The gay marriage vote is a milestone ...

The gay marriage vote is a milestone for gay rights

There are 143 comments on the The Guardian story from Feb 6, 2013, titled The gay marriage vote is a milestone for gay rights. In it, The Guardian reports that:

Both Barack Obama and David Cameron have spoken strongly in official speeches in favour of gay rights.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Guardian.

“JESUS WOULD IMPEACH THE GOP!!!”

Since: May 09

Lake Success, N.Y.

#21 Feb 6, 2013
au contraire wrote:
<quoted text>Ok, everybody wins. I am unemployed, a closet queen and a proud illegal alien of the United States.....in otherwords, your enemy.
Okay - if you say so???????

au contraire

“Forever Is Promised To No One”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#22 Feb 6, 2013
tha Professor wrote:
<quoted text>
You're a liar, spammer, stalker, troll, fake, pervert, and punk. But you're right about the 'enemy' part.
Oh, and you're a stinking hypocrite, too.
Proofs pookie, ya gots ta axe me's da answers to gets da troof. You couldn't witn a debate with a nat. Give it up.
neutral observer

West Palm Beach, FL

#23 Feb 6, 2013
Benjamin Frankly wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do you think that gay marriage will lead to.
Once the flood gates are opened you can not limit it to homosexuals. If they can marry then bisexuals will have to be given the right to... then those whose sexual preference is pedophilia, bestiality, necrophilia...

All sexual minorities deserve equal treatment under the law. Basic common sense.

au contraire

“Forever Is Promised To No One”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#24 Feb 6, 2013
TonyT1961 wrote:
<quoted text>
Okay - if you say so???????
When all else fails, start changing my post. I win again. You sure aren't much of a challange.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#25 Feb 6, 2013
neutral observer wrote:
<quoted text>
Once the flood gates are opened you can not limit it to homosexuals. If they can marry then bisexuals will have to be given the right to.
...they would already be able to.
neutral observer wrote:
.. then those whose sexual preference is pedophilia, bestiality, necrophilia.
Marriage is a contract, and requires consent. Children, animals, and dead people cannot consent.

Your comparison is asinine.
neutral observer

West Palm Beach, FL

#26 Feb 6, 2013
The_Box wrote:
<quoted text>
...they would already be able to.
In which states is having both a husband and a wife permitted?

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#27 Feb 6, 2013
neutral observer wrote:
<quoted text>
Once the flood gates are opened you can not limit it to homosexuals. If they can marry then bisexuals will have to be given the right to... then those whose sexual preference is pedophilia, bestiality, necrophilia...
All sexual minorities deserve equal treatment under the law. Basic common sense.
Ummm bisexuals can marry now...

children animals and dead people cannot enter into the legal, binding contract that is marriage.

Did you really think you were the first brainiac to think of this totally illogical and factually incorrect concept?

back to nursuryt school for you, bigot...

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#28 Feb 6, 2013
neutral observer wrote:
<quoted text>
In which states is having both a husband and a wife permitted?
That's not what bisexuality is.
neutral observer

West Palm Beach, FL

#29 Feb 6, 2013
The_Box wrote:
<quoted text>
That's not what bisexuality is.
It is a sexual attraction to both sexes. Most heterosexuals are to some extent...

If gays have a basic human right to fully explore their sexuality then so do bisexuals. In their case that means the right to marry both sexes.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#30 Feb 6, 2013
neutral observer wrote:
<quoted text>
In which states is having both a husband and a wife permitted?
polygamy is not legal in the US. we do not have the laws for such a multiple person sharing of assets.(actually we do, but it is under corporate law, not marriage law.)

bisexuals, if that is what you are refering to, can marry either of the genders they are sexually attracted to (depending on their state fo residence) but not both as per the previously described limitations in US marriage laws.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#31 Feb 6, 2013
neutral observer wrote:
<quoted text>
It is a sexual attraction to both sexes. Most heterosexuals are to some extent...
If gays have a basic human right to fully explore their sexuality then so do bisexuals. In their case that means the right to marry both sexes.
No, it doesn't. Heterosexuals and homosexuals are attracted to multiple people as well.

