Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-S...

Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions

There are 52033 comments on the CBS2 story from Nov 30, 2010, titled Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions. In it, CBS2 reports that:

The Illinois House has approved a measure to legalize civil unions for same-sex couples.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CBS2.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#37339 Jan 28, 2013
Mockababy wrote:
<quoted text>
Clearly you're the one saying 'ouch' if you were bothered enough by my calling you a troll to respond in such length, a little touchy are we?
Again mr cliche not all lesbian relationships are butch/femme. Wonder what you make of that. Smirk.
Not a long answer, except for an idiot to understand.

I didn't say all lesbian relationships are butch/femme.

Snicker.

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#37340 Jan 28, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Not a long answer, except for an idiot to understand.
I didn't say all lesbian relationships are butch/femme.
Snicker.
No but you seem strangely obsessed with that one question. "why does a butch lesbian blah blah blah" it's all you blather on about.

Here's a question, why do you seem to think people only dress and act the way they do to attract a mate?

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#37342 Jan 28, 2013
Mockababy wrote:
<quoted text>
No but you seem strangely obsessed with that one question. "why does a butch lesbian blah blah blah" it's all you blather on about.
Here's a question, why do you seem to think people only dress and act the way they do to attract a mate?
I already explained the reasoning for the question. You need to look up mating behavior and the strength of its influence on behavior.

Smile.
jack

Markham, IL

#37343 Jan 28, 2013
if jack got on a horse and was afraid to get off --would you help jack --off the horse??

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#37344 Jan 28, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I already explained the reasoning for the question. You need to look up mating behavior and the strength of its influence on behavior.
Smile.
Ok fine, lets make believe for a moment that you haven't been talking out of your asshole. Let's say you "Expose the defect of homosexual orientation." as you put it. Ok now what. Tell me why it matters. If two people are wired wrong or "defective" what do you care? How does it bring harm to anyone for them to marry? The handicapped are allowed to marry, hell even mentally handicapped people can marry. So "defect" and "unnatural" don't really cut it.

The only reason to prevent SSM is if it causes identifiable harm. All this nonsense about mating behaviors is irrelevant.
answer it

Markham, IL

#37346 Jan 29, 2013
Mockababy wrote:
<quoted text>
Ok fine, lets make believe for a moment that you haven't been talking out of your asshole. Let's say you "Expose the defect of homosexual orientation." as you put it. Ok now what. Tell me why it matters. If two people are wired wrong or "defective" what do you care? How does it bring harm to anyone for them to marry? The handicapped are allowed to marry, hell even mentally handicapped people can marry. So "defect" and "unnatural" don't really cut it.
The only reason to prevent SSM is if it causes identifiable harm. All this nonsense about mating behaviors is irrelevant.
but what about JACK?????
jon jon

Saint Louis, MO

#37347 Jan 29, 2013
I would!!!!
jack wrote:
if jack got on a horse and was afraid to get off --would you help jack --off the horse??
Mr Ed

Saint Louis, MO

#37348 Jan 29, 2013
Jon Jon makes me feel good!!!
jon jon wrote:
I would!!!!
<quoted text>
wilber

Saint Louis, MO

#37349 Jan 29, 2013
stop doing that to my horse jon jon!!!
Catholic voter

Naperville, IL

#37350 Jan 29, 2013
I'm against gay marriage.
Mr Ed

Saint Louis, MO

#37351 Jan 29, 2013
Jon Jon is nothing next to what your priest did to me.
Catholic voter wrote:
I'm against gay marriage.
Rainbow Kid

Alpharetta, GA

#37352 Jan 29, 2013
Catholic voter wrote:
I'm against gay marriage.
If you are straight or bi-sexual; you are restricted to straight marriage only
.
You're only eligible for gay marriage if you are gay
yes

United States

#37353 Jan 29, 2013
Catholic voter wrote:
I'm against gay marriage.
I'm not catholic and I don't believe in gay marriage either. They want to be "gay", be gay. But gay marriage should not be allowed. I think their are way to many homosexual men and women these days...
yes

United States

#37354 Jan 29, 2013
Mockababy wrote:
<quoted text>Ok fine, lets make believe for a moment that you haven't been talking out of your asshole. Let's say you "Expose the defect of homosexual orientation." as you put it. Ok now what. Tell me why it matters. If two people are wired wrong or "defective" what do you care? How does it bring harm to anyone for them to marry? The handicapped are allowed to marry, hell even mentally handicapped people can marry. So "defect" and "unnatural" don't really cut it.

