Washington holds first same-sex wedding

Dec 9, 2012 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: Detroit Free Press

SEATTLE -- Emily cried, Sarah choked up and 9-month-old Carter looked puzzled as camera shutters whirred when her moms were pronounced "legally wed" by Superior Court Judge Mary Yu at 12:04 a.m. today, making them the first same sex couple to be married in Washington state.

Comments
61 - 80 of 94 Comments Last updated Dec 25, 2012

Since: May 12

Bellevue, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#86
Dec 13, 2012
 
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Okay,
1. Why does a butch lesbian dress and act like a man to attract another lesbian?
2. What is the purpose of homosexuality in the evolutionary basic of survival of the fittest?
Smile.
<quoted text>
So much for that 'real debate', huh?
Bazinga!
<quoted text>
1. Where did I say all lesbians are butch? In fact, I stated the other was not.
2. Humans are not about evolving? You think they are exempted?
Did that voice in your head bring up Adolf?
Go back to the zoo, we'll be safe then.
Bazinga!
aaaaawwwhhh what's wrong bigot boy... equallity got you down..... to flucking bad

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#87
Dec 13, 2012
 
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Okay,
1. Why does a butch lesbian dress and act like a man to attract another lesbian?
2. What is the purpose of homosexuality in the evolutionary basic of survival of the fittest?
Smile.
<quoted text>
So much for that 'real debate', huh?
Bazinga!
<quoted text>

1. Just stating fact.

2. The purpose of humans to pursue happiness is a basic element of humanity. Your ill thought out idea that gays don't fit within humanity holds the same thoughts your mentor Hitler would have carried and he too brought into light 'evolution' and 'survival of the fittest' as an inaccrate method to berate those he did not feel should hold rights.

Bawang!
1. Where did I say all lesbians are butch? In fact, I stated the other was not.
2. Humans are not about evolving? You think they are exempted?
Did that voice in your head bring up Adolf?
Go back to the zoo, we'll be safe then.
Bazinga!
1. Just stating fact.

2. The purpose of humans to pursue happiness is a basic element of humanity. Your ill thought out idea that gays don't fit within humanity holds the same thoughts your mentor Hitler would have carried and he too brought into light 'evolution' and 'survival of the fittest' as an demeaning method to berate those he did not feel should hold rights.

Bawang you stupid game player.

LOL!!!

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#88
Dec 13, 2012
 
Lililth_Satans_Bore wrote:
<quoted text>aaaaawwwhhh what's wrong bigot boy... equallity got you down..... to flucking bad
I suspect reality has you down. The quicker you hit bottom, the quicker reality can cure.

Smile.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#89
Dec 13, 2012
 
Wakanatabi wrote:
<quoted text>
1. Just stating fact.
2. The purpose of humans to pursue happiness is a basic element of humanity. Your ill thought out idea that gays don't fit within humanity holds the same thoughts your mentor Hitler would have carried and he too brought into light 'evolution' and 'survival of the fittest' as an demeaning method to berate those he did not feel should hold rights.
Bawang you stupid game player.
LOL!!!
Your post picture is fitting.

Smirk.

“Marriage equality for all”

Since: Jul 07

Illinois

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#90
Dec 13, 2012
 
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Your post picture is fitting.
Smirk.
oooooooh, sounds like an "ad homonem" to me.

troll on, mangina man.

“Marriage equality for all”

Since: Jul 07

Illinois

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#91
Dec 13, 2012
 
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Okay,
1. Why does a butch lesbian dress and act like a man to attract another lesbian?
2. What is the purpose of homosexuality in the evolutionary basic of survival of the fittest?
Smile.
<quoted text>
So much for that 'real debate', huh?
Bazinga!
<quoted text>
1. Where did I say all lesbians are butch? In fact, I stated the other was not.
2. Humans are not about evolving? You think they are exempted?
Did that voice in your head bring up Adolf?
Go back to the zoo, we'll be safe then.
Bazinga!
You know the difference between you and a one-trick pony? The one-trick pony has a respectable penis.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#92
Dec 14, 2012
 
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Your post picture is fitting.
Smirk.
I wouldn't grin too wide.

