Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-S...

Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions

There are 52086 comments on the CBS2 story from Nov 30, 2010, titled Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions. In it, CBS2 reports that:

The Illinois House has approved a measure to legalize civil unions for same-sex couples.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CBS2.

The Lone Gunmen

United States

#37144 Jan 17, 2013
ObamaCare regulations decree unmarried homosexuals ‘are treated as family members’

Tue Jul 24, 2012 14:28 EST

WASHINGTON, D.C., July 24, 2012,– Although same-sex “marriage” is not recognized by the federal government, President Barack Obama has continued to change federal benefit regulations to grant unmarried homosexuals the same rights as married couples. The purpose of the regulations is “to ensure same-sex domestic partners are treated as family members” and “have access to these benefits to the same extent as spouses of Federal employees and their children.”

The Obama administration has imposed a series of new government rules extending federal benefits to the same-sex partners and stepchildren of unmarried homosexuals, but not unmarried heterosexuals.

One controversial proposed rule would allow the children of same-sex partners to remain on federal workers’ taxpayer-funded insurance until they turn 26.

The last regulatory change was accomplished by “tweaking” the federal definition of the word “stepchild.”

The government is accepting comments on the proposed measure until September 18.

Another new rule grants “same-sex domestic partners,”“former same-sex domestic partners,” and “persons with whom the employee or Member has agreed to enter into a same-sex domestic partnership” an insurable interest in the homosexual partner.

Click “like” if you want to defend true marriage.

Others extend federal coverage for child care to “children of same-sex domestic partners of Federal employees,” presumably from a previous heterosexual union;
or make domestic partners eligible for pay and perks available to married couples.

The Office of Personnel and Management (OPM) explained these benefits are available only to homosexual cohabitants rather than heterosexual ones, because “marriage is not an option for same-sex couples wishing to obtain federal benefits.”

The federal diktats were written in accordance with President Obama’s June 2, 2010, memorandum on the “Extension of Benefits to Same-Sex Domestic Partners of Federal Employees.”

President Obama has publicly endorsed same-sex “marriage,” and has been known to implement his agenda through executive orders or other federal regulations when one of his favored bills cannot pass Congress.

The regulations follow a familiar pattern of executive power. In January, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) adopted a rule forcing all landlords who accept Section 8 to rent to homosexual and transgender individuals by redefining the word “family.”

The new benefits will pad the bottom line of already generous federal worker benefits. Chris Edwards of the Cato Institute found,“In 2010, federal workers enjoyed average benefits of $42,462, which compared to average benefits in the U.S. private sector of just $10,771.” Federal workers’ pay rose faster than that of private sector workers in 2011, and they have suffered less income decline than private sector employees since the recession.

Earlier this year, President Obama suggested that the insurance premiums that military retirees pay to Tricare increase 300 percent. Some retired veterans will pay five-times more money for their health benefits.
boss

Shorewood, IL

#37149 Jan 18, 2013
Take a chill pill my little heroin junkie.....you just love the attention dont you ...you little bitch......
Obama wrote:
Just shut the F up and stick a dick in your Liberal mouth.<quoted text>
the liberal

Saint Louis, MO

#37150 Jan 18, 2013
Only if you hold it for me :)
Obama wrote:
Just shut the F up and stick a dick in your Liberal mouth.<quoted text>

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#37151 Jan 18, 2013
Marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.

Gay unions are a direct and defective conflict with evolution's fundamental purpose. Literally,'unmarriage'.

Snicker.

“Free to buy cake”

Since: Jul 07

wherever I like.

#37152 Jan 18, 2013
KiMare wrote:
Gay unions are a direct and defective conflict with evolution's fundamental purpose. Literally,'unmarriage'.
Snicker.
You are a direct and defective conflict with common sense, literacy, and purpose. Literally, "unhuman".

Troll on, Mangaina Man.
test

Sugar Grove, IL

#37153 Jan 18, 2013
test
new 32

Elgin, IL

#37155 Jan 20, 2013
new 32
hroola

Rochester, PA

#37156 Jan 20, 2013
youtube.com/watch...
life been good so far
Droppin in for a tad

Watsonville, CA

#37157 Jan 20, 2013
KiMare wrote:
Marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
Gay unions are a direct and defective conflict with evolution's fundamental purpose. Literally,'unmarriage'.
Snicker.
Nature IS darwinian, BUT ... I have this half pound of frontal cortex that offers me the option to NOT be.

