-se... 11 hr Jerald 51
Confronting homophobes 101: Class act lesbian m... (Dec '11) 19 hr Tam Phat 12
Refusal to sell wedding gowns to lesbian couple... 22 hr TomInElPaso 149
Today's News: Our Take - Melody Thomas Scott Di... (Apr '13) Thu dmw 45
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••

Wedding People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••