Even that little monkey is no doubt more intelligent than yourself given your feedback in here.

LOL!!!
Mona Lott

Hoboken, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#93
Dec 14, 2012
 
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Okay,
1. Why does a butch lesbian dress and act like a man to attract another lesbian?
2. What is the purpose of homosexuality in the evolutionary basic of survival of the fittest?
Smile.
1. Who says they do? And how many more times are you going to bring up this stupid question? You're already on about 14 times now. Alzheimer's much? Sheesh!
2. Give it up KMerde... your lack of understanding about evolution is making you write stupid stuff.

Why has homosexual behavior been observed in every single animal species (that reproduces sexually)?????

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#94
Dec 14, 2012
 
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Okay,
1. Why does a butch lesbian dress and act like a man to attract another lesbian?
2. What is the purpose of homosexuality in the evolutionary basic of survival of the fittest?
Smile.

Two simple questions, and all I get are ad homoan hissy fits???

Really?

Is there any one here that can give a reasoned answer? These are NOT unreasonable questions for those demanding gay couples be equated with marriage!

Smile.

“Marriage equality for all”

Since: Jul 07

Illinois

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#96
Dec 14, 2012
 
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Okay,
1. Why does a butch lesbian dress and act like a man to attract another lesbian?
2. What is the purpose of homosexuality in the evolutionary basic of survival of the fittest?
Smile.
Two simple questions, and all I get are ad homoan hissy fits???
Really?
Is there any one here that can give a reasoned answer? These are NOT unreasonable questions for those demanding gay couples be equated with marriage!
Smile.
They have nothing to do with marriage equality (your questions). You're the only one who doesn't see that.

“Engaged to the love of my life”

Since: Aug 12

Montreal

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#97
Dec 14, 2012
 
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Okay,
1. Why does a butch lesbian dress and act like a man to attract another lesbian?
2. What is the purpose of homosexuality in the evolutionary basic of survival of the fittest?
Smile.
Two simple questions, and all I get are ad homoan hissy fits???
Really?
Is there any one here that can give a reasoned answer? These are NOT unreasonable questions for those demanding gay couples be equated with marriage!
Smile.
Anyone can see that your questions have nothing to do marriage.

On top of that, we've shown you time and time again that all those questions are are your uneducated opinions. You're the one that can't get over the truth of the matter and continue to obsesses over questions that have already been answered.

Since: Mar 07

The entire US of A

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#98
Dec 14, 2012
 
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Okay,
1. Why does a butch lesbian dress and act like a man to attract another lesbian?
.......
You are phrasing your question incorrectly.

The vast majority of lesbians are not "butch" or any other specific label. We look and dress to suit ourselves, and not so often to attract female attention. Most women look beyond clothes when choosing a mate - lesbians and straight women alike.

At least the sensible ones do.

As to why a few women, both lesbian and straight, wear more "mannish" clothes, you would have to find one and ask them. And this does indeed apply to straight women - I live in a rural area, and it is more common than not to see a straight farmer's wife looking a bit "masculine".

Mullets never seem to go out of style out here.

As to certain clothing choices, many women would likely say that it is because some men's clothes are cheaper and more comfortable. Some might give you other reasons.

But none the answers you might possibly receive would have anything to do with marriage law. As you well know.

Keep trying, though. You are often quite amusing.

Since: Mar 07

The entire US of A

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#99
Dec 14, 2012
 
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
.....
2. What is the purpose of homosexuality in the evolutionary basic of survival of the fittest?
Smile.
..........
We could sit around and speculate all day, but, since gay creatures, including humans, have lived on this earth for as long as heterosexuals have, what would be the point?

It would make as much sense as debating left-handedness or brown eyes as opposed to green ones.

