"Hunger is the inner human experience while eating is the physical expression of the drive."<quoted text>
And yet even those spread out along the bi-sexual continuum, still have a sex drive. He continues to confuse sex drive with the expression of that drive through behavior. I have repeatedly pointed out that even people who choose not to act on the drive, still have a basic drive. Hunger is the inner human experience while eating is the physical expression of the drive. A person can be hungry without eating. We learn what to eat and even how to eat it depending on culture, yet even without learning, hunger remains a basic drive.
Really? You're using that for a comparison to our sex drive and our sexual behavior? No problem.
A baby knows hunger. According to you then, a baby has sexual hunger or a sex drive that should be noticeable like it's hunger.
Why don't you explain what to look for to spot a baby's sex drive? I know what to listen for when it's hunger drive is in operation.
Or will you now state a baby doesn't have a developed sex drive? Maybe you'll say it's like cancer cells. We all have them but they lie dormant in many. Maybe we all, according to your logic, we all have dormant sex drives? But how can a dormant sex drive be dormant and yet remain hard wired at the same time?
I'm waiting to hear your rational explanations on this one :)