What are you doing with yours?

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#37161 Jan 21, 2013
Droppin in for a tad wrote:
<quoted text>
Nature IS darwinian, BUT ... I have this half pound of frontal cortex that offers me the option to NOT be.
What are you doing with yours?
Read about mating behavior and it's pervasive influence in everything you do.

Your half pound of cortex is WIRED for mating behavior! However, for GLBT, the wiring was messed up. Hence, a butch lesbian dresses and acts like a man to attract a barely lesbian lesbian.

Smile.

“Free to buy cake”

Since: Jul 07

wherever I like.

#37163 Jan 21, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Hence, a butch lesbian dresses and acts like a man to attract a barely lesbian lesbian.
Smile.
Explain:

1. Two butch lesbians attracted to each other.
2. Two LL (Lipstick and Lace) lesbians attracted to each other.

Your ONE scenario falls apart when compared to the variety of lesbian couples that exist.

Everything that spout on every forum is nothing more than opinion.

Or, as I refer to them, geriatric troll droppings.

Troll on, Mangina Man
Horatio Caine

Miami, FL

#37164 Jan 21, 2013
Pretty much the same thing as people who have sex with animals.
Marengo Jon wrote:
<quoted text>
Explain:
1. Two butch lesbians attracted to each other.
2. Two LL (Lipstick and Lace) lesbians attracted to each other.
Your ONE scenario falls apart when compared to the variety of lesbian couples that exist.
Everything that spout on every forum is nothing more than opinion.
Or, as I refer to them, geriatric troll droppings.
Troll on, Mangina Man
Cool Hand Luke

Scranton, PA

#37166 Jan 21, 2013
I am sure there are plenty of animals concerned about these homosexuals but yet they are being denied their civil rights to file charges when they are molested.
huh wrote:
Who cares

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#37167 Jan 21, 2013
Marengo Jon wrote:
<quoted text>
Explain:
1. Two butch lesbians attracted to each other.
2. Two LL (Lipstick and Lace) lesbians attracted to each other.
Your ONE scenario falls apart when compared to the variety of lesbian couples that exist.
Everything that spout on every forum is nothing more than opinion.
Or, as I refer to them, geriatric troll droppings.
Troll on, Mangina Man
Two really gay lesbians, and two barely gay lesbians.

Snicker.
the fact king

Mattoon, IL

#37169 Jan 21, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Two really gay lesbians, and two barely gay lesbians.
Snicker.
Your wife REALLY likes it when I put it in her *ss but BARELY like it when I make her lick it clean......SNICKER
the fact king

Mattoon, IL

#37170 Jan 21, 2013
the fact king wrote:
<quoted text>Hey KiMare your wife's half pound of cortex was "WIRED" to suck me off last night..... After that she was "WIRED" to let me put it in her ass......Quite the little (well other than her p*ss) wifey you got there...SNICKER
That ho likes it balls deep.........

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#37172 Jan 21, 2013
Before you can equate gay unions to marriage, you have to prove they are the same type of relationship.

Marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.

Gay couples are a direct defective conflict with the primary goal of evolution.

Bottom line? There is no relationship more opposite marriage.

:-)
Not

Belleville, IL

#37173 Jan 21, 2013
Hello
Rainbow Kid

Alpharetta, GA

#37174 Jan 21, 2013
Not wrote:
Hello
C'mon out wherever you are
Professor Bubblegum Shoe

Alpharetta, GA

#37175 Jan 21, 2013
banfatjan wrote:
darwin was the 1st meth head
No
.
Darwin died in 1882; 37 years before the Japanese invention of meth in 1919

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Wedding Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Homosexuality and the Bible (Aug '11) 41 min NoahLovesU 34,825
News Mormon church backs Utah LGBT anti-discriminati... 43 min NoMo 7,209
News Court: Baker who refused gay wedding cake can't... 1 hr DaveinMass 1,070
News 4 GOP candidates sign anti-gay marriage pledge 1 hr Fa-Foxy 215
News Reluctant Kentucky clerk gets time for gay marr... 6 hr troe 11
News Episcopalians vote to allow gay marriage in chu... 6 hr Bugs Bunyak - Car... 15
News End of Boy Scouts' ban on gays prompts elation ... 7 hr VeganTiger 126
More from around the web