Losing Streak Lengthens for Foes of G...

Losing Streak Lengthens for Foes of Gay Marriage

There are 3876 comments on the EDGE story from Jun 15, 2014, titled Losing Streak Lengthens for Foes of Gay Marriage. In it, EDGE reports that:

For foes of same-sex marriage, their losing streak keeps growing. Some sense a lost cause, others vow to fight on.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at EDGE.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#964 Jun 27, 2014
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
Well if no one else is drinking I'll have another alone. I won't be shy.
Here's to marriage equality for all consenting adults! Mazel tov! Down the hatch! Good Canadian hootch aboard the Rizzo today.
Neat neat.
Yep, another drink- maybe your liver will give out along with your limp legs & your limp pecker.

Judged:

11

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#965 Jun 27, 2014
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
You're telling us this because.....?
Sober up and check a few posts back.

Judged:

11

10

9

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#966 Jun 27, 2014
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
Sober up and check a few posts back.
No.

YUK!YUK!YUK! Ah good times.

Judged:

11

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#967 Jun 27, 2014
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
Yep, another drink- maybe your liver will give out along with your limp legs & your limp pecker.
So is that your newest argument against marriage equality? It's really silly. You are getting very desperate.

I know I know, it's not a real argument you are just insulting me to make yourself feel better.
If I was gay you wouldn't say those hateful things to me. Proving what kind of person you are better than I ever could.

I have a friend at the VA hospital in a wheelchair likes to eat guys like you for breakfast! But I am a peaceful man, I just call you what you are. A punk.

Judged:

11

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#968 Jun 27, 2014
Here's to marriage equality! Down the hatch! That's three Sheeples. Keep count you little b!tch!

Ah good times!

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#969 Jun 27, 2014
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
So is that your newest argument against marriage equality? It's really silly. You are getting very desperate.
I know I know, it's not a real argument you are just insulting me to make yourself feel better.
If I was gay you wouldn't say those hateful things to me. Proving what kind of person you are better than I ever could.
I have a friend at the VA hospital in a wheelchair likes to eat guys like you for breakfast! But I am a peaceful man, I just call you what you are. A punk.
And I just call you what you are- a crippled troll.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#970 Jun 27, 2014
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
And I just call you what you are- a crippled troll.
Just as long as you don't call that an argument. Because you so very obviously have no argument, troll.

Even if I could walk you'd still have no argument against marriage equality except ignorance and bigotry.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#971 Jun 27, 2014
Ah good times! Here's to marriage equality for all consenting adults! Down the hatch, wash it down with ice cold Pabst Blue Ribbon beer!

“2014 TDF”

Since: Mar 09

Boca Raton, FL.

#972 Jun 27, 2014
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Just as long as you don't call that an argument. Because you so very obviously have no argument, troll.
Even if I could walk you'd still have no argument against marriage equality except ignorance and bigotry.
Even if you could walk, you'd still wouldn't have the tools with which to please one wife, let alone two or three.

More so when you require a catheter to pee.

Shabbat Shalom, ben zona.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#973 Jun 27, 2014
Conservative Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
Even if you could walk, you'd still wouldn't have the tools with which to please one wife, let alone two or three.
More so when you require a catheter to pee.
Shabbat Shalom, ben zona.
I have successfully confirmed that you are nothing but a fake warrior troll. I am done with you young lad. Unless you want me to use you as a mop some more, happy to oblige.

Trolling is OK. Phony warriors suck. That's low.

Judged:

11

11

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#975 Jun 27, 2014
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Just as long as you don't call that an argument. Because you so very obviously have no argument, troll.
Even if I could walk you'd still have no argument against marriage equality except ignorance and bigotry.
Why would I need an argument against that which I fully support?

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#976 Jun 27, 2014
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
Ah good times! Here's to marriage equality for all consenting adults! Down the hatch, wash it down with ice cold Pabst Blue Ribbon beer!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =56duVYLsd4QXX
Why do you oppose marriage equality for everyone else?

Why not children?

Why not non-consenting adults?

Why not animals or furniture?

What a bigot...

Judged:

11

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#977 Jun 27, 2014
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
Why would I need an argument against that which I fully support?
Congratulations! See? All my work with you paid off. You used to not support polygamy. Now you truly support marriage equality! Yay Sheeples! You the man.

Judged:

13

13

13

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#978 Jun 27, 2014
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do you oppose marriage equality for everyone else?
Why not children?
Why not non-consenting adults?
Why not animals or furniture?
What a bigot...
I remember when you called those arguments silly! I did too. Because they are silly. Silly when used against your marriage, silly when you use them against others' marriages.