The only reason to prevent SSM is if it causes identifiable harm. All this nonsense about mating behaviors is irrelevant.
there is more domestic violence against "gays", then there are straight people!= FACT!
Mr Ed

Saint Louis, MO

#37355 Jan 29, 2013
Jon Jon asked for my hoof in marriage. I said yes of course.
Rainbow Kid wrote:
<quoted text>
If you are straight or bi-sexual; you are restricted to straight marriage only
.
You're only eligible for gay marriage if you are gay
Rainbow Kid

Alpharetta, GA

#37356 Jan 29, 2013
Mr Ed wrote:
Jon Jon asked for my hoof in marriage. I said yes of course.
<quoted text>
You found True Love! Congratulations! &#10084;
.
Are we invited to the wedding?
.
Are you renting a limo for your horneymoon; or is Jon Jon planning to ride you bareback?
Mr Ed

Saint Louis, MO

#37357 Jan 29, 2013
All invited.
I trust Jon Jon.
He is one horse man.
Sometimes he actually DOES use a saddle.
Rainbow Kid wrote:
<quoted text>
You found True Love! Congratulations! &#10084;
.
Are we invited to the wedding?
.
Are you renting a limo for your horneymoon; or is Jon Jon planning to ride you bareback?
Mr Ed

Saint Louis, MO

#37358 Jan 29, 2013
I love Jon Jon dearly.
I just wish he had a better sense of humor.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#37359 Jan 29, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I already explained the reasoning for the question. You need to look up mating behavior and the strength of its influence on behavior.
Smile.
Mockababy wrote:
<quoted text>
Ok fine, lets make believe for a moment that you haven't been talking out of your asshole. Let's say you "Expose the defect of homosexual orientation." as you put it. Ok now what. Tell me why it matters. If two people are wired wrong or "defective" what do you care? How does it bring harm to anyone for them to marry? The handicapped are allowed to marry, hell even mentally handicapped people can marry. So "defect" and "unnatural" don't really cut it.
The only reason to prevent SSM is if it causes identifiable harm. All this nonsense about mating behaviors is irrelevant.
No assumption needed. You haven't disproved the point.

Here is why it matters. Words describe reality. Accuracy makes us safe and happy. Inaccuracy is called denial. It is dangerous not only for the person in denial, but all those around him. An example would be labeling arsenic 'sugar'.

In your example, you are equating genetic defects, but denying the gender distinctions. This is exactly why I encouraged you to read up on mating behavior.

Once again, if you look at the most basic essence of marriage, it is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior. Not only is it impossible to equate gay couples to marriage, they are diametrically opposed to each other.

I appreciate an honest question.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#37360 Jan 29, 2013
Mockababy wrote:
<quoted text>
The only reason to prevent SSM is if it causes identifiable harm. All this nonsense about mating behaviors is irrelevant.
Why is that the only reason to resist calling gay unions marriage? Who says so? There may be millions of valid reasons to resist the attempt.

Moreover, it is at the best speculation. Unprovable either way.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Wedding Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Gay wedding cake at center of Colorado Appeals ... 7 min NorCal Native 20
News Homosexuality and the Bible (Aug '11) 22 min Suculent-dry 34,086
News What would Jesus say about same-sex marriage? 28 min Imprtnrd 167
News Governors vow to fight SCOTUS ruling on gay mar... 38 min NorCal Native 774
News Religious liberty is rallying cry after gay mar... 44 min Dan 187
News Mormon church backs Utah LGBT anti-discriminati... 45 min tongangodz 5,420
News Now the gay marriage fight will become a fight ... 53 min Dan 8
More from around the web