If you believe that such a speculative discussion would (or should) have any bearing on Marriage law, tell us why?

The ONLY point is whether or not legal recognition of marriage would be beneficial to gay couples and their kids, and if such recognition would harm anyone else.

We know the answers to these questions already.

Unless you have a new slant on them?

Do you?

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#100
Dec 15, 2012
 
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Okay,
1. Why does a butch lesbian dress and act like a man to attract another lesbian?
2. What is the purpose of homosexuality in the evolutionary basic of survival of the fittest?
Smile.
Two simple questions, and all I get are ad homoan hissy fits???
Really?
Is there any one here that can give a reasoned answer? These are NOT unreasonable questions for those demanding gay couples be equated with marriage!
Smile.
Marengo Jon wrote:
<quoted text>
They have nothing to do with marriage equality (your questions). You're the only one who doesn't see that.
The fact that you would pretend to speak for 'everyone' only exposes your bigotry and bias.

But let me help you again;

1. The question of a butch lesbian and a minor lesbian exposes gender confusion. A brokenness at the most intimate level of relationship and sexuality. A major disqualification of equating gay couples with marriage.

2. At the most simple and basic level, marriage is the cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior. The fundamental goal of evolution. At this foundational level, do gay couples qualify? Hardly. They are a major fail.

Seems to me a pretty logical and even simple connection. I would suggest you may be the only one who does not 'see' it... But if you are still having trouble, I'd be happy to explain it further.

I would however, suggest you look at your denial in things like this. Maybe even seek some professional help...

Smirk.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#101
Dec 15, 2012
 
Lacez wrote:
<quoted text>
Anyone can see that your questions have nothing to do marriage.
On top of that, we've shown you time and time again that all those questions are are your uneducated opinions. You're the one that can't get over the truth of the matter and continue to obsesses over questions that have already been answered.
Questions and opinions are two different things.

See my response to jonny boy.

Bazinga!

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#102
Dec 15, 2012
 
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Okay,
1. Why does a butch lesbian dress and act like a man to attract another lesbian?
Quest wrote:
<quoted text>
You are phrasing your question incorrectly.
The vast majority of lesbians are not "butch" or any other specific label. We look and dress to suit ourselves, and not so often to attract female attention. Most women look beyond clothes when choosing a mate - lesbians and straight women alike.
At least the sensible ones do.
As to why a few women, both lesbian and straight, wear more "mannish" clothes, you would have to find one and ask them. And this does indeed apply to straight women - I live in a rural area, and it is more common than not to see a straight farmer's wife looking a bit "masculine".
Mullets never seem to go out of style out here.
As to certain clothing choices, many women would likely say that it is because some men's clothes are cheaper and more comfortable. Some might give you other reasons.
But none the answers you might possibly receive would have anything to do with marriage law. As you well know.
Keep trying, though. You are often quite amusing.
1. I did not 'phrase my question incorrectly.

You conducted a classic gay twirl slander by injecting things I did not say. Where did I say 'all' lesbians are butch? The silly thing is in the same sentence I noted the two EXTREMES of lesbianism!

This begs the question once again; Why would a legitimate cause need to engage this kind of deliberate dishonesty? You never answer that question, nor do you apologize. It is a fundamental character issue...

2. Your generalization about mating behavior is blatantly AND immensely false and ignorant.

-Do you know there are web sites specific to butch lesbians?
-Do you understand how ignorant your brushing aside of mating behavior influence is?

See my answer to jonny boy. Especially the last suggestion...

