White House Brief Foreshadows Supreme Court Arguments on Gay Marriage

The White House has asked the Supreme Court to strike down a main provision of the Defense of Marriage Act, but in the legal paper filed with the judiciary it may have signaled a wider push for same-sex marriage as a constitutional right on the horizon.

[Lance]

I guess worrying about rights for gays is more important than getting jobs, fixing the economy, taking care of the fiscal cliff, bombing people with drones, bullshiting about Benghazi or dealing with the 50% of the nation that wants the man OUT of office.

Still, he got to spend the afternoon with Tiger Woods so that was a plus. What a loser.

[equalityboy81]

Lance wrote:

I guess worrying about rights for gays is more important than getting jobs, fixing the economy, taking care of the fiscal cliff, bombing people with drones, bullshiting about Benghazi or dealing with the 50% of the nation that wants the man OUT of office.
Still, he got to spend the afternoon with Tiger Woods so that was a plus. What a loser.

According to you people there will never be a good time for gay rights. Just because they took a few minutes to stand up for gay rights isn't taking a whole lot of time away from the economic issues. The gay rights organizations are fighting for rights more than any branch of the government so don't worry the economy is not on the backburner. The diversion tactic you are using is quite overused.

[snapcracklepop]

Just wait until they start having safe gay sex movies in middle school, your kids will come home exciting about what they learned about butt sex.

[equalityboy81]

snapcracklepop wrote:

Just wait until they start having safe gay sex movies in middle school, your kids will come home exciting about what they learned about butt sex.

How is denying gays their right to marry going to promote or prevent any of what you describe? Gay people exist and deserve to do the same things you take for granted. Get over it! They wouldn't teach anything inappropriate for one's age level.

[JrEsq]

equalityboy81 wrote:

<quoted text>
How is denying gays their right to marry going to promote or prevent any of what you describe? Gay people exist and deserve to do the same things you take for granted. Get over it! They wouldn't teach anything inappropriate for one's age level.

"They wouldn't teach anything inappropriate for one's age level."
Teaching kids about homosexuality would not be appropriate at any age level.

[equalityboy81]

JrEsq wrote:

<quoted text>
"They wouldn't teach anything inappropriate for one's age level."
Teaching kids about homosexuality would not be appropriate at any age level.

That is your opinion. Kids are not stupid, they know gay people exist. Bullying against gays in school should be prevent.

[snapcracklepop]

JrEsq wrote:

<quoted text>
"They wouldn't teach anything inappropriate for one's age level."
Teaching kids about homosexuality would not be appropriate at any age level.

Teaching kids that homosexuality is acceptable would not be appropriate at any age level.

[JrEsq]

equalityboy81 wrote:

<quoted text>
That is your opinion. Kids are not stupid, they know gay people exist. Bullying against gays in school should be prevent.

Typical gay thinking.
Who said kids are stupid?
Who said gay people don't exist?
Who said bullying is OK?

Or were you responding to the wrong post?

[equalityboy81]

snapcracklepop wrote:

<quoted text>
Teaching kids that homosexuality is acceptable would not be appropriate at any age level.

Then don't teach kids about heterosexuality either or that that is acceptable or sex period. Leave it completely up to the parents. Who are you to say what is or is not acceptable? Being gay is not a crime nor a mental illness so you can't tell a child that because they are born gay they are not acceptable. Get lost!

[Xavier Breath]

JrEsq wrote:

<quoted text>
"They wouldn't teach anything inappropriate for one's age level."
Teaching kids about homosexuality would not be appropriate at any age level.

Yes. We know your kind are against education.

[JrEsq]

Xavier Breath wrote:

<quoted text>Yes. We know your kind are against education.

Children should be educated about the dangers of homosexuality.

[snapcracklepop]

equalityboy81 wrote:

<quoted text>
Then don't teach kids about heterosexuality either or that that is acceptable or sex period. Leave it completely up to the parents. Who are you to say what is or is not acceptable? Being gay is not a crime nor a mental illness so you can't tell a child that because they are born gay they are not acceptable. Get lost!

Being gay is too a mental disease, look into every gay person's history and you will find a child molested, by an uncle, a brother, a father, etc like clock work and for the ones who said it never happen, they are in denial.

[Quest]

snapcracklepop wrote:

<quoted text>
Being gay is too a mental disease, look into every gay person's history and you will find a child molested, by an uncle, a brother, a father, etc like clock work and for the ones who said it never happen, they are in denial.

You don't get out much, do you?

Where did you get this silly stuff?

[Quest]

JrEsq wrote:

<quoted text>
Children should be educated about the dangers of homosexuality.

There aren't any such inherent dangers, so it would be a 20 second class. Now, if you are saying that children should be taught how to handle sex responsibly, then that would apply to all children.

[Xavier Breath]

JrEsq wrote:

<quoted text>
Children should be educated about the dangers of homosexuality.

Children should be educated about the dangers of heterosexuality.

[Xavier Breath]

snapcracklepop wrote:

<quoted text>
Being gay is too a mental disease, look into every gay person's history and you will find a child molested, by an uncle, a brother, a father, etc like clock work and for the ones who said it never happen, they are in denial.

Oh dear god, here we go again. Yet another liar for jeebus. How exciting.

[TheTroll Stopper]

snapcracklepop wrote:

<quoted text>
Being gay is too a mental disease,

Every respected medical and mental-health organization on the planet disagrees with you. I'll gladly take their scientifically-proven, peer-reviewed word for it over the word of a knuckle-dragging, mouth-breathing Neanderthal bigot like you any old day of the week, boy.