The word you should have used is 'polygamy'.

au contraire

“Forever Is Promised To No One”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#32 Feb 6, 2013
neutral observer wrote:
<quoted text>
In which states is having both a husband and a wife permitted?
All of them.

au contraire

“Forever Is Promised To No One”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#33 Feb 6, 2013
neutral observer wrote:
<quoted text>
It is a sexual attraction to both sexes. Most heterosexuals are to some extent...
If gays have a basic human right to fully explore their sexuality then so do bisexuals. In their case that means the right to marry both sexes.
and so does beastality and incest....keep going you're doing great.
neutral observer

West Palm Beach, FL

#34 Feb 6, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>polygamy is not legal in the US. we do not have the laws for such a multiple person sharing of assets.(actually we do, but it is under corporate law, not marriage law.)

bisexuals, if that is what you are refering to, can marry either of the genders they are sexually attracted to (depending on their state fo residence) but not both as per the previously described limitations in US marriage laws.
A special exemption for bisexuals so they can fully explore their sexuality? It would be discriminatory to give homosexuals that right but not the far larger bisexual...

Once the camel's nose is inside the tent... all perversions must be given equal treatment.

“What Goes Around, Comes Around”

Since: Mar 07

Kansas City, MO.

#35 Feb 6, 2013
The_Box wrote:
<quoted text>
No, it doesn't. Heterosexuals and homosexuals are attracted to multiple people as well.
The word you should have used is 'polygamy'.
oh my! don't get 'THAT' topic going!
neutral observer

West Palm Beach, FL

#36 Feb 6, 2013
The_Box wrote:
<quoted text>
No, it doesn't. Heterosexuals and homosexuals are attracted to multiple people as well.

The word you should have used is 'polygamy'.
No. They are bisexual... but in denial.

Heterosexuals are naturally into momogamy.
neutral observer

West Palm Beach, FL

#37 Feb 6, 2013
au contraire wrote:
<quoted text>and so does beastality and incest....keep going you're doing great.
Nothing wrong with heterosexual incest. Pretty much everyone in Arkansas is married to their cousin. Why should adult family members be prohibited from...?

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#38 Feb 6, 2013
neutral observer wrote:
<quoted text>
No. They are bisexual... but in denial.
Who?
neutral observer wrote:
Heterosexuals are naturally into momogamy.
Not true. For most of human history, men had multiple wives.
neutral observer

West Palm Beach, FL

#39 Feb 6, 2013
The_Box wrote:
<quoted text>
Who?
<quoted text>
Not true. For most of human history, men had multiple wives.
Homosexuality is but an invention of western culture. Like dogs throughout history men would hump just about anything they could get their hands on. Most folks are to some extent bisexual.

When white guys watch a porn movie about a blond giving a bj to a black guy with a huge... they can pretend their fantasies are about her but... why else would they be into that kind of...?

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#40 Feb 6, 2013
neutral observer wrote:
<quoted text>
Homosexuality is but an invention of western culture.
No, it isn't. It's found in every culture and has clear biological influences.
neutral observer wrote:
When white guys watch a porn movie about a blond giving a bj to a black guy with a huge... they can pretend their fantasies are about her but... why else would they be into that kind of...?
Larger penises in pornography are associated with dominance in a sexual act and many people find dominance/submissiveness appealing.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Wedding Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Hawaii Republican resigns from party after crit... 7 hr American_Infidel 1
News Loved and left behind (Feb '09) 9 hr Leb 266
News What would Jesus say about same-sex marriage? (Jul '15) 16 hr pearl 5,376
News The August eclipse is the 'most spectacular thi... Mar 20 NationalEclipse 1
News Collapse recalled on eve of Heron Road bridge r... Mar 19 Pat 1
News Collapse recalled on eve of Heron Road bridge r... Mar 19 Pat 1
News eric williams; william yancey; robert earle thomas (Dec '09) Mar 19 Victim two 26
More from around the web