Smile.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#103
Dec 15, 2012
 
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
.....
2. What is the purpose of homosexuality in the evolutionary basic of survival of the fittest?
Smile.
Quest wrote:
<quoted text>
We could sit around and speculate all day, but, since gay creatures, including humans, have lived on this earth for as long as heterosexuals have, what would be the point?
It would make as much sense as debating left-handedness or brown eyes as opposed to green ones.
If you believe that such a speculative discussion would (or should) have any bearing on Marriage law, tell us why?
The ONLY point is whether or not legal recognition of marriage would be beneficial to gay couples and their kids, and if such recognition would harm anyone else.
We know the answers to these questions already.
Unless you have a new slant on them?
Do you?
1.'We' don't have to speculate. You know that. The basics of evolution are well known.

Scientists have already searched and discovered the genetic cause and purpose of eye color.'Handedness' is also a deeply studies pursuit. Which brings us to the evolutionary purpose of homosexuality. Yes, many scientists 'sit around' and study the issue, as distortingly noted on here many times.

Once again, your lack of character seeks to employ denial and distortion to falsely belittle the question.

See my response to jonny boy as to why this question is relevant (if you really don't already know ~ smirk).

2. Who in hell are you to frame which questions about marriage are relevant?

We already 'know' the answers to your bigoted questions?

Just a heads up, gay couples don't have 'their' biological children...

Sounds like either a silly expression of a god complex to me, or an childish attempt to avoid the breadth of marriage and family in a vain effort to deceitfully impose an imposter relationship on marriage.

:-)

“Engaged to the love of my life”

Since: Aug 12

Montreal

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#104
Dec 15, 2012
 
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
.....
2. What is the purpose of homosexuality in the evolutionary basic of survival of the fittest?
Smile.
<quoted text>
1.'We' don't have to speculate. You know that. The basics of evolution are well known.
Scientists have already searched and discovered the genetic cause and purpose of eye color.'Handedness' is also a deeply studies pursuit. Which brings us to the evolutionary purpose of homosexuality. Yes, many scientists 'sit around' and study the issue, as distortingly noted on here many times.
Once again, your lack of character seeks to employ denial and distortion to falsely belittle the question.
See my response to jonny boy as to why this question is relevant (if you really don't already know ~ smirk).
2. Who in hell are you to frame which questions about marriage are relevant?
We already 'know' the answers to your bigoted questions?
Just a heads up, gay couples don't have 'their' biological children...
Sounds like either a silly expression of a god complex to me, or an childish attempt to avoid the breadth of marriage and family in a vain effort to deceitfully impose an imposter relationship on marriage.
:-)
Calling everyone else bigoted is stupid, troll.
It shows you have no idea what the word means, for you are the bigotted one.

“Engaged to the love of my life”

Since: Aug 12

Montreal

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#105
Dec 15, 2012
 
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Questions and opinions are two different things.
See my response to jonny boy.
Bazinga!
Your questions are not questions, for no matter what answer we give you, even ones that disprove your opinions on homosexuality, you continue to try and tell everyone this is how it is. If you were asking questions, instead of stating opinions in a question-format, then you would accept your fallacies and move on. Instead, we have you stating the same uninformed and uneducated fallacious opinions over and over like a broken record set on "unbelievably wrong."

You are a troll, out there for reaction, you have no argument, you simply wish to waste other people's time with your stupidity because you obvious have nothing better to do in your life.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#106
Dec 15, 2012
 
Lacez wrote:
<quoted text>
You are a troll, out there for reaction, you have no argument, you simply wish to waste other people's time with your stupidity because you obvious have nothing better to do in your life.
I think your post picture exposes the real troll.

Smirk.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Wedding Discussions

Search the Wedding Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 4 min truth 48,998
CO Baker Found Guilty for Denying Gay Couple We... (Dec '13) 12 min Subliminal 16,205
Losing Streak Lengthens for Foes of Gay Marriage 14 min Frankie Rizzo 2,742
The Coming Christian Revolt 32 min Liam R 268
Comment: Let's allow Christians to have their v... 1 hr Belle Sexton 1,050
Totus Tuus...all yours (Mar '12) 1 hr INC - Iglesia ni Coitus 141
Homosexuality and the Bible (Aug '11) 3 hr RevKen 24,741
•••
•••