Ill. Rep. Aaron Schock's Gay Marriage Quote Revives Rumors

Aaron Schock, a young congressman from Illinois, has been receiving national attention not so much for his political stances as for his buff physique, his non-reluctance to display it, his wardrobe choices, and his sexual preference.

[KirkW]

He's GOP and he's against Gay marriage - Big shock there.

If (and I stress the word IF) he's gay and he's deep in the closet - well he's still GOP so that would be no great shock either.

[snyper]

Wow. An in-shape Republican!(or Congressman)

That's a first!

[Eddie]

So I guess if he's a shallow body-obsessed queen who wears pinks shirts and teal belts then he MUST be gay? Whether he's gay or not, this article is a crock of shit that makes us all look bad. But then, all one has to do is pick up any gay magazine or newspaper to see this kind of drivel.

[Speedieg]

Eddie wrote:

So I guess if he's a shallow body-obsessed queen who wears pinks shirts and teal belts then he MUST be gay? Whether he's gay or not, this article is a crock of shit that makes us all look bad. But then, all one has to do is pick up any gay magazine or newspaper to see this kind of drivel.

Duh! the Edge is a gay magazine, so that's what they do.

[KittenKoder]

Eddie wrote:

So I guess if he's a shallow body-obsessed queen who wears pinks shirts and teal belts then he MUST be gay? Whether he's gay or not, this article is a crock of shit that makes us all look bad. But then, all one has to do is pick up any gay magazine or newspaper to see this kind of drivel.

You started off with a very valid and decent point ... and then you crashed and burned at the end. You should have stuck with the first run-on sentence/question, now you are exposed as a bigot who is just looking for some excuse to hate.

[nhjeff]

Eddie wrote:

So I guess if he's a shallow body-obsessed queen who wears pinks shirts and teal belts then he MUST be gay? Whether he's gay or not, this article is a crock of shit that makes us all look bad. But then, all one has to do is pick up any gay magazine or newspaper to see this kind of drivel.

All you have to do is pick up any celebrity or social magazine to see this drivel. Gay people have their share of such gossip magazines. I'm not sure what point you were trying to make.

[When The Levee Breaks]

nhjeff wrote:

<quoted text>
All you have to do is pick up any celebrity or social magazine to see this drivel. Gay people have their share of such gossip magazines. I'm not sure what point you were trying to make.

Just pointing out how decadent you are rising out of bed in the morning looking to stain the morning sun.

[JohnInToronto]

No comment on the Schock guy, but gay people for years have been trying to ingrain into het brains that "sexual preference" means something like whether you like doing it with the lights on or off and "sexual orientation" means the gender of the partner you prefer. So why is this gay rag displaying such trashy journalism as using "sexual preference" with the wrong meaning? May the writer be sentenced to three months in Topeka, KS covering a Westboro Baptist Church function!