So I'm glad it's settled. Your arguments are very silly. You're just frustrated and angry. Remember! Never let them see you sweat like that. You had a little public meltdown there son. Poor form!

Judged:

13

13

13

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#979 Jun 27, 2014
So let's review! Here are the arguments against marriage equality some of you clowns have given me today.

Sheeples argument: "Yep, another drink- maybe your liver will give out along with your limp legs & your limp pecker. And I just call you what you are- a crippled troll."

Conservative Democrat's argument: "Even if you could walk, you'd still wouldn't have the tools with which to please one wife, let alone two or three. More so when you require a catheter to pee.

Priceless! That's why I like you silly jackasses. Ah good times.

Marriage. There is no one right way.

Judged:

11

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Old Sarge

Anonymous Proxy

#980 Jun 28, 2014
Conservative Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
Even if you could walk, you'd still wouldn't have the tools with which to please one wife, let alone two or three.
More so when you require a catheter to pee.
Shabbat Shalom, ben zona.
Explain why your wife screws the gardener "Leroy" the mail man the plumber the tv repair man
cable guy etc etc ... pays the bills huh? Dickless veteran asshat.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#981 Jun 28, 2014
Conservative Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
I see, you're a Conservative Democrat and I'm a Liberal Democrat. Is that it?
Ok. Let's prove you wrong, once again.
Who's the one advocating FOR the illegal practice of Polygamy, under the fake argument that no one has a right to tell consenting adults how many people to be involved with, but NEVER refers to it as no one having the right to tell consenting adults how many people one can be married to, at the same time?
Who's the one that says, the law of the land is what it is and polygamy is illegal?
Who's the one calling the above "circular reasoning" when it's a factual statement?
Again, who's the "Liberal Democrat" and who's the "Conservative Democrat?" The latter would be me.
The former would be you.
Please do not insult the Democratic party by suggesting brainless people like you belong to it.
Brainless people are members of the "Grand Ole Party," a/k/a "Tea [Turd] Party."
You and the other are advocating for polygamy and incest marriage too that is currently illegal too and you are an insult to the Democrat Party and part of the same brainless group of radicals that is trying to destroy the democrat party with your Liberalism you advocate which has no use for the US Constitution.

Court Puts Indiana Gay Marriage Ruling on Hold

INDIANAPOLIS Jun 27, 2014, 6:59 PM ET

A federal appeals court on Friday put on hold a judge's order striking down Indiana's gay marriage ban, bringing same-sex marriages to a halt and leaving those who've already tied the knot in legal limbo.

By TOM LoBIANCO Associated Press

http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/court-gran...

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#982 Jun 28, 2014
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Appeal to tradition fallacy. Which court has rendered an opinion based upon Baker in the history of case law?
Baker v. Nelson is a legal fallacy which actually supports same sex marriage as a fundamental right.
No the SCOTUS has not and the argument and the US 7th Circuit Court of Appeals agrees with SCOTUS that Baker v Nelson still stands just like the Family Law Lawyers here in Indiana have confirmed.

Court Puts Indiana Gay Marriage Ruling on Hold

INDIANAPOLIS Jun 27, 2014, 6:59 PM ET

By TOM LoBIANCO Associated Press

A federal appeals court on Friday put on hold a judge's order striking down Indiana's gay marriage ban, bringing same-sex marriages to a halt and leaving those who've already tied the knot in legal limbo.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/court-gran...

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#983 Jun 28, 2014
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
No the SCOTUS has not and the argument and the US 7th Circuit Court of Appeals agrees with SCOTUS that Baker v Nelson still stands just like the Family Law Lawyers here in Indiana have confirmed.
No, moron, they granted a stay pending the appeal, this in no way means that they affirmed Baker. Were you not an imbecile, you might understand.

“A JOURNEY OF A THOUSAND MILES”

Since: Aug 08

MUST BEGIN WITH A SINGLE STEP!

#984 Jun 28, 2014
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
Please try and keep up......a stay DOESN'T mean a win....it's just a delay tactic that Indiana will lose on appeal just like Utah has!!!!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Wedding Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Feds' transgender guidance provokes fierce back... 6 min An NFL Fan 819
News What would Jesus say about same-sex marriage? (Jul '15) 1 hr Demon Finder 4,180
News Pope Francis eases way for divorced Catholics w... 4 hr Demon Finder 29
News Husband Decides to Divorce New Wife on Wedding ... 4 hr Ben Tovah 10
News Minnesota becomes 12th state to OK gay marriage (May '13) 5 hr cpeter1313 1,854
News Newfoundland charity volunteer ousted for pro-g... 6 hr Bob 3
News Tony Perkins claims churches will lose federal ... (May '15) 7 hr Senior Vaginal Odor 6